Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Obama a Coke-head?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Gamecock



Joined: 26 Nov 2003

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 6:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
So now the qualifications for being president are "willingness to listen" and "being articulate." Well, dang, then let's nominate Chris Rock, and he's funny to boot.

Obama's being bandied about (by Oprah and the rest of the sympathetic liberal media) for one reason only: he's black. If he were just another white guy with high hopes, he'd be, well, just another white guy with high hopes.

If Isaiah Thomas, the former Detroit Piston great, can say that Larry Bird wouldn't have gotten much notice if he had been black, then I sure as heck can make this claim about Obama.

And never trust Chicago politicos.


I usually like what Stevemcgarret has to say because he is intelligent and articulate in his arguments. But this is utter B.S. Has he ever heard Obama speak or know what he stands for?

In the last presidential election I was completely disillusioned with the political realm of my country. It embarrassed me that these two men were the best both parties could put up. Then Obama stood up at the DNC and gave a speech that brought tears to my eyes. He connected with everything I believed politicians should be (a true servant of the people, no more business as usual, etc.). And it wasn't just me he struck a chord with, but millions of Americans. I have followed his career since then and seen him consistently live out the values he preaches. I don't know if he is electable or not, but he is definitely a fresh wind in American politics, and not just another black face. Maybe his race is why Oprah jumped on the bandwagon, but that has nothing to do with him being a very good man in the midst of scoundrels.

Your argument sounds very partisan and Rush Limbaugh-ish. If you're the opposition, I must tear you down irrespective of the truth (i.e. the Chicago comment).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gamecock:

Stirring, emotional speeches does not necessarily a great politician make. Liberals love to cry, don't they? Maudlin to the max at their conventions. I'm not a Republican--they can be cheesy at times too--but an independent, so you can put those "vast right-wing conspiracy theories to rest." You sound like one of his exploratory committee members.

And one more thing: his character and judgment have NOT been put to the test, nor has he held higher office very long. He indeed might yet have a bright future in politics, but he needs to earn his wings.

SarcasmKills:

You obviously know NOTHING about Powell's family life judging by your most recent statement. I suggest before you opine again that you make an ounce of effort to get informed. Even in his bestselling autobiography he stressed the importance of his family and, contrary to what your cynicism commands you to believe, not every aspiring politician puts his own ambitions first. Incidentally, many cynics blathered similarly before Ferraro was placed as the first female VP nominee in 1984.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think Powell would have made an excellent president. I think he very well could have given Clinton a run for his money and possibly won in 1996. See Stephanopoulos's memoirs on just how concerned the Clintons and their advisors were on this point. They believed he was going to run and beat them.

I think Powell has walked away from politics once and for all, however.

I have watched and listened to Obama handle questions and articulate his positions. I have found him calm and articulate. Let me remind everyone that I have come to dislike the left by watching them hypocritically foam at the mouth and tear W. Bush apart just as they complained that "a vast right-wing conspiracy" was foaming at the mouth and tearing Clilnton apart during his administration. I find them mostly full of bile, dominated by petty hatreds, and knee-jerk, sneering anti-[insert a range of things here]. No self-control whatsoever. They remind me that I am mostly sick of official Washington.

However, I have seen none of this in Obama. He projects reason and confidence. I have seen him sincerely reach for consensus rather than embrace his own personal opinion on a range of issues. He just met with the President and talked about him dispassionately and without denoucning him or personalizing the issues. That is the kind of behavior in a politician that wins my support.

He has even spoken out against the Iraqi War without sounding like an antiwar hippie moonbat, and in a way that I can respect and even agree with...

Obama wrote:
I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars...You want a fight, President Bush? Let's finish the fight with Bin Laden and al-Qaeda, through effective, coordinated intelligence, and a shutting down of the financial networks that support terrorism, and a homeland security program that involves more than color-coded warnings.


Dammit, there is Realism in there.

(See the Wikipedia article on Obama for the cite)

And he has admitted to having a history of cocaine use? He has explained that this is in his past and he wants young people to understand that we need not be hung up on our mistakes in life? Good for him. Additional points in my book: credibility, forthrightness, and courage.

