Korean Job Discussion Forums

[huffdaddy]

The Hindus are at it again.

[thepeel]

Soon, we will have anti-Western marches by "new vibrant citizens" in Western cities! "Behead those who kiss in public in India!" the signs will say. Hollywood execs will be killed all over the world as retributions. The left in the West will smile with glee that the brown folks are finally standing up to the 'imperialist yankee dogs' who culturally invade brown nations and sell them bad comedy movies. The hindu "youths" in Paris will riot for 399 days and burn 10,000 cars and 200 schools. The cast of Saturday Night Live will go into hiding. The UN, EU and douchbage left-wingers the world over will loudly advocate for a decrease in public-kissing freedoms so as not to offend the "moderate hindus" and further radicalize them in Vancouver. Taxi drivers in Winnipeg will stop driving people who have beef, be it in frozen or cooked hamburger form. My family farm in Alberta (a cattle farm) will be tagged with anti-Western graffiti written in Hindi.

Get ready!

[Kuros]

In some way or another, every reactionary thread is an attempt at trolling.

Some posters, like BB, admit that they like to 'stir things up,' i.e. troll a little, but also will try to get into serious discussions. This is why Big Bird will sometimes put a provocative title on her threads.

In other cases, people will use satire and in some extreme cases actually become more obnoxious than the poster they intend to satirize. MOS' reactionary posts to SteveMcGarrett spring to mind.

In this case, we have someone employing sarcasm to make their point. It's not a reductio ad absurdum because the of the nature of the example. It's actually sarcastic because the very fact that an anecdote could provide any 'evidence,' here the evidence I guess is of the intolerance of Hinduism, is itself being mocked. The OP doesn't seem to believe that Hindus can be called intolerant based on one anecdote.

This is not the most blatant piece of trolling, but I think we could see that it will get a lot of responses that many outside the debate would deem less than productive. Unless of course I'm mistaken, and HuffDaddy really thinks Hindus are intolerant.

[Adventurer]

I think it was fair for huff daddy to post this. It shows that there are a lot of intolerant Hindus. They are overreacting regarding some wedding. Why should they get their knickers all tied up over something like this. They may have behaved badly, but to go on about how Hindu values were insulted seems a bit much.

[ella]

They won't go to jail. All the huff and bother is mainly for show. But if you make the choice to marry in a ceremony for a particular religion then, good grief, respect their rules. I don't know about criminal but their behavior was certainly boorish. Hurley not removing her shoes was gravely insulting. I couldn't imagine doing such a thing (and I'm not Hindu).

[gang ah jee]

[thepeel]

My reply was as (not) serious as the OP, but also as reflective of my real ideas as was the OP. Huff doesn't think muslims are unique in their intolerance. He is right. People are generally intolerant. But I believe islam is unique in its ability to create frothing mouthed violent responses to insults.

I seriously await the marches in Vancouver. But we all know they won't happen.

He actually beat me to the OP.

[huffdaddy]

[thepeel]

I am blindly certain, without any meaningful evidence, that the moderate Hindus vastly outnumber the extremists and that that article is racist and hinduaphobic.

And the dude who write it is a nazi too. Take it to stormfront huff.

[huffdaddy]

[thepeel]

You are a bigot/racist. I lived in XXXX for many years and while there met many moderate hindus who would never think of such things.

[On the other hand]

[thepeel]

[ED209]

[mindmetoo]

Intolerant Christians:

http://www.bethuneinstitute.org/documents/killers.html