Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Are 'foreigners' and Westerners just one big lump group?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Are all Western or American criminals the same in Asia ill-regard of deeper social identities?
Yes, an American is an American and that's about all a headline should state.
33%
 33%  [ 3 ]
No, a perpetrator should be identified to enough degree so that not ALL groups are dragged down with him.
11%
 11%  [ 1 ]
#2 answer, plus I'm tired of seeing alot of distorted and misleading information generated about my respective country and the people I grew up around.
55%
 55%  [ 5 ]
Total Votes : 9

Author Message
dogbert



Joined: 29 Jan 2003
Location: Killbox 90210

PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2003 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

William Beckerson wrote:
Your entire argument is based on a faulty premise: Skin pigmentation = violent human.

Skin pigmentation is there to protect us from UV rays. That's all it does. If you had said, "Poor and desperate for money = Violent human" Then you'd have a leg to stand on. And I'd even agree with you.

What you're doing right now is similar to saying that the runny nose is the reason for the cold. That's why everyone thinks you're a bigot.


Is he saying that the runny nose causes the cold or is he saying that if you have a runny nose, odds are you have a cold? If it's the second, would you say he is not a bigot?

Sometimes you have to think things through if you make a longer post than usual.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
William Beckerson
Guest




PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2003 9:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Coffeecup wrote:
A particularly childish trashy user like William Peckerson might try and act real clever and say "aha you call yourself Ghost you are a white separatist!"


AHAHAHAHAHAA~

He called me "Peckerson".

Keep up the good work, Jesus Coffeecup. You're a beautiful martyr in your own way.
Back to top
William Beckerson
Guest




PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2003 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dogbert wrote:
William Beckerson wrote:
Your entire argument is based on a faulty premise: Skin pigmentation = violent human.

Skin pigmentation is there to protect us from UV rays. That's all it does. If you had said, "Poor and desperate for money = Violent human" Then you'd have a leg to stand on. And I'd even agree with you.

What you're doing right now is similar to saying that the runny nose is the reason for the cold. That's why everyone thinks you're a bigot.


Is he saying that the runny nose causes the cold or is he saying that if you have a runny nose, odds are you have a cold? If it's the second, would you say he is not a bigot?

Sometimes you have to think things through if you make a longer post than usual.


The theory presented: Runny nose (pigment) = cold (violent human being).

A cute little nit-picker such as yourself knows that this is a non-starter.
Back to top
dogbert



Joined: 29 Jan 2003
Location: Killbox 90210

PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2003 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

William Beckerson wrote:
dogbert wrote:
William Beckerson wrote:
Your entire argument is based on a faulty premise: Skin pigmentation = violent human.

Skin pigmentation is there to protect us from UV rays. That's all it does. If you had said, "Poor and desperate for money = Violent human" Then you'd have a leg to stand on. And I'd even agree with you.

What you're doing right now is similar to saying that the runny nose is the reason for the cold. That's why everyone thinks you're a bigot.


Is he saying that the runny nose causes the cold or is he saying that if you have a runny nose, odds are you have a cold? If it's the second, would you say he is not a bigot?

Sometimes you have to think things through if you make a longer post than usual.


The theory presented: Runny nose (pigment) = cold (violent human being).

A cute little nit-picker such as yourself knows that this is a non-starter.


Accuracy's a bitch, ain't it?

Free of charge, here's a book recommendation for you. There are no pictures in it, but it's surprisingly readable nonetheless.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0911/p15s01-bogn.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ghostinthemachine



Joined: 22 Jun 2003

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2003 1:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dogbert wrote

Quote:
Ghostinthemachine wrote:
Quote:
this leads me to believe that crime is related to economic deprivation rather than being a question of race.



This is the third time I've read a variation of this assertion on this page.

Can anyone tell me how economic deprivation causes rape? Thanks.


Are you

a) suggesting that rape is more prevalent in lower socio-economic groups.

b) suggesting some races are inherently more prone to rape than others.

c) being deliberately obtuse.

d) all of the above.

Question Question Question
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dogbert



Joined: 29 Jan 2003
Location: Killbox 90210

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2003 1:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ghostinthemachine wrote:
dogbert wrote

Quote:
Ghostinthemachine wrote:
Quote:
this leads me to believe that crime is related to economic deprivation rather than being a question of race.



