Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Teachers drop the Holocaust to avoid offending Muslims
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
gang ah jee



Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Location: city of paper

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BJWD wrote:
There are more than one. They used one as an example, but the article makes clear that there are more than one by using the plural form of 'school'.

Well, it's probably true that the school mentioned in the report is not the only one - but the Daily Mail doesn't say where it got the plural from. Think about this - you're writing an exciting story about glossing over the holocaust in UK schools based on a paragraph in an obscure governmental report that you know 99.99% of your readership will never bother looking up. You can choose between an accurate 'A school has dropped the Holocaust from history lessons...' and the more exciting but exagerrated 'Schools are dropping the Holocaust from history lessons...'. I think there's a pretty damn decent chance here that the Mail was just being opportunistic with a hot issue.

Quote:
But on to your question. There is nothing to suggest. There must be a large-scale cultural change. The things we now value (tolerance, diversity etc etc) are of no value. How does this happen? I don't know.

Do you have a suggestion?

A couple spring to mind. I think that the West should cease all forms of support for religious education regardless of denomination, and if possible should create barriers for the funding of sectarian schools. Also, the postmodernist left (and increasingly the postmodernist right) needs to be delegitimised and the influence of their relativist nonsense in public policy needs to be rolled back. We need to keep very clear on what our core values are, and to make sure that we do not throw them away in a panic.

So tell us more about your large-scale cultural change that will solve the Muslim problem. Tell us exactly what you have in mind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
thepeel



Joined: 08 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The first part of your reply I strongly disagree with.

I have know this to be the case for a number of years via anecdotal evidence. I even spoke of it on this site and was called a 'racist'.

Surprise! I was right. As I understood it then, and now, the more angry elements get what they want when you live in a society with no balls. England, for all her soccer brawls and bar-room tough talk, has no balls. No self-respecting nation would allow herself to kneel down for a mouthful like this. And the only loud reaction you get in England is a racist one. That is another major problem. We are meeting their tribalism with more tribalism.

About the second part, I agree. Good luck. Post-modern relativism is the final nail in our cultural coffin. I've been returning to this idea in the past months. When I first explored PM, in my undergrad days, I tossed the PM critique aside. Truth can be deducted and rationally agreed upon. I still believe that. But, a post-modern society can not handle the more raw and aggressive/angry elements of a barbaric, pre-modern culture. England does not have the cultural tool-kit to appropriately deal with this, in my opinion. And not just the UK. Canada too.

So, your suggestion is basically to rebuild this tool-kit. I'm down with that. How?

Also, what are our "core values". I've forgotten.
Quote:

So tell us more about your large-scale cultural change that will solve the Muslim problem. Tell us exactly what you have in mind.


I don't know. I already said that. For a start, we could stop being wimps. Also, we could stop meeting criticism of the "other" with cat-calls of racist. Then maybe more people would speak out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
freethought



Joined: 13 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's not so much meeting things with 'no balls'. It's more a matter of getting elected that is the issue. You piss off a tightly knit, closed community, whether it be based on national background or religion, it can cause major electoral challenges, often resulting in defeat. The same can be said to occur along neighbourhood lines. You tell the people of one ward, district etc something they don't want to hear, whether it be true or not, it causes problems.

In short, people and emotions are the problems. Eliminating religion removes but one sociological factor, while dozens more remain. Does that mean we shouldn't do anything, no. We should do as much as possible to remove these factors, especially religion.

The issue is, however, that it is far more complex than having balls or eliminating a given causative factor (religion or a particular religion). But when 5.5 of the planet's roughly 6.5 billion people believe in fairy tales and hocus pocus of one sort or another, then we have a fundamentally irrational society/species, and getting it to behave rationally simply may not be in the cards.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gang ah jee



Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Location: city of paper

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BJWD wrote:
The first part of your reply I strongly disagree with.

I have know this to be the case for a number of years via anecdotal evidence. I even spoke of it on this site and was called a 'racist'.

You've known that British schools are not teaching the Holocaust for years? Fine, but if the Daily Mail wants to make that claim they should source it properly rather than to a single report that talks of one case only. Or do you mean my first point about discouraging religious schools?

