Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Seoul ranks 87th in quality of living among world cities
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Real Reality



Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 7:00 am    Post subject: Seoul ranks 87th in quality of living among world cities Reply with quote

Seoul ranks 87th in quality of living among world cities
"Seoul ranked 87th in quality of living among the world's major urban centers, a survey by a New York-based human resource consulting firm said Tuesday.

The ranking is a gain of two compared to last year's report by the Mercer Human Resource Consulting Group. Last year, the South Korean capital of over 10 million people ranked 89th on the list."
Yonhap News (April 3, 2007)
http://english.yna.co.kr/Engnews/20070403/410100000020070403213710E9.html

Highlights from the 2007 Quality of Living Survey
http://www.mercerhr.com/referencecontent.jhtml?idContent=1128060
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blaseblasphemener



Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 7:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That list is a joke. Believe Calgary made it into the top 25, a city where you can't get a family doctor, so you have to wait 7 hours at a clinic to see a doctor. Also, a crap house costs $400,000, weather is crap 5 months or more out of the year, there are no quality lakes or for that matter ocean anywhere close by, and taxes are still, well, Canadian taxes. Basically, these lists seem to be ethnocentrically biased, IMO. Sure, Seoul has a lot of crap, but it has a lot going for it too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

But what about public transport? Calgary made a whole five new C-Train stations over the past decade. After they make Crowfoot Station they're going to build the next one lickety-split by 2023. And it doesn't give you the hassle of having to carry change when you pay with a toonie - in Seoul the machine spits out the change and then you have to carry your money around whereas in Calgary it keeps the entire amount without change so you don't have to feel weighed down. And without accepting payment for tickets with bills you get the added convenience of a trip to a convenience store to break the bill, or the extra exercise by just walking home, or the adrenalin rush of taking the train without payment because it's -30 and you didn't have anywhere to break the bill. In Seoul it's so blah - put your money in, get your change back, get your ticket, get on the train. Give me the C-Train any day.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
The Hierophant



Joined: 13 Sep 2005

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Auckland tied for fifth! Eat that ya Auzzie bastards! Razz

Seriously though, I really like Seoul. Don't see what all the hatin's about.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gundy



Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Location: Calgary

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 10:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="mithridates"]But what about public transport? Calgary made a whole five new C-Train stations over the past decade. After they make Crowfoot Station they're going to build the next one lickety-split by 2023. And it doesn't give you the hassle of having to carry change when you pay with a toonie - in Seoul the machine spits out the change and then you have to carry your money around whereas in Calgary it keeps the entire amount without change so you don't have to feel weighed down. And without accepting payment for tickets with bills you get the added convenience of a trip to a convenience store to break the bill, or the extra exercise by just walking home, or the adrenalin rush of taking the train without payment because it's -30 and you didn't have anywhere to break the bill. In Seoul it's so blah - put your money in, get your change back, get your ticket, get on the train. Give me the C-Train any day.[/quote]

Currently living in Calgary. I agree with you about how amazing the public transit system is so amazing in fact that in my awe of is amazingness I have decided I can't take it anymore and have began walking to work. Walking to work in minus -19C (with windchill) is really great.

I have to add that the night life in Seoul has nothing on Calgary. Unlike Seoul with a great variety of establishments across various city districts, Calgary has decided to make every bar a sports bar!!! (Go Flames Go). It's so great never having to choose what to do!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kiwigal



Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Location: South Korea

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Huh, Auckland beat Sydney and Wellington beat Melbourne. Interesting...
I wasn't really aware that NZ and Australia were part of Asia?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I drove through Calgary about 7 years ago, didn't stop, and just remember thinking, this is no place I ever, ever want to live.

But I wonder if this survey takes suburbs into consideration. Yes, Vancouver is fabulous, and expensive by Canadian standards but not by many other cities' standards. But what about Surrey or Langley? Factor those in and I'm sure Vancouver would plumet.

At any rate, for an EFL teacher with minimal qualifications, Seoul has to be better than the 87th best city in the world.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pest2



Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 6:13 pm    Post subject: Re: Seoul ranks 87th in quality of living among world cities Reply with quote

the study claims the quality of living survey is set up for expats in the cities. Takes into consideration special appeal and interesting things in a non-objective way.

If you ask me, this is an almost impossible thing to do objectively. People always want such different things in a place to live.

For me, compared to world cities, Seoul is in fact probably at the bottom of the list. Nightlife suks. conservative. Uniformly similar throughout. Polluted. The cost of living relative to the average person's pay is high. The average person scrapes by on very little.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Saxiif



Joined: 15 May 2003
Location: Seongnam

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hmmmmm it seems that they're rating cities according to how "safe and stable" they are. Seoul is a lot of things but unsafe (except for the traffic) certainly isn't one of them.

Also according to the list you have to go down to 34 before running into a city that isn't full of white people, so it seems that this is a list of "where rich white businessmen will feel at home" more than anything...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
pastis



Joined: 20 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 7:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it's a stupid survey too. As far as I'm concerned "quality of life" has way more to do with how much money you have than anything else. If you're rich, then it's hard to imagine better places to live than the nice areas in big cities like New York, Paris, London or Tokyo etc. They have every kind of luxury and convenience, and things like safety and healthcare etc. become moot if the price is right. And you can always take vacations away from the big city if you have money.
If I were a millionaire I'd way rather live in a huge city like New York or Tokyo than Geneva or Vancouver (I found Vancouver pretty with the mountains and that, but kinda dull otherwise). Actually I prefer bigger cities regardless, but the bottom line is that it's not easy to live in any city with no money, including the list toppers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Canuck Teacher



Joined: 18 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 7:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

87th? sounds about right. a big jump from 89th the year before. way to go seoul!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Canuck Teacher



Joined: 18 Feb 2007

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 7:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

blaseblasphemener wrote:
Basically, these lists seem to be ethnocentrically biased, IMO. Sure, Seoul has a lot of crap, but it has a lot going for it too.


Ethnocentrically biased? How can it not be?! Different parts of the world, and the cultures associated with those regions, have different setㄴ of functioning values (declared or not) for most things; including what constitutes a "good standard of living." If the test criteria for this survey placed any value on clean air, clean water, modern and professional health care, openness to multiculturalism, standards of education, sexual equality, universal and legitimate access to legal rights, population density, then you will find it skewed to Western cities/countries.

Seoul may be a good place to earn a buck, and Koreans can be excellent people, but lets face it, Seoul is a shit hole.

Truth isn't cultural, it's universal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
eamo



Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Koreans are only starting to realise in the 21st century that economic and industrial progress aren't the only factors in what makes a country successful. That's why we got the Cheonggye-chung!

When they sort out the schools and hospitals, and create a few green spaces here and there, they will make big jumps in that survey.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Saxiif wrote:
hmmmmm it seems that they're rating cities according to how "safe and stable" they are. Seoul is a lot of things but unsafe (except for the traffic) certainly isn't one of them.

Also according to the list you have to go down to 34 before running into a city that isn't full of white people...


Hongcouver?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
funkywinkerbeans



Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Location: seoul

PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ha ha ha

34th down the list until you find a city that's not full of white people.

I stopped at #3, Vancouver, until I found a city not full of white people.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International