|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JZer
Joined: 16 Jan 2005 Posts: 3898 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The teacher must understand the grammar (would you ask a mathematics teacher if he or she should understand the rules of his discipline?) |
I don't know if teaching math and teaching a foreign language are the same. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kootvela

Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 513 Location: Lithuania
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
JZer wrote: |
Quote: |
The teacher must understand the grammar (would you ask a mathematics teacher if he or she should understand the rules of his discipline?) |
I don't know if teaching math and teaching a foreign language are the same. |
I sucked at maths and ended up a teacher of English. I suppose these are two different planets of their own! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kootvela

Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 513 Location: Lithuania
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
JZer wrote: |
Quote: |
I had English since 4th grade (out of 12) |
While I am sure that you might be able to find a grammar error in my post, I doubt too many native speakers would use this sentence. Probably none. If I am wrong I hope that someone will correct me. If you are using "since", you probably need to be using the present perfect(I have studied English since fourth grade.)Indicating that you started studying English in fourth grade and continue to study English up until today.
If you want to use the simple past you should use "from" instead of since. (I had English from fourth grade to twelfth grade.) |
What if I DO study it and today? Life-long learning and self-study don't count? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kootvela

Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 513 Location: Lithuania
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
travellingscot wrote: |
Kootvela- you wrote "I had English since 4th grade (out of 12). Two, then three times per week. Plus, 6 years at university. Also, we did grammar from the scratch, like parts of speech, conjugations, etc."
If you have not yet realised your mistake then I think it helps to prove my point.I did not have to look in a textbook either. Also, perhaps it is just me, but i don't think I would have used "of" twice later on.
|
What point? That native speakers never have tongue slips? WOW!!!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kootvela

Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 513 Location: Lithuania
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
hollysuel wrote: |
JZer wrote: |
Quote: |
I would have to hear you speak and socialize with you a bit to know, but I wouldn't discount you just because you are not a 'native' speaker of English. I know plenty of native speakers who can not teach English (and thankfully these people don't) and plenty of non-native English teachers who know grammar much better than me... Embarassed |
Of course the question is how important is knowing grammar in becoming functional or even fluent in English or any foreign language. There are Chinese who know English grammar and can score well on an English test yet cannot make a sentence. |
Agree totally! Knowledge of grammar does not make a person fluent in the language.
I would hope that you agree with me that just because a person is a native speaker of English does not give them the automatic ability to teach grammar. Of course, it is all relative! |
Knowledge of grammar does make one more fluent that before and helps teach more efficiently. Lithuanian students of English are obsessed with grammar and want more and more of it, speaking comes next in popularity. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ratsareeatingmybrain
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 35 Location: lisbon
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
'I had English since 4th grade' sounds like it might be American English to my ears.
Any Americans listening? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ratsareeatingmybrain
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 35 Location: lisbon
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, reading back to the 'math' comment presumably, JZer, you're American.
Might an American use this construct? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kootvela

Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 513 Location: Lithuania
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think anyone is really teaching British, American or Australian English for real. For example, in Lithuania we teach Lithuanian English, where direct translation, pronunciation issues, vocabulary range, collocations are adapted to and from L1. It doesn't matter if the teacher is a native speaker or not. I don't think one can learn a specific variety of language perfectly. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JZer
Joined: 16 Jan 2005 Posts: 3898 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
What if I DO study it and today? Life-long learning and self-study don't count? |
If you still study English today you should be using the Present Perfect. I have studied English since fourth grade.
Any action that started in the past and continues until today needs to use the Present Perfect.
(P.S. If you find any mistakes in my post I was just at the bar so don't kill me.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kootvela

Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 513 Location: Lithuania
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm used to seeing 'native speakers don't say that' on this forum so often that I'm surprised they speak at all!
Anyhoo, that's my last working day and my misprints are the last thing I care about. FREEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hollysuel
Joined: 07 Oct 2007 Posts: 225 Location: Connecticut, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kootvela wrote: |
I don't think anyone is really teaching British, American or Australian English for real. For example, in Lithuania we teach Lithuanian English, where direct translation, pronunciation issues, vocabulary range, collocations are adapted to and from L1. It doesn't matter if the teacher is a native speaker or not. I don't think one can learn a specific variety of language perfectly. |
I think that is where the native English teacher comes in. I have been teaching here in Finland for ten years now and I would say that one of things I do in class that my Finnish counterparts do not do is to eliminate the errors due to L1. Even when I am not teaching, I will need to correct the Finglish in my head so that I am effective in the classroom and actually hear the errors! Thus, the difference between the native and non-native. The students really appreciate this as they are working internationally and some phrases they may say just doesn't work in English... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
travellingscot
Joined: 27 Jan 2003 Posts: 64 Location: UK/Eastern Europe
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kootvela- is Lithuanian English a recognised form of English like Jamaican and Indian for example,or is something that you have dreamed up to try to excuse your refusal to conceed an argument ? You continue to dig a hole for yourself with almost every post and seem oblivious to the fact that you are making errors which a native speaker would probably never make. Your mistakes are NOT misprints - go back, re-read, have a think, look at all your grammar books which you say there is nothing wrong with looking at, then tell us where you decided that Lithuanian English will contain an expression like "from the scratch" [Just one example] !
Your frequency of posting in this thread shows you have a real chip on your shoulder about it. Perhaps if you were to think about all the things you have seen on this forum which native speakers do not say, you would not be making so many mistakes. I do not expect non-natives to be perfect, and consider it to be impolite to correct someone on here but your apparent idea that you are as good in every way as a native speaker is laughable, bordering on arrogance perhaps ?
Frankly, your refusal to accept that you may have been wrong,and say your mistakes are misprints, makes it very clear that native speakers do indeed have an uphill task in many cases. This is particularly so in countries where jobs are "protected" and local teachers used even when their English is far from perfect [I was not including you]. I have had students complain that a previous teacher was so bad they either did not understand or were so distracted by the mistakes they recognised,that they failed to progres very much.
Perhaps you are showing us just why many jobs specify native speakers, and why we will continue to get people like you not understanding why ?
If you still do not get my "point" then look again at my first post on page five, also your own post before it where you state "I AM speaking properly to my students". Presumably then your spoken English is better than your written ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JZer
Joined: 16 Jan 2005 Posts: 3898 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
You continue to dig a hole for yourself with almost every post and seem oblivious to the fact that you are making errors which a native speaker would probably never make. Your mistakes are NOT misprints - go back, re-read, have a think, look at all your grammar books which you say there is nothing wrong with looking at, then tell us where you decided that Lithuanian English will contain an expression like "from the scratch" |
I think that anyone who has studied a foreign language would know that it is almost impossible to speak like a native speaker no matter how hard you try unless you learn English as a child. Maybe that is why some non-native speakers have a chip on their shoulder. They worked so hard to learn English and a native speaker who put no effort into it comes and gets paid more. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kootvela

Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 513 Location: Lithuania
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
travellingscot wrote: |
Kootvela- is Lithuanian English a recognised form of English like Jamaican and Indian for example,or is something that you have dreamed up to try to excuse your refusal to conceed an argument ? You continue to dig a hole for yourself with almost every post and seem oblivious to the fact that you are making errors which a native speaker would probably never make. Your mistakes are NOT misprints - go back, re-read, have a think, look at all your grammar books which you say there is nothing wrong with looking at, then tell us where you decided that Lithuanian English will contain an expression like "from the scratch" [Just one example] !
Your frequency of posting in this thread shows you have a real chip on your shoulder about it. Perhaps if you were to think about all the things you have seen on this forum which native speakers do not say, you would not be making so many mistakes. I do not expect non-natives to be perfect, and consider it to be impolite to correct someone on here but your apparent idea that you are as good in every way as a native speaker is laughable, bordering on arrogance perhaps ?
Frankly, your refusal to accept that you may have been wrong,and say your mistakes are misprints, makes it very clear that native speakers do indeed have an uphill task in many cases. This is particularly so in countries where jobs are "protected" and local teachers used even when their English is far from perfect [I was not including you]. I have had students complain that a previous teacher was so bad they either did not understand or were so distracted by the mistakes they recognised,that they failed to progres very much.
Perhaps you are showing us just why many jobs specify native speakers, and why we will continue to get people like you not understanding why ?
If you still do not get my "point" then look again at my first post on page five, also your own post before it where you state "I AM speaking properly to my students". Presumably then your spoken English is better than your written ? |
Gosh, what long sentences you can write!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JZer
Joined: 16 Jan 2005 Posts: 3898 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Knowledge of grammar does make one more fluent that before and helps teach more efficiently. |
No, using grammar correctly makes one more fluent. It is really irrelevant if you can explain it or not. I am not saying that a teacher should not understand grammar but I don't know that it is really that important that students do. Most students need to learn to use English more than they need to understand English.
Furthermore, I am no brain expert but I believe that knowing the rules of a language and using it come from different parts of the brain. So, I am not sure how much of a connection there is between the two. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|