Otherwise, our core values have to involve tolerance. This doesn't mean saying that all cultural practices are equally right, just that they are all acceptable as long as they don't cross fundamental ideas about equality, freedom, etc. If we adopt an adversarial stance towards Muslims then there is no hope of their successful integration into the West. Chicken-littlers like Mark Steyn do nothing but forment the cultural conflict they warn of.

By the way, here's a list of the features of Islamophobia from a UK report:

1. Islam is seen as a monolithic bloc, static and unresponsive to change.
2. It is seen as separate and "other". It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected by them and does not influence them.
3. It is seen as inferior to the West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive, and sexist.
4. It is seen as violent, aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism, and engaged in a clash of civilizations.
5. It is seen as a political ideology, used for political or military advantage.
6. Criticisms made of "the West" by Islam are rejected out of hand.
7. Hostility towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society.
8. Anti-Muslim hostility is seen as natural and normal.

What do you think? Here's the full report if you're interested: http://www.runnymedetrust.org/publications/pdfs/islamophobia.pdf

And freethought, I'm certainly no fan of religion myself, so we agree there. But if we're actually talking about solutions to behaviour based on irrational and imaginary thinking, do you have any actual ideas other than just saying that religion is silly?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
SPINOZA



Joined: 10 Jun 2005
Location: $eoul

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, you've always got to be careful with the Daily Mail. This school in this unnamed northern city will be majority Muslim. My mother taught for many years in such a school. Faced with a class of 90% Muslim faces, many of whom express open hatred for Jews and Israel, Holocaust material is bound to cause trouble. It saddens me that this is the case, but in such schools, they just give up.

Let's put this into perspective. The UK's Muslim population is approx 3% (a little under 2 million of a 60 million total). This is just one school in what I assume is an overwhelmingly Muslim school in some very poor area of a northern city, so untypical English circumstances. Less than 50% of Muslims own their own homes, so these people live mainly in areas of council housing - poor conditions by British standards. I don't think it's likely we'll see an epidemic of schools playing down the Holocaust given that the schools many Muslims attend are precisely this kind of school. Muslims in mainly white schools will just have to deal with it, as the Holocaust will be going nowhere from British education generally. And it's hardly as though the Brits are just getting walked over by Muslims given that 47% of Muslim students report incidents of Islamaphobia and also police-on-Muslim stop-and-searches are always disproportionately high.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bigverne



Joined: 12 May 2004

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Otherwise, our core values have to involve tolerance. This doesn't mean saying that all cultural practices are equally right, just that they are all acceptable as long as they don't cross fundamental ideas about equality, freedom, etc.


Yes, but the problem is that many Muslim cultural practices do cross fundamental Western norms, and to point this out is not Islamophobia.

Quote:
If we adopt an adversarial stance towards Muslims then there is no hope of their successful integration into the West


In a recent survey of British Muslims almost 50% were in favour of Shariah Law. So tell me, who is adopting an 'adversarial' stance? Moreover, perhaps it is time to wake up to reality, stop making excuses and admit that they may well not be able to successfully integrate into the West.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What Britain now suffers from is what is afflicting much of Western Europe these days: creeping socialism and all the apologetics that goes with that. British academia is mired in pc thought of the sort that would turn Orwell in his grave. It's sad, really, and makes Blair, a true moderate, come across in the media as a conservative.

Who's next? Italy? Spain? Greece? France? (They all have vocal communist and socialist elements too, to be sure, but religion and other factors have enabled them to resist at least some of the slime).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gang ah jee



Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Location: city of paper

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bigverne wrote:
In a recent survey of British Muslims almost 50% were in favour of Shariah Law. So tell me, who is adopting an 'adversarial' stance? Moreover, perhaps it is time to wake up to reality, stop making excuses and admit that they may well not be able to successfully integrate into the West.

Ah yes. Can't beat 'em, join 'em. Nice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bigverne



Joined: 12 May 2004

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Ah yes. Can't beat 'em, join 'em. Nice.


Your point?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thepeel



Joined: 08 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Spinoza.
http://www.google.com/news?sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1B3GGGL_enSG214SG215&ncl=1115004928&hl=en
I dislike the "source" game. This story is even in the loony-left rags like the Guardian.

