Korean Job Discussion Forums

[sundubuman]

[Sincinnatislink]

If you read the article, it's pretty straightforward that his speech is tailored to this specific end.
His ratings are faltering. That's a matter of public record. When you are unpopular, you go places where you will be warmly received and say popular things.

Bush has nothing to do with these policies. The Republican party is cutting its losses and reminding people that a lot of people have jobs.
You are mistaking a person for a party. After Bush is out, he will still be associated with the Republican party. That is what is making "him" care about polls. The Republicans need to cut their losses and make themselves look better.
I'm sorry, but you're just stupid if you really don't see that.
I'm not criticizing the Republicans' approach, I'm describing it. It is a perfectly reasonable thing to do, and I agree with the New York Times on this, although I still think they are a shitty newspaper for other reasons.

[Sincinnatislink]

I'd still like to hear you leave the realm of ad hominem.

[sundubuman]

I'd like to hear your plans for grad school. That's the plan right?

[Sincinnatislink]

[Sincinnatislink]

[sundubuman]

well then,

why not a phd in linguistics?

maybe you are the next Noam Chomsky waiting in the wings.

the ivory tower is so cozy isn't it??? it even has branches that extend to places like the New York Times....where you can posit your theories as news.

what fun fighting the facists!


woo hoo!

[sundubuman]

and my previous post was in response to your linguistic.punctuation focused post

1) Only in the sense that any language use is "editorializing." The instruction manual for you DVD player editorializes. I explained above that that yes, the Republican party, via Bush, is clearly shifting public focus to the economy from foreign policy. I do not criticize that, but it is what they are doing. And it takes about ten seconds of following the news to see that.

2) Your three question marks at the end of every post serves mostly to make you look ridiculous. Keep doing it if you will, but it makes it more difficult to take you seriously.

seems like a phd in linguistics might be ideal. seriously. why get messy and live in the real world.

[Sincinnatislink]

You're still saying bad things about a hypothetical person you've constructed.
I'm not going to start insulting you back.

Now please, respond to my assessment of the situation.

[sundubuman]

I offer suggestions,
why not a phd in linguistics

you give me commands....
Now please, respond to my assessment of the situation.

right versus left in a capsule.

I suggest you stop commanding people (which is tough for leftists, I know)

end of thread.

[bucheon bum]

meaning you cannot come up with any legitimate response. He's actually trying to make you think.

Someone on dave's has a a great quote from Mahfouz in their sig. It is something along the lines of, "You can tell a person is clever by his answer but you can tell how intelligent a person is by his questions."

[Ya-ta Boy]

[gang ah jee]

[ddeubel]

I just read this whole thread while enjoying my strong french roast coffee.

Enjoyable and entertaining -- like Ali vs Tyson.

I've nothing to add of substance to this thread.
It's all been said.
Except for who'll be on the mat in the fifth.
Blue, white or RED.

DD

[desultude]

Yes, those "facist jornalists" sure are a problem.

Why can't some English teachers spell?

And the author of the bad spelling is taking someone else to task for having too much education. Methinks SDBM could use a bit of schooling himself.