Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

MI5 Report: Iranian supported terrorist planning attack
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Kuros"]Endo is essentially right.

Quote:
America's support of MEK is hypocritical. It also hurts us, as MEK targets the very same liberal and open Iranian population we purportedly wish to woo.


For the record

MEK is not being supported they are being ignored. The US is supporting Balluchi tribesman in South East Iran. But not against Iran (wink - wink) .

It is hyprocritical a little but only if someone holds the US to a very high standard.

It is still not comparable w/ what Iran does for many reasons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo, you have to demonstrate why co-operation with the MEK is beneficial.

Similarly, proponents of water-boarding and torture have to demonstrate how torture is effective (they can't).

The ends can only justify the means if the end result is beneficial. Do you think there would be so much outrage over Iraq in America if the mission were really accomplished four years ago from May 1st?

Holding America to a high standard is not what I am doing. I am questioning the efficacy of a questionable policy. What does the US get from the MEK? Or have we forgotten the results of our over-reliance on Iraqi ex-patriot intelligence in the lead up to the war?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
endo



Joined: 14 Mar 2004
Location: Seoul...my home

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ignored Joo Rip Gwa Rhee?

Ignored would suggest that there is no contact between the MEK and the American military.

I would use the word "tolerated" with private contacts between the two sides.

Either way, a CIA field officer in Iraq must have a fascinating job. Dangerous as hell, but intreaging nonetheless.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Joo, you have to demonstrate why co-operation with the MEK is beneficial.


I haven't made up my mind but Iran does bad stuff to the US one could make a strong case that the US is just giving Iran back what it gives and Iran started it.

I don't know if the US is obligated to turn those guys over to Iran - a nation that has conducted a low level war against the US for a long time.

As I know the US has pretty much put the group out of comission.

Anyway for the record the ones conduting attacks are non persian Ballui Tribesman not the MEK.

Quote:
Similarly, proponents of water-boarding and torture have to demonstrate how torture is effective (they can't).

The ends can only justify the means if the end result is beneficial. Do you think there would be so much outrage over Iraq in America if the mission were really accomplished four years ago from May 1st?


No , if the war in Iraq went better everyone including the democrats who voted for it would be proudly be declaring they were for it all along.

Quote:
Holding America to a high standard is not what I am doing. I am questioning the efficacy of a questionable policy. What does the US get from the MEK? Or have we forgotten the results of our over-reliance on Iraqi ex-patriot intelligence in the lead up to the war?


Ok I understand.

If the groups the US supported were more powerful it might be worth doing, but they are not powerful on the scale of Hizzbollah they might cause more harm than good. So I agree in principle with what you are saying.

However there are many who would oppose the policy even if the groups were very effective against Iran. Were that the case then someone would be holding the US to a high standard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

endo wrote:
Ignored Joo Rip Gwa Rhee?

Ignored would suggest that there is no contact between the MEK and the American military.

I would use the word "tolerated" with private contacts between the two sides.

Either way, a CIA field officer in Iraq must have a fascinating job. Dangerous as hell, but intreaging nonetheless.



I stand corrected your choice of words is much better.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International