View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jen_blue
Joined: 20 Aug 2011 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 6:48 pm Post subject: Has anyone else done this course? |
|
|
hello,
I have researched qualifications to go abrouad teaching english and come across this course provider -
[/url]http://www.tefltraining.co.uk/[url][/url]
So far I havent been able to find anything bad about the course, I am interested in the 140 hour course and would likely go to London for my teaching practise.
Has anyone else trained with them?
Thanks
Jenny |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The standard entry level course for most regions is 100+ hours on site, and includes supervised teaching practice with real students. The 20-hour weekend course is obviously too short, and it seems this providers' 100+ hour course does not include the (key) teaching practice: There is no practical teaching element to this course
I would steer clear. Go for a CELTA or equivalent.
Also depends where you want to teach. There are some regions (Asia, I think) where certification isn't necessary. In Europe and North America, I can say for certain that CELTA and equivalent are needed to compete effectively on the job market. I believe this is also true of most of Latin America, but others can say for sure. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jen_blue
Joined: 20 Aug 2011 Posts: 33
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Online certs are considered substandard in many regions. They have a pretty website.
To get the standard supervised teaching practice, you apparently have to take a much longer course than the standard 100-120 hours:
Quote: |
For Level 5 courses that include TEACHING PRACTICE please choose from the courses below:
Level 5 190 Hour Cert TESOL with Teaching Practice
Level 5 220 Hour Cert TESOL with Business English, Young Learners and Teaching Practice |
Again, I cannot see the reason to nearly double the length of the course just to get the teaching practice. Unless the course is really cheap  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jen_blue, where do you want to teach? The best answer to your query will heavily depend on the answer to this question. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jen_blue
Joined: 20 Aug 2011 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hi,
This is probably the most unattractive website I have seen so far when researching this area, the TEFL International one (which I have already discounted) is far more approachable - they have spent far longer on it than they have on the actual courses I would imagine.
I'm looking to apply with ESL Starter for Korea and Georgia but would really like to go to Latin America/Mexico. I am looking to spend a year in one place then will likely look to moving on and going elsewhere.
Jen |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tttompatz

Joined: 06 Mar 2010 Posts: 1951 Location: Talibon, Bohol, Philippines
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jen_blue wrote: |
hi,
This is probably the most unattractive website I have seen so far when researching this area, the TEFL International one (which I have already discounted) is far more approachable - they have spent far longer on it than they have on the actual courses I would imagine.
I'm looking to apply with ESL Starter for Korea and Georgia but would really like to go to Latin America/Mexico. I am looking to spend a year in one place then will likely look to moving on and going elsewhere.
Jen |
For Korea, go with the cheapest on-line cert you can find.
IF your plan is to move on afterward then and change countries a couple of times then go with the recognized brands (CELTA, Trinity, SIT TESOL). The cost is higher but it will make a difference later (depending on the country you head for).
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jen_blue
Joined: 20 Aug 2011 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Its comments on the course/company that I am looking for....
Its all very well saying go for a recognised brand but the fact is I simply cant afford over �1,000 + take time off work (and continue paying living costs etc) in order to do this.
Hence I am looking at alternative providers. Suggestions would also be welcomed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jen_blue wrote: |
Its comments on the course/company that I am looking for....
Its all very well saying go for a recognised brand but the fact is I simply cant afford over �1,000 + take time off work (and continue paying living costs etc) in order to do this.
Hence I am looking at alternative providers. Suggestions would also be welcomed. |
As people have said, online certs usually aren't on the same level as on-site ones. International House (IH) also has online ones. I don't know about the quality. A friend of mine did hers at ITTT. It took her a good 6 months (she procrastinated a lot) but was pretty affordable, maybe about $200 for 120 hour course.
If you can't afford an on-site one, then you could simply just get an online one or not get one at all. Check with immigration reqs where you're going. They might not require a TEFL cert. Some employers might require it or you might get a boost in pay. A friend of mine is getting 100 dollars extra a month for her (online) TEFL cert. That means she's only getting $1200 over the course of a year and that's often less than a good TEFL course. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Shroob
Joined: 02 Aug 2010 Posts: 1339
|
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just my opinion, but I'd go for Korea, save up and do a recognised qualification (CELTA/Trinity).
The CELTA/Trinity may not work out economical for the first year, however, if you plan on staying in TEFL for longer it's worth it. Also, they give a good introduction into teaching, I know it's boosted my confidence/ability in teaching. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ossie39
Joined: 18 Jan 2009 Posts: 105
|
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 3:38 am Post subject: INTESOL |
|
|
I completed a course with this company and I thought it was brilliant. The course I followed was the teaching ESP course. The course is unique because it addresses Business English, English for Occupational Purposes, English for Science and Technology, Academic English. This was an advanced course and to my knowledge, there is no other course in teaching that covers areas of ESP. Previous to doing this course I had taught in EFL for 18 years. I found my course stimulating and very 'hands on.'
So INTESOL have very well qualified and experienced tutors as you can see by scrolling down on their web page. The photos, names, credentials and portfolios are there to see! INTESOL have provided courses for more than 2O years and have so many centres worldwide. I think the word credibility is emerging already. Externally assessed, all their qualifications meet National Qualification Framework as do CELTA, TRINITY and many other qualifications so no doubt about credibility. The qualifications are endorsed by College of Teachers (university staus since 185�) or OCN or some other awarding body. It changes from time to time because of charges from the particular external examiner at the time. INTESOL staff are friendly and well organised. I always had valuable tutor feedback and it was marked promptly.
There are many opportunities to do teaching practice and for new teachers it is strongly encouraged by INTESOL. They have many branches around the world! There 'Young Learners' Certificate is interesting too because they give detail on teaching teenagers too. There is the option to do the longer course because it combines general English teaching with ESP teaching, but I can say the ESP was a challenge and I would recommend people do that ESP course after at least 3 years of teaching in general English. I used my materials at Nottingham University and they were recieved very favourably. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|