As far as I am concerned, McCain has my vote in 2008. But if the Democrats nominate Obama, I might just reconsider.

Ultimately my presidential vote will almost certainly go to the candidate who convinces me that she or he will go to the Oval Office and manage this country's business dispassionately and profesionally, work with good advisors and the legislature, do what she or he thinks is right, and leave any hard feelings or personal scores she or he has outside that door -- indeed, show no tolerance for anyone bringing such things into the White House. I can and will overlook all ideological differences if I trust them to do that...which necessarily excludes a certain ambitious, female, Democratic senator, by the way -- but that is another topic altogether.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gopher:

I agree with nearly everything you said. And what people like SarcasmKills forget or don't know is that many military leaders shy away from political office regardless of family circumstances. They are reluctant to get involved where the chain of command is lax and indecisive.

I would probably vote for McCain over any of the others currently in the running, including Obama.

He still sounds like a sound byte to me, especially his comments on the war which come right from the Democratic playbook, I'm afraid. Articulating the party line doesn't cut it for me. I'm not saying he's slick like Clinton but time will tell. His African immigrant roots certainly would work in his favor in dealing with the Third World.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gamecock



Joined: 26 Nov 2003

PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, the big difference between Obama and the rest of the Democrats "sound bytes" concerning the war is that Obama is one of the only people sitting in Washington who has not changed his stance on the war from the very beginning. When all the other dems endorsed the war for political expediency, he stood his ground and took the unpopular stand.

I, too, have always liked McCain and wished he would have been on the ticket previously. He has always been one to speak his mind and promote common sense even when it's not politically correct. I have been disappointed in the last couple of years, however, to see him back down on certain issues (i.e. torture is what the President says it is) and fall in line with the party...presumably to get their support in '98.

You are correct Steve, stirring speeches and emotion don't make a good leader. But I would rather hear a man speak from his values and stand by them then listen all the political double-talk that has dominated both parties for the last decade.

I don't believe in vast right-wing conspiracies, in fact I respect many members of the GOP. I don't respect when either side blindly condemns someone because they are "the enemy." And it seems obvious from your derisive statements that you hate liberals and Chicago politicians (huh???). I'd think an Independent would want to look at candidates as individuals.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mcgarrett: not a few Hollywood actors' and their (per usual) righteous endorsement of Obama nearly sank him in my eyes once-and-for-all. I was not open to hearing him or anything about him for that matter.

In my eyes, Hollywood's meddling in politics (which example do I begin with? Rolling Eyes ) is just as offensive and egregious as Washington's meddling in Hollywood (McCarthyism is the obvious example).

In any case, I chanced upon a few speeches and interviews. I have since deemed Obama not only impressive, but admirable and worthy to lead America in one capacity or another as well.

It is your call, but try to clear your head of all that you think you know about him and take another look...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 4:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gamecock wrote:
Actually, the big difference between Obama and the rest of the Democrats "sound bytes" concerning the war is that Obama is one of the only people sitting in Washington who has not changed his stance on the war from the very beginning. When all the other dems endorsed the war for political expediency, he stood his ground and took the unpopular stand.

.


Obama wasn't even in the Senate when the war began. He was elected in 2004 and his first vote there was on the confirmation of Rice (if I remember rightly) back in 2005.
By 2005 the war was quite unpopular and Obama was right on the bandwagon with the rest of them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gamecock:

I do vote occasionally as an independent for Democrats, but not those who proudly wear the "deer-in-the-headlights" facial expressions of bonafide liberals.

Truth be told, I'm fed up with both parties: we need a viable third party desperately to break the deadlock and petty infighting in Washington.

UrbanMyth:

The bandwagon is indeed what Obama has jumped on. And he would have been riding in the front had he been elected sooner. I don't trust the guy and, sorry to say (unlike Powell and Keyes) he'd place his racial issues front and center if elected. Well, on second thought, he'd be more subtle about it than some idiot racebaiter like Sharpton or Jackson.

