View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
braunshade
Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Location: Somewhere better!
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:59 am Post subject: Where in the USA or Canada can you live w/o a car? |
|
|
I am putting a list together of cities in North America where one can live comfortably with out relying on a car.
San Francisco
NYC
Boston
Vancouver?
Others? Show me your list! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kim Jong Jordan

Joined: 13 Mar 2004 Location: The Internet
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Guelph, Ontario |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kimchi story

Joined: 23 Nov 2006
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Victoria, BC. I HATE being in Vancouver without a car. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
J.B. Clamence

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chicago |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zappadelta

Joined: 31 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would say nowhere. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
krats1976

Joined: 14 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pretty much anywhere with a mass transit system. ... Which means pretty much anywhere. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Son Deureo!
Joined: 30 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Seattle has a really good bus system and you can even strap your bicycle to the front of their buses. They might even actually expand the monorail some day like the voters have been voting for the city to do in referendums for years.
Too bad about the 8 months of clouds and rain, though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ChopChaeJoe
Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Defintely NOT Houston, Texas, but you'll do allright in Austin, Texas ( a 100x better town anyways) if you can afford 20-40 bucks American a week in taxis. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
djsmnc

Joined: 20 Jan 2003 Location: Dave's ESL Cafe
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
krats1976 wrote: |
Pretty much anywhere with a mass transit system. ... Which means pretty much anywhere. |
Really? Like Wyoming, South Dakota, and Montana? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Son Deureo! wrote: |
Seattle has a really good bus system and you can even strap your bicycle to the front of their buses. They might even actually expand the monorail some day like the voters have been voting for the city to do in referendums for years.
Too bad about the 8 months of clouds and rain, though. |
It ain't so bad. Better than mountains of snow and 5 months of winter like we get in Canada. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
seoul_nhl

Joined: 18 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
montreal |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
slow_life

Joined: 29 Dec 2006 Location: here
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Manhattan
downtown Minneapolis |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Svetlana

Joined: 22 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I spent some time in Toronto, and it seemed quote nice. Transit was good and they had a fast metro. If you live in the city (not suburbs) you could easily live without a car. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Demophobe

Joined: 17 May 2004
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Moose Jaw. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sincinnatislink

Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Location: Top secret.
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
krats1976 wrote: |
Pretty much anywhere with a mass transit system. ... Which means pretty much anywhere. |
No. Mass transit does not mean reliable mass transit, or even adequate mass transit.
Cincinnati has not updated their bus routes significantly since the mid seventies. That and figure in that several places refuse to have stops in their neighborhoods, and you have a mess. The refusals for stops are generally to "keep out the urban element," so if you live in the area where it makes the most sense to not have a car, you're fucked. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|