View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Manner of Speaking wrote: |
...at least eight events of at least ten thousand protesters each, in the US, by the end of August [emphasis added]. |
That is a bold position, Manner. Here is why I think so:
W. Bush is on his way out. New presidential candidates' names are in the air. People will start to calm down and think about the future soon. If Obama stays near the front of the race, things might just get hopeful and optimistic.
Moreover, W. Bush does not appear to have sufficient political capital or moral authority to launch an Iranian campaign. Such a campaign might -- that is might -- provoke something akin to a coup d'etat and not merely increased war protests. But that is what it would take to get the numbers you are predicting.
Also, my understanding is that Nixon succeeded in gutting many of the antiwar protests simply by making the draft fairer and more rational and transparent than it had been under Johnson. That was, arguably, the decisive (but not the only) issue driving the protestors. And that entire issue is nonexistent in today's context.
In short, I doubt the protestors' numbers will climb -- even if I do believe they will be out again and again this summer and "at least eight" does not sound unlikely at all... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fair enough, I'm willing to bet that I might be wrong on the numbers.
The exercise here is to have a bit of fun with forecasts and predictions. I (obviously) hope there will be more than eight protest events of 10,000 people or more, otherwise I will be out my $20.
The actual political issue - people protesting against the war - is germane, but somewhat secondary to this thread. Under certain circumstances, betting can be seen as an expression of 'faith' or 'belief' in a particular understanding of the world, and an expression of faith in how that particular paradigm will express itself in the future. A bet like this can test one's understanding of the electorate and of public opinion, and the outcome of the bet (when it ends in August) will gauge to a certain extent whether that weltanschung is accurate.
Everybody's willing to express their opinion on this forum, but very few people are ever willing to admit they're wrong. It would make things a lot more interesting here if participants were more willing to put themselves in a position where they could be wrong once in a while.
On a side note, I have this bizarre sensation this week that Washington is experiencing a 'Vietnam' and a 'Watergate' simultaneously.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aren't they really "anti war by the US" protests?
I mean there are lots of wars going on in the world but they only seem to notice the ones where they US is involved and only protest against US actions.
I mean anyone every see the "anti war " movement protest gains the on going war by the Bathists, Khomeni followers and Al Qaedists?
Of course not. These people aren't really "anti war " they are just anti US . These people ought to really say what they are for they won't cause they are dishonest. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mosley
Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
My old friend Joo is right. The so-called peaceniks are remarkably tolerant of violence when it is directed against Western civilians(esp. in Israel), for example. The fact is, the "peace" crowd learned a tactical lesson from the Vietnam War era: never proclaim openly who you support. That lesson was learned by the SDS when, having praised the Viet Cong and Ho Chi Minh, found out that it alienated the famous "Silent Majority". It also tended to invite a good whuppin' from construction workers. "Damn those proles! Don't they know their class interests like we bourgeois intellectuals do!?" Moreover, the fact that over a 4 yr. period U.S. military casualties have been RELATIVELY low has been a wet blanket on the protest "movement".
To the aging SDS types of yesteryear, I would ask: where were your protests in '68(Czechoslovakia), '79(Afghanistan), '80-'82(crackdown on Solidarity in Poland)? I know you sprung to life in '83(protesting the liberation of Grenada) and '91(liberation of Kuwait). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, this isn't really what this thread is about, but in answer to your question, I AM old enough to remember how thousands of people turned out on the streets - at least in Canada - to protest the Tienanmen Massacre and the coup against Michael Gorbachev in 1991. And I remember that awesome party we had at my house in Ottawa when the Berlin Wall fell. I'm pretty sure I got laid that night, but I can't exactly remember.
Ahh, Mosley, those were the days, my man...** recalling fondly ** I remember WAY back in the early 80s, that was BA time: Before AIDS.
You didn't need condoms or anything, just get your girlfriend on the pill and the two of you were all set. I met this one black chick at an antinuclear war rally, she was amazing. Could suck the chrome off a trailer hitch.
Those were the days. 
Last edited by Manner of Speaking on Mon Apr 02, 2007 3:28 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
In any case...I mentioned earlier, this thread is not about the merits of the "war", either for or against, or the merits of the opinions of those in the US who choose to protest against the war. It's simply intended as a prediction exercise.
Last edited by Manner of Speaking on Mon Apr 02, 2007 3:29 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I predict this won't be the last time the thread goes off-topic.
I further predict a few of our neo-con idiots will be pouncing soon in this thread. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mosley
Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fair enough, Manner, fair enough. And I give you credit for putting your a$$ on the line for making the prediction. That alone guarantees that this thread won't die for months to come.
"BA". Ha, ha! I'm old enough to remember the "just say yes" Seventies, when syph & clap were the deadliest STDs around.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mosley
Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
*Bump*
Well, MOS...feel the 20 bucks slippin' away?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
As a matter of fact, I do. I'm surprised, but in any case, it's been an interesting exercise. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Tens of thousands of people have taken part in demonstrations against the war in Iraq in cities across the US.
Rallies took place in a dozen cities, with the biggest crowds gathering in New York, Chicago and San Francisco.
They were timed to coincide with the fifth anniversary of a vote by the US Senate to authorise the Iraq invasion.
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7065975.stm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
...and the relevance to this thread is...? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IGTG needs not be relevant, he's IGTG after all. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|