|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Do you buy music cds? |
Yes and often |
|
16% |
[ 8 ] |
Sometimes. If I really like the cd. |
|
42% |
[ 21 ] |
No. I have a spindle of 100 cd-rs and I always download. |
|
40% |
[ 20 ] |
|
Total Votes : 49 |
|
Author |
Message |
Dev
Joined: 18 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:08 am Post subject: Does Anybody Buy CDs Anymore? |
|
|
Even I'm not sure why I do, but I still buy music CDs sometimes. Part of me says "Why bother? It's more convenient to just download and not pay anything."
On the other hand, I have somehow convinced myself that it's the right thing to do sometimes. I like the sound I get from cds better than MP3 files. It's bad enough that we've lost the warm feeling of sound from vinyl, even worse is to get a bad MP3 copy of a cd.
This justifies in me the reason to sometimes buys CDs. I particularly like to buy the CDs of indie bands because they could use my support.
Big name artists like Bruce Springsteen, who got some kind of record deal recently for $100 million dollars does not need my help. He's not my taste anyway.
So, I am curious. How many of you actually buy a CD every now and then? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
happeningthang

Joined: 26 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Before the advent of MP3s I was a devotee of the second hand record stores, because as much as I loved music , I just couldn't afford $30 per CD.
Now that there's a much cheaper option, I haven't bought a CD in 2-3 years, and I'm pretty sure, outside of pirated copies, I never will again.
I will pay to download a wide range of music from sites like allofmp3.com, since P2Ps are usually limited in their ranges, but the days of the record shop are dead or dying. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sine qua non

Joined: 18 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:40 am Post subject: Re: Does Anybody Buy CDs Anymore? |
|
|
Dev wrote: |
Big name artist...does not need my help. |
Dude, purchasing a CD isn't some form of charity where the buying is helping some poor, downtrodden minstrel. You are paying for what the artist made, the service rendered.
Using your logic, it would be the same for a hagwon owner to tell the native speaking English teacher, "Well, you come from a country with a higher per capita income than Korea, so I don't really need to pay you. You already have enough wealth."
I can understand the temptation of penniless students to download music (though it is still illegal), but for someone who is out of school and working and making a big chunk of cash every month in Korea, that's just theft. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oneofthesarahs

Joined: 05 Nov 2006 Location: Sacheon City
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
I dig CDs. I have an Ipod, I download music, but there still something about the having the physical CD in hand that I love. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Qinella
Joined: 25 Feb 2005 Location: the crib
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
I still purchase CDs of the bands I really dig, but usually only if a) I've already downloaded the album and checked it out or b) it's a band I know will not disappoint.
Though, I don't buy nearly as much these days as I once did. As with happeningthang, I too used to be a major CD thrift store junkie. There were several spots I'd frequent and pick up about 10 CDs a month. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think any money from a used CD sale goes to the artist/record company. So now that I d/l a ton of music, I feel like it's basically the same thing as I was always doing--that is, not supporting the artists.
I don't purchase MP3s, either. I probably would if there were a site that actually had a decent selection and did not put all kinds of annoying tags and certificates on the files. Once I purchase a product, it's mine, just like a CD, not some goofy thing I can only use 4 times or whatever.
Justifications:
1. Record companies only give a fraction of the CD sales to the artists, anyhow. (so I only support small- or indie-label productions)
2. The price of CDs, unlike just about every other type of technology in the past two decades, has never gone down. CDs have always been absurdly expensive, and jewel cases are total crap that constantly break.
3. Record companies are trying their best to impede technology rather than work with it. Only as a last resort are they turning to options, which still suck because of reasons I said above.
4. Who wants to support an industry that pays off radio stations to decide who gets on the air and makes it really freakin hard for anyone not on one of the big labels to make a name for themselves? Big record companies have always been and continue to be actively oppressing musicians nationwide to the best of their ability. Screw the RIAA et al. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bibbitybop

Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Qinella hit it on the head. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Woland
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I still hit used cd stores because there is a lot of stuff that is not easily available online. In Seattle recently I picked up a ton of zydeco at a store called Swerve which had a great collection. Why a place in Seattle had that much good, obscure zydeco, I don't know, but I'm grateful for it.
I also occasionally will buy something new, just because it is convenient, but only with bands I know won't disappoint. When I can, I buy directly from the artist, to maximize their take. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
plokiju

Joined: 15 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rarely will a buy a CD. I know it's unethical and it's stealing but most of the music I download is stuff I wouldn't buy normally anyways. I download especially in Korea since they really only sell top 40 stuff. Or at least that's what I figure from the one time I went looking for CDs at the one record store I went to. Plus Qinella's reasons. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mnhnhyouh

Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Location: The Middle Kingdom
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just download music now. I used to buy a lot of CDs but then stopped. I was buying digital music from a wonderful Russian website, allofmp3.com but they have been getting attacked by the RIAA. They were selling albums encoded anyway you wanted, for USD$0.02 per mb. So high quality rips were more than lower quality rips. I was buying 192k mp3 for about USD$2.00 per album.
RIAA recently sued them for USD$1.26 TRILLION.
My problem with buying digital music online from the more recognised suppliers is that they are gouging. They are charging nearly as much for a lossy mp3 album as they do for a CD with none of the infrastructure needed for the distribution chain.
*beep* 'em, I say, until they charge a reasonable amount.
Wish I was Canadian though, where all the downloading is legal.
h |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
swetepete

Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Location: a limp little burg
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
I gleefully steal music from the internet. I don't think I'm entitled to, exactly, but *%$ it, I'm a thief when it comes to music. Always have been: ie Qinella's used-record shops, taping stuff off the radio when I was a kid, making mix tapes from other people's cd's...that's just the way it's always been.
I figure musicians, unless they're all crippled and old, should go out and tour if they want my money. Let them work like the rest of us! Let 'em make a union for their retirement funds. They can eat my ass if they got beef with that. I'll kick Lars Ulrich's skinny little billionaire rectum so hard he coughs poop for weeks if I get the chance. %#$#ing Metallica--pseudotoughguy leatherboy cokehead pukes, anyway. They got sixty or seventy bucks from me back in the day when I bought that kinda stuff--what, they want me to buy it AGAIN, just cause the crappy cd they sold me only lasted five years? Whatever.
Screw them--I'm not tithing to anybody. Goddamn punks never bought me any beer.
Now, a touring band, selling their own t-shirts and cds, I will support. Record companies? Not so much.
"Downloading music is destroying the music Industry...and it's FUN!!" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mole

Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Location: Act III
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bah~!
Some telemarketer talked me into the BMG music club.
I just wanna buy my last CD on contract, get my 4 free, and cancel. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SPINOZA
Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Location: $eoul
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was an avid CD buyer but - as sheer coincidence would have it - suddenly stopped once I discovered Limewire and Soulseek, which is not unrecently.
I love my CD collection at home....all those Pink Floyd and Bowie CDs lined up together. And also I recently bought the latest album from Coex of my favorite band who are not rich or well-known and whom I'm happy to support financially. That's kind of an obligation, because they've been my favorite band for 10 years, I've met them, I've been backstage, I flew to the US for a die-hard fans meet-up twice. Other than that, I feel no compulsion to spend good money on CDs when I can view the lyrics, artwork, artist info online and downloand the material from a file-sharing site, the latter I view as no different from borrowing a CD from someone and making a copy (so the 'steeling' analogy seems simplistic). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JongnoGuru

Joined: 25 May 2004 Location: peeing on your doorstep
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I suppose my habits and views re: CDs are generally in line with those of Sine qua non, oneofthesarahs and Woland.
Habits: I've been buying music (on LPs, cassettes & CDs) for most of my adult life. That's far more years than MP3s & downloading, legal or illegal, have been around. I was a poor, skinny uni student partly because of genetics, but also because whenever given with the choice, I'd opt for a new LP instead of a proper meal. So there's the habit of about two decades of paying full price, and expecting to pay full price, for my music. That and the simple enjoyment of having something tangible that I can pull off the shelf, open, load, hit "PLAY", and maybe reading the liner notes for the 50th time, as you do.
Views: I've done my fair share of things in my life that I regret, things I'm ashamed of, things that just remembering can induce feelings of general unwellness and dizziness. However and at the risk of sounding like the pompous, self-righteous blowhard I proudly admit to being, there is one thing that I am not, one thing that friends, colleagues, clients and anyone who's worked for me can count on me never to be. And that's a rationaliser.
If I know something to be unethical and wrong (excluding sexual perfidy of course) then I'm not going to construct clever rationales or compile lists of justifications to try and convince myself otherwise, or to excuse my dirty deed to others & assuage my guilt after the fact. While I think I might, under the right circumstances, make an okay Robin Hood, it's never going to be a case of "rob from the rich (record companies, etc.) and give to the Guru".
"Oh, I know it's wrong. But fark it, I'm a thief! Hyuk hyuk! "
Yeah... That *beep* doesn't fly with me. But then, it doesn't surprise me either. I've always known I have higher standards of integrity than most people. It's hereditary, so I can't really blame low-born scoundrels for their inability to rise above their genetic limits any more than I can blame Koreans for being shorter than me.
(they need a "tongue-in-cheek" smiley, but this one will have to do) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Leopard-Skin Pill-Box Hat

