Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

How many have learned Hangul by self study and how useful?
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ghost



Joined: 06 Dec 2006
Location: Many congenial places

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:29 pm    Post subject: How many have learned Hangul by self study and how useful? Reply with quote

Hi folks,

When ghost spent 8 months in Taiwan in 2005-2006 it learned Mandarin at one of the local Universities, but quickly came to realize that learning Chinese Mandarin characters would take years of actual study to get to any decent/meaningful level. And ghost found the prospect of learning 3000 characters in isolation rather daunting.....it meant spending 2-3 hours per night just writing down Chinese characters ad infinitum.....or close......some people can and are able and willing to learn like that....not ghost!

For that reason, ghost decided to opt out of learning characters and just concentrated on Pinyin Chinese (romanized script) and conversation (using Pinyin as a reading guide, even though 'bopa mofa' is more common in Taiwan). In the class in which ghost was studying, it quickly acquired much more ability to speak in Mandarin in class and out, compared with the students who tenaciously opted for the 'slow track' memorization of characters method.

Everyone says Hangul is easy to master, but how true is that, and what have your experiences been learning Hangul, and how much has it helped you in your daily life in Korea? And is learning Hangul as easy as is claimed? And, last of all, has anyone actually just learned Korean conversation with romanized script and forgot about learning Hangul?

Thanks for any feedback you may have.

Ghost, certified ESL/FSL teacher, French Montreal school board
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jazblanc77



Joined: 22 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jazblanc77 learned hangul and was okay at it after a couple of days for the purposes of reading menus, traffic signs, and shop names. According to jazblanc77, it is very useful and will improve your quality of life, even if it just means being able to tell what TV show is playing at any given time, reading labels at the supermarket, or being able to make better landmarks while you are around town.

Jazblanc77 was just thinking that it might be considered annoying when people like jazblanc77 and ghost speak in the third person? Perhaps that is the point though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hyeon Een



Joined: 24 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hangul can be learned in an afternoon. One of my friends learned it on his flight over to Korea. It is easy.

I will qualify that statement though because most people dont'. It will take you a considerable amount of time to learn to read it well rather than just have an ability to recognise the "symbols" and put them together. To read at a decent pace will take a few weeks of practice.

Learning Hangul is way way way easier than learning Chinese characters. It's an 'alphabet' rather than a system of symbols. Just learning to read is not a big obstacle. You will meet a few weird foreigners who've been here a few years who've never managed to learn how to read, but they are a minority. They're probably dumb ignorant fools who complain about Korea every 2 seconds as well, ignore them.

As with regards to learning spoken Korean.... it is difficult. I've never studied spoken Chinese but I've met more than a few people who've said it's easier than spoken Korean. Personally I could not imagine learning spoken Korean without the written language.. once you have the 'alphabet' down it makes so many things so much clearer.

Learning spoken Korean is MUCH easier if you understand the written language (approximately a billion times easier). It is hard to get the pronounciation right as a beginner (or an intermediate, or..) and having something written down will make things so much clearer very often. Even native speakers of Korean "write" in the air with their fingers to clarify a name.

In conclusion (1) LEARN HANGUL, it won't take long to get the basics down, 'speed reading' might take a while though (2) Then consider the spoken language. I firmly believe that if you can't read the written language you will have BIG problems with the spoken language. It REALLY REALLY helps the speaking if you can read first.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ghost



Joined: 06 Dec 2006
Location: Many congenial places

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:34 pm    Post subject: Speaking versus reading Reply with quote

Learning to speak has always come easier to ghost compared with learning to read....and this is the way children learn....yes...we are not children, but we can learn a lot from them (their uninhibited way of learning to speak including asking silly "questions" and repeating the same things ad nauseum).

Your point is well taken....that learning Hangul will help in learning to speak.

One is interested in knowing why you feel Korean is a more difficult language to master compared with Chinese/Mandarin, which ghost has learned to a passable conversational level (in Taiwan), using just Pinyin (romanized characters) and conversation?

Ghost, certified ESL/FSL teacher, French Montreal school board
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hyeon Een



Joined: 24 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:50 pm    Post subject: Re: Speaking versus reading Reply with quote

ghost wrote:
Learning to speak has always come easier to ghost compared with learning to read....
One is interested in knowing why you feel Korean is a more difficult language to master compared with Chinese/Mandarin, which ghost has learned to a passable conversational level


With regards to Chinese: I'm NOT speaking from personal experience; I've just met a couple of engineer types who've worked in both Korea and China and found Korean more problematic. My advice in that regard should be taken with a huge grain of salt.