About "islamophobia". Phobia means fear. It should be Islamobigot. Using phobia is an attempt to talk down to people.

And the points you made. I agree with 2 (though, as we see here, it does influence),3,4,5 and to some extent the others. 3,4,5 are demonstratively true. The more "muslim" someone is, the more dangerous they tend to become. The more you 'believe' in the Koran, the more likely you are to do that which is demands. Full Stop. And number 8. Well, I think we should all be hostile to an ideology that is the damn opposite of what liberal societies ought to be. But 6, I don't hold. I agree with many of their criticisms.

But this isn't about them. This is about us. Yes, us/them. How are we, in our nations, going to ensure that we don't become like them. islam is not a Western culture, and holds totally different assumptions. Time to face up to this and put the name-calling away.

And Steyn. Is he unhelpful even when he is right? That, is our problem. That kind of thinking.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gang ah jee



Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Location: city of paper

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No call on item 7, BJWD?

BJWD wrote:
And Steyn. Is he unhelpful even when he is right? That, is our problem. That kind of thinking.

What's he right about?

Anyway, yes, people like you and bigverne think that there's some value in sharing your panic about this, and if enough people think like you we'll get our clash of civilisations soon enough. That's bigotry for you, I guess.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
thepeel



Joined: 08 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SPINOZA wrote:
And it's hardly as though the Brits are just getting walked over by Muslims given that 47% of Muslim students report incidents of Islamaphobia and also police-on-Muslim stop-and-searches are always disproportionately high.


This is pathetic spinoza. What constitutes "islamophobia" is the defending of British culture. You can not speak truth about islam without being an islamophobe. Look at GAJ's definitions. The word is meaningless except to accelerate dhimmnitude.

Some imams in the USA took a flight and on the flight deliberately tried to provoke the people on the plane into thinking it was a terrorist attempt. They called the police. Now, CAIR is suing those people for discrimination citing "islamophobia". It is a made-up word that only exists to pacify the new host society.

Quote:
MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota (AP) -- Six Muslim men who are suing an airline after being removed from a plane last fall are also threatening to sue passengers who complained they were behaving suspiciously -- a move some fear could discourage travelers from speaking up when they see something unusual.

The civil rights lawsuit, filed in March, has so alarmed some lawyers that they are offering to defend the unnamed "John Doe" passengers listed as "possible defendants" free of charge. They say it is vital that the flying public be able to report suspicious behavior without fear of being dragged into court.

"When you drive up the road towards the airport, there's a big road sign that says, `Report suspicious behavior,' " said Gerry Nolting, a Minneapolis lawyer. "There's no disclaimer that adds, `But beware if you do that, you might get sued.' "

The six imams were taken off a Phoenix, Arizona-bound US Airways flight on November 20 while returning home from a conference of Islamic clerics in Minneapolis.

Other passengers had gotten nervous when the men were seen praying and chanting in Arabic as they waited to board. Some passengers also said that the men spoke of Saddam Hussein and cursed the United States; that they requested seat belt extenders with heavy buckles and stowed them under their seats; that they were moving about and conferring with one another during boarding; and that they sat separately in seats scattered through the cabin.

The plane was cleared for a security sweep, nothing was found, and the jet took off without the imams.

The Muslim clerics say they were humiliated and are seeking unspecified damages from the airline, the Minneapolis airport and, potentially, the John Does.

Omar Mohammedi, the New York City attorney for the imams, said the intent is not to go after passengers who raise valid concerns about security. But he suggested some passengers may have acted in bad faith out of prejudice.

"As an attorney, I have seen a lot of abuse by the general public when it comes to members of the community creating stories that do not exist," he said.

Mohammedi denied the imams were talking about Hussein and said that their seats were assigned and that they requested extenders because their seat belts didn't fit.

Some fear such lawsuits could weaken what has become the first line of defense against terrorism since Sept. 11, 2001 -- an alert public. At airports and train and subway stations around the country, travelers are routinely warned to watch for unattended bags and suspicious activity and to notify authorities.

