Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Vista Upgrades Require Presence of Old OS
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Technology Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rocklee



Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am relaxed, but there has been a number of threads complaining about Vista already, yet no one has any real experience with the platform, no screenshots, no feedbacks, nothing. Sounds like conclusions were drawn from mainly "professonal" tech writers.

I read one guy saying that first Gen DX10 cards will suck (how and why?) and that winFS is designed for the business crowd (in what way?) and that MS' naming scheme is terrible (how? 95,98,200,XP,Vista). Please elaborate rather than write like some troll on engadget.

Our winter programs will finish this week so I'll have more time to write on the other gaming thread (a lot of misinformation there too).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Demophobe



Joined: 17 May 2004

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rocklee wrote:
I am relaxed, but there has been a number of threads complaining about Vista already, yet no one has any real experience with the platform, no screenshots, no feedbacks, nothing. Sounds like conclusions were drawn from mainly "professonal" tech writers.

I read one guy saying that first Gen DX10 cards will suck (how and why?) and that winFS is designed for the business crowd (in what way?) and that MS' naming scheme is terrible (how? 95,98,200,XP,Vista). Please elaborate rather than write like some troll on engadget.

Our winter programs will finish this week so I'll have more time to write on the other gaming thread (a lot of misinformation there too).


Laughing

Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rocklee



Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here are some walkthroughs of setting up Vista :

http://www.engadget.com/photos/windows-vista-in-pictures/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wrench



Joined: 07 Apr 2005

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was quite aware that there are pre existing recorded demos floating on the net.

I meant actual on my PC demo of DX 10. Real hands on stuff not MS propaganda.

There is no noticable difference according to devs of Crysis between DX 9 and DX10 besides faster speed.

G8800 is an uncertainty because DX10 is not publicaly available neither is there DX10 demo. So we will have to wait untill Q3/2007 to see the diff between DX9/DX10 WinXP/Vista. Nvidia was shooting at a really good DX9 card and DX10 compatible card when they built G80 core. Sure the games will run in DX10 but will they run as good as current cards run DX9?

I remember the first gen DX9 cards and DX8 cards sucking big time compared to the 2nd iteration cards.

IE GF2/GF3/GF4/GF5
IE Radeon 7000/8500/9000/9800

WINFS

WinFS is a data storage and management system based on relational databases, developed by Microsoft and first demonstrated in 2003 as an advanced storage subsystem for the Microsoft Windows operating system.

When introduced at the 2003 Professional Developers Conference, WinFS was billed a pillar of the "Longhorn" wave of technologies, and would ship as part of the next version of Windows. It was subsequently decided that WinFS would ship after the release of Windows Vista, but those plans were shelved in June 2006, with some of its component technologies being integrated into upcoming releases of ADO.NET and Microsoft SQL Server[1]. While it was then assumed by observers that WinFS was done as a project, in November 2006 Steve Ballmer announced that WinFS was still in development, though it was not clear if the technology was planned for Vista's successor, Windows "Vienna", or if it would be made available as a separate product.[2]

WinFS is the code name of the system, and is short for Windows Future Storage.

Organizing the data that is in files by its relationships, as WinFS does, has various uses, including:
Integrated storage - One example scenario is the Integrated Storage Conception that helps to reuse data. This feature will be of great use for businesses, by allowing it to automatically aggregate data from different departments.
Full text search - A second possible scenario is a full-text search that works with items fields - the rich filters feature. By making use of the fact that any application's data files can be used by any other application, searches can be made to encompass the contents of the file as well, rather than just its attributes.
Advanced search and data aggregation - WinFS provides an opportunity to create rich and custom made search queries, such as to find “all persons whom I called last weekend”.
Data mining - WinFS can also give more information about data, by using data mining techniques and applying rules to the data, thus helping to uncover new information. This scenario is intended to use in development of expert systems.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WinFS

Are you telling me your going to use these features extensively?
WinFS was originaly designed with Business in mind. WinFS is just a fancy database running atop of NTFS, its there to help in searching for data. This is not a feature that most people would use at home unless they are serious power users. Anyway just use a Dekstop search engine, IE google, jeeves, yahoo, MSlive if you want this feature (its a psudo fix but its close enough) If you seriously think you need these feature then sir you are a much bigger power user then I. This is why WINFS was delayed until the release of VISTA Server.

I don't own a Mac although I would like to now. Seriously your telling me that Windows Vista sounds as Good as OSX Tiger/Leopard (They use the number to differentiate updates) I guess Apple has that allure of simplicity in its presentation of their products. Just look at the packaging of of their OS. I liked Windows 2000 Profesional name a lot I still use it to this day why? Cause it looks serious, like its for profesionals. Hell my Windows XP looks like Windows 2000.





