|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
EFLtrainer
Joined: 04 May 2005
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:43 pm Post subject: Bush Hands NK Nukes |
 |
|
As introduced on a blog. One can quibble with the characterization, but the general point is accurate: Bush, et. al., confronted NK giving it an excuse (by breaking the agreement) to abandoned the Framework.
US pulled out... still got pregnant.
The full original story:
From the Times
So.... thanks to the Bush Cadre, NK now has nukes.
Way to go, Dumbya. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Maybe, but what you fail to acknowldge is the fact that even with the AF in place NK was still actively pursuing nukes. NK would have gotten them anyway because the basci truth is that NK DOESNT HONOR AGREEMENTS. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NAVFC
Joined: 10 May 2006
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:46 pm Post subject: Re: Bush Hands NK Nukes |
|
|
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
As introduced on a blog. One can quibble with the characterization, but the general point is accurate: Bush, et. al., confronted NK giving it an excuse (by breaking the agreement) to abandoned the Framework.
US pulled out... still got pregnant.
The full original story:
From the Times
So.... thanks to the Bush Cadre, NK now has nukes.
Way to go, Dumbya. |
This is BS. And if Bush had attacked NK and prevented such you would have blamed him for the 2nd Koreanw ar too. Damned if you do, dmaned if you dont. Bush goes to war in iraq, you slam him, diplomacy in Korea, slam him. Nothing is ever good enough for you liberals.
Also what Jinju said is also correct. at the time of the AF NK began almost instnatly on it's uranium program since we knew about the Plutonium one but notn the Uranium. They were never going to honor there deal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:48 pm Post subject: Re: Bush Hands NK Nukes |
|
|
| NAVFC wrote: |
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
As introduced on a blog. One can quibble with the characterization, but the general point is accurate: Bush, et. al., confronted NK giving it an excuse (by breaking the agreement) to abandoned the Framework.
US pulled out... still got pregnant.
The full original story:
From the Times
So.... thanks to the Bush Cadre, NK now has nukes.
Way to go, Dumbya. |
This is BS. And if Bush had attacked NK and prevented such you would have blamed him for the 2nd Koreanw ar too. Damned if you do, dmaned if you dont. Bush goes to war in iraq, you slam him, diplomacy in Korea, slam him. Nothing is ever good enough for you liberals. |
The worst thing about these limp writed libs is that they pretend to care about humanity, human rights, what is good but they ALWAYS, without fail make excuses for real evil and blame someone else. Bush may not be perfect, but who is really evil here, Washington or Pyongyang? Why do libs always side with evil? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NAVFC
Joined: 10 May 2006
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:51 pm Post subject: Re: Bush Hands NK Nukes |
|
|
| jinju wrote: |
| NAVFC wrote: |
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
As introduced on a blog. One can quibble with the characterization, but the general point is accurate: Bush, et. al., confronted NK giving it an excuse (by breaking the agreement) to abandoned the Framework.
US pulled out... still got pregnant.
The full original story:
From the Times
So.... thanks to the Bush Cadre, NK now has nukes.
Way to go, Dumbya. |
This is BS. And if Bush had attacked NK and prevented such you would have blamed him for the 2nd Koreanw ar too. Damned if you do, dmaned if you dont. Bush goes to war in iraq, you slam him, diplomacy in Korea, slam him. Nothing is ever good enough for you liberals. |
The worst thing about these limp writed libs is that they pretend to care about humanity, human rights, what is good but they ALWAYS, without fail make excuses for real evil and blame someone else. Bush may not be perfect, but who is really evil here, Washington or Pyongyang? Why do libs always side with evil? |
Exactly. I dont get it.
Several concentration camps, slave labor, horrible living conditions, public execution, forced loyaylty..and WERE the bad guys! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:11 pm Post subject: Re: Bush Hands NK Nukes |
|
|
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
As introduced on a blog. One can quibble with the characterization, but the general point is accurate: Bush, et. al., confronted NK giving it an excuse (by breaking the agreement) to abandoned the Framework.
US pulled out... still got pregnant.
The full original story:
From the Times
So.... thanks to the Bush Cadre, NK now has nukes.
Way to go, Dumbya. |
Nonsense. N.K was pursuing nukes BEFORE the Bush administration ever came to power. A little history reading would clear that up. Furthermore they broke the agreement first.
