| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
celticbutterfly
Joined: 13 Jul 2009 Posts: 41
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
homeless vet
Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 80
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
"We did a study and found that 70 per cent of employees end their contracts before completing the three years."
Yes, but changing the law isn't going to change this...changing the sorry country might, though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
elmoro
Joined: 12 Feb 2010 Posts: 58 Location: The Emerald City
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"We used to have control over them, and we knew it wasn't easy from them to go, now we will lose this control."
yeah, i wouldn't have given my last name either.
"This is really bad news, this means we will have to pay our employees their end of service payments at the end of their contracts after two years,"
he didn't give his last name either.
bet my salary they are related and their last name is al scumbagee! sad as it may sound, this pretty much sums up the situation.
elmoro
THE HORROR, THE HORROR! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This may not be related to education... hard to tell as it isn't stated. The contracts used to be two years. Not to mention that I know dozens of people who have gone from job to job in the Emirates. There has been lots of discussion here about places having a "no poaching" policy, but none of NOCs.
VS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
republocrat
Joined: 14 May 2010 Posts: 70 Location: Stuck in Traffic on Airport Road
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeh, that's great news. Now they'll have to treat people decently, instead of like they were bonded labour - which will be difficult for some Emiratis.
Actually, the other main sticking point is that of the contractual bonus. At present the employer holds on to it until you leave, or get fired, in which case it gets reduced considerably, which means unscrupulous employers (about 90% of them) have a good incentive to fire you before the end of your Nth contract.
I'd like to see it paid either at the end of each year, or at the end of each contract. Some of my colleagues' employers are sitting on a gratuity worth 15 months salary, which is a lot of money to be stuck in your employer's grubby hands. It would be far better to have it sitting in your bank account collecting interest, and away from the whims of an Emirati boss. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Never Ceased To Be Amazed

Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 3500 Location: Shhh...don't talk to me...I'm playin' dead...
|
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| homeless vet wrote: |
| Yes, but changing the law isn't going to change this...changing the sorry country might, though. |
HV, i'm sorry to point out that contrary to you accusation, the country is NOT SORRY! In fact, it doesn't have an apologetic bone in it's national body...
"Sorry" would insinuate that there is something to be contrite about...
NCTBA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| republocrat wrote: |
| I'd like to see it paid either at the end of each year, or at the end of each contract. Some of my colleagues' employers are sitting on a gratuity worth 15 months salary, which is a lot of money to be stuck in your employer's grubby hands. It would be far better to have it sitting in your bank account collecting interest, and away from the whims of an Emirati boss. |
Of course, but don't hold your breath. It certainly isn't to their advantage to pay it out annually. Why should they pay it out when it is an incentive for you to stick around and watch it build. I have a number of friends who retired from their jobs there with nearly 20 years of accumulated gratuity. The advantage for those who manage to do so is that it is based on their current salary... not their salary at the beginning.
For many it is also a forced savings plan... since they would have blown it if paid each year rather than socking it away.
VS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
helenl
Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Posts: 1202
|
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I for one would prefer to get my EOS benes at least at the end of each contract or better yet, at the end of each year completed - mainly because most don't fund the EOS accounts as they go along - if everyone left HCT tomorrow, giving proper notice and following all the rules, HCT would find it difficult if not impossible to pay up in full and on time. That's one of the sub-reasons they refused to pay summer payroll in advance this past year (as they have done since the inception). They don't have the $$ in their accounts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
elmoro
Joined: 12 Feb 2010 Posts: 58 Location: The Emerald City
|
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
these are what i call movie theater laws. when i was young, my father wouldn't let me go to the R rated movies because it was the "law". i asked him the rationale of a "law" that is not enforced. he had no answer.
example, it is the "law" that these companies can not hold the passport of employees, but when i pointed this out to a hr guy, he promptly replied, "if the shaikh wants to enforce this law, let him come and get the passport himself." also, this national id clearly states that no one is allowed to hold your id as collateral, but everyone does it anyway. like VS told someone on another thread, if you open a case (even one that you will probably win) you will probably spend more money than you will win.
btw, the he guy in the passport issue asked me how they would control their employees if they didn't keep the passport. i suggested that they try fairness and kindness.
i also call them catch 22 laws because if you try to open a case, they can just cancel you, refuse to give you time off so that you can go to the court, or just make life plain miserable for you.
elmoro
THE HORROR, THE HORROR! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Willard
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 251
|
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How then can they control the individual with a second passport, when no exit visa is required?
Why is anyone giving | |