|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I really doubt Morrocco is as bad as Pakistan when it comes to women. Of course, we would need statistics. It is more common to hear of murders of women happening in Pakistan and also neighbouring India. In India, some hindus murder their wives if they think the dowry is not enough and too many girls are aborted. The Muslim Indians are probably similar to their counterparts in Pakistan with the exception of their being too many fanatics in a certain part of Pakiistan called Waziristan as compared to the rest of the country which is pretty bad.
What happened to that law that Musharaff wanted passed to protect Pakistani women? I think it passed as far as I remember. I am not sure what effect it will have. Another twist in Pakistan is if a man marries a woman and the tribal people don't like him and feel offended they will sometimes kill both the girl and the boy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rteacher

Joined: 23 May 2005 Location: Western MA, USA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Of course it wasn't that long ago in a "civilized" country like the U.S. that any dark-colored fella even lookin' funny at a white woman would end up lynched from the highest tree or dragged for a coupled miles tied to the back of a pick-up truck...
No shortage of abortions in America, either...
And contestants on reality TV shows viewed by millions compete to see who can eat the most (gouged-out) sheep eyes ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tud Ferguson
Joined: 03 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Let me guess, the dude is a muslim? Then of course the Koran says that's cool |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Tud Ferguson wrote: |
| Let me guess, the dude is a muslim? Then of course the Koran says that's cool |
No, the Koran doesn't say you can blind your wife if she doesn't give you sex. However, some Muslims say that a woman must give her sex if he wants it, and that it is his right, and she also can divorce him on grounds that she isn't getting it. But, I do believe there is some Quranic verse about women being akin to men's fields for plowing or planting or something like that, and that they have a right to it and some of the radical clerics said one can use force to rectify the behaviour but not severe force kind of like a spanking. I am not sure, but no religion sanctions blinding someone for not obeying the husband. He's just psycho.
As far as abortion in India and the West, in the West, rteacher, we don't abort based on gender. That happens in India. We don't kill women over dowries or burn them. We don't neglect girls and not care if they get medical treatment or marry them off at age 12. I am not saying this is what Hinduism sanctions. It isn't, but it happens in India. Generally, if you live in a poor third world country and you are a woman, you can have a tough shake unless your society is matriarchal in some ways. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zoidberg

Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Location: Somewhere too hot for my delicate marine constitution
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rteacher wrote: |
Of course it wasn't that long ago in a "civilized" country like the U.S. that any dark-colored fella even lookin' funny at a white woman would end up lynched from the highest tree or dragged for a coupled miles tied to the back of a pick-up truck...
No shortage of abortions in America, either...
And contestants on reality TV shows viewed by millions compete to see who can eat the most (gouged-out) sheep eyes ... |
An abortion is not on par with blinding a woman for not wanting sex, or burning a woman alive because her husband died before her. (An abortion is not a negative act, unless motivated by the fetus' gender. It's quite responsible if the parents feel unready to raise a child. Who wants to grow up being a resented mistake?)
Eating sheep eyes (gouged out after the sheep is dead, what would be the point of doing it while it was alive, they couldn't broadcast that anyway) is not on par with blinding a woman for not wanting sex, or burning a woman alive because her husband died before her.
What are you trying to say? That because Western countries have some bad junk going on that we cannot criticize bizarre practices like burning wives or genital mutilation, or some eye gouging psycho?
Your lynch mob example doesn't cut it either. In general the US (and other Western countries where stuff like this happened) has gotten past that. Is it too much to expect other countries to do the same? Or should we excuse it on the basis of "culture"?
Looks like Princess was on to something. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SuperFly

Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Location: In the doghouse
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| T/F? I hear random acid-on-the-face-throwing is popular in India. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alyallen

Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SuperFly wrote: |
| T/F? I hear random acid-on-the-face-throwing is popular in India. |
I think you are right. It was a big hit in Jamaica when I was a kid in the late later 80s and early 90s....Also bleach. They banned the super soaker for a while because people were using it to spray bleach into peoples' faces.
The world is a strange strange place  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SPINOZA wrote: |
Give over. No-one's gonna pull out cultural relativism in defence of a man who cuts a woman's eyes out |
Are you sure? Multiculturalism/cultural relativism are dominant in certain ares of Western society. Now, how about this for example.
| Quote: |
German judge stirs protest by citing Koran
She claims it sanctions wife-beating
FRANKFURT: A German judge has stirred a storm of protest here by citing the Koran in turning down a German Muslim wife's request for a fast-track divorce on the ground that her husband beat her.
In a remarkable ruling that underlines the tension between Muslim customs and European laws, the judge, Christa Datz-Winter, said the couple came from a Moroccan cultural milieu in which it is common for husbands to beat their wives. The Koran, she wrote, sanctions such physical abuse.
"It was terrible for my client," Becker-Rojczyk said. "This man beat her seriously from the beginning of their marriage. After they separated, he called her and threatened to kill her."
|
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/22/news/germany.php
If you read the whole article, you will find that the woman had been getting her ass totally and throughly kicked by her husband (religion to remain unmentioned...). While not as bad as having her eyes pulled out (that is just fucking sick), it is certainly in the same type of abusive behavior. Keep in mind, that in islamic culture, a man owns his wife and may do to her what he pleases. And the wife may NOT ever refuse sex. In the koran, it is very clearly stipulated that a woman must accept being banged whenever her husband may ask.
And here we have a German judge saying that it is ok for the man to beat the shit out of his wife because the 7th century "moral" code contained in the koran permits it.
Spinoza, you would be surprised what people believe.
Multiculturalism encourages these kind of abuses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zoidberg

Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Location: Somewhere too hot for my delicate marine constitution
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That judge must have lost her brain on holidays. Fine, their culture permits it, whatever, but the law of Germany (I assume) does not permit violent beatings and rape. I was under the impression that judges are supposed to rule on the basis of the law, not of the offenders home culture.
Islam allows for the killing of adulterers (assuming certain conditions are met). So, can certain Muslims get away with murder in Germany on this basis? Or certain Africans get away with genital mutilation? Or certain Indians get away with burning women to death.
"Oh, but it's my culture!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zoidberg wrote: |
That judge must have lost her brain on holidays. Fine, their culture permits it, whatever, but the law of Germany (I assume) does not permit violent beatings and rape. I was under the impression that judges are supposed to rule on the basis of the law, not of the offenders home culture.
Islam allows for the killing of adulterers (assuming certain conditions are met). So, can certain Muslims get away with murder in Germany on this basis? Or certain Africans get away with genital mutilation? Or certain Indians get away with burning women to death.
"Oh, but it's my culture!" |
The laws of Germany should apply not Orthodox Islam, Judaism or any kind of law that contradicts German laws or principles set forth by the E.U.
Let us clear about certain things, though. There is a difference between Hindu political culture and Hinduism and a difference between Islam and Islamic political culture i.e. what is practiced in various countries where the people are Islamic.
The Islamic equivalent of canonical law is the Sharia. The Sharia does not sanction beating a woman whenever you so choose or you are in a rage. In Egypt, the women are allowed to divorce their husbands. It was made easier in the last few years and women are also allowed to bequeath their citizenship to their children while they were not allowed to before that. So Islamic clerics would rule the divorce would be acceptable if there is some blind pattern of abuse. As far as sex, as BJWD essentially stated, the Quran literally compares women to a farming field and that a man is free to enter whenever. That has been interpreted by many that a woman cannot refuse sex. Some men could use that to justify raping their wives. The Sharia needs to be overhauled and certainly not applied in Germany, Canada or any country. I cannot say I know the books in the Middle East, but in many of the countries like Egypt they can sue for divorce, but it was very hard some years back in Egypt, so it was easier for them to be mistreated, or kept in limbo.
Last edited by Adventurer on Fri Mar 23, 2007 2:29 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SPINOZA
Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Location: $eoul
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A female judge too? Good god, that's the most bizarre thing I've ever heard.
So, Muslims may beat their wives in Germany, but German men may not. Interesting precedent, to say the least. What an absolutely stupid t**t - how the hell did she make it as a judge?
"When the Koran is put above the German Constitution, I can only say, 'Good night, Germany,'" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rteacher

