View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Rapacious Mr. Batstove

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Location: Central Areola
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 12:38 am Post subject: What if there were........grammar question |
|
|
A couple of quick questions. This is out of my middle school grade three textbook, a few sentences feel a little iffy. Are these correct?
What if there were a natural disaster here in Korea?
Q: 'was' and 'were' both feel correct here, which is it?
What if there were no water?
Q: 'were' just feels wrong here, surely 'was' is correct?
Any help is greatly appreciated. Cheers |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BuHaoChi
Joined: 30 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
....
Last edited by BuHaoChi on Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:12 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Woland
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Right - subjunctive for both (but it's a mood, not a tense). (Apologies in advance; I'm in a grammar persnickety mood tonight.)
You may feel used to the indicative form 'was' in these because the subjunctive is increasingly being restricted in many dialects of English and losing the competition with the indicative. Nonetheless, proper use of the subjunctive will be expected of your students on tests, and is still considered in many educated circles one of the markers that distinguishes the educated from the riff-raff. Not that, you, Mr. Batstove, as well dressed as you are in your avatar, are riff-raff. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
procrastinatrix
Joined: 01 May 2006 Location: Sinchon
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
agreed w/ the above 2 posts
subjunctive isn't that big a deal in vernacular English...i think you might see a bit more if it in langs like Spanish, Italian
I hate when people say "if i was..." the grammatically correct way is "if I were" but was is starting to sound right to me sometimes.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jmbran11
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 Location: U.S.
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Many textbooks today say that always using "were" in the subjunctive is a suggestion or a past rule, meaning that it isn't uniformly accepted or practiced.
Frankly, unless your students have mastered all of the typical tenses and use them appropriately and correctly, I wouldn't worry about the subjunctive, as many native-speakers get it "wrong" all the time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mrsquirrel
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We often use were instead of was after if. This is common in both formal and informal styles. In a formal style were is more common that was, and many people consider it more correct, especially in American English. The grammatical name for this use of were is 'subjunctive'. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dogshed

Joined: 28 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fiddler On The Roof
If I were a rich man. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tzechuk

Joined: 20 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was always told to use *were* for hypothetical questions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The simple rule "if is followed by the subjunctive" works pretty well.
From a French grammar textbook for English I read:
Quote: |
The subjucntive is little used in English, but when it is, the effect is enormous. Eg:
"I thought you were in London? ....
"Oh, would that I were". |
For me, the answer "I wish I wozz" just doesn't work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|