With regards to straight up Korean though, LEARN HANGUL. It will take you about as much time to learn an acceptable romanization as it will to learn the Korean alphabet. Learning Hangul will take less time than learning Pinyin. Also there are no books which teach you spoken Korean in a romanized English (well, there might be some, but if there are I bet they're crap). If you just want to learn super basic stuff then you can learn it all on this board (Start a thread saying: The ghost wants to know how to order a beer)

In terms of learning the written language it is NOT like Chinese. Written Korean is easy to learn and will help you a huge amount when you want to learn how to speak. You mentioned studying 3hrs a day every day to learn Chinese characters.. you can learn the Korean alphabet in ONE day, straight up, if you spend 3 hours.

Having spent a bit of time learning Korean I can't imagine learning it without the written language. I very frequently ask someone to write it down when I learn something new.. I find it VERY hard to get the pronounciation right if I don't see it written in Hangul first.

Korean is a language that lends itself to learning the spoken and written at the same time. Unless you want to have terrible pronounciation. Which you don't want to do because no one will understand you if your pronounciation isn't 'spot on' .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ghost



Joined: 06 Dec 2006
Location: Many congenial places

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:23 pm    Post subject: response Reply with quote

Quote:
Korean is a language that lends itself to learning the spoken and written at the same time. Unless you want to have terrible pronounciation. Which you don't want to do because no one will understand you if your pronounciation isn't 'spot on' .


This is interesting....and the same with Mandarin.....most foreigners have a real hard time making themselves understood in Mandarin, because they (the foreigners) are unable to master the tones in Mandarin/Chinese, and if you do not pronounce the tones correctly your Chinese/Taiwanese interlocuters will simply not understand you! Been there, experienced this!

Now with Korean, which is not (to ghost's knowledge) a 'tonal' language, why would it not be possible to master conversation by simply listenting and speaking a lot?

Yes, of course, the Korean grammar system is much more complex compared with Chinese grammar (very easy, because the verbs always stay in their original form...) but ghost learned good level conversational Turkish using mostly a conversational approach....and of course one can read Turkish because they have used romanized script since Kemal Ataturk changed the former arab script in use.

Ghost, certified ESL/FSL teacher, Montreal French school board
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hyeon Een



Joined: 24 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:33 pm    Post subject: Re: response Reply with quote

ghost wrote:
[why would it not be possible to master conversation by simply listenting and speaking a lot?


Maybe it is possible. I suspect that that is how the 3D workers learn it. I've not noticed any English teacher learn it that way though (beyond bar flirting talk). Good luck with that though.. if you succeed I'll be jolly impressed. I hope the Ghost will relay that information here if it works for him. Most people who speak Korean well here have put in a lot of book time. Perhaps the Ghost will be an exception.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gang ah jee



Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Location: city of paper

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:36 pm    Post subject: Re: response Reply with quote

ghost wrote:
Ghost, certified ESL/FSL teacher, Montreal French school board

Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ghost



Joined: 06 Dec 2006
Location: Many congenial places

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:50 pm    Post subject: the research says.... Reply with quote

Quote:
Maybe it is possible. I suspect that that is how the 3D workers learn it. I've not noticed any English teacher learn it that way though (beyond bar flirting talk). Good luck with that though.. if you succeed I'll be jolly impressed. I hope the Ghost will relay that information here if it works for him. Most people who speak Korean well here have put in a lot of book time. Perhaps the Ghost will be an exception.


There is a lot of research out there dealing with language acquisition with reference to acquiring/learning foreign languages...and learning and acquiring do not necessarily go hand in hand.

Most of the research on view points to the most effective way of learning languages to be one in which comprehensible spoken input is first acquired through a process of frequent contact with the new spoken language, with a start at a very low difficulty level and then increasing gradually.

Ghost noticed in Taiwan that most foreign students of Mandarin spent years (yes years!) of study memorizing chinese characters....and even then after two or so years their spoken Chinese was still pretty poor compared with people like the Mormons who used a total conversation input method of learning in their training and then once 'on the job' on the Island.

Ghost also noticed that the attrition rate for people learning Mandarin was extremely high for those learning using the memorization of characters system....easily understandable...because let's be honest about it...spending 1-3 hours per night writing out Chinese characters can be a challenge no matter how motivated and assiduous the student in question.

Ghost has learned quite a few languages in its time....with fluency in 6 (Eng., Fr., Ger., Sp., Ital., Port.,) and conversational ability in 3 others (Mandarin, Turkish, Tagalog)....and has always used the same method.....usually getting massive doses of 'baby talk' input, followed by a more formal approach.

But one has to take into account that there are different learning styles, and this approach might suit some, but not all.

Ghost, certified ESL/FSL teacher, Montreal French school board
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
gang ah jee



Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Location: city of paper

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:28 pm    Post subject: Re: the research says.... Reply with quote

ghost wrote:
Most of the research on view points to the most effective way of learning languages to be one in which comprehensible spoken input is first acquired through a process of frequent contact with the new spoken language, with a start at a very low difficulty level and then increasing gradually.

Some obvious points - Krashen's input hypothesis failed, much of the research you're presumably citing was conducted between languages that have a great deal of cognate vocabulary and grammar, and without regular language classes you're extremely unlikely to actually get very much comprehensible spoken input at all.

