Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Phonics in Pre- and K EFL - a Pharce?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
LongShiKong



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 1082
Location: China

PostPosted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 3:43 pm    Post subject: Phonics in Pre- and K EFL - a Pharce? Reply with quote

I'm once again expected to teach phonics to kids with virtually no English. If phonics is used to help English-speaking primary students develop literacy skills--decoding words they already know--what's the point of presenting unknown words for each letter of the alphabet without expecting them to read such or similar words on their own? This is the 3rd private school I've worked for where this is the case.

Last summer, I took over (another school's) senior teacher's course with kids who'd done that for months to a year with the result that most couldn't even point to the letters of the alphabet unless sequentially presented let alone much of the 20 or so vocabulary pictures....and why not words, if it's a 'phonics' course!?!?

It's completely backwards! Conventionally, native English kids start with a set of 'sight words', the learning of which exemplifies the skills they'll independently* need to decode new words. Such sight words are usually clearly visible on classroom walls or within pocketcharts (apparently unavailable here in China even on China's own eBay). Without an initial group of sight words which students are expected to know and distinguish, there's really no point teaching phonics or is there? Most schools such as the one I'm working don't even have pocketcharts and they're not even available on China's eBay.

There's enough controversy regarding phonics instruction already (in English-speaking education) given the unconventional nature of English spelling and the challenge decoding presents to such a young reader, it just seems absurd to teach this to K and Pre-K kids with no English

* perhaps it's a cultural thing, Asians education instills dependency.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Glenski



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 12844
Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN

PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 12:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Perhaps you could agree to teach the course anyway and just call it Introductory Phonics, but really doing what you want to introduce spelling and the most basic of sounds, and focusing on elementary language skills as usual but with an emphasis on pronunciation.

What does your employer have to say about his expectations from the course you've been given? Might not hurt to have a discussion, even if to show the error of his ways/thinking.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DebMer



Joined: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 232
Location: Southern California

PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 1:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, it does sound backwards. Everybody learns to speak before they learn to read. It must feel like an exercise in futility to the kids.

h.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
microbabe



Joined: 03 Feb 2010
Posts: 115

PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 4:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I teach phonics to pre-school and up to KG2 and am using flash cards,they are not too bad, however it is a nightmare. I have one class of 27 KG 1 kids. I am starting to run out of ideas. Some KG teachers at the school say us a DVD, shove it one and let them watch it. You can't do that all the time.

I've started doing basic spelling and letter tracing, not ideal. I have one kid in the KG1 class who doesn't speak at all. So when they do tests she gets zero. What is the point of testing them at such an early age they are suppose to be having fun at that age. We also have no resources to speak of.

The joys of teaching!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
spiral78



Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 11534
Location: On a Short Leash

PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's all too common that schools promote the mistaken notion that second language learners can successfully study using the same approaches used by native speakers. My first Czech teachers used materials from Czech primary schools, for example. We students were all English language teachers a d were able to make a coherent case that the target students for those materials already had a grasp of the language and it was poorly designed for real beginners. It is unfortunate that this isn't always apparent to those making decisions regarding materials and methods!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LongShiKong



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 1082
Location: China

PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My first Chinese textbooks were the same--stories written for primary students even though they were 'revised'. There were few resources then.

--------------------------------------------------------
Correction: my use of the term 'sight word'------
Quote:
Many of the 220 Dolch words can't be "sounded out" using common sound-to-letter implicit phonics patterns and have to be learned by sight; hence the alternative term, "sight word." Although the list is divided into grades, for native English speakers, all the words in the Dolch should be mastered by the end of first grade.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sight_words
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's some great Sesame Street phonics music videos:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMNjnubg6Ws (-et family: pet, jet, etc)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tj086LhfXH4 (-op family: mop, top, etc)
At the end of the video, the kids I taught caught on and were not only able to sing along but recognize any letter combo. The next week, they wanted to watch the videos again and be retested. My advice is to get (or make) pocketcharts for working with letters, phonemes, and picture cards--something unavailable here in China.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
naturegirl321



Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 9041
Location: home sweet home

PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I taught phonics to kids aged 4-5. We used Dr Suess and Dolch words. It works out ok, especially if the parents help out at home.

The kids were in English immersion though, so 8am to 5pm, with only a couple Chinese classes. I also taught privates to Korean kids in Peru, about an hour a week and the DOlch words and phonics worked out about the same as with the kids in immersion. I really think a lot depends on the parents.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Chancellor



Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 1337
Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)

PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phonics vs. phonological awareness?

http://www.readingresource.net/phonicsversusphonologicalawareness.html

Phonemic awareness vs. phonological awareness?

http://www.k12reader.com/phonemic-awareness-vs-phonological-awareness/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LongShiKong



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 1082
Location: China

PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chancellor wrote:
Phonics vs. phonological awareness?
Phonemic awareness vs. phonological awareness?


You missed my point. These are 4-5 yr olds with exceedingly limited English. Such skills are challenging, time-consuming, and abstract enough to teach to native English-speakers let alone in L2 with virtually no vocabulary.

Shouldn't FT class time be better spent helping students actually use English. As with defining vocabulary and explaining grammar, I prefer leaving that up to the local teacher. At least here in China, few children learning English, especially at this age, later on encounter the typical literacy issues that plague children in English-speaking countries!

I once used Sesame Street coursebooks. The first book(s) had no words--just pictures with an audio track. By the time phonics was introduced, the children already had a good foundation with which to identify these sounds. Had I known about the videos I'd listed, I would've used them.

Recently, I made my own playing deck of consonants (and blends) and common word ending cards which could be used for a variety of activities. They're narrow (2.5 cm x 10 cm) and color-coded with text also in small at the top left (as with playing cards so you can see them if you've got many in your hand. PM me and I'll send you the file.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China