|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 9:06 am Post subject: Iraq war headline from 2003 |
|
|
I just stumbled across this article by chance. I'm posting it just because 2003 still feels like yesterday to me.
Quote: |
Coalition deaths fewer than in 1991
'We became stronger while Saddam became weaker'
By Patrick Cooper
CNN
Wednesday, June 25, 2003 Posted: 2232 GMT ( 6:32 AM HKT)
(CNN) -- As the fighting winds down, U.S.-led coalition deaths so far in this war in Iraq are far fewer than those killed in the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
As of Thursday, 157 U.S. and British troops had died in the war, less than half the 358 coalition deaths in Desert Storm.
In 1991, 148 U.S. forces were killed in action. In this war, 109 Americans have died in combat. Noncombatant U.S. deaths in Desert Storm numbered 145; the number so far in this war is 17.
So-called friendly fire deaths -- when troops accidentally fire on allies or their own units -- are counted among combat deaths. Thirty-five happened in 1991 and fewer than a dozen in this war.
On the down side, the number of British deaths was higher in this war, 31 compared with 24. Many of the 31 deaths came during a pair of helicopter accidents last month.
Although several other countries have contributed personnel to this war effort, none have suffered deaths. (In 1991, France and allied Arab nations lost 41 troops.)
Factors on both sides of the fighting resulted in fewer coalition casualties, according to retired U.S. Air Force Maj. Gen. Don Shepperd, a military analyst for CNN.
A deteriorating Iraqi economy and technological advances gave the coalition a greater advantage in almost all aspects of the battlefield, Shepperd said.
"We became stronger while Saddam became weaker. ... We can bring appropriate and overwhelming firepower to bear at times and places of our choosing, while Saddam can only respond to what attacks him," he said.
After the 1991 war, Iraq was "severely hampered" by sanctions and had trouble re-arming, while the United States was significantly upgrading its military capabilities, Shepperd said.
Also, the U.S. military has improved its precision, response strategies and training during the past 12 years, he said.
The Pentagon has not said when it will declare the present war finished. But with almost all of Iraq's major cities under coalition control, it would take a major twist in the coalition's fortunes to match the toll of Desert Storm.
The coalition has avoided an attack as deadly as the Dhahran strike of 1991. In that incident, an Iraqi Scud missile hit U.S. barracks near Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, killing 28 troops and wounding more than 100.
But Gen. Tommy Franks, chief of the U.S. Central Command, told CNN on Sunday the number of American losses this time still troubled him.
"Someone made a comment to me the other day that we've had amazingly few casualties. And I said, 'Well, I don't know how we can say that.' The perfect plan spends no treasure and has no casualties," Franks said.
"We have spent treasure and we have had casualties. I believe that we ought to all recognize that if you're a mom, a dad, a husband, a wife of someone lost in a war, the casualties have not been low."
Smarter weapons, strategies cut losses
The U.S. military has kept casualties in mind as it develops weapons and war plans. "We know almost everything about Iraqi military dispositions and can attack them with appropriate air power first, while he knows nothing about us," Shepperd said.
Search-and-rescue operations have also greatly improved, he said. Better training techniques have decreased accidents and allowed the military to bloodlessly test strategies.
The Pentagon has touted the precision of its weapons, saying it results in fewer Iraqi civilian deaths. Although figures are hard to come by, media reports indicate that fewer Iraqi civilians have been killed in this war in Iraq than in the last.
After Desert Storm, the Iraqi government estimated 35,000 civilians had died. Abu Dhabi TV reported on April 8 that Iraqi sources claimed 1,252 civilians had been killed and 5,103 had been wounded in this conflict.
The antiwar Iraq Body Count project, which is monitoring and compiling media reports of Iraqi civilian casualties, estimates between 1,631 and 1,887 civilians had died as of April 17.
On the battlefield, however, unknown thousands of Iraqi soldiers have been killed. U.S. Central Command has given few figures on the subject, but officials did estimate 2,000-3,000 Iraqi troops were killed in one day alone, during an April 5 blitz into Baghdad.
