|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Isla Guapa
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 1520 Location: Mexico City o sea La Gran Manzana Mexicana
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've always found this business of asking for XX% English proficiency very strange. I ask myself, "XX% of what?" What is this percentage definition of English proficiency based on? Can anyone enlighten me? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Professor

Joined: 22 May 2009 Posts: 449 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
mejms wrote: |
If there's this little said about the international standard exams that help define the EFL market, whether you like them or not, maybe there's not a lot of EFL teachers that are that invested in their field.
|
I disagree. Perhaps there are many teachers here in Mexico who just don't have the students that NEED these tests. When I was at HH and Wall Street Institute, I was never trained to give any of those tests. Perhaps HH and WSI give these exams but I never saw anyone administering them and I never once heard any student mention any of them.
When I was teaching ESL at a community college back in the United States, I helped to give the placement test to new students in order to know which class they would be able to function in.
The conversation part was just asking some questions that we were given and then the one listening would decide if their conversation skills were good enough for one of the three conversation sections we offered. They did offer a prep class for the TOEFL but it was taught by Bob and only Bob. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Professor

Joined: 22 May 2009 Posts: 449 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Isla Guapa wrote: |
I've always found this business of asking for XX% English proficiency very strange. I ask myself, "XX% of what?" What is this percentage definition of English proficiency based on? Can anyone enlighten me? |
And me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mejms
Joined: 04 Jan 2010 Posts: 390
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
I by no means accept standarized testing as a definitive way of checking someone's ability with a language. I do think however that an industry as unregulated as EFL needs something more than conversation classes to be taken seriously.
The percentage issue is of course difficult to reconcile with language acquisition. When can you really say 100% for a second language? Or 90%? And so on.
But holding students (and their teachers) accountable for visible progress and results is important, and companies and universities need to be able to quantify a skill from an administrative perspective. Reconciling the administrative and educational aspects of education is a HUGE issue for schools. That's why you see so many schools rely heavily on a course book finished in 6 months. They don't know how to manage these two aspects, so they just give way to the administrative needs.
I said that standarized testing is in a way definitive of the market because something's got to be. There have to be benchmarks, however flawed, or all this language business as an industry is a guessing game.
I also said this because I've seen that we as a forum readily spent pages and pages rehashing the same topics on pay, positions, and serious pitfalls of EFL in Mexico, but there isn't much discussed about concrete curriculum development or what's being done to develop professionalism in the market. It's easy to become an EFL teacher in Mexico. No one would say it isn't. But when we're talking about knowledge of standarized testing, knowledge that requires experience, research... namely, the focus of a career, not just anyone will have something to say. If there's another topic in EFL that requires equal attention and experience in terms of a professional career, I'm all ears.
The matter at hand is professionalism. Since teachers are a dime a dozen and pay is about the same, what will separate the haves from the have-nots? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Professor

Joined: 22 May 2009 Posts: 449 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
mejms wrote: |
I do think however that an industry as unregulated as EFL needs something more than conversation classes to be taken seriously.
|
I agree but there are some students who only want to practice SPEAKING and they will let you know that at the beginning. Would anyone walk away from an hour class that pays 200 pesos??  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Professor

Joined: 22 May 2009 Posts: 449 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
mejms wrote: |
there isn't much discussed about concrete curriculum development or what's being done to develop professionalism in the market. |
I agree again but are tests the ONLY way to concrete curriculum development? Maybe EFL teachers do need to focus more on the exams like the TOEIC, TOEFL and others. And other ways to curriculum development. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Professor

Joined: 22 May 2009 Posts: 449 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
mejms wrote: |
an industry as unregulated as EFL
|
Any thoughts on how to go about regulating EFL? In Mexico for example?? Would regulating the market help or hurt?? Would the quality of the teachers become better?? Tests like the TOEIC and TOEFL are good regulators, yes?
What other tools could be used?? Any new, fresh ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Professor

