|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JMO
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:03 am Post subject: Re: 173 witness express shot sources |
 |
|
| regicide wrote: |
| JMO wrote: |
| Rteacher wrote: |
I think that the videos make a very coherent, compelling case that Lyndon Johnson was at least complicit in the assassination of JFK...
The fact that many posters on these forums apparently lack the brains and/or guts and/or interest to see the truth of this (or any important matter) is not especially surprising... |
I have too much interest in this. Its obvious that there is a lack of evidence and has been since it happened. Its also obvious that people will believe what they want to believe whether that be god, leprechauns or vast conspiracies involving thousands of people that have remained secret for decades. People like this do not appreciate logic. |
JMO You had said before that eyewitness testimony is unrealable. Alright.
Just take a look at these 173 opinions. All are not pro-conspiracy.
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=1603 |
What are your conclusions Regi? Maybe instead of spamming links that you don't actually read, you should look at one, analyse it and come to a conclusion.
I think eye witness testimony is unreliable yes. It is obvious that in any situation what we think we remember isn't always what happened. Witnesses either pro or anti conspiracy should both be taken with a pinch of salt.
This is especially the case when it is something like "how many shots did you hear", "what direction did the shot come from". In a case where someone is standing 5 feet away, sees a man pull a gun and shoot someone, it is different. But even in this situation more than eye witness testimony should be needed. We really do not have very good memories for details.
You seem to follow a pattern. Post a link. Have that link dissected and shown to be
a: laughable
b: highly ambiguous
You then post a different link. What exactly do you believe happened? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
regicide
Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 8:05 am Post subject: Re: 173 witness express shot sources |
|
|
| JMO wrote: |
| regicide wrote: |
| JMO wrote: |
| Rteacher wrote: |
I think that the videos make a very coherent, compelling case that Lyndon Johnson was at least complicit in the assassination of JFK...
The fact that many posters on these forums apparently lack the brains and/or guts and/or interest to see the truth of this (or any important matter) is not especially surprising... |
I have too much interest in this. Its obvious that there is a lack of evidence and has been since it happened. Its also obvious that people will believe what they want to believe whether that be god, leprechauns or vast conspiracies involving thousands of people that have remained secret for decades. People like this do not appreciate logic. |
JMO You had said before that eyewitness testimony is unrealable. Alright.
Just take a look at these 173 opinions. All are not pro-conspiracy.
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=1603 |
What are your conclusions Regi? Maybe instead of spamming links that you don't actually read, you should look at one, analyse it and come to a conclusion.
I think eye witness testimony is unreliable yes. It is obvious that in any situation what we think we remember isn't always what happened. Witnesses either pro or anti conspiracy should both be taken with a pinch of salt.
This is especially the case when it is something like "how many shots did you hear", "what direction did the shot come from". In a case where someone is standing 5 feet away, sees a man pull a gun and shoot someone, it is different. But even in this situation more than eye witness testimony should be needed. We really do not have very good memories for details.
You seem to follow a pattern. Post a link. Have that link dissected and shown to be
a: laughable
b: highly ambiguous
You then post a different link. What exactly do you believe happened? |
I also didn't read your post completely. I don't like your tone or manner aand I don't give a rats ass what you believe. I was only trying to help you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JMO
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I also didn't read your post completely. I don't like your tone or manner aand I don't give a rats ass what you believe. I was only trying to help you. |
I'm not sure what the problem is , you said before you don't read/watch the links you post. Seriously Regi, develop some critical thinking skills. Help me, help you.
According to your MO, you should now break off this discussion, then post another link which is either a laughable or b highly ambiguous. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
regicide
Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| JMO wrote: |
| Quote: |
| I also didn't read your post completely. I don't like your tone or manner aand I don't give a rats ass what you believe. I was only trying to help you. |
I'm not sure what the problem is , you said before you don't read/watch the links you post. Seriously Regi, develop some critical thinking skills. Help me, help you.
According to your MO, you should now break off this discussion, then post another link which is either a laughable or b highly ambiguous. |
JMO. I think it has already been said you are weird by another member , and or are never going to believe anything.
WTF is your point?
Are you the only moron in Asia who doesnt get it? Or just a pain in the ass? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JMO
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
JMO. I think it has already been said you are weird by another member , and or are never going to believe anything.
WTF is your point?
Are you the only moron in Asia who doesnt get it? Or just a pain in the ass? |
Now now, don't get b!tchy.
Run along to you tube, I'm sure there is a highly ambiguous video containing no actual evidence but a ton of conjecture. Post it, but don't under any circumstances question anything if it supports your world view. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lowpo
Joined: 01 Mar 2007
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| JMO wrote: |
| Quote: |
JMO. I think it has already been said you are weird by another member , and or are never going to believe anything.
WTF is your point?
Are you the only moron in Asia who doesnt get it? Or just a pain in the ass? |
Now now, don't get b!tchy.
Run along to you tube, I'm sure there is a highly ambiguous video containing no actual evidence but a ton of conjecture. Post it, but don't under any circumstances question anything if it supports your world view. |
My father use to tell me stories that Johnson didn't want to be Kennedy's running mate. He actually refused to run with Kennnedy. Someone told Johnson that Kennedy would not serve out his term and you would be the President of the United States before his term was over. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JMO
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lowpo wrote: |
| JMO wrote: |
| Quote: |
JMO. I think it has already been said you are weird by another member , and or are never going to believe anything.
WTF is your point?
Are you the only moron in Asia who doesnt get it? Or just a pain in the ass? |
Now now, don't get b!tchy.
Run along to you tube, I'm sure there is a highly ambiguous video containing no actual evidence but a ton of conjecture. Post it, but don't under any circumstances question anything if it supports your world view. |
My father use to tell me stories that Johnson didn't want to be Kennedy's running mate. He actually refused to run with Kennnedy. Someone told Johnson that Kennedy would not serve out his term and you would be the President of the United States before his term was over. |
Was your dad involved in the 'conspiracy'? Get him and his evidence to the police..the world needs to know. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
