|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 10:41 pm Post subject: Men, doers. Women, watchers? |
|
|
The star quarterback and head cheerleader. This may be a movie cliche, but is it really? From business to science to sports to art, it seems like its the men doing and the women watching and supporting. It seems infact that a woman will ride a man better than a rodeo star rides a bull. Not only does she hang on to him longer, the man doesnt take half of what the bull has at the end. Now, yes, there are exceptions, but even those exceptions provide support to my thesis in this post. Take the most visible woman today, Hillary Clinton. I doubt she could be a senator, much less a presidential candidate if she didnt ride Bill to the bitter end. He flung her into the position she is in now. If her name was Hillary Roddham...no one would give a flying duck about her.
So, are men fundamentally The Doers, and women The Watchers? Do a few women who make it, even some in UPPER MANAGEMENT, somehow disprove my thesis even in the face of overwhelming support? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Natalia
Joined: 10 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, you really hate women don't you?
We're sheep. We're too vain. We're not vain enough.........
We get it. Why do you need to keep making these threads? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Natalia wrote: |
Wow, you really hate women don't you?
We're sheep. We're too vain. We're not vain enough.........
We get it. Why do you need to keep making these threads? |
Actually I dont KEEP making these threads. I have made 2 threads about women total.
I dont have a hate on for women. Theres nothing wrong with supporting. You can either disprove me with facts or you can just flame, as you did here.
Im just bringing up a topic for debate.
And dont forget to vote in the panda poll. The URL is in my sig. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scouse Mouse
Joined: 07 Jan 2007 Location: Cloud #9
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:51 pm Post subject: Re: Men, doers. Women, watchers? |
|
|
| jinju wrote: |
| Take the most visible woman today, Hillary Clinton. I doubt she could be a senator, much less a presidential candidate if she didnt ride Bill to the bitter end. He flung her into the position she is in now. If her name was Hillary Roddham...no one would give a flying duck about her. |
Hillary Rodham Clinton is an amazing woman though, and has a greater mind that you ever will. The fact that you can't even spell her name tells me that much!
The fact that you could only come with her as a successful politicial says a lot more about your small mind than it does the achievment of women. Margaret Thatcher was one of the most powerful women in history... and I doubt any educated person would have put that down to her gobshite husband. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Junior

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Location: the eye
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd like to see more women in positions of authority and power, particularly in Korea.
I've always viewed women as equals. Its only traditional societal structures that have kept women down and allowed men to physically intimidate them into subsevience. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JMO

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:05 pm Post subject: Re: Men, doers. Women, watchers? |
|
|
| Scouse Mouse wrote: |
Hillary Rodham Clinton is an amazing woman though, and has a greater mind that you ever will. The fact that you can't even spell her name tells me that much! |
Explain how she is an amazing woman. She is riding high thanks to the Clinton name. Again, if her name was not Clinton she wouldnt even be in the senate. One thing that Ive got to give her credit for is not letting emotions get the best of her and sticking by Bill during the whole Monica mess. She did well to stay and now she is reaping the rewards.
Gee, I misspelled her name. Tells you how highly I value her, doesnt it?
| Quote: |
| The fact that you could only come with her as a successful politicial says a lot more about your small mind than it does the achievment of women. Margaret Thatcher was one of the most powerful women in history... and I doubt any educated person would have put that down to her *beep* husband. |
Wow, You incredibly DOUBLED me! Throw in Merkel and Pelosi too while you are at it. Still that is enough successful women in poltics to count on the fingers of one hand. One flower doesnt mean its spring my friend, which is the point of my thesis here. Im not denying that there are successful women out there. Because there are a few. What I'm saying is that men dominate pretty much every field known to humankind. But also, Im saying that women are much more inclined to play the supportive role rather than lead. And guess what, thats what Hillary did. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
swetepete

Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Location: a limp little burg
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I disagree.
1) Women pump out the babies.
2) Virginia Woolf is not famous because of her husband.
3) Annie Liebowitz needed no man.
4) Lindsay Lohan does whoever she wants.
5) Frieda Kahlo was a much better painter than Diego Rivera.
6) Margaret Thatcher.
7) Catherine the Great.
8 ) The Dowager Empress in China during the Boxer Rebellion.
9) Elizabeth I.
10) "Though Queen Bodacea is long dead and gone, her spirit, in her children's children's children, lives on." (--Pete 'crackhead' Doherty)
So, yeah, I disagree. I think historically, and in many contemporary societies, women were pummeled into a spectator's role, but plenty rose above it. I'm glad as hell women are, in many countries at least, out from under that yoke, at least somewhat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blaseblasphemener
Joined: 01 Jun 2006 Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 7:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think a million or so years of humanity shouldn't be so easily discounted. Men have ruled the roost, and women have cared for children and the home for 99.99 percent of man's history, and this is still predominately true in nearly every country in the world.
Biology is what we are. For men, it's about sex. For women, it's about feeling loved, desired, and protected. Everything else is interesting but at the end of the day, those are the things we need.
Good luck beating biology... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flakfizer

Joined: 12 Nov 2004 Location: scaling the Cliffs of Insanity with a frayed rope.
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Here in Korea, when I go to my bank or the post office or many other businesses, it seems that women doing while the man are watching (or chatting with other men or falling asleep). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tarmangani

Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Location: the Calm
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:44 pm Post subject: |
| | |