| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
justin moffatt
Joined: 29 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:10 am Post subject: Broken Verbal Contracts=Labour Board? |
|
|
When arriving in Korea, I was informed by many koreans and foreigners alike, that "in Korea the verbal contract is as important as a written contract". However, after viewing numerous postings on various forums, consulting with expats in local watering holes, contacting various legal counsels, and experiencing firsthand the fallacy of the statement, I dismissed the notion altogether.
Although, I began to wonder about the numerous part time positions that are offered with no official contract (even if on a F2 visa). In fact, if one asks for a contract, it usually guarantees no position of any kind. Therefore, without a formal written contract, can one actually go to the Labour Board and contest a broken verbal agreement? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mehamrick

Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Location: South Korea
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
There used to be a saying somewhere that if it wasnt on paper it doesnt exist. The difference being on an F2 is they can tell them to promptly F*# off where an E2 really doesnt have that luxury..
You could go to the labor board but how would you prove it.. Unless it was recorded.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
justin moffatt
Joined: 29 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:53 am Post subject: Response to Mehamrick: |
|
|
| Interesting point. Does anyone have any experience with taped recordings of employers being admissable at the Labor Board? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bibbitybop

Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Verbal contracts are "legal" in the US only if you can prove it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
insam
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Why would you or the company want a contract for part time work? Most of them are cash positions with totally different 'payrolls'. Sometimes it's best to be a ghost. If you're looking for something formal try the larger corporate institutes. You're more likely to be 'in the system' with those, but you're also likely to get less per hour. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Young FRANKenstein

Joined: 02 Oct 2006 Location: Castle Frankenstein (that's FRONKensteen)
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 5:02 am Post subject: Re: Response to Mehamrick: |
|
|
| justin moffatt wrote: |
| Interesting point. Does anyone have any experience with taped recordings of employers being admissable at the Labor Board? |
they are neither admissable nor legal.
As for the original question, verbal contracts are 100% unenforceable. To file a complaint, it has to be a written contract. Handshake deals and verbal agreements are great if everyone keeps their word, but they mean absolutely nothing if the other party decides to change the deal on you. Not a thing you can do about it. Anyone in business with Koreans can tell you this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wylies99

Joined: 13 May 2006 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If it all comes down to the word of a Korean vs a foreigner, which one will win in the Korean legal system? Guess.
BTW- I wouldn't deal with a "verbal contract" in any country. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
The verbal contract only works oneway
Just like respect, you have to respect them, but they do not have to respect you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wylies99

Joined: 13 May 2006 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's a lot of trust to give someone, especially with money on the line. In Korea, they don't even honor written contracts.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
justin moffatt
Joined: 29 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My understanding of law in North America, is that taped conversations are not admissable if the other party does not give consent to be recorded. However, the legal system here is not yet refined (e.g. criminal vs civil distinction). Therefore, if "foreigners" do not have the same civil rights as Koreans, would not having some form of documentation or evidence seem reasonable? Perhaps, this may give "foreigners" the advantage they need in contractual arrangements.
Furthermore, Korean employers may be concerned that this documentation become public (i.e. court of law, Labour Board). On the other hand, in my experience dealing with Korean employers is many know every detail of Korean law and what evidence may be threatening or not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hellofaniceguy

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: On your computer screen!
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Always get it in writing. Period.
Verbal means nothing...subject to interpretation�..and a judge would agree. The labor board will be of no help in your case. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
A Country of Liars
article by Kim Dae-joong, Chosun Ilbo (July 3, 2005)
| |