Joined: 22 May 2009 Posts: 449 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Speaking of professionalism and career development, how could one go about learning how to administer tests like the TOEIC and TOEFL? Buy the books and do a little self study?
Are there any courses in Mexico that train teachers on how to administer such tests? I know there are plenty of teacher training courses but TOEFL and TOEIC?
We spend a lot of time learning how to become teachers, but why no training course for the tests?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mejms
Joined: 04 Jan 2010 Posts: 390
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Prof,
Limiting yourself to one post would be really helpful in getting your message across. Seeing post after post without any input from anyone else makes it difficult to concentrate on your point. Just a friendly tip. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Professor

Joined: 22 May 2009 Posts: 449 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
mejms wrote: |
Prof,
Limiting yourself to one post would be really helpful in getting your message across. Seeing post after post without any input from anyone else makes it difficult to concentrate on your point. Just a friendly tip. |
Point taken mejms.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dragonlady

Joined: 10 May 2004 Posts: 720 Location: Chillinfernow, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry this post is so long. I understand that most of us have short attention spans, but I hope you�ll read it through.
mejms wrote: |
Thanks for everyone's responses. Looks like this thread has died out.
It's amazing to me that thread after thread has been started and continued regarding the state of EFL in Mexico and the poor job opportunities and lack of professionalism. But when it comes to saying some constructive things about something more than just the ABCs of teaching English, something that requires specific knowledge and professional experience, there's just silence for the most part.
If there's this little said about the international standard exams that help define the EFL market, whether you like them or not, maybe there's not a lot of EFL teachers that are that invested in their field. . |
B I N G O
Why? IMHO there are several reasons (in no particular order).
1) It�s a long weekend here in Mexico. Most teachers are hopefully out rejuvenating their souls. I myself have just returned from spending the entire Sunday in Xalapa at their Int�l Jazz Festival. It�s after 12a.m. I�m having a night cap�
2) The number of professional ESOL teachers that actually know of a/o post here is just a fraction of those that are here teaching in Mexico, so by default we aren�t going to hear from those who know�
3) IELTS, TOEFL, TOEIC are big league tickets. It�s no longer about having your students pass an exam you�ve designed, or successfully complete an activity you�ve assessed based on your own criteria. The instructor is now just as accountable as the student is, for the student�s success. Here is where the cream rises to the top. Some teachers have the confidence that they will guide their students to success. Others don�t, and therefore steer clear away from the challenge.
mejms wrote: |
I by no means accept standardized testing as a definitive way of checking someone's ability with a language. I do think however that an industry as unregulated as EFL needs something more than conversation classes to be taken seriously. |
Agree and disagree. IMO de-standardizing anything promotes corruption. The fact that (in our industry) we have choices now (IELTS, TOEFL, TOEIC) makes this pill easier to swallow and students succeed solely on their true abilities, not by who they're related to a/o how much they bribed someone.
mejms wrote: |
The percentage issue is of course difficult to reconcile with language acquisition. When can you really say 100% for a second language? Or 90%? And so on. |
I�ve never run across this before, and wouldn�t give it the time of day either. One can�t even say that they, as a native speaker of any language has 100% knowledge of said language.
mejms wrote: |
But holding students (and their teachers) accountable for visible progress and results is important, and companies and universities need to be able to quantify a skill from an administrative perspective. Reconciling the administrative and educational aspects of education is a HUGE issue for schools. That's why you see so many schools rely heavily on a course book finished in 6 months. They don't know how to manage these two aspects, so they just give way to the administrative needs. |
B I N G O
We have a few shop keepers here on the forum who might be so kind as to comment why their program�s successful conclusion doesn�t mean sitting one of the standardized exams. As you say mejms, it now puts some pressure (accountability) on these institutes.
mejms wrote: |
I said that standardized testing is in a way definitive of the market because something's got to be. There have to be benchmarks, however flawed, or all this language business as an industry is a guessing game. |
There are benchmarks. Being Canadian, this is my benchmark for assessment http://www.language.ca/display_page.asp?page_id=206 , ideally of course, because inevitably administration gets in the way of really offering a product/program that students truly learn from.
mejms wrote: |
