Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

South Korea's reconciliation gamble

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Alias



Joined: 24 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2007 5:20 pm    Post subject: South Korea's reconciliation gamble Reply with quote

Eighty-million dollars might seem a lot of money to pay for a short train journey.

But that is in effect what South Korea paid to the North Koreans for permission to test the rail links they have been building through the heavily-fortified demilitarised zone.

On Thursday two trains crossed the military demarcation line - from the north and the south - for the first time in 56 years.

In the circumstances it is hardly surprising the South Koreans milked the event for all it was worth.

The government is facing domestic and foreign criticism for being too easy on North Korea. It wants to show that its policy of reconciliation is bearing fruit.

"This is more than just a train test," said the Unification Minister Lee Jae-joung at a colourful departure ceremony at Munsan station, north of Seoul.

"This rail link means the reconnection of our national blood vessels and an end to our history of national division."

South Korea has become accustomed to paying for even small, symbolic concessions from its impoverished neighbour.

It set the tone in 2000 when it paid nearly $500m for the privilege of a first summit meeting between the two leaders.

Payments 'humiliating'

The $80m aid package for the train test will be given in the form of materials for North Korea's light industry.

The United States worries that South Korea is giving too much away to the North and undermining pressure on the regime to shut down its nuclear weapons programme.

Domestic critics say it is humiliating that the North is getting such generous aid while allowing only a purely symbolic one-off border crossing - the military rejected South Korean appeals for a regular service.

"The North Koreans are employing a salami strategy, as always," said North Korea watcher Nam Sung-wook, of Korea University in Seoul.

"They want to receive maximum economic aid for every small concession they make."

He said the same tactics apply to the North's promise to shut down its nuclear facilities.

Totalitarian control

North Korea of course wants all the economic aid it can get but not at the cost of opening its borders to meaningful contact with the outside world - and particularly not to South Koreans.

The regime fears that ideas from abroad will quickly undermine its totalitarian control over a still docile population.

Although South Korea is growing frustrated waiting for progress on the nuclear dispute, it is still anxious to see progress on bilateral relations.

"We are in the lame-duck season now in the run up to the December elections," said Professor Nam.

"The nationalists in the Blue House [the presidential mansion] want to make haste with the North as fast as they can."

That haste has led to much speculation of a possible second inter-Korean summit meeting before the summer is out.

Price worth paying?

Even South Korea's opposition conservatives are showing signs of going soft on the North.

There are no votes to be gained in the coming election through a policy of confrontation.

South Koreans are aware that the road to reconciliation will be long, difficult and expensive. But they see little alternative.

Confrontation with a heavily-armed and now nuclear neighbour is seen as out of the question, and collapse would be an economic disaster.

In the circumstances many South Koreans think a few hundred million dollars here and there is a price worth paying.




http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/6666093.stm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jinju



Joined: 22 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2007 5:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Price worth paying?

Its actually pathetic the lengths this government goes to prostrate this democratic, wealthy, free country before that poverty stricken 3rd world shithole. The Roh and Kim administrations must be held acountable for this. South Korea has no backbone, atleast a leftist run South Korea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hater Depot



Joined: 29 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2007 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The sunshine policy is sold to voters as if it will somehow convince the north to accept reunification in the south's terms, but by now anyone who isn't willfully deceiving themselves can see it isn't so. The real goal now is to counter China's considerable and growing influence in the north, to prevent it from becoming a de facto, or perhaps actual, colony. Looked at from this perspective sunshine doesn't seem so stupid.

Unfortunately, southern leaders don't seem to recognize that China has been more successful partly because it is willing to make serious threats to cut off flows of cash and oil, and even when those flows are open China wants things in return.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alias



Joined: 24 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2007 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hater Depot wrote:
The sunshine policy is sold to voters as if it will somehow convince the north to accept reunification in the south's terms, but by now anyone who isn't willfully deceiving themselves can see it isn't so. The real goal now is to counter China's considerable and growing influence in the north, to prevent it from becoming a de facto, or perhaps actual, colony. Looked at from this perspective sunshine doesn't seem so stupid.

Unfortunately, southern leaders don't seem to recognize that China has been more successful partly because it is willing to make serious threats to cut off flows of cash and oil, and even when those flows are open China wants things in return.


Excellent point.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International