Last edited by TheUrbanMyth on Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:31 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:15 pm Post subject: Re: Bush Hands NK Nukes |
|
|
| TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
As introduced on a blog. One can quibble with the characterization, but the general point is accurate: Bush, et. al., confronted NK giving it an excuse (by breaking the agreement) to abandoned the Framework.
US pulled out... still got pregnant.
The full original story:
From the Times
So.... thanks to the Bush Cadre, NK now has nukes.
Way to go, Dumbya. |
Nonsense. N.K was pursuing nukes BEFORE the Bush administration ever came to power. A little history reading would clear that up. |
That would mean rational thinking. C'mon, we all know Bush is evil while KJI who puts hundreds of thousands in gulags, starves millions and keeps his people in a state of terror is really just a cute pudgy guy who feels threatened..let's not blame KJI, its all Bush's fault. ALL of it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nautilus
Joined: 26 Nov 2005
Location: Je jump, Tu jump, oui jump!
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lets make it accurate: US pulls out: NK gets pregnant: father is left holding the baby.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nautilus wrote: |
| lets make it accurate: US pulls out: NK gets pregnant: father is left holding the baby. |
and nautilus violently attacks bab's wee wee with a cleaver. he then defends the woman who subsequently kills the baby and sticks it in a freezer out of
(wait for it)
LOVE.
Nothing says love like a dead baby in a freezer, eh nautilus? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gopher
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
| N.K was pursuing nukes BEFORE the [W.] Bush administration... |
What...!?
Trying to distract our inquiring little mind with such inconvenient facts as this...!?
There is nothing, absolutely nothing that you or I or anyone else on or off planet Earth could ever say to this poster that would dent his W. Bush-centric fantasy world, Urban.
Objecting to Pyongyang's nuclear program and Washington's "giving" it to them? Have you not heard, Urban? The President's powers are far greater than this. When W. Bush does not like you -- as in, say, New Orleans's blacks -- he can and will even decline to sign an international environmental treaty which will almost immediately create a powerful hurricane to smite you down...He can plan, coordinate, and execute 9/11 terrorist attacks just to fabricate a pretext that will allow him and his friends to seize Middle Eastern oil fields...He can leap tall buildings in a single bound, and run faster than a speeding bullet...Look! It's "SuperDumbya: The Mythical President...!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EFLtrainer
Joined: 04 May 2005
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jinju wrote: |
| Maybe, but what you fail to acknowldge is the fact that even with the AF in place NK was still actively pursuing nukes. NK would have gotten them anyway because the basci truth is that NK DOESNT HONOR AGREEMENTS. |
No, you failed to read the articles. The whole point is that, yet again, Bush's claims have turned out to be bull. Read before posting, eh? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EFLtrainer
Joined: 04 May 2005
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 11:50 pm Post subject: Re: Bush Hands NK Nukes |
|
|
| NAVFC wrote: |
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
As introduced on a blog. One can quibble with the characterization, but the general point is accurate: Bush, et. al., confronted NK giving it an excuse (by breaking the agreement) to abandoned the Framework.
US pulled out... still got pregnant.
The full original story:
From the Times
So.... thanks to the Bush Cadre, NK now has nukes.
Way to go, Dumbya. |
This is BS. And if Bush had attacked NK and prevented such you would have blamed him for the 2nd Koreanw ar too. Damned if you do, dmaned if you dont. Bush goes to war in iraq, you slam him, diplomacy in Korea, slam him. Nothing is ever good enough for you liberals.
Also what Jinju said is also correct. at the time of the AF NK began almost instnatly on it's uranium program since we knew about the Plutonium one but notn the Uranium. They were never going to honor there deal. |
See above. And learn to think and read, not follow a party line. The whole point of the posts is that the claim of the second program was bullshit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EFLtrainer
Joined: 04 May 2005
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 11:52 pm Post subject: Re: Bush Hands NK Nukes |
|
|
| TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
As introduced on a blog. One can quibble with the characterization, but the general point is accurate: Bush, et. al., confronted NK giving it an excuse (by breaking the agreement) to abandoned the Framework.
US pulled out... still got pregnant.
The full original story:
From the Times
So.... thanks to the Bush Cadre, NK now has nukes.
Way to go, Dumbya. |
Nonsense. N.K was pursuing nukes BEFORE the Bush administration ever came to power. A little history reading would clear that up. Furthermore they broke the agreement first. |
Three for three. Gee, what a surprise...
Not one of you numbnuts even read the articles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