I also said this because I've seen that we as a forum readily spent pages and pages rehashing the same topics on pay, positions, and serious pitfalls of EFL in Mexico, but there isn't much discussed about concrete curriculum development or what's being done to develop professionalism in the market. It's easy to become an EFL teacher in Mexico. No one would say it isn't. But when we're talking about knowledge of standardized testing, knowledge that requires experience, research... namely, the focus of a career, not just anyone will have something to say. If there's another topic in EFL that requires equal attention and experience in terms of a professional career, I'm all ears.
The matter at hand is professionalism. Since teachers are a dime a dozen and pay is about the same, what will separate the haves from the have-nots? |
HAT TRICK!
First, this topic does have a separate forum here on Dave�s. Were you not able to find what you needed there? Secondly, a quick google �teacher forums, IELTS� etc. will bring up a host of other sites that do have serious discussions on these topics. As comfortable as the Caf� is, it�s not the be all, end all in teacher forums.
And yes, it is possible to separate the eggs from the egg heads.
One last point I wish to add is that in lieu of the fact that the ESOL programs in Mexico are so unregulated, I have taken upon myself to inform my students (where applicable) that their success in the program will be measured by sitting one of Cambridge�s standardized exams� not mine, not report cards issued by the school, not in any way that can be manipulated, bribed, or bought. Half of my high school students have no idea what I�m talking about. The other half that does, WILL be successful!
Best regards,
Dragonlady
PS: I keep going to the fridge and seeing these banana crispy things that look like salty bacon crisps but aren't . I'm having bacon for breakfast regardless of how many arteries quit working afterwards! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mejms
Joined: 04 Jan 2010 Posts: 390
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All good comments, Dragon. You're right that eslcafe is a comfortable place to come to for feedback but by no means the only one. I get used to seeing the same screen names and am curious about their insight, rather than going to a random forum and reading comments from people who I know simply nothing about.
I didn't find the TOEFL forum that you gave the link for all that helpful. There was no concrete comparison of the different standard exams out there. But I've since taken the initiative, spent some time searching the internet, and am making headway on getting a base of knowledge for myself.
You're also right that it's a long weekend and we've only got a handful of regular posters on this site as opposed to the many, many others in the country who don't post. In fact, of the other responsible, serious teachers I know, I'm the only one who posts here.
Still though, I get the nagging sense that when it comes down to talking about the nitty gritty aspects of career-building and professionalism, not a lot of people have a whole lot to say. So yes, it's a low paid field, but it even gets lower when everyone's just doing their own thing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
One last point I wish to add is that in lieu of the fact that the ESOL programs in Mexico are so unregulated, I have taken upon myself to inform my students (where applicable) that their success in the program will be measured by sitting one of Cambridge�s standardized exams� not mine, not report cards issued by the school, not in any way that can be manipulated, bribed, or bought. Half of my high school students have no idea what I�m talking about. The other half that does, WILL be successful! |
The ETS people that manage the TOEFL might have been thinking along these lines at least partially when they created the Internet based format for the test (iBT). From a testing point of view, the iBT is supposed to present a more 'integrated' approach to the skills and incorporates a speaking component. From an administrative point of view, it also returns near complete control of the scoring to ETS since the test is done online at authorized testing centers in real time, practically speaking.
Of course that only addresses the few that need a TOEFL score in order to study in the US. The iBT isn't used locally here in Mexico as a school admission benchmark in English. CBT and PBT remain for that, or knock-off tests, or the British systems. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
laconic
Joined: 23 May 2005 Posts: 198 Location: "When the Lord made me he made a ramblin man."
|
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Guy Courchesne wrote: |
Of course that only addresses the few that need a TOEFL score in order to study in the US. The iBT isn't used locally here in Mexico as a school admission benchmark in English. CBT and PBT remain for that, or knock-off tests, or the British systems. |
Your definition of "few" and mine are obviously very different given the number of U.S. universities that do require the TOEFL as part of their admissions process. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Isla Guapa
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 1520 Location: Mexico City o sea La Gran Manzana Mexicana
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
laconic wrote: |
Guy Courchesne wrote: |
Of course that only addresses the few that need a TOEFL score in order to study in the US. The iBT isn't used locally here in Mexico as a school admission benchmark in English. CBT and PBT remain for that, or knock-off tests, or the British systems. |
Your definition of "few" and mine are obviously very different given the number of U.S. universities that do require the TOEFL as part of their admissions process. |
Might I suggest that Guy meant "few" students, not universities, in his post. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|