He has potential but not the credentials in my book. He's too young, too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SarcasmKills



Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are straying away from my main point.

Powell NEVER had a legitimate chance to win the presidency, and neither does Obama... are they great men? perhaps. were/are they serious threats to win? Nope.

Putting family first is obviously the right thing to do, but you know what, I still believe that if he would have had a legitimate chance to win that he would've done what's best for his country, his people and his family... to not have taken that chance, when a legitimate chance is there, and after all he had accomplished in his career, would have been a disservice to everyone..

Would I like to see Obama win, sure, why not... but I'd also like the environment to be cared for more seriously, soldiers to stop having their pay and benefits cut and for cities to stray away on the dependency on cars... it's always nice to want things... then reality smacks you in the face..

I am not anti-Powell in any way... well, maybe some minor issues bother me about him, but I can say that about almost anyone...

P.S. I did read his bio.. and while I do genuinely believe that he is a family man, the fact that he stresses it so much throughout came across to me as presenting an excuse for his not taking a chance.. what flag-waving christian is going to bad mouth a man who stresses family values?

exactly.

He gets off the hook for not going through a hopeless drawn out campaign AND he gets to spend more time with his family.

Win-win. He's no dummy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gamecock



Joined: 26 Nov 2003

PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

triple post

Last edited by Gamecock on Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:03 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gamecock



Joined: 26 Nov 2003

PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

triple post

Last edited by Gamecock on Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:03 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gamecock



Joined: 26 Nov 2003

PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Obama wasn't even in the Senate when the war began. He was elected in 2004 and his first vote there was on the confirmation of Rice (if I remember rightly) back in 2005.
By 2005 the war was quite unpopular and Obama was right on the bandwagon with the rest of them.


Obama was on the campaign trail in 2003 speaking out against the war, at the time when everyone in Washington (Dems and Repubs alike) had already voted to send troops to Iraq the year before and were still standing behind that decision.

Quote:
I don't trust the guy and, sorry to say (unlike Powell and Keyes) he'd place his racial issues front and center if elected.


Again, you're showing your ignorance of this candidate. Did you really know ANYTHING about him before this thread? If you don't like him, that's your choice. But don't just make stuff up...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 8:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SarcasmKills:

Does anything of substance register with you? Powell's wife has suffered from depression for a very long time. His concern for his well-being predates the first Gulf War when he stepped onto the national stage. You need to read more than his bio to know that too. He is a career serviceman. Most military brass don't aspire to the White House. People like Wesley Clark are the exception. You'd know that if you'd grown up on military bases like I did.

Quote:
to not have taken that chance, when a legitimate chance is there, and after all he had accomplished in his career, would have been a disservice to everyone..


Powell didn't owe you, me, or country a da*mn thing. What are you going on about?

Gamecock:

I know who he associates with and that speaks volumes. No need for me to be presumptuous or engage in a rush to judgment. Really, you ought to work for his exploratory committee. Lick envelopes, anything. As the Colt 45 commercial said, he's got all the makings of just another "smooth operator" but I will grant him the benefit of the doubt.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gamecock



Joined: 26 Nov 2003

PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 8:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
As the Colt 45 commercial said, he's got all the makings of just another "smooth operator" but I will grant him the benefit of the doubt.


Haha. Maybe you're right. Time will tell. I will grant ya that he's a good public speaker, and he's no Texas "straight shooter."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 8:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SarcasmKills wrote:
Powell NEVER had a legitimate chance to win the presidency, and neither does Obama...


Sarcasm: do not be so sure of yourself. Who can say for sure?

And the Clinton Administration did not assume what you so confidently assert in 1996. Powell terrified them.

They wanted to find a way to award him a fifth star, ask him to stay on as JCS Chairman indefinitely -- anything to neutralize him politically in 1996.

They behaved as if they considered him their main threat. They ended up running against Dole: a guy half-dead already.

And yes, whoever is making the point about Powell's wife, her history with depression, and his concerns that political opponents would hit him (and her) there, I believe that is true also.


Last edited by Gopher on Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:30 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International