|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stevemcgarrett

Joined: 24 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 2:20 am Post subject: WHY KOREAN EDUCATION IS PRONE TO DISHONESTY |
|
|
Actually, my explanation could apply to all East Asian societies.
It has to everything to do with saving and giving face, as Michael Bond, the eminent comparative psychologist at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, has discussed at length in his published articles.
When Korean students cheat, it is usually a source of great consternation to them IF it is publicly known and their classmates actually disapprove of it. That's why many are not even flustered if their classmates don't care about their actions and it isn't held up by the faculty or administrative staff as an egregious example of immoral conduct. Getting caught tends to matter less than it would for a typical Western student simply because it is far less likely to involve the conscience.
As I discovered after teaching Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter and "Young Goodman Brown," the traditional East Asian concept of guilt is at great variance with that in the West. To wit: Korean guilt is externally induced; Western guilt is internally induced. In other words, the former's sense of guilt comes from others; the latter from oneself.
And the collectivist mentality contributes to this variance in reaction. If the majority are content to accept the bell curve, which unfairly alters the grades of some higher-achieving students, it won't be a source of guilt. What matters is the web of interpersonal relationships, not the plight of the individual, however deserving of concern he or she might be.
What are your thoughts on this essential cultural phenomenon?
(And let's hope this thread doesn't get deleted too) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stevemcgarrett

Joined: 24 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Guess I must have this situation completely figured out judging by the response.
Kimo, call the Governor and tell him I'm ready to retire from 5-0. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Moldy Rutabaga

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Ansan, Korea
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[....]
Last edited by Moldy Rutabaga on Thu Jan 02, 2014 5:40 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rothkowitz
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It was a pretty good argument.
Certainly in this part of the world one hardly ever(if ever) hears about people being wracked with guilt to the point that they blow the whistle.
Everyone just goes along with what is considered to be acceptable and woe betide the person that rocks the boat. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dev
Joined: 18 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are you suggesting that Asians have no sense of what's right & wrong as Western people do.
Because we know something we do is wrong, we feel shame. The shame comes from our own internalized belief system - code of morals.
As for learning to break rules and feeling okay about it, you also find this in the West. In Montreal, everyone jay-walks. People know they're violating traffic rules, but since so many people are doing it, not many people think twice about it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stevemcgarrett

Joined: 24 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dev:
Good question. Asians do of course have their own moral compass and those Koreans who are Christians might have a more Western orientation toward guilt, which would be interesting to research.
But I wouldn't equate jaywalking with wholesale cheating on college exams.
Rutabaga:
You make a good point: guilt can also come by shaming one's family. So this raises the ante, as it were:
Is it likely that Korean students brazenly cheat on exams because even if they're caught, their family will not feel shamed?
Or does the drive to succeed, or rather to compete with classmates, outweigh concern about family shame when the opportunity to cheat presents itself? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rocklee
Joined: 04 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OP,
You are trying to create a ripple in a storm.
We know cheating will be prevalent in any rapidly developing countries. If it takes less time to get something done, even to cheat, then so be it.
Case closed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
markhan
Joined: 02 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:27 pm Post subject: Re: WHY KOREAN EDUCATION IS PRONE TO DISHONESTY |
|
|
stevemcgarrett wrote: |
Actually, my explanation could apply to all East Asian societies.
It has to everything to do with saving and giving face, as Michael Bond, the eminent comparative psychologist at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, has discussed at length in his published articles.
When Korean students cheat, it is usually a source of great consternation to them IF it is publicly known and their classmates actually disapprove of it. That's why many are not even flustered if their classmates don't care about their actions and it isn't held up by the faculty or administrative staff as an egregious example of immoral conduct. Getting caught tends to matter less than it would for a typical Western student simply because it is far less likely to involve the conscience.
As I discovered after teaching Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter and "Young Goodman Brown," the traditional East Asian concept of guilt is at great variance with that in the West. To wit: Korean guilt is externally induced; Western guilt is internally induced. In other words, the former's sense of guilt comes from others; the latter from oneself.
And the collectivist mentality contributes to this variance in reaction. If the majority are content to accept the bell curve, which unfairly alters the grades of some higher-achieving students, it won't be a source of guilt. What matters is the web of interpersonal relationships, not the plight of the individual, however deserving of concern he or she might be.
What are your thoughts on this essential cultural phenomenon?
(And let's hope this thread doesn't get deleted too) |
Is it really? Then how do you explain rampant shoplifting in some part of the US?
In Korea, I often saw some stores that are left unattended (shop owners go to bathroom or something) and you rarely see Koreans shoplift. Even when there is no around.
The main reason why people do and don't do certain thing is the consequence of their actions. As if you claimed, "internally induced," how does one internalize in the first place? Doesnt' it come from external? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rocklee
Joined: 04 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
In Korea, I often saw some stores that are left unattended (shop owners go to bathroom or something) and you rarely see Koreans shoplift. Even when there is no around. |
That's because somebody is gonna get a beating so bad their mother won't recognise them. In the US, they get a slap on the wrists. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
billybrobby

