View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
venus
Joined: 25 Oct 2006 Location: Near Seoul
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:21 pm Post subject: security deposits - blackmail and bullying |
|
|
Christ. I'm applying for new jobs at the moment and I've noticed that more than ever before schools are asking for security depositis between 600,000 - 900,000 Won to be deducted from salary in first three months.
Even GEPIK are doing this now. Even public schools!
What does this say about the relationships between teachers and employers in this country for them to have to essentially bully and blackmail us into staying at their schools...?
I'm going to add this to my list of things that are better in Japan...
If it wasn't for the money...
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mrsquirrel
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I personally see no problem with the 900,000 I'm paying at GEPIK. In my eyes it's a damage deposit which I would expect to pay in any country.
It's not a lot of money and it's taken out in installments so I don't notice it.
Effectively money in the bank. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
venus
Joined: 25 Oct 2006 Location: Near Seoul
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mrsquirrel wrote: |
I personally see no problem with the 900,000 I'm paying at GEPIK. In my eyes it's a damage deposit which I would expect to pay in any country.
It's not a lot of money and it's taken out in installments so I don't notice it.
Effectively money in the bank. |
Not quite money in the bank as the contract stipulates it will be returned at the completion of the one year contract.
If you decide to leave or are fired, you most likely will not see that money again.
It is a cynical attempt on the part of employers to make you 'serve' a full year.
People should be able to start jobs and feel free to stay as long as they want to, without penalty if things don't work out.
This is just so archaic and speaks volumes to me about the relationships between foriegn employees and Korean empoyers in this industry. They basically want to bully you into staying. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bosintang

Joined: 01 Dec 2003 Location: In the pot with the rest of the mutts
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Really, the only big question is why aren't *more* schools asking for a damage deposit?
I think a wise move for public schools would be to distance themselves from teachers as much as possible. They should still help teachers set up housing, but do so using a 3rd party. Schools should provide key money, but rent should not be included in salary.
The company I worked for in Japan did exactly this ( I had to pay a month's rent as a deposit, and it cost me that to break my lease.)
Ultimately, the foreign teacher choosing and being responsible for their housing would be better for both parties.
I also wonder when, if ever, schools will start reimbursing airfare at 6month mark or end of contract rather than in the beginning. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shifdog
Joined: 20 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A deposit isn't a bad idea. Unfortunately they are imposed for the wrong reasons. The purpose of a deposit is to cover damages or someone skipping out on rent. In Korea it's used by school's to penalize teachers who leave their job early. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mrsquirrel
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
People should be able to start jobs and feel free to stay as long as they want to, without penalty if things don't work out. |
Depends how you look at it.
If you rent a house on a one year lease and you pay an initial deposit you can lose that deposit if you break your contract, mess the house up.
Why shouldn't schools be able to ensure that the money they are paying out for the accomodation they have paid 5mill+ on and guaranteed a monthly payment on.
As I said I see no problem with it. Maybe I'll get shafted at the end then I will be pissed off for a week or so then forget about it. Hopefully not. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
venus
Joined: 25 Oct 2006 Location: Near Seoul
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have no problem with providing deposits for housing.
That is not the issue here and the experinced among you will know that.
How many of you really believe that if you don't finish the contract you'll get that money back...?
I'd like to be so naive, but experience here has shown me otherwise.
Does anyone know if I were to start a job with EPIK and for whatever reason did not complete the full 12 months -would that 900,000 Won deposit be returned.
Is it simply a housing deposit not linked in anyway to your completing the contract...?
I say this as a friend of mine quit his hakwan job after 6 months and his 'security' deposit was witheld.
I wouldn't EXPECT, yet wouldn't be SURPRISED if a public school did the same....
Anyone got any stories...? I'm going to apply with GEPIK and SEPIK but am wary about the deposit.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The_Conservative
Joined: 15 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
venus wrote: |
[If you decide to leave or are fired, you most likely will not see that money again.
People should be able to start jobs and feel free to stay as long as they want to, without penalty if things don't work out.
. |
With a public school you will get that money back, it's yours...unless you mess the house up.
What about those who pull a runner or damage their apartment?
In the first year (or so I was told) there was no damage deposit. Unfortunately a few losers had to damage their apartment or skip out on the last month's bills and fled back to their home country. Why should GEPIK foot the bills for irresponsible people?
That's why it gets more and more restrictive. Transcripts, verification, deposits...all are a response to foreign teachers coming over and abusing the system.
Last edited by The_Conservative on Wed May 02, 2007 6:46 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bosintang

Joined: 01 Dec 2003 Location: In the pot with the rest of the mutts
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
venus wrote: |
Anyone got any stories...? I'm going to apply with GEPIK and SEPIK but am wary about the deposit.... |
You make a good point, but I don't think this would apply so much to public schools, although of course you can never guarantee these kind of things.
But I'd make sure it is clearly stated that the money is returned after termination of contract.
As for stories...I heard a story from my ex-supervisor about an Irish girl that called in sick one day. After a few days of not showing up, they went to her apartment to find that she took off out of town and the place was completely emptied. She had sold everything. The new foreign teacher who replaced her was apparently getting phone calls weeks later from people responding to her advertisement.
Last edited by bosintang on Wed May 02, 2007 6:44 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mrsquirrel
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From what I know. I could be wrong. As long as you leave your job with thr right amount of notice everything will be fine. Maybe you will lose it if you leave before you have completed six months so that they get their airfare back.
I'm comfortable with the situation. I don't see it as runner security. Then I am confident in my ability to stick it out in a job for a year. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you terminate early they can keep your bonus money.
And they don't have to pay your return airfare.
And if they are smart they have held your initial airfare for 6 months.
This should be more than adequate security.
cbc
Last edited by cbclark4 on Wed May 02, 2007 6:44 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mrsquirrel
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cbclark4 wrote: |
If you terminate early they can keep your bonus money.
cbc |
Severance pay or deposit? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, it sucks in some respects, but look at it this way;
if you worked at a hagwan, you may have a lot more to worry about than just getting your deposit back. You may get shafted out of a month or more's wages + you probably won't get health insurance + you probably won't get your pension paid etc.
At least with the public school jobs, you know you will get paid on time and there is a very good likelihood of getting your deposit back at the end of your contract.
With a hagwan, you never know.
Anyway, good luck. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
merkurix
Joined: 21 Dec 2006 Location: Not far from the deep end.
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I want to agree with the OP. Instead of penalties, there should be more incentives to stay on. At one place I worked at, they didn't skim your paychecks for three months, but they did have a ton of cash bonuses available for the completion of a one year contract, which included severance pay, completion bonus, and unused sick pay (as well as getting double your pension deductions back if you return to your country). There was just to much cash to be had at the end to want to quit, and if you quit, no sweat off your back--at least there was no financial penalties out of your pocket. I say carrots, not sanctions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mrsquirrel
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is the same argument that goes around and around in circles.
I say it's not a penalty it's a security deposit on the apartment.
He says it is cause it means he can't run.
There you go
Argument finished
Thread closed |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|