Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

HILLARY PANDERS TO BLACK VOTERS YET AGAIN
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Sincinnatislink



Joined: 30 Jan 2007
Location: Top secret.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 2:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevemcgarrett wrote:
I said that promiscuous blacks don't have anyone to blame but themselves, meaning if they contract HIV. Nowhere did I say or intimate that blacks or anyone else deserves to get HIV.

That's a pretty lame division. "Nobody else to blame" is the same thing as "they deserve." Furthermore, you continue to use the word promiscuous . . . well, really casually.
Quote:

Look, risky sexual behavior often if not usually includes an unwillingness to wear condoms or otherwise protect oneself. Numerous accounts of the strong tendency of many young black males to resist using protection have been widely reported. I'm not going to take the time to look for the evidence for you. Retrieve it yourself. I lived and worked in a lower income black community in a large inner city area for more than a decade and I often heard this said. Now, granted, that's anecdotal but shouldn't be discounted on that basis alone.

Not only that, but look at your huge pile of "often"s, "usually"s, "numerous"es, "strong tendency"[s], followed by a "I have direct experience" claim. How are all those black friends that prove you're ot racist doing, by the way? And you even admit this is anecdotal. You don't deserve the capacity for language.

Quote:
Conservative black commentators like radio talk show host Ken Hamblin, who goes by the on-air name "The Black Avenger," has been lamenting this for years--and there are others out there.

That's mostly because the armies of morons like you buy papers and listen to commercial radio that thrives on you maintaining your convenient views. Maybe some/all of these commentators think they're doing the right thing. That doesn't change that they're stupid.
Quote:

Some black commentators even go so far as to call it a moral malaise--an illness of conscience among many blacks. Just look at the gangsta rap and hip-hop. It exudes this sort of irresponsible behavior.

Yes. All black people want to be Snoop. This is why black people get AIDS. The CDC needs to hire you. You still have not defined "irresponsible behavior" or "promiscuity."
Quote:

And let's not forget what triggered my observation in the first place: Hillary Clinton's reckless insinuation that if it weren't blacks getting HIV disproportionately, the government would be doing more research and spending more money on HIV awareness. Rubbish.


That sounds plausible to me. You don't offer a counterargument. So far this is simply outrage that such a thing is thinkable, by your account. This tells me how much you're willing to evaluate anything seriously. You started a conversation in a public forum and are now getting all huffy that people disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Sincinnatislink



Joined: 30 Jan 2007
Location: Top secret.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 2:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Furthermore, it wasn't until wealthy, well-known people started contracting HIV that *anyone* cared at all.
This isn't about race, but race serves as a deceptively simple account.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
cerulean808



Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Of course you won't catch a Republican politician stupid enough to pander to black voters. It would be a waste of time and money, blacks don't vote Republican for some strange reason...

Instead Republican politicians have taken a more successful approach to black voters; gerrymandering and eliminating blacks from voting registration lists.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

15% did in the last election.

and the Bush adminstration has put more African Americans in to high positions than just about anyone else. Including the first two African Amercan Secrataries of State. That is really being color blind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
boyne11



Joined: 08 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

WHAT'S WRONG WITH PANDERING FOR SOME LOVE?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cerulean808



Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Roo

Quote:
15% did in the last election.


Yeah, like I said blacks don't vote Republican. Mind you Bushie seems to be suffering from white flight lately, if the trend continues he might get only 15% support from them. Laughing

Quote:
and the Bush adminstration has put more African Americans in to high positions than just about anyone else. Including the first two African Amercan Secrataries of State. That is really being color blind.


And even with that window dressing you still cant fool black voters. Thats why the more productive approach...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cerulean wrote:

Quote:
And even with that window dressing you still cant fool black voters. Thats why the more productive approach...


