| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
baa_baa

Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 265
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| veiledsentiments wrote: |
An Employment letter gives dates and basic details. No reason why the principal of your school couldn't sign it. Most of mine came from my university department head.
At the same time as you get this, a letter of reference from this person would also be a good idea. Assuming that s/he will write one for you.
VS |
ok this is good. The letter I have includes basic details, and qualifications. So its both an employment letter plus reference, 2 in 1. what more would they want For a second I thought I had to go back and get new ones again. It is signed by the principal.
Do you think I should contact the university one more time? But what would I say--bahhh maybe Ill just wait for another opportunity... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baa_baa

Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 265
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BretHarte wrote: |
Either English is a 2nd language or you have a Ph.D.
It's hard to figure out what you're writing about. |
Very sorry for the confusion... I applied to a university. VS and I are discussing my "references" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Reference or recommendation letters (AKA experience/reference certificates) from your last two or three employers should include the dates you were employed with them as well as info about your character, work habits, accomplishments, classroom management, teaching style, yada yada � basically, when and how you performed your work and why you're a great catch. Each letter should be on official letterhead and include the contact information, title, and signature of the person providing the reference. (Before listing someone as a reference on your resume/CV or job application, contact them first to make sure they're okay with providing a written or verbal recommendation or reference on your behalf.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nomad soul wrote: |
| Reference or recommendation letters (AKA experience/reference certificates) from your last two or three employers should include the dates you were employed with them as well as info about your character, work habits, accomplishments, classroom management, teaching style, yada yada � basically |
On the contrary, IMHO, these two things are different animals and should not be combined. The employers that I dealt with asked for both. All of my employment letter/certificates from the Gulf employers are very bare bones. They only include dates, salary, and perhaps general info on what courses were taught in which departments and that I left an employee of good standing. Most of them are mere lists. There was never anything personal on them. Most employers wanted to see them going as far back as possible and some employers will only give you pay steps based on the number of employment letters provided. If you say you have ten years of experience, to get paid at that level, you had to provide employment letters covering all those years. This presented a problem for American teachers as American employers don't provide them and have no idea what you are talking about if you ask for one.
A reference or recommendation letter is from each of the references that you list on your CV/resume and normally include nothing about dates or salary... only what it says... a recommendation that the employer hire you - and current contact information in case the new employer wants to confirm.
VS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baa_baa

Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 265
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nomad soul wrote: |
| Reference or recommendation letters (AKA experience/reference certificates) from your last two or three employers should include the dates you were employed with them as well as info about your character, work habits, accomplishments, classroom management, teaching style, yada yada � basically, when and how you performed your work and why you're a great catch. Each letter should be on official letterhead and include the contact information, title, and signature of the person providing the reference. (Before listing someone as a reference on your resume/CV or job application, contact them first to make sure they're okay with providing a written or verbal recommendation or reference on your behalf.) |
My references are written in the format you mentioned at the moment ... lets see what happens..
V.S. thank you for your posts. I am very sorry for my terrible first answer.. see you around take care. Ill be away for awhile. Im soooo upset that KAU didnt work out. wishing for a magic wand...but Ill go with this must be the best for me and KAU  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nomad soul

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Posts: 11454 Location: The real world
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I hear you, VS, but reference/recommendation letters are just that: a description of the employee's experience and character as a predictor for potential employment. They're not intended to confirm dates a person was employed. However, having general dates on these letters simply indicates how recent the employers' observations and interactions with the employee occurred. As for salaries and specific dates of employment over the past umpteen years, that info usually goes on the employment application along with the HR contact information for each previous employer. This has been my experience working in the Gulf thus far. But I can see where requiring employment verification letters from past places of employment could be a nightmare. I guess it comes down to what each potential employer is looking for in terms of verification and references. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nomad soul wrote: |
| As for salaries and specific dates of employment over the past umpteen years, that info usually goes on the employment application along with the HR contact information for each previous employer. This has been my experience working in the Gulf thus far. But I can see where requiring employment verification letters from past places of employment could be a nightmare. I guess it comes down to what each potential employer is looking for in terms of verification and references. |
My university level Gulf employers automatically provided the "letter of employment" when anyone left their employment. They seemed to all be aware that your next employer would want to see them. When I left SQU in the 90's, the LC Director had his secretary give me the standard form. (and he and the Asst Director both wrote normal letters of recommendation...) It was the same when I left HCT. The branch HR person automatically gave me the stock "letter of employment." The Head offered to write a letter of recommendation for me.
VS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
In Saudi, every time I left, the Director at that time would tell me, "You write it; I'll sign it."
It was very difficult to be modest - so, I didn't try to be
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
I presume that your director was not a native speaker of English. I only got that response once with a local, rather than expat, supervisor. It made me uncomfortable to write about myself, so I agreed to sit down and write it "with" her rather than for her.
Turns out that I was a wonderful employee and person.
VS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear VS,
My directors were always Saudis - and I had 4 or 5 different ones in my time there. Amazingly enough, they were all fine - ranging from good to excellent.
The only problems the "good" one had were that he was vulnerable to student wasta and lacked the backbone to stand up to the higher-ups when those higher-ups were proposing some idiotic new policy.
Bur there was really only one like that. The others were excellent. I still correspond with some of them.
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|