|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jajdude
Joined: 18 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:47 am Post subject: Opinions presented as facts |
|
|
This is something I've thought about lately. It could be something to do with the way we were taught to write in school. Was it high school or uni where we were told to avoid using "I" in papers? I don't recall. Instead we were told to present things in a so-called objective manner. What a bunch of nonsense.
"The way the writer presents his arguments leaves the reader to wonder at his cleverness..." blah blah blah
vs
"I thought the writer was clever"
Which is a better and more accurate statement?
The first was the way I was told to write in school, Eng Lit major. Avoid "I" for some reason. UGH.
One of the most important things had been left out: telling facts from opinions.
Throughout this board and everywhere, really, we have the same. People saying things as though these things were facts. Separating them is the critical skill we must have. Otherwise we are lost. It's easy to forget in the arrogance we have all learned so well, of how important intellect and being correct is, that our opinions are not facts.
Hey, let's be careful. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Qinella
Joined: 25 Feb 2005 Location: the crib
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
For formal writing, I prefer the writer avoid the first person in most cases. However, I can't think of any logical reason to support this. Maybe because the focus should be on the subject rather than the writer. For informal writing, such as here on the Internet, I like first person.
About your complaint, though, I just cannot empathize with you at all. If someone says something like "Canadians are tired of always being mistaken as maple syrup canisters by sticky-fingered Koreans" and you cannot distinguish that this is a reflection of a personal opinion rather than a tested fact, well.. I can't blame the writer.
Also, I think you are ascribing a writing habit to most people on here where it probably does not exist. I used to work as a copy editor for a daily (college) newspaper, and I can tell you that most people are absolute sade at writing. And these are people who want to be writers. Not everyone is aware of and consciously practicing habits such as avoiding "I", "is", and copious adjectives. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jajdude
Joined: 18 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Q, look carefully, many if not most posts here, and many things people say are full of opinions presents as 'facts' because people want support in their beliefs. We are all guilty.
It is wrong
Korea is soft
this is how it is..
too many to mention really |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TECO

Joined: 20 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good point. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cheonmunka

Joined: 04 Jun 2004
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
These two cultivated writers, neigh, artists presenting us their arguments quite definitively (within the confines of this genre) have thoughtfully given me, while processing the previous episodes, a provocation to write a lot of twadwallap maself.
(And that took four edits!)
Last edited by Cheonmunka on Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:35 am; edited 5 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Qinella
Joined: 25 Feb 2005 Location: the crib
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
jajdude wrote: |
Q, look carefully, many if not most posts here, and many things people say are full of opinions presents as 'facts' because people want support in their beliefs. We are all guilty.
It is wrong
Korea is soft
this is how it is..
too many to mention really |
Right but it's a little obvious that these are opinions, don't you think? Let's look at your post. You said that we are all guilty. I don't believe that's a fact. Instead, I believe it's your own point of view.
You're being presumptuous by guessing people's motives, as well as contradicting what you said in the OP. First, you said people are trying to avoid the first person pronoun because of learned writing habits. Now you're saying they're withholding the word in a move to garner support. Is it both? How do you know? Maybe this is just your opinion, but you're stating it like it's a fact.
You also said that it takes critical reasoning skills to "separate them", lest we become lost. That's unreasonable (in my opinion ). When someone says that Korea is soft or that something is wrong, every thinking person knows s/he can disagree.
Qualifying opinions with "I think" or "imo" is largely a redundant procedure, and is generally done in an attempt to soften the impact of a strong opinion. Iow, it helps to fill the void created by emotionless Internet communication. It's a crutch, a tool provided for bad readers.
Now, I will say that if this thread had gone in the direction of analyzing the avoidance of self-reference, it would be more interesting. But if you are just saying that people should clarify when they are stating an opinion, I'm afraid you aren't making much of a point. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:51 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
On the one hand, avoiding I seems to make arguments sound more universal and powerful.
On the other, it does, in some sense, seem to be disingenuous.
However, I don't necessarily think avoiding the first person means one is "presenting opinions as fact".
For example, if I'm reviewing a movie, I might say "The acting is sub-par" rather than "I didn't like the acting". In this case, given that it's a movie review, I think it's clear that I'm offering an opinion.
It gets more dangerous when you deal with more charged or controversial topics. For, example, if I say "America is fundamentally benign" or, on balance, "America went into Iraq for oil", it may not be clear whether a fact or an opinion is being offered. Moreover, the person making such a statement may themselves be confused as to what they are presenting. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just presume that unless someone is refering to statistical research or provable historical fact they are presenting an opinion... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kimchi story

