|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| You cant read very well, can you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Roh tried to cover the sky with his palm, but he failed, so now he is changing his story |
He tried to bite off more than he could chew? *shrug* literal translations aren't always best. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Octavius Hite

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Uhh, D!CK:
| Quote: |
Octavius Hite wrote:
I will make this simple for the retarded children in the class:
The LAW:
Quote:
Under South Korean law, all contact with the North must be reported to the Unification Ministry either in advance or immediately afterward. Failure to do so is punishable by a 1 million won fine.
The Unification Ministry:
Quote:
he Unification Ministry agreed that Ahn�s case is not in violation of law, because he acted under a presidential order. �Ahn also consulted with the unification minister at the time, and there was nothing wrong with the purpose of the contact and the outcome,� Kim Nam-sik, spokesman of the Unification Ministry, said. �Ahn will not be fined, nor will he be warned.�
just in cased you missed it in your commie-hating, bagel-loving mind:
Quote:
Ahn also consulted with the unification minister at the time
So no law was broken. |
Read again. Please. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| "Illegal? That's ok, I can brake the law, I'm ...& |
How does one slow down the law? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NAVFC
Joined: 10 May 2006
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Octavius Hite wrote: |
| Quote: |
| The Unification Ministry agreed that Ahn�s case is not in violation of law, because he acted under a presidential order. �Ahn also consulted with the unification minister at the time, and there was nothing wrong with the purpose of the contact and the outcome,� Kim Nam-sik, spokesman of the Unification Ministry, said. �Ahn will not be fined, nor will he be warned.� |
Sorta proves you wrong, doesn't it Jinju?
| Quote: |
| It is extremely dangerous to contact the North with a non-professional,� Yoo said. |
This must be Jinju's Korean Doppelganger, still ranting and raving about commies as if they still had any pull on the world. Dude, get back on your meds and join us in 2007. |
Hey Octavius, communists are still a threat to the world... looking at the rising Red China...
given China's lack of many natural resources, at some point in time, in order to fuel its own expansion. china will have to acquire more natural resources. Ill give you 3 guesses how they plan to do it.
hint:the Chinese military build up isnt for nothing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NAVFC wrote: |
Hey Octavius, communists are still a threat to the world... looking at the rising Red China...
given China's lack of many natural resources, at some point in time, in order to fuel its own expansion. china will have to acquire more natural resources. Ill give you 3 guesses how they plan to do it.
hint:the Chinese military build up isnt for nothing. |
I'll give you one guess how The Bush Cadre has tried to do it... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NAVFC
Joined: 10 May 2006
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
| NAVFC wrote: |
Hey Octavius, communists are still a threat to the world... looking at the rising Red China...
given China's lack of many natural resources, at some point in time, in order to fuel its own expansion. china will have to acquire more natural resources. Ill give you 3 guesses how they plan to do it.
hint:the Chinese military build up isnt for nothing. |
I'll give you one guess how The Bush Cadre has tried to do it... |
Oh please. We know you dislike Bush, but the GWOT isnt about trying to conquer the world or expand US resources. If thatw ere the case theyd be going at it alot differently as this war has done nothing but cost us money. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Octavius Hite

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey smart guy. China is a threat because of its monster economy, it has nothing toi do with whether or not it is communist. If China today were a democracy it would still be building up its army and looking to expand into overseas raw material markets (look at the democracy that is Russia these days).
Again, China is a threat because its China, its not trying to export communism to anyone, just cheap, sh1tty plastic and streel products. Jinju has an irrational fear of commies and still lives somwhere between September 1939 and 1989. He needs to take his meds and you need to stop defending his craziness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NAVFC
Joined: 10 May 2006
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Octavius Hite wrote: |
Hey smart guy. China is a threat because of its monster economy, it has nothing toi do with whether or not it is communist. If China today were a democracy it would still be building up its army and looking to expand into overseas raw material markets (look at the democracy that is Russia these days).
Again, China is a threat because its China, its not trying to export communism to anyone, just cheap, sh1tty plastic and streel products. Jinju has an irrational fear of commies and still lives somwhere between September 1939 and 1989. He needs to take his meds and you need to stop defending his craziness. |
whats democracy got to do with it?
Ok but if it was capitalist, not communist, they would have a much easier time expanding then they are now, and without conquering anyone. But Id say in oh, maybe 7-10 years, theres going to be a war wth China on some front. id bet money on it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Octavius Hite

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Ok but if it was capitalist, not communist, they would have a much easier time expanding then they are now, |
You're not even worth talking too, get a clue, read a book, watch some news man. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NAVFC
Joined: 10 May 2006
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Octavius Hite wrote: |
| Quote: |
| Ok but if it was capitalist, not communist, they would have a much easier time expanding then they are now, |
You're not even worth talking too, get a clue, read a book, watch some news man. |
It would seem you are the clueless one. Do you even know the difference between a capitalist and communist economy? Democracy has nothing tyo do with it..hell if someone wanted they could have a nation that was both a communist economy and democratic in nature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NAVFC wrote: |
...
... Do you even know the difference between a capitalist and communist economy? Democracy has nothing tyo do with it..hell if someone wanted they could have a nation that was both a communist economy and democratic in nature. |
Perhaps, but not for long. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Octavius Hite

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dude have you been to China? While its has some communistic elements it also has many, many market driven capitalist elements. Its economy defies definition but it certainly is not communist by traditional definitions. Its more like Canada circa 1970. It is changing and the threat it poses has nothing to do with it being "communist".
The threat from China is that there is no way possible for it to reach American levels of individual wealth for all 1.3 billion of its people. I don't think there will be a war, nuclear powers will avoid war at all costs, but I think you will see many regional conflicts between governments and rebel groups fighting over water, oil, diamonds, copper,etc with one side backed by the west and one side backed by China. It will be the cold war redux but instead of ideology it will be resources which are fought over. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NAVFC wrote: |
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
| NAVFC wrote: |
Hey Octavius, communists are still a threat to the world... looking at the rising Red China...
given China's lack of many natural resources, at some point in time, in order to fuel its own expansion. china will have to acquire more natural resources. Ill give you 3 guesses how they plan to do it.
hint:the Chinese military build up isnt for nothing. |
I'll give you one guess how The Bush Cadre has tried to do it... |
Oh please. We know you dislike Bush, but the GWOT isnt about trying to conquer the world or expand US resources. |
Not if you're a 30% wingnut.
| Quote: |
| If thatw ere the case theyd be going at it alot differently as this war has done nothing but cost us money. |
You think they **planned it this way??**
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|