|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nautilus

Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Location: Je jump, Tu jump, oui jump!
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:29 pm Post subject: South Korea population now 49 million. |
|
|
Personally I think there are too many people and korea is too overcrowded...so why the push to increase the birth rate?
South Koreas population hits 49 million
Roughly 450,000 babies were born last year. That figure was up 2.23 percent from the previous year, but was a sharp drop from the 1980s, during which an average 750,000 babies were born annually.
The number of births versus deaths suggested the country will have to wait five years to reach the population milestone of 50 million.
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/189717.html
http://english.kbs.co.kr/news/newsview_sub.php?menu=4&key=20 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:00 pm Post subject: Re: South Korea population now 49 million. |
|
|
nautilus wrote: |
Personally I think there are too many people and korea is too overcrowded... |
Personally I think you shouldn't conflate Korea with Seoul. I agree the latter is way overcrowded, and Busan is also pretty crowded, but as someone who lives in smaller communities in this country, and travels extensively all over it, the country does not seem overcrowded overall. Plenty of beautiful valleys and open farm land for future cities to be built.
The concern in Korea for Koreans long term is negative population growth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nautilus

Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Location: Je jump, Tu jump, oui jump!
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:22 pm Post subject: Re: South Korea population now 49 million. |
|
|
VanIslander wrote: |
Plenty of beautiful valleys and open farm land for future cities to be built.
|
The country is already an end-to-end urban conurbation and many of its beauty spots have been concreted over in the past 5 years- but you want more?
whats the aim exactly. Is it to fit as many people per square 100m of land possible? think about it. Is making the maximum number of people possible, at the cost of the environment, humanity's highest goal? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:29 pm Post subject: Re: South Korea population now 49 million. |
|
|
nautilus wrote: |
The country is already an end-to-end urban conurbation |
HAHAHAHA! An agglomeration of cities might have happened in Gyonggi province around Seoul but how anybody could say this about South Korea as a whole is beyond me and those who have travelled this country. Seriously, conurbation is localized to a few areas outside of which there are plenty (majority!) of farms and undeveloped land.
A remarkable phenomenon in this country is the LACK of urban sprawl, instead the habit of Koreans to crowd together within urban limits, with amazing contrasts between densely populated cities and the rest of the country. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Leslie Cheswyck

Joined: 31 May 2003 Location: University of Western Chile
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When they get to 50, sell! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why increase the birthrate, well, um, have you turned on that brain of yours lately?
1. People die.
2. The less people born the older the average of the population gets.
3. The older the average age, the more people who dont contribute anything to the economy.
4. The more old, uncontributing people the bigger the burden on the younger.
5. People die. When the old people die off, and if there arent enough younger people to replace them, the population decreases rapidly.
6. Having less people means you cant support the same size economy.
Is that easy to understand?
if only 1 person is being born per couple that means this country is in for a sharp reduction of population in a very short time down the road.
Seriously, how did you ever get a degree? This isnt the first thread of yours thats making me ask that question. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nautilus

Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Location: Je jump, Tu jump, oui jump!
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Korea is one of the most densely populated counries on earth.
But your idea is to make it even more so?
Compare it to your home countries for a second. Compare their surface area and population.Where would you rather live?
Having lived on geoje-do, van islander, and coming from a country famous for its space and natural beauty, I am really surprised you want to replace the last patches of intensively utilised korean countryside with more smog-filled cities. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nautilus wrote: |
Korea is one of the most densely populated counries on earth.
But your idea is to make it even more so? |
Again you simply dont get it. The idea is to at the very least replace the dying population, which isnt even close to happening. Also, you simply dont get the fact that:
1. Overall population means nothing. Old people contribute nothing to the economy
2. The idea is to have a lot of people of productive age and enough younger people to be able to replace them once they get too old to contribute.
if this doesnt happen you will simply have a lot of old people with nobody to fill the important positions in buisness, industry, etc. THEN you have a problem because you still have a large population but your economy tanks.
Quote: |
Compare it to your home countries for a second. Compare their surface area and population.Where would you rather live? |
WTF does that matter? Surface area? Who gave you a degree, debate champion? What does surface area matter? Go live in Russia, they have a large surface area.
Again you simply fail to grasp the point of the discussion: this is about keeping the economy going by having enough people to AT THE VERY LEAST replace those who will be leaving their jobs. If that doesnt happen, you have a problem.
Quote: |
Having lived on geoje-do, van islander, and coming from a country famous for its space and natural beauty, I am really surprised you want to replace the last patches of intensively utilised korean countryside with more smog-filled cities. |
The thing with nice scenery is that you cant package it, sell it and feed people from the profits. Ultimately, its the economy, stupid. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nautilus

Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Location: Je jump, Tu jump, oui jump!
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Let me give some examples of how the burgeoning korean population and hyper-development has harmed the environment in the past 3 years. its been a very rapid, uncontrolled trashing of the environment.
1) Construction: the massive and politically powerful construction business here have undertaken many reckless and unbridled projects, many of them needles "make work' schemes to keep people in jobs. I have seen mountains carved up and gouged away for building materials; riverbanks and streams concreted and banked into lifeless trenches: formerly charming and scenic coastal views ruined overnight by ugly construction projects and seemingly pointless roadbuilding. in one case, a road was built to connect just one house- in the process of which a whole hillside and wood was bulldozed into oblivion. Areas of natural beauty and solitude have been bulldozed and in their place, "peoples parks" of concrete, a few swings and so on with the resultant noise from loudspeakers and hordes of people.
2) Coastline; if you take a boat journey along any of koreas coastline, you will see that every available inch of sea is fouled by endless driftnets that catch and kill every living thing. To add to it, the estuaries have all been reclaimed and built on, and more needless roads and harbors built everywhere. Most of these projects are simply to line the pockets of a few businessmen, and they sit idle after completion.
3) Liesure industry: koreans have suddenly transformed their last areas of natural scenery into numerous golf courses. Another one is to open up every last pond or stretch of river into an overcrowded fishing resort. You can't go anywhere in countryside without hordes of people being there already- making noise, playing radios etc. If you want to climb a mountain, there will be not a moments peace: the tracks are used by the new quad-bike obsession or armies of hikers with loudspeakers.
Its blatantly obvious to anyone who has been here longer than a year- koreans are busy turning their country into a massive, sterile parking lot. A gigantic concrete monolith. A really ugly sight. there are something like 90 more cars on the road every day in Gyeonggi province. Travel by road is virtually pointless at weekends or holidays, you are left sitting in traffic jams for hours or trickling along at 10mph.
its madness.
Korea needs less people and less development. Not more.
My definition of an ideal situation is not simply the highest number of people per square kilometre (as seems to be your recomendation). Its a matter of quality of life, spatial distribution, and healthy environment. From what I can see, korea is making the classic development mistakes and doing it in overdrive. i'm surprised you can't see that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Octavius Hite

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jinju (and this is killing me to type this) is right, despite his snotty attitude and way of putting it, the population is both aging and the birthrate is declining. If something is not done the Korean economy could grind to a halt.
However, there is another way to prevent this rather than having more babies. The solution is immigration. There are plenty of people in Vietnam, Cambodia, the Philippines that would love to immigrate and become a Korean. That said, we all know where this will go, Koreans are loath to give up their "one race" crap. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Octavius Hite wrote: |
However, there is another way to prevent this rather than having more babies. The solution is immigration. There are plenty of people in Vietnam, Cambodia, the Philippines that would love to immigrate and become a Korean. That said, we all know where this will go, Koreans are loath to give up their "one race" crap. |
If you want to fill unskilled positions then maybe yes. However this is an economy that is increasingly turning to high tech, and those countries arent exactly great sources for higlhy skilled, educated workers. Quality over quantity. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nautilus wrote: |
Korea needs less people and less development. Not more.
My definition of an ideal situation is not simply the highest number of people per square kilometre (as seems to be your recomendation). Its a matter of quality of life, spatial distribution, and healthy environment. From what I can see, korea is making the classic development mistakes and doing it in overdrive. i'm surprised you can't see that. |
You are partly right but not really. What Korea DOESNT need is less people. What Korea does need is smarter, not necessarily less, development. Better planing before construction is begun and yes, I agree, more thought put into environmental impacts. However with the current trend of aging society and the ultra low birthrate, theres a real crisis brewing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nautilus

Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Location: Je jump, Tu jump, oui jump!
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jinju wrote: |
What Korea does need is smarter (....) development. Better planing before construction is begun and yes, I agree, more thought put into environmental impacts.. |
Thats certainly true.
I have yet to see any evidence of planning permission, genuine environmental impact assessments, or tasteful and attractive development here. Instead you have tacky and ugly construction spoiling even the prettiest areas overnight, you have environmental warnings completely ignored and suppressed in order for top honcho businessmen to make big profits, you have a lack of regulations to control development, over-exploitation and pollution.
Noise pollution is a minor side point but it does reflect on the situation as a whole: I would like to see laws banning the use of loudspeakers all over the countryside, playing inane poppy music across every promenade or mountainside, let alone blaring at you in urban areas early on a saturday morning.
Going a bit off topic here, but to get back to population, I agree that an ageing population is unbalanced, however as octavious says, this is koreas opportunity to become a bit more cosmopolitan and thrive on cheaper foreign labour. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Now there I can agree. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Octavius Hite

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jinju wrote:
Quote: |
If you want to fill unskilled positions then maybe yes. However this is an economy that is increasingly turning to high tech, and those countries arent exactly great sources for higlhy skilled, educated workers. Quality over quantity. |
I agree with that, but I would argue that if Korea would open up to more cultures and people they would be able to attract skilled immigrants. Right now they only look for those people to fill the jobs Koreans won't do anymore ala California/Arizona/Colorado. There are plenty of Filipino doctors, high tech workers, scientists, etc. they just choose to go to better (better in terms of quality of life) countries. Korea just doesn't market itself a place to move to, instead the government is trying all sorts of whacky schemes to raise the birthrate (I love the one about Soap Operas encouraging woman to have bablies, LOL). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|