Joined: 01 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JongnoGuru wrote: |
Views: I've done my fair share of things in my life that I regret, things I'm ashamed of, things that just remembering can induce feelings of general unwellness and dizziness. However and at the risk of sounding like the pompous, self-righteous blowhard I proudly admit to being, there is one thing that I am not, one thing that friends, colleagues, clients and anyone who's worked for me can count on me never to be. And that's a rationaliser
If I know something to be unethical and wrong (excluding sexual perfidy of course) then I'm not going to construct clever rationales or compile lists of justifications to try and convince myself otherwise, or to excuse my dirty deed to others & assuage my guilt after the fact. While I think I might, under the right circumstances, make an okay Robin Hood, it's never going to be a case of "rob from the rich (record companies, etc.) and give to the Guru".
"Oh, I know it's wrong. But fark it, I'm a thief! Hyuk hyuk! " |
Fair argument, and commendable even. But just wondering, how (if at all) do you reconcile this view with the fact that the record companies blatantly rip off both the consumers and the artists? I mean $30+ for a CD is pretty ridiculous, almost enough to be described (in my books at least) as a mild form of extortion (i.e. a form of theft). Or is that just beside the point?
I guess the reason I ask is because for me the one thing I hope will come out of the whole downloading thing is to force the record companies to lower the prices to a reasonable level. If that happens, they might have a 'ethical' leg to stand on, but for now I'm not so sure.
Also, another point people seem to have missed: file sharing isn't stealing. At least no more so than buying the CD and lending it to your friend to listen to or recording a copy for him (this has been done for years, well before mp3s came out). Stealing would be selling the music and reaping the profits for yourself, while not paying the owner, or taking a physical CD from a store without paying - as that would cost the store real money. Downloading music can only be said to take away from potential profit, which boils down to pure speculation (speaking for myself, I know that most of the time I would never buy the CD anyway, even if I hadn't downloaded it). But either way, simply accessing shared files (uploaded by someone who bought the CD in the first place) is not stealing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JongnoGuru

Joined: 25 May 2004 Location: peeing on your doorstep
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Leopard-Skin Pill-Box Hat wrote: |
Fair argument, and commendable even. But just wondering, how (if at all) do you reconcile this view with the fact that the record companies blatantly rip off both the consumers and the artists? I mean $30+ for a CD is pretty ridiculous, almost enough to be described (in my booksat least) as a mild form of extortion (i.e. a form of theft). Or is that just beside the point? |
I've never spent $30+ for a CD in my life unless it was a compilation set, but that's beside the point, as is the generalisation about record companies being these unsatiable, unprincipled thieves, as though gouging product suppliers & buyers is somehow a trait unique to the music industry. Music isn't a basic life necessity like food or housing, yet buyers of these products/services, esp. in Korea, regularly get fxcked stupid, but what can you do? Pitch a tent & grow your own rice? With CDs, at least you have a choice both whether to buy or not, and whether to be a self-deluding, dishonest, weak-willed little "pirate" or buy it legally.
Quote: |
I guess the reason I ask is because for me the one thing I hope that will come out of the whole downloading thing is to force the record companies to lower the prices to a reasonable level. If that happens, they might have a 'ethical' leg to stand on, but for now I'm not so sure. |
Yeah, great. My gut instinct, which is never wrong, tells me that most Westerners who are illegal downloaders have become thoroughly Asianised in this respect, and the only price that will ever really satisfy them is the five-finger discount.
Quote: |
Also, another point people seem to have missed: file sharing isn't stealing. At least no more so than buying the CD and lending it to your friend to listen to or recording a copy for him (this has been done for years, well before mp3s came out). Stealing would be selling the music and reaping the profits for yourself, while not paying the owner, or taking a physical CD from a store without paying - as that would cost the store real money. Downloading music can only be said to take away from potential profit, which boils down to pure speculation (speaking for myself, I know that most of the time I would never buy the CD anyway, even if I hadn't downloaded it). But either way, simply accessing shared files (which were uploaded by someone who bought the CD in the first place) is not stealing. |
You seriously see no difference between lending a CD to a friend or relative (TO PLAY, NOT TO RIP, damn it) and tossing it up on the internet for millions of strangers to d/l, huh? Okay, whatever. See, what you claim to be sound reasons are what I consider technical loopholes, clever arguments, and rationalising, rationalising, rationalising. And I'm pretty sure God sees it the same way, so I fear you will be going to Hell, Leopard. So am I, but for other reasons, so can I ask you to please, please remember to bring your pirated MP3 collection when you come?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|