Joined: 23 Nov 2006
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just assume that, unless my name is referenced in the works cited, the writer is presenting an opinion. ㅋㅋㅋ
Seriously jajdude, you raise a good point. And I don't think the use of passive voice and its elided subject is usually done by accident or unconciously - hence the value of the reminder that the singular of data is not anecdote.
Now, let me tell ya... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
krats1976

Joined: 14 May 2003
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:38 pm Post subject: Re: Opinions presented as facts |
|
|
jajdude wrote: |
... Separating them is the critical skill we must have. Otherwise we are lost... |
Which is why lessons on learning how to tell the difference between fact & opinion are in all four of my social studies/language arts text books.
As you say... it's a skill. People trying to pass off opinion as fact isn't going away, so people need to learn how to differentiate between the two. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
venus
Joined: 25 Oct 2006 Location: Near Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
"The way the writer presents his arguments leaves the reader to wonder at his cleverness..." blah blah blah
vs
"I thought the writer was clever" |
Don't you think they both say the same thing. To say "The writer presents a clever argument... etc' rather than 'I think the writer's arguement is clever.' Is still YOUR opinion. Just because you negate the 'I' and hide behind 'The writer leaves the reader' to suggest objectivity and that you are presenting the opinions of some imaginary others or readers other than yourself is a mere, flimsy masquerade.
The issue here is not actually that one is stating opinion as facts and the other isn't. That would be making an assertion without following on with a rational argument to back up that opinion. However, not using the 'I think' does come accross better, but it's really a matter of form rather than function.
See what I mean?
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SPINOZA
Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Location: $eoul
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
"The way the writer presents his arguments leaves the reader to wonder at his cleverness..." blah blah blah
vs
"I thought the writer was clever"
|
That's just academia for you. It isn't an attempt to pass off an opinion that, basically, the writer was clever as fact. Clearly it's subjective. In academia, even though both the above sentences logically entail the same thing, the former of the two would be less likely to be scrutinized. The latter is a middle school sentence, whereas the former contains greater powers of expression and this ought to be encouraged. Considering the subject matter - critical analysis of some piece of writing - it's difficult to see how there can be any factual discourse anyway and presumably the writer is aware that the former, more expressive of these sentences is not an objective fact. In any case, both sentences won't score points alone. Both sentences require justification and if "I think the writer was clever"'s justification is good, defensible, evidenced and the other waffly and bluffing its way through battle with verbosity, "I think...." may well end up part of the better paper.
"Soccer is the best game in the world" is subjective. "Soccer is the most popular game in the world" is either true or false, a fact or not a fact. "Mars is the most interesting planet in the Solar System" is subjective. "Mars is the most Earth-like planet in the Solar System" is objective. My method of logical analysis reveals that it depends whether the concepts used by a writer are capable of truth or falsehood in order to determine whether they are passing opinion off as fact.
Last edited by SPINOZA on Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:01 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gang ah jee

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Location: city of paper
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:51 pm Post subject: Re: Opinions presented as facts |
|
|
jajdude wrote: |
"The way the writer presents his arguments leaves the reader to wonder at his cleverness..." blah blah blah
vs
"I thought the writer was clever" |
The first sentence presupposes the fact that the writer is clever. This is a very well established rhetorical device in both law and the humanities where the primary purpose of discourse is to convince. However, that kind of presupposition is, to my understanding, not acceptable in the social sciences and sciences where such overt persuasive rhetoric is frowned upon.
Does this matter for presenting opinions on the board? Well, we're all well-educated world travellers, right? We don't need any particular protection against undergraduate rhetorical devices, do we? No, I didn't think so. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
venus
Joined: 25 Oct 2006 Location: Near Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Does this matter for presenting opinions on the board?
Perhaps in current events...?
Or discussing said social Humanities / Siences issues...
Surely not for Korean Table Manners or porn star names though... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jajdude
Joined: 18 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
It does matter, because it is everywhere. Have a listen, or read almost anything. Of course it would be tedious to always say or write, "in my opinion" or "I think that.."
People are forever spouting their views, clothed in the dress of fact, assuming many will concur, but it is still nakedly narrow, an opinion. Politicians get elected this way.
Still we are left with the enormous field of opinions presented as facts. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|