Joined: 23 May 2005 Location: Western MA, USA
|
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
While the U.S. legal system may be relatively advanced and progressive, I don't buy the idea of cultural superiority.
Any country that unnecessarily slaughters ten billion animals a year is not especially civilized or cultured.
The fetus is a sentient being. No one should have the right to kill a sentient being unnecessarily (i.e. unless the mother's life depends on it...)
Animals are also sentient beings that should not to be unnecessarily killed. Many are also tortured (eg: veal calves - http://www.all-creatures.org/aip/nl-28jan2001-veal.html)
Modern science is only now beginning to understand how sentient animals really are :http://www.newscientist.com/channel/life/mg18625025.700
That same article also notes how popular bestiality apparently still is:
...Type "dog sex" into Google and you get 13 million hits. "Farm sex" yields 7 million, while "horse sex" is not far behind at just under 5 million. "Bestiality" yields 1.8 million hits...
...Sex with animals is legal in Sweden, as it is in half the states of the US. In Germany it is not explicitly banned, and in other countries the law is at best unclear...
Actually, the Fear Factor episode that I saw where contestants had to eat gouged-out sheeps' eyes was set in a barn, and live sheep could be seen in the background with black patches over their eyes (hopefully that was just for dramatic effect - since gouging out the eyes of living animals for TV ratings gotta be against the law...)
My main point (excuse the rambling...) is that all cultures that sanction unnecessary abuse and killing of any sentient beings are sick - so we shouldn't feel so culturally superior until we get our own acts together... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peppermint

Joined: 13 May 2003 Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rteacher wrote: |
The fetus is a sentient being. No one should have the right to kill a sentient being unnecessarily (i.e. unless the mother's life depends on it...)
|
I just lost the miniscule amount of respect I had for you, with this phrase. Sentient females tend not to appreciate being told they're baby incubators first and autonomous beings second. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rteacher

Joined: 23 May 2005 Location: Western MA, USA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
My understanding (based on Vedic scriptures , and - as far as I know - not disproved by modern science...) is that as soon as a fetus starts growing it has consciousness (symptomatic of the spirit-soul...) and therefore feelings.
Not only can it feel pain, but in that pre-birth period the individual soul can also remember a certain number of its previous human births and deaths. Some of them were in male bodies, and some were in female.
From a spiritual perspective, the "abortion issue" isn't a matter of complex gender politics. Neither men nor women can kill another living being without incurring some karmic reaction (according to the circumstances...) If a mother's life would be imperiled by giving birth there would be mimimal reaction in that case.
The male partner involved is also subject to reaction (this life or next...) Both should have some spiritual understanding of the meaning of life and make necessary sacrifices with regard to their own sense gratification in order to raise good children...
Women should not be exploited as a class; rather they should be specially protected and provided for because of their natural role as mothers. Men who champion women's right to abort for most any reason tend to be those who wish to exploit women for casual sex without having to be responsible fathers...
Therefore, the idea of "sacred marriage" has been practically destroyed, and children lucky enough to be born often have just one parent (usually the mother - who has to work harder than ever without a responsible husband and father for their kids...)
It's another sign that modern culture - at least in some important respects - is more degraded now than ever... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zoidberg

Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Location: Somewhere too hot for my delicate marine constitution
|
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 6:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
You're not doing do yourself any favours. You're using your religion to justify saying women are nothing but baby machines before anything else. Even your statement "they should be specially protected and provided for because of their natural role as mothers" is distasteful since, when taken with what else you wrote, it implies that a woman's only value is as a potential mother.
And on this:
| Rteacher wrote: |
| My understanding (based on Vedic scriptures , and - as far as I know - not disproved by modern science...) is that as soon as a fetus starts growing it has consciousness (symptomatic of the spirit-soul...) and therefore feelings. |
I think that you've been told many times before (on the evolution/origin-of-life thread) science isn't in the business of disproving things. You have a claim, the onus is on you to prove it, not on others to disprove it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|