Ellen Howe, spokeswoman for the Transportation Security Administration, which oversees security at all U.S. airports, would not comment specifically on the imams' lawsuit. But she said the TSA counts on passengers to help the agency do its job.

" 'See something, say something' is certainly a common mantra in this day and age," Howe said. "We would always remind passengers to be both vigilant and thoughtful."

Muslim advocacy groups, however, have repeatedly said that individuals who appear to be of Arab, Middle Eastern and South Asian descent are often subjected to greater scrutiny and profiling in airports as a result of post-Sept. 11 fears, leading to an increase in such incidents.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, in an open letter addressing concerns about the lawsuit, said the intention was to focus only on passengers who knowingly filed false reports. The imams will not sue any passenger who reported suspicious activity in good faith, "even when the 'suspicious behavior included the imams' constitutionally-protected right to practice their religion without fear or intimidation," the advocacy group said in the letter this week.

"Making false reports of suspicious behavior with the intent to discriminate during a time of war is doubly harmful. It not only harms the persons against whom false reports are made, but wastes urgently needed law enforcement resources."

In reaction to the imams' lawsuit, Congress has taken steps to legally protect passengers who report suspicious activity. This week, the House approved an amendment to a rail transportation security bill that would make passengers immune from such lawsuits, unless they say something they know is false.

Mohammedi said he has not yet identified any of the complaining passengers. An airport police report listed a passenger and two US Airways employees as complaining about the imams. All three had their names blacked out before the lawsuit was filed by invoking a Minnesota law that allows it, airport spokesman Pat Hogan said.

Nolting, the Minneapolis lawyer, said he has been contacted by several potential John Does.

Passenger Pat Snelson, who lives in a Twin Cities suburb, said he and his wife were not among those who reported suspicious behavior. But he said his wife noticed the men praying, and he saw them moving around the cabin while others were boarding.

"These guys were up to no good," Snelson said. "We think the airport people did a real good job in taking care of it."

Bomb-sniffing dogs examined the men and their baggage. FBI agents and other federal law enforcement officers questioned the men for several hours before releasing them.

Authorities have not filed any charges against the men and have cleared them of any allegations or suspicions of wrongdoing.

Billie Vincent, a former director of security for the Federal Aviation Administration, said he is troubled by the mere attempt to identify the passengers who raised concerns.

Airline passengers "are your eyes and your ears," said Vincent, who now owns an aviation security company. "If attorneys can get those names and sue them, you put a chilling effect on the whole system."

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/30/imams.flight.ap/

The more aggressive culture will you for breakfast if you don't start asserting to them right and wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big_Bird



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

From what I recall, most kids went through school without coming accross the Holocaust anyway. In First year you did the stone age up to the Romans and finally the Anglo-Saxon invasion. In second year you studied medieaval Kings and Queens, the murder in the Cathedral, the princes in the tower etc and fascinating 12th century torture and execution techniques, and in Third year you did the industrial revolution. Only those who chose to go on and do a History O'level ever got a glimpse of 20th century history. Maybe things have changed since Ah were a lass.

Last edited by Big_Bird on Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:18 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thepeel



Joined: 08 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

gang ah jee wrote:
No call on item 7, BJWD?

BJWD wrote:
And Steyn. Is he unhelpful even when he is right? That, is our problem. That kind of thinking.

What's he right about?

Anyway, yes, people like you and bigverne think that there's some value in sharing your panic about this, and if enough people think like you we'll get our clash of civilisations soon enough. That's bigotry for you, I guess.


I didn't mention #7, so, what do you think? Eh?

Yes, panic. Just another attempt to use language to downplay what is a looming crises.

The clash of civilizations is on. islam vs the world. It has always been this way. You aren't going to tolerate them into accepting us. That is what is missing. We accept them. They do not accept us. I don't know what is bigoted about defending my culture. islam fights the Buddhists, the Hindus the Jews and us. How do you not see this?

And Steyn is right that you do not need 50%+1 to made a group of people do what you want. You need to be the most aggressive, the loudest, more willing to use violence and you need the larger group to lack confidence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
khyber



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Compunction Junction

PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Yes, panic. Just another attempt to use language to downplay what is a looming crises.
Not unlike those "global warming clowns" hey?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 3 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International