The U.S. estimated more than 100,000 Iraqi soldiers died in the 1991 Gulf War, but human rights groups claimed much higher numbers.
Friendly fire deaths
Friendly fire deaths have continued to haunt British forces. In the 1991 war, nine of the 24 British fatalities came from friendly fire. In this war, six of the 31 British fatalities have been attributed to friendly fire.
Five of the British deaths from friendly fire in this war came from a Basra tank incident and when a Patriot missile shot down a Royal Air Force plane.
The sixth death -- which happened when a U.S. A-10 plane fired on two British light armored vehicles -- echoed a Gulf War incident in which a U.S. A-10 plane attacked two British infantry vehicles in daylight. That incident accounted for all nine of the British friendly fire deaths in 1991.
Since then, the British Ministry of Defense has been under intense pressure to reduce those deaths. A Parliament committee took the ministry to task in August 2002, saying ministry solutions were "years away from fruition."
In addition to the accidental attacks on British troops, U.S. forces also attacked a friendly Kurdish military convoy on April 6, killing 18.
U.S. friendly fire deaths drop
Two American deaths were officially attributed to friendly fire in this war, but several others are being are investigated as friendly fire-related, according to U.S. Central Command.
The final number will almost certainly be down from the 35 such deaths of U.S. troops in 1991.
The 1991 deaths happened for some of the same reasons friendly fire incidents have happened in all wars: troops misidentifying targets, usually because of weather and battlefield conditions, and coordination problems.
In this war, despite fierce sandstorms and skirmishes with irregular forces, the Pentagon has used technology to help identify "blues," the color the military designates its own forces and its allies.
A new digital system called the "Blue Force Tracker" uses satellite signals to map out positions and aid communications.
"We know where our people are and can command and control them," Shepperd said. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ah yes, the heady days of 2003...
Quote: |
What lies behind the military's victory in Iraq.
By Fred Kaplan
Posted Thursday, April 10, 2003, at 6:45 PM ET
So when and how did the U.S. military get this good? The elements of swift victory in Gulf War II have been well laid-out: the agility and flexibility of our forces, the pinpoint accuracy of the bombs, the commanders' real-time view of the battlefield, the remarkable coordination among all branches of the armed services (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines) and special operations. But these elements, and this degree of success, have not been seen in previous wars, not even in the first Gulf War 12 years ago. Three major changes have taken hold within the military since then�a new war-fighting doctrine, advanced digital technology, and a less parochial culture.
|
I suppose the analysis might be accurate, as far as it went at that time. Hard to imagine anyone taking such a triumphalist tone in 2007 though.
Quote: |
We don't yet fully know the lessons of this war�in part because it isn't over yet and in part because, as James Carafano, a former Army officer now with the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, put it, "90 percent of the war was going on out of our vision." |
Nice touch of modesty there. However, I'm guessing that the lessons Kaplan might have been speculating about learning in 2003 were not quite the ones he finds himself learning in 2007. Not even in the same ballpark.
Quote: |
Most of that 90 percent was being conducted by special ops (no embedded reporters there) and by the laptop-wielding joint-forces crew in Qatar (a few embeds, but no access to that part of the operation). What they were and are doing, however invisible, formed a large part of what made this war so stunning and new.
|
"Stunning and new." Well, I guess that's one way of putting it.
http://www.slate.com/id/2081388/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh gosh that gave me a laugh. I too remember it as if it were yesterday, even though I hadn't yet come to Korea at the time. I was living in America at the time and found myself just looking around wondering what the hell are you people thinking.
Then they didn't find any WMD. Well, I thought, the American people will never be stupid enough to put up with this! [Bum-suk to self: never underestimate the stupidity of the American people]. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Junior

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Location: the eye
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
Ah yes, the heady days of 2003... |
-when a certain poster named "rapier" was laughed off the board for predicting the US would be come bogged down in an unwinnable war of attrition, "another vietnam".  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|