|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
killthebuddha
Joined: 06 Jul 2010 Posts: 144 Location: Assigned to the Imperial Gourd
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| johnslat wrote: |
Dear ktb,
Umm, OK, I guess (he wrote ironically.) But then, there's still the problem of pronoun reference:
"Jaded, fatigued, disillusioned, bored, frustrated and having to suppress much of their real feelings and opinions, one . . .
I'm NOT giving up easily.
Regards,
John |
LOL Why step on my joke? Are you a grammar Nazi? ("Not that there's anything wrong with that!")
Okay, I'm your huckleberry. Both can be indefinite pronouns, as they are here, grammatically speaking. As you correctly point out in this instance, their would have to be the (correct) indefinite referent of the indefinite one. But can their be the referent of one?
It's a discouraged practice, but yes, "one can find their (one's) evidence" for such amidst the ruins of two crumbling edifices of English. (Because the word "one" can also be used for inanimate objects, creating possible confusion in careless writing, an indefinite pronoun is the preferred referent to "one.") The first is the pluralis majestatis or royal "we" that spawned the editorial "we," the author's "we" and the patronizing "we." The royal or generic "one" is of the same camp. The second is the abandonment of the gender-biased default to "he" when referencing an unknown person. Taken together,
"One can glean from this whatever he may"
has become
"One can glean from this whatever they may."
(Katie Wales, "Impersonal one: a new personal pronoun", Personal pronouns in present-day English, pp. 78+)
p.s. Mind you, I would never use/endorse this construction. "In a frequently-repeated story, United States Navy Admiral Hyman G. Rickover told a subordinate who used the royal we: 'Three groups are permitted that usage: pregnant women, royalty, and schizophrenics. Which one are you?'"
"Another remark is often attributed (probably wrongly) to Mark Twain: 'Only kings, presidents, editors, and people with tapeworms have the right to use the editorial 'we.' '" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear ktb,
We agree with you.
Regards,
John(s) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
killthebuddha
Joined: 06 Jul 2010 Posts: 144 Location: Assigned to the Imperial Gourd
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Linguist
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 202
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
KTB (sounds like KGB ),
Thanks for the links. Even though this is my first time hearing about John Taylor Gatto, a lot of what he says make sense (I haven't read the books yet but will certainly do so). A lot of teachers do not know why/what they are teaching and students do not know why/what they are being taught at school.
Ask any backpacker TEFLER about which teaching methodology he is using in class, and he will spew out the 'communicative approach'. In reality, he does not have a clue what it's all about and whether this methodology is suitable for his students.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Linguist
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 202
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
One afternoon when I was seven I complained to him of boredom, and he batted me hard on the head. He told me that I was never to use that term in his presence again, that if I was bored it was my fault and no one else's. The obligation to amuse and instruct myself was entirely my own, and people who didn't know that were childish people, to be avoided if possible. Certainty not to be trusted. That episode cured me of boredom forever, and here and there over the years I was able to pass on the lesson to some remarkable student.
http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/hp/frames.htm
|
I wonder if we should batter TEFLers too to stop them from complaining of boredom. If the majority of TEFLers are hopeless, how can they motivate their students ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
killthebuddha
Joined: 06 Jul 2010 Posts: 144 Location: Assigned to the Imperial Gourd
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's The Rub,
How many teachers, in our case, are improving their own English through a better understanding of it? In any other field you must have a strong foundation in that field to teach it, or you used to. Even for certification in the U.S., teachers are getting education degrees rather than degrees in a specific field, the result of which is that they come away with about half the number of hours in their subject than they used to. There was a recent news report about the poor quality of newly certified teachers in the state of Illinois. These programs that the teachers came out of were ill-defined and weak in specific subject matter development. All the "methods" and "theories" classes in the world won't help you to teach what you do not know. Students need to be challenged; condescending to them through our own poor expectations and limitations is a recipe for disaster.
Consider the following (this site is a great resource, BTW):
http://www.worldmapper.org/index.html
The world according to Education:
http://www.worldmapper.org/textindex/text_education.html
According to secondary education enrollment:
http://www.worldmapper.org/display.php?selected=200
According to tertiary education enrollment:
http://www.worldmapper.org/display.php?selected=203
According to science research:
http://www.worldmapper.org/display.php?selected=205
Draw your own conclusions.
--ktb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Linguist
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 202
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The CELTA and other quick TEFL certificates that get backpackers 'certified' to teach are all contributing to this state of affairs: bastardisation of TEFL. It's no more a profession, it has become a ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Linguist,
"It's no more a profession, it has become a ...
Well, if it's not a PROfession, has it become a CONfession?
Seriously though, what others think about the EFL/ESL field is of no significance to me. I know that I do a professional job and that's all that matters to me (and I've known many others who have always been professional, too.)
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scot47

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Is what Gatto has to say so different from what Illich told us all those years ago ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
killthebuddha
Joined: 06 Jul 2010 Posts: 144 Location: Assigned to the Imperial Gourd
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Linguist,
You were saying, "...it has become a..."
I would say "it" (by which you meant the TEFL field) has become a huge industry, and various certifications have simply become a convenient/default screening mechanism for the schools and government regulating bodies. But it's just as true of America's certification programs for teachers.
If you look at the percentages shown by the worldmapper.org links I posted above, there's an apparent discrepancy. The percentage of participating students in secondary education in the U.S. is abysmal by world standards. There is a notable rise in the percentage of those participating in tertiary education. When you get to scientific research, the U.S. absolutely explodes. Either the great (and it would have to be exponentially great) majority of U.S. high school grads also attend university, or these tertiary participators and scientific researchers (the numbers here include published papers) are coming from overseas. And of course, they are. (Just look at China for these same categories and you'll see the inverse law in play.) Why? How? Money. The business of America is business, and "education" is big business almost anywhere you go.
Take johnslat's advice and worry not. (Who's Illich? I must know. Hello Google.)
--ktb
Last edited by killthebuddha on Thu Dec 23, 2010 6:07 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear scot47,
They both had very similar views - Illich, I'd say, is more intellectual and theoretical, a priest and an administrator. Gatto, I think, is more practical, and down-to-earth, a guy who spent thirty years in the classroom.
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
killthebuddha
Joined: 06 Jul 2010 Posts: 144 Location: Assigned to the Imperial Gourd
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scot47,
I've always enjoyed your posts--you're one of a handful of regulars here that I always make certain to read--but I'm especially grateful for your mention of Illich. Where have I been? It's like stumbling upon Buckminster Fuller for the first time, or Pearl Jam--Touring Band 2000. Thanks.
--ktb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bebsi
Joined: 07 Feb 2005 Posts: 958
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Concerning the concern concerning 'concerning' as an adjective, and the subsequent concern expressed concerning the concern concerning 'concerning', I would like to express my concern concerning the concern concerning the concern whether 'concerning' is an adjective or not. It is a matter of serious concern that such concern be expressed over the whole issue of concern in the first place. As far as I am concerned, anyway.
Most disconcerting!
Last edited by Bebsi on Fri Dec 24, 2010 2:42 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bulgogiboy

Joined: 23 Feb 2005 Posts: 803
|
Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| [W]hile the remaining 20%, the top 20, I would place as excellent individuals in terms of being both professional and moral human beings. |
Probably around 99% of the ESL teachers reading this will consider themselves in this elite top 20%.
They probably aren't.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|