I am not complaining about Vista I am saying that its really not worth the upgrade AS OF NOW. Maybe 6 months down the road when the hardware is there. Also things like HDCP DRM want to make me not want to buy it either I spent 500 dollars on a nice monitor I don't feel like buying a new one right now either.. Most people will upgrade to Vista when they get new hardware. I use to be IT I know having the latest and greatest is awsome feels good but its plain stupid. I rather buy some stocks or bonds/mutual funds that I know that will make me money and not loose it.

Plus I forgot to mention Maya 6 doesn't work worth shit in Vista. (I got at discount for 1.5k) Hmm OS for 400 bucks or brand new Maya at 6k(edit price went up to 7k). No thanks.


Last edited by Wrench on Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:49 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wrench



Joined: 07 Apr 2005

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rocklee wrote:
Here are some walkthroughs of setting up Vista :

http://www.engadget.com/photos/windows-vista-in-pictures/


So what about these pictures what exactly am I supposed to get excited about?

I know what vista is like I ran it for about 3 months in the Beta program, it was nice to look at but it didn't really offer any substential improvements over Windows XP plus it killed the battery on my laptop rather quickly. I did like the DVD maker. Still not willing to shell out 400 bucks for it tho.

And talk about an Engadget troll Razz

If you think other wise of my comments I am not going disagree or get angry but can you tell me of any real engaging enhancments? I would like to know what you think the Pros of Vista are?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SuperHero



Joined: 10 Dec 2003
Location: Superhero Hideout

PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wrench wrote:
So what about these pictures what exactly am I supposed to get excited about?

I know what vista is like I ran it for about 3 months in the Beta program, it was nice to look at but it didn't really offer any substential improvements

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Demophobe



Joined: 17 May 2004

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Peeping Tom



Joined: 15 Feb 2006

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:27 am    Post subject: Re: Vista Upgrades Require Presence of Old OS Reply with quote

SuperHero wrote:
Vista Upgrades Require Presence of Old OS

Quote:
"Ars Technica is reporting that upgrade versions of Windows Vista Home Basic, Premium, and Starter Edition cannot be installed on a PC unless Windows XP or Windows 2000 is already installed. This is a change from previous versions of Windows, which only required a valid license key. This change has the potential to make disaster recovery very tedious. The article says: 'For its part, Microsoft seems to be confident that the Vista repair process should be sufficient to solve any problems with the OS, since otherwise the only option for disaster recovery in the absence of backups would be to wipe a machine, install XP, and then upgrade to Vista. This will certainly make disaster recovery a more irritating experience.'"


What a pain in the ass if you want to do a fresh install; first you have to install your old obselete o/s and then vista? Thankfully I won't have that problem as I'll be buying a standard oem version. I was pretty sure upgrading from pirate xp wouldn't go over very well.


Well, it is an "upgrade." You can buy the full version and not worry about that if you want, but otherwise how would the software know if you really owned a previous version or not.

Actually, I have a Windows XP upgrade that requires a previous version to be installed, so I'm not sure what that article is talking about.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Demophobe



Joined: 17 May 2004

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


.
.
.
.
.

Or perhaps....

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Demophobe



Joined: 17 May 2004

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:38 am    Post subject: Re: Vista Upgrades Require Presence of Old OS Reply with quote

Peeping Tom wrote:

Well, it is an "upgrade." You can buy the full version and not worry about that if you want, but otherwise how would the software know if you really owned a previous version or not.

Actually, I have a Windows XP upgrade that requires a previous version to be installed, so I'm not sure what that article is talking about.


No, you don't. You have an upgrade copy that asks for the previous version CD to be inserted in the CD-ROM for a moment. The article in the OP talks of a complete installation of a previous version to be present.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SuperHero



Joined: 10 Dec 2003
Location: Superhero Hideout

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Demophobe wrote:


I like it, but it belongs in this thread.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cubanlord



Joined: 08 Jul 2005
Location: In Japan!

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Demophobe wrote:


hahahhahahaha Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Demophobe



Joined: 17 May 2004

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Done like dinner....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SuperHero



Joined: 10 Dec 2003
Location: Superhero Hideout

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:18 am    Post subject: Re: Vista Upgrades Require Presence of Old OS Reply with quote

Demophobe wrote:
Peeping Tom wrote:

Well, it is an "upgrade." You can buy the full version and not worry about that if you want, but otherwise how would the software know if you really owned a previous version or not.

Actually, I have a Windows XP upgrade that requires a previous version to be installed, so I'm not sure what that article is talking about.


No, you don't. You have an upgrade copy that asks for the previous version CD to be inserted in the CD-ROM for a moment. The article in the OP talks of a complete installation of a previous version to be present.

Demophobe is correct. Read this to understand.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Demophobe



Joined: 17 May 2004

PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you use the upgrade edition over your legit copy of XP, you lose the XP license. Yep....there's no turning back...be darn sure you want Vista.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Technology Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International