|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bramble wrote: |
| Just stop stalking me, and don't send me any more PMs. |
I'm trying to have a discussion. You are working VERY hard NOT to have one. That is not stalking. That is you being VERY lame.
In case anyone is thinking I was harassing the lady, this is the pm I sent :
| Quote: |
We agree ...
... about Jade. Probably not much more.
Seems to me, a lot of what you are about is trying to get people to stop saying things you don't like to hear. Maybe I'm wrong, but you haven't looked at that yet.
Got nothing against you. Sorry if it looks like I'm going after you. I'm not. It's just the things you are saying and the things you'd rather not respond to.
We're all on the same side, in the end. You know?
Bob. |
Good day to you, ma'am. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Woland
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Big_Bird wrote: |
| The Bobster wrote: |
But you found nothing objectionable about someone referring to a man's wife as a blow-up plastic sex toy? You didn't find anything "abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated" or even, dare I say it, hateful toward women?
|
I'm surprised that you are persisting with this interpretation of Freaka's potshot. Bramle's interpretation strikes me as correct.
Freaka was taking a potshot at the delightful jinju, not at jinju's wife with whom she had no issue. Her point was that jinju seemed so bloody awful, she couldn't imagine that he really had a wife, and that this wife that he was refering to, could only be a blow up doll. Not a big deal for most normal people. Not exactly 'insult of the year.' jinju was being a prat when he started making such a fuss. In fact he loved the excuse to make a fuss. He's a bully and an attention *beep*.
That you prefer to take the side of a well known bully like jinju rather surprises me, actually. |
Well put, Big Bird. I think your analysis of this is correct. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bramble

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Location: National treasures need homes
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Woland wrote: |
| Big_Bird wrote: |
| The Bobster wrote: |
But you found nothing objectionable about someone referring to a man's wife as a blow-up plastic sex toy? You didn't find anything "abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated" or even, dare I say it, hateful toward women?
|
I'm surprised that you are persisting with this interpretation of Freaka's potshot. Bramle's interpretation strikes me as correct.
Freaka was taking a potshot at the delightful jinju, not at jinju's wife with whom she had no issue. Her point was that jinju seemed so bloody awful, she couldn't imagine that he really had a wife, and that this wife that he was refering to, could only be a blow up doll. Not a big deal for most normal people. Not exactly 'insult of the year.' jinju was being a prat when he started making such a fuss. In fact he loved the excuse to make a fuss. He's a bully and an attention *beep*.
That you prefer to take the side of a well known bully like jinju rather surprises me, actually. |
Well put, Big Bird. I think your analysis of this is correct. |
Yes, it is. Except for the "surprising" part. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've said it many times, and NO ONE has adressed it : It is USING the loved one as a tool to take the pot shot - THIS is what is despicable.
Bramble, stop picking on me. I can't stand the way you follow me and continually harass me every chance you get. You're making me afraid, and I have a right to feel safe here.
Last edited by The Bobster on Mon Jun 25, 2007 5:02 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Usolicited Advice
Why is it that people don't know that they can delete a PM before they even read it.
It's kinda like TV if you don't like the program change the channel.
If you recieve a PM from someone you don't want to hear from delete it.
If your read a PM you don't like, don't respond to it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The_Conservative
Joined: 15 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bramble wrote: |
| Woland wrote: |
| Big_Bird wrote: |
| The Bobster wrote: |
But you found nothing objectionable about someone referring to a man's wife as a blow-up plastic sex toy? You didn't find anything "abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated" or even, dare I say it, hateful toward women?
|
I'm surprised that you are persisting with this interpretation of Freaka's potshot. Bramle's interpretation strikes me as correct.
Freaka was taking a potshot at the delightful jinju, not at jinju's wife with whom she had no issue. Her point was that jinju seemed so bloody awful, she couldn't imagine that he really had a wife, and that this wife that he was refering to, could only be a blow up doll. Not a big deal for most normal people. Not exactly 'insult of the year.' jinju was being a prat when he started making such a fuss. In fact he loved the excuse to make a fuss. He's a bully and an attention *beep*.
That you prefer to take the side of a well known bully like jinju rather surprises me, actually. |
Well put, Big Bird. I think your analysis of this is correct. |
Yes, it is. Except for the "surprising" part. |
While I rarely agree with The Bobster, he has made some good points here.
And I must ask Bramble, if you don't want The Bobster to reply to you...then why CONTINUE to post in a thread he started?
Are you trying to provoke him?
This post is a perfect example. You insult him AFTER telling him to leave you alone. That's not the actions of someone who really wants someone else to "leave them alone." YOU jumped into a thread started by him, and now YOU are telling him to leave you alone?
Lest anyone think otherwise, I am not a fan of the poster known online as The Bobster. In fact as I said above I rarely agree with him on just about any issue...but fair's fair.
As for what The Bobster said about THIS issue here is my stance. Attacking a poster's family member or friends is crossing a very clear line. Say what you will about me, and I will respond or not as I choose. But attack my family or friends...and off come the gloves. I usually try to be civil...but that is one of the very few issues that I see red when it occurs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The_Conservative wrote: |
| Attacking a poster's family member or friends is crossing a very clear line. Say what you will about me, and I will respond or not as I choose. But attack my family or friends...and off come the gloves. I usually try to be civil...but that is one of the very few issues that I see red when it occurs. |
All I been sayin' all along. Glad SOMEone understands that much ... thanks, T_C.
Doesn't matter that the family member was not the target, what matters is that she was the tool used to hurt someone else. Where hypocrisy comes in is that the target is someone who is not quite the most popular fella around, so I'm thinking some people were clapping their hands with glee instead of thinking about what is the right thing. That's not good, not good at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yingwenlaoshi

Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Location: ... location, location!
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh for fk's sake. Who gives a rat's arse.
Tell your woman to go get you a beer and then go down on you. After you're finished tell her you're hungry and that she should go make you something to eat. Scoff it down and go out drinking with the boys. Come back whenever. If she complains, tell her that that's the way it is and if she doesn't like it, the door is not far away. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, at least there's one guy we can't call a hypocrite ... something to be said for putting your faeces out on the table for everyone to see.
Okay, not MUCH to be said - is it better than people who call themselves feminists while watching other women being attacked and feeling glee? I'm still pondering ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yingwenlaoshi

Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Location: ... location, location!
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The Bobster wrote: |
Well, at least there's one guy we can't call a hypocrite ... something to be said for putting your faeces out on the table for everyone to see.
Okay, not MUCH to be said - is it better than people who call themselves feminists while watching other women being attacked and feeling glee? I'm still pondering ... |
You've been to my apartment? I don't remember any guys being over since I put my *beep* on display. I'm starting to suspect my woman's sleeping around now.
I'll give her a choice: belt or stand outside naked for an hour. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yingwenlaoshi wrote: |
| The Bobster wrote: |
Well, at least there's one guy we can't call a hypocrite ... something to be said for putting your faeces out on the table for everyone to see.
Okay, not MUCH to be said - is it better than people who call themselves feminists while watching other women being attacked and feeling glee? I'm still pondering ... |
You've been to my apartment? I don't remember any guys being over since I put my *beep* on display. I'm starting to suspect my woman's sleeping around now.
I'll give her a choice: belt or stand outside naked for an hour. |
You actually have an apartment? You actually have a woman? These are the most surprising things I've heard in days. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bramble

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Location: National treasures need homes
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yingwenlaoshi wrote: |
Oh for fk's sake. Who gives a rat's arse.
Tell your woman to go get you a beer and then go down on you. After you're finished tell her you're hungry and that she should go make you something to eat. Scoff it down and go out drinking with the boys. Come back whenever. If she complains, tell her that that's the way it is and if she doesn't like it, the door is not far away. |
Who's "you"? Maybe you should be the next target in a harassment campaign? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bramble wrote: |
| Who's "you"? Maybe you should be the next target in a harassment campaign? |
Um, are you the new sheriff in town? I was sort of thinking so ...
Bramble, please stop attacking male posters you don't agree with, unless you can do so with the love and respect that every human being deserves. Your persistence in only attacking men is a clear sign of something that I am too polite to be more specific about. Argue ideas, go after wrong thinking - not people. Frankly, your pattern is becoming very obvious.
It's all about love. Find the love, Bramble. Correct action will follow naturally from the love. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Woland wrote: |
| Big_Bird wrote: |
| The Bobster wrote: |
But you found nothing objectionable about someone referring to a man's wife as a blow-up plastic sex toy? You didn't find anything "abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated" or even, dare I say it, hateful toward women?
|
I'm surprised that you are persisting with this interpretation of Freaka's potshot. Bramle's interpretation strikes me as correct.
Freaka was taking a potshot at the delightful jinju, not at jinju's wife with whom she had no issue. Her point was that jinju seemed so bloody awful, she couldn't imagine that he really had a wife, and that this wife that he was refering to, could only be a blow up doll. Not a big deal for most normal people. Not exactly 'insult of the year.' jinju was being a prat when he started making such a fuss. In fact he loved the excuse to make a fuss. He's a bully and an attention *beep*.
That you prefer to take the side of a well known bully like jinju rather surprises me, actually. |
Well put, Big Bird. I think your analysis of this is correct. |
I often agree with both of you. She wanted to hurt a guy. She reached out and took a swipe at his wife. People who call themselves feminists think it's okay. I don't think it's okay.
You know what? It's not okay. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SuperFly

Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Location: In the doghouse
|
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I see bad juju ahead.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|