View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
The Great Wall of Whiner

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Posts: 4946 Location: Blabbing
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 2:25 am Post subject: IELTS examiners in mainland China |
|
|
My friend is seriously considering this position, but I know little about this position. Has anyone worked for the British Council before? I tried explaining to her that 5k a month is far too low for Shanghai, but she did not seem too concerned about it.
Anyone work for them or know someone who did? What are working conditions like? The school asks for a 2-year contract, not the usual one year. And they are always advertising. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JayCee86
Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 82
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Whatever job your friend has been offered it is not as an IELTS examiner. They are paid per test they do not a set amount a month.
Signing a contract with a school is definitely not something an IELTS examiner does. It sounds like your friend has been offered a job teaching English at a middle school but the placement has been organised by the British Council. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yaramaz

Joined: 05 Mar 2003 Posts: 2384 Location: Not where I was before
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is absurd. IELTS is not a school. It's a contractor job, piecemeal. You do speaking tests and get paid per interview; you mark essays and get paid per script. There are no monthly salaries. The contract isn't so much a contract as something you sign that says you can do stuff with them if you want. It is a secondary job, as they don't do work permits. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Wall of Whiner

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Posts: 4946 Location: Blabbing
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK well whoever or whatever it is, she declined because of the two-year contract stipulation. Thanks for the um.... advice. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igorG
Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Posts: 1473 Location: asia
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JayCee86 wrote: |
Signing a contract with a school is definitely not something an IELTS examiner does. |
Without a contract with a local school/employer, an IELTS examiner will most likely not have a legal work permit on mainland China. I believe that this is the issue examiners and BC may have, although few will make a fuss for the quick and easy buck. I can't imagine the fair play of the local competition in the field, where another school's students get an IELTS examiner to prepare them and perhaps to examine them later too. I doubt this is legal although quite common. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yaramaz

Joined: 05 Mar 2003 Posts: 2384 Location: Not where I was before
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IELTS examiners generally do sign contracts... with their main visa-sponsoring job. Examining is a side gig for most people (unless they've been able to wrangle work-friendly residence permits through another means, which some long termers have). The jobs I've had for the past 3 years (both Oz joint venture uni programs) have all liked the fact that I'm an examiner because I can more accurately do assessments of the kids who will need a 6.5 to move on to the Oz end of their course. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Baozi man
Joined: 06 Sep 2011 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yaramaz,
How about doing an informational thread on just what it is that IELTS examiners are looking for in the oral English task? For example, if a student can use the simple past, present, and future tenses without error, exhibit a large vocabulary, proper preposition use, correct pronoun usage, and clear pronounciation how will they do? Assume that their basic grammar is also good.
Can you give examples of weighted errors that will seriously damage their score?
I'd appreciate hearing whatever you have to say. If inclined, please give a brief sketch of your own experience as an IELTS examiner. Are you a beginner or a seasoned examiner? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yaramaz

Joined: 05 Mar 2003 Posts: 2384 Location: Not where I was before
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JayCee86
Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 82
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yaramaz is correct, IELTS examiners do sign contracts with their main visa-sponsoring job but they certainly don't sign a contract with a school as part of being an IELTS examiner.
Preparing a student and later examining them is pretty much impossible to do - you don't get to choose where you examine, and once there you don't get to choose your candidates. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yaramaz

Joined: 05 Mar 2003 Posts: 2384 Location: Not where I was before
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Also, until recently, there was a strictly enforced rule that if you teach IELTS prep, you can't be an examiner (and vice versa). I guess too many examiners were being bribed to give out the assessment criteria. This has actually led to a big problem in that IELTS prep courses are being run/taught by people who have no idea what the criteria really is. We get so much memorized BS from candidates that it's embarrassing.
And yeah, you don't know where or who you'll examine. I've tested everywhere from Hangzhou to Dalian. As far as part time gigs are concerned, it's well paid and actually useful for my day job. I'm definitely a better teacher now, as I have a stronger grasp of the building blocks of language acquisition. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
7969

Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 5782 Location: Coastal Guangdong
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Some helpful info on this thread. Thank you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igorG
Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Posts: 1473 Location: asia
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yaramaz wrote: |
IELTS examiners generally do sign contracts... with their main visa-sponsoring job. Examining is a side gig for most people (unless they've been able to wrangle work-friendly residence permits through another means, which some long termers have). The jobs I've had for the past 3 years (both Oz joint venture uni programs) have all liked the fact that I'm an examiner because I can more accurately do assessments of the kids who will need a 6.5 to move on to the Oz end of their course. |
The main visa-sponsoring job is the school/employer. Should readers believe that BC keeps a long distance from the local schools/employers?
OZ joint venture uni programs on mainland China most likely have students that must pass the greatest obstacle, IELTS. IELTS examiners are under their confidentiality contracts with the BC, and so "coaching" the kids to get 6.5 in the exams is, in my view, a breach, which under the circumstances not surprisingly neither the employer nor BC will mind.
With all due respect, assessing the language proficiency for university programs is, in my professional opinion, a bit more complex than the poster above or BC claim it is. The BC has been modifying their tests with the environment which dictates the rules of engagement. Even though the organization alleges that it is not for profit, it turns around money as it is hand in hand with officials of governments and higher educational institutions around the world.
Back on topic, the bottom line is that it comes down to a BC trained FT that may claim s/he can assess students more accurately than another FT who may be better qualified and more professional than the BC one. It's a shame we have such a mess in the industry. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yaramaz

Joined: 05 Mar 2003 Posts: 2384 Location: Not where I was before
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The main visa-sponsoring job is the school/employer. Should readers believe that BC keeps a long distance from the local schools/employers? |
Mine did. We dealt with the Australian uni, not with the BC.
Quote: |
OZ joint venture uni programs on mainland China most likely have students that must pass the greatest obstacle, IELTS. IELTS examiners are under their confidentiality contracts with the BC, and so "coaching" the kids to get 6.5 in the exams is, in my view, a breach, which under the circumstances not surprisingly neither the employer nor BC will mind. |
I taught business and EAP not IELTS prep.
Quote: |
With all due respect, assessing the language proficiency for university programs is, in my professional opinion, a bit more complex than the poster above or BC claim it is. The BC has been modifying their tests with the environment which dictates the rules of engagement. Even though the organization alleges that it is not for profit, it turns around money as it is hand in hand with officials of governments and higher educational institutions around the world.
|
True.
Quote: |
Back on topic, the bottom line is that it comes down to a BC trained FT that may claim s/he can assess students more accurately than another FT who may be better qualified and more professional than the BC one. It's a shame we have such a mess in the industry. |
Thanks for making assumptions about my experience, qualifications and professionalism as a teacher. I wasn't saying that I was better than other teachers, I was saying that with 3 years of examining under my belt I had a much better idea how things are externally assessed. This gives me a better idea of what my students are up against when they're trying to get that 6.5--- a number which doesn't necessarily mean they are fit for an Aust. classroom, just as a kid who keeps getting 5.5 may not be unfit. At least now I know where these numbers come from at a very detailed level.
Thanks for calling me a mess. Very kind of you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igorG
Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Posts: 1473 Location: asia
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yaramaz wrote: |
Quote: |
Back on topic, the bottom line is that it comes down to a BC trained FT that may claim s/he can assess students more accurately than another FT who may be better qualified and more professional than the BC one. It's a shame we have such a mess in the industry. |
Thanks for making assumptions about my experience, qualifications and professionalism as a teacher. I wasn't saying that I was better than other teachers, I was saying that with 3 years of examining under my belt I had a much better idea how things are externally assessed. This gives me a better idea of what my students are up against when they're trying to get that 6.5--- a number which doesn't necessarily mean they are fit for an Aust. classroom, just as a kid who keeps getting 5.5 may not be unfit. At least now I know where these numbers come from at a very detailed level.
Thanks for calling me a mess. Very kind of you. |
I don't believe i have either addressed the poster or assumed about his/her experiences. I thought i was speaking in general. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Baozi man
Joined: 06 Sep 2011 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
There are five areas which determine the IELTS oral English score: vocabulary, pronunciation, fluency, coherence, and grammar.
Vocabulary is the easiest task of language acquisition. Studying vocabulary with pronunciation should be a major focus of oral English.
Many grammar mistakes have to do with verb tenses, pronouns, and prepositions. It's best to focus on the simple past, present and future tenses. Make sure the students have mastered them before moving on to more complex verb tenses. Preposition drills are also useful. People smile "at you," not "to you." This stuff is not difficult.
Another major focus of my instruction has been on liaison, the merging of words in oral English. This has a lot to do with fluency in the language and contributes to the overall impression of the student's English mastery.
I often do chorusing drills for pronunciation practice, including sentences which include various connected words [words ending in a consonant followed by a word starting with a vowel] to familiarize the students with liaison.
What are others doing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|