This is the third time I've read a variation of this assertion on this page.

Can anyone tell me how economic deprivation causes rape? Thanks.


Are you

a) suggesting that rape is more prevalent in lower socio-economic groups.

b) suggesting some races are inherently more prone to rape than others.

c) being deliberately obtuse.

d) all of the above.

Question Question Question


No, I'm saying that when people claim that poverty causes violent crime, I disagree with that. I think rape is a good example of how there is no correlation.

In that instance, it would support my belief if it turns out that rape is more prevalent in higher socio-economic groups.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
William Beckerson
Guest




PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dogbert wrote:

Accuracy's a *beep*, ain't it?

Thank you for taking time out of your busy schedule to show up and be irrelivent.

Next time I need someone with your qualifications, I'll be sure ask for you specifically.
Back to top
Ghostinthemachine



Joined: 22 Jun 2003

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dogbert wrote

Quote:
No, I'm saying that when people claim that poverty causes violent crime, I disagree with that. I think rape is a good example of how there is no correlation.


Some rules can be absolute and some rules can be general. When you find an exception to a general rule it doesn't mean that that rule is no longer valid.

I'm curious though. How do you account for a higher incidence of crime in the lower socio-economic groups in a racially homogenous society?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ghostinthemachine



Joined: 22 Jun 2003

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2003 6:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Coffeecup as far as I'm aware (please correct me if I'm wrong) there isn't any scientific evidence that one particular race is more genetically prone to criminality than another. There is evidence that some people are more genetically prone to criminality than others but this is only in rare cases where a male/female has an extra 'y' chromosome (xyy for males and xxy for females)....... but this condition is not race related.

In the absense of such evidence and given that there are other factors that could explain higher criminality, it is unreasonable and unfair to conclude that race/genetics are the determining factors. The fact that you do draw such a conclusion leaves you open to the charge of prejudice (specifically racism).

If you are prejudiced then it is pointless to discuss this issue with you as the very nature of prejudice is that you will already have made up your mind before looking at the facts.

So are you prejudiced or are you open to changing your mind if a convincing argument against your viewpoint can be made?

Even if you don't want to answer the question for me it may be worth your while answering it for yourself.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zed



Joined: 20 Jan 2003
Location: Shakedown Street

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2003 6:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Coffeecup wrote:
By the way ghost you'd better be real careful especially with your white colored Avatar. A particularly childish trashy user like William Peckerson might try and act real clever and say "aha you call yourself Ghost you are a white separatist!


This guy is truly disturbing yet I can't help but be amused.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
katydid



Joined: 02 Feb 2003
Location: Here kitty kitty kitty...

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2003 4:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Zed wrote:
This guy is truly disturbing yet I can't help but be amused.


That's exactly how I feel about your avatar, Zed! Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
dogbert



Joined: 29 Jan 2003
Location: Killbox 90210

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2003 4:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

William Beckerson wrote:
dogbert wrote:

Accuracy's a *beep*, ain't it?

Thank you for taking time out of your busy schedule to show up and be irrelivent.

Next time I need someone with your qualifications, I'll be sure ask for you specifically.


Don't drink and post, pal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dogbert



Joined: 29 Jan 2003
Location: Killbox 90210

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2003 4:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ghostinthemachine wrote:
dogbert wrote

Quote:
No, I'm saying that when people claim that poverty causes violent crime, I disagree with that. I think rape is a good example of how there is no correlation.


Some rules can be absolute and some rules can be general. When you find an exception to a general rule it doesn't mean that that rule is no longer valid.

I'm curious though. How do you account for a higher incidence of crime in the lower socio-economic groups in a racially homogenous society?


I don't think I could answer that without at least knowing (a) which racially homogenous society; (b) the definition of lower and higher socio-economic groups;and (c) how you define "crime" (violent crimes only? fraud and other "white-collar" crimes? drug-related crimes?, and so on).

I will say that I disagree that poverty is the primary cause of violent crime.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
William Beckerson
Guest




PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2003 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dogbert wrote:
Don't drink and post, pal.

As much as I'd love to continue this pissing match with you, it's wasting everyone's time. Please feel free to PM me with any and all complaints. I'll be sure to give them all the consideration they deserve.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International