Joined: 09 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I haven't read the articles you mentioned, but to me this is just another concocted theory. It might be right, but it draws such a sharp, artificial-seeming dichotomy between the east and west that it rings false.
Also, it seems pro-western and anti-asian in that it depicts asian morality as mere performance and western morality as more deeply felt.
Where's the evidence? Studies?
People have done a lot of experiments to show that westerners are more likely to cheat when they think they won't get caught and less likely in the opposite situation. Which to me suggests that their morality is not springing from some moral code but from social pressure or just practical consideration.
To me, moral decisions are always arrived at through a combination of inner morality and external pressure. And with socialization, it's hard to distinguish the two. So that's another sharp dichotomy made by your argument which rings false to me.
Last edited by billybrobby on Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:37 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kimchieluver

Joined: 02 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One could also factor in the rich - poor gap. A lot of students receive better education because of their financial status, through better hogwans etc (maybe even the odd bribe). So the less well to do may feel justified in doing whatever it takes to get into the same category of the better off.
I doubt this explains much, but if cheating is what it takes to get into a good university because you are competing against kids that have had 30 million won worth of extra education thrown at them, they may feel justified. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
billybrobby

Joined: 09 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think before we go looking for causes we should first establish that the basic argument is true. And I think it isn't. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rothkowitz
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Any argument which relies on just a flat out dichotomy deserves suspicion.People are much more complicated than that.
I think we're just discusing pretty simple points as a springboard of sorts.
Asians and westerners both want to make their families proud of their achievements.Western families though I think are proudest when they see their children maturing ie making it on their own in the world.
There are different relationalities/dynamics going on.
As for cheating on tests I think,depending on one's relation to ones' teachers an idea of "critical propriety" can become a kind of internalised moral system.You get an idea of what's expected and you try to meet that expectation.I simply wouldn't dream of just plagiarising something because if I got pulled up on it it would be mortifying.
How asian students would approach the same question I can't really say,though they seem to have no qualms about arguing for higher grades as if it were just a matter of fact thing to do,akin to asking for a discount. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
billybrobby

Joined: 09 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
rothkowitz wrote: |
Any argument which relies on just a flat out dichotomy deserves suspicion.People are much more complicated than that.
I think we're just discusing pretty simple points as a springboard of sorts.
|
Yeah, that's fair enough. The idea is interesting. Ideally, we'd have some evidence that Asian students cheat more or in a different way than Western students. But I doubt any such studies even exist, and we'll be left to sift through various pieces of anecdotal evidence provided by the members of this board as usual. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stevemcgarrett

Joined: 24 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
billybrobby:
Quote: |
I haven't read the articles you mentioned, but to me this is just another concocted theory. |
You can be dismissive if you wish, but it doesn't carry much force since by your own admission you haven't read the studies. They're available in two edited books, Beyond the Chinese Face: Insights from Psychology and The Psychology of the Chinese People. Various scholarly articles can be accessed via other sources. Tellingly, the Chinese government permits the first book to be sold in all the larger hotels in the country and much of his work has been culturally collaborative.
Quote: |
I think before we go looking for causes we should first establish that the basic argument is true |
You mean my premise?
Quote: |
To me, moral decisions are always arrived at through a combination of inner morality and external pressure |
External pressure is considerably more intense in East Asian collectivist societies.
rothkowitz:
Yes, there are indeed different family dynamics going on; how otherwise to explain the relatively greater emotional dependency of the typical Korean college student on his or her parents?
You might have hit (at least one of) the nails on the head when you characterize the manner in which the typical East Asian regards cheating. If they in fact tend to assign it to a lower rank in the moral scheme of things, then it wouldn't naturally strike them as so egregious. Alastair Pennycook (1996), a Brit who taught for years in Hong Kong and now teaches at an Australian university, who is a self-described critical applied linguist, has suggested as much, even going so far as to justify plagiarism among East Asians.
In my original post I spoke of tendencies, inclinations, typicality, and variance--a tacit acknowledgement to take caution when making cultural generalizations. That's hardly the language one uses when rashly posing a dichotomy.
Still, I am concerned that what I have propped up is ultimately a false dichtomy and, worse yet, indicative of a propensity to portray East Asians as something less than individuals with divergent and unique personalities.
rocklee:
Your economic explanation rings hollow to me because they sound deterministic (ironically, a trait of binary thinking, which I might be engaging in myself); can we say with certainty that all developing nations are more susceptible to dishonesty and corruption? And, besides, hasn't Korea joined the ranks of developed nations by now? Does the typical Korean vie for basic necessities and limited resources on a daily basis? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|