Perhaps you will be able to learn a certain level of Korean without studying Korean grammar, but I'd be very surprised if you managed to get past basic survival phrases. Also, if you never study hangul your pronunciation will suffer - knowledge of hangul is very important for understanding the sound change rules.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
NAVFC



Joined: 10 May 2006

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:26 pm    Post subject: Re: How many have learned Hangul by self study and how usefu Reply with quote

ghost wrote:
Hi folks,

When ghost spent 8 months in Taiwan in 2005-2006 it learned Mandarin at one of the local Universities, but quickly came to realize that learning Chinese Mandarin characters would take years of actual study to get to any decent/meaningful level. And ghost found the prospect of learning 3000 characters in isolation rather daunting.....it meant spending 2-3 hours per night just writing down Chinese characters ad infinitum.....or close......some people can and are able and willing to learn like that....not ghost!

For that reason, ghost decided to opt out of learning characters and just concentrated on Pinyin Chinese (romanized script) and conversation (using Pinyin as a reading guide, even though 'bopa mofa' is more common in Taiwan). In the class in which ghost was studying, it quickly acquired much more ability to speak in Mandarin in class and out, compared with the students who tenaciously opted for the 'slow track' memorization of characters method.

Everyone says Hangul is easy to master, but how true is that, and what have your experiences been learning Hangul, and how much has it helped you in your daily life in Korea? And is learning Hangul as easy as is claimed? And, last of all, has anyone actually just learned Korean conversation with romanized script and forgot about learning Hangul?

Thanks for any feedback you may have.

Ghost, certified ESL/FSL teacher, French Montreal school board


why the heck do you refer to yourself in the 3rd person?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
SirFink



Joined: 05 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hangeul is easy. I figured out about half of it in my first few days here. A day of actual study and you'll have it down. It's helpful in that there's so much Konglish here. Have a headache? Look for that box of "Ah-Suh-Pee-Leen."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SPINOZA



Joined: 10 Jun 2005
Location: $eoul

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

His Majesty SPIN, Commander of man and beast, advocates the following:

1. Buy these books: 'Survival Korean' and 'Korean Made Easy. The latter is good for phrases, the former is good for verb conjugations. Both teach Hanguel.

2. Type "Korean verbs" into a search engine. You'll quickly learn lots of verbs and will be able to conjugate them in a variety of ways.

3. Instead of asking about Hanguel, give it a try yourself. It ought to be obvious that it's extremely useful if Ghost sees himself as having something of a long-term future here. The better you are at Korean, the better you are as a person. If you suck at Korean, YOU suck, so better get studying!

4. Use dictionaries such as this: http://endic.naver.com/ and type stuff in that interests you and try to memorize it.

5. Definitely, definitely learn Hanguel. Romanization of Korean sucks more than everything else that sucks combined multiplied by 50. For example, the letter ㅓ is romanized as "eo" or "u" despite sounding nothing whatsoever like either.

6. Koreans suck at English. A recent study found that they are genetically incapable of seeing any distinction between 'fun' and 'funny', 'bored' and 'boring' and also cannot produce sounds as simple as 'th', 'f', 'z', 'r'....despite years of study in many cases! My point is....if you want Korean friends, girlfriends and so forth, some ability in Korean is essential.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NAVFC



Joined: 10 May 2006

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="SPINOZA"]His Majesty SPIN, Commander of man and beast, advocates the following:

1. Buy these books: 'Survival Korean' and 'Korean Made Easy. The latter is good for phrases, the former is good for verb conjugations. Both teach Hanguel.

2. Type "Korean verbs" into a search engine. You'll quickly learn lots of verbs and will be able to conjugate them in a variety of ways.

3. Instead of asking about Hanguel, give it a try yourself. It ought to be obvious that it's extremely useful if Ghost sees himself as having something of a long-term future here. The better you are at Korean, the better you are as a person. If you suck at Korean, YOU suck, so better get studying!

4. Use dictionaries such as this: http://endic.naver.com/ and type stuff in that interests you and try to memorize it.

5. Definitely, definitely learn Hanguel. Romanization of Korean sucks more than everything else that sucks combined multiplied by 50. For example, the letter ㅓ is romanized as "eo" or "u" despite sounding nothing whatsoever like either.

6. Koreans suck at English. A recent study found that they are genetically incapable of seeing any distinction between 'fun' and 'funny', 'bored' and 'boring' and also cannot produce sounds as simple as 'th', 'f', 'z', 'r'....despite years of study in many cases! My point is....if you want Korean friends, girlfriends and so forth, some ability in Korean is essential.[/quotI am throwing out the BS flag on #6. Ive known quite a few who can pronounce those syllables fairly accurately.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
jinju



Joined: 22 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

can you memorize 24 or so characters?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International