Ah, yes, another whale of an ignorant assertion from you. Actually, most blacks would rather let their self-appointed leaders speak for them; it saves them the trouble. When you believe you're a victim, it doesn't take much to be convinced of it. Just ask the growing number of well-educated black conservatives who lament this group-think among their own people.

You can start with John McWhorter's Losing the Race.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
And even with that window dressing you still cant fool black voters. Thats why the more productive approach...


A widow dressing - a conspiracy to deceive African American voters. Rolling Eyes

When you don't like the facts then it is a " conspiracy"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sincinnatislink



Joined: 30 Jan 2007
Location: Top secret.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 4:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevemcgarrett wrote:
Actually, most blacks would rather let their self-appointed leaders speak for them; it saves them the trouble.


If these blacks "would rather let" these people speak "for them," I don't see the problem. Isn't that called "representation?"

Furthermore, have you even asked a black person if they'd rather someone take up their cause than themselves?

You are making wild, unsupported claims.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
thepeel



Joined: 08 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rather than have a bunch of white dudes talk about this...

AlleyAllen, what's your opinion?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alyallen



Joined: 29 Mar 2004
Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!

PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 9:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BJWD wrote:
Rather than have a bunch of white dudes talk about this...

AlleyAllen, what's your opinion?


Haha...that's funny. I just happened to notice this thread was alive and well my opinion was requested. How funny.

Well...I'm at work and there is a lot of different things tossed around on this thread so I'll see what I can fit in in a few minutes.

1. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are not the spokesmen of the Black community. That idea doesn't even make sense. Blacks will speak or not speak with their votes, just like anyone else in the U.S. I've stated time and time again that Blacks are not some homogenous group infested in AIDS living in the ghetto collecting welfare. Each person has their own view on how government should be run and how government should be run to the best of their own personal advantage. Sharpton and Jackson run around with power in the name of Blacks everywhere but it benefits only them. They are ultimately unofficiial lobbyists for Blacks which is sad. Who's the president of the NAACP? Most don't know because he does his work behind the scenes for the benefits of all "Colored" people. Sharpton and Jackson basically run from scandal to scandal eager for face time. I find it disgusting but others support them. That is their right.

2. It is interesting that in many states (with a large Black populous) that felons are not allowed the vote? I do wonder where all those votes would go....hmmm....

That's all for now....I gotta go teach....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
thepeel



Joined: 08 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mark Steyn calls J.Jackson "President for Life of the Peoples Republic of Himself". Whenever I see the dude on tv I think of that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alyallen



Joined: 29 Mar 2004
Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!

PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As far as HIV and AIDS go, here's a great article

http://www.slate.com/id/2108724/

A Silent Epidemic
Why is there such a high percentage of HIV and AIDS among black women?
By Jon Cohen
Posted Wednesday, Oct. 27, 2004, at 6:43 AM ET
When Gwen Ifill asked a pressing question about AIDS during the vice-presidential debate, both candidates were utterly lost. "I want to talk to you about AIDS, and not about AIDS in China or Africa, but AIDS right here in this country, where black women between the ages of 25 and 44 are 13 times more likely to die of the disease than their counterparts," said Ifill. "What should the government's role be in helping to end the growth of this epidemic?"

Cheney did not bother trying to hide his ignorance. "I have not heard those numbers with respect to African-American women. I was not aware that it was�that they're in epidemic there [sic]," he said. Edwards resorted to dodge ball, spending his 90 seconds on AIDS in Africa, the genocide in Sudan, uninsured Americans, and John Kerry. "OK, we'll move on," said Ifill, who somehow restrained herself from rolling her eyes � la Jon Stewart.

Cheney and Edwards both suffered sharp criticism for their shockingly vacuous replies�a competent briefing on HIV/AIDS in the United States could have made these men at least conversant on the topic in less time than it takes them to do their on-air hair and makeup. Besides, in debates, even a shallow answer scores more points than saying "I dunno" or changing the subject.


That said, coming up with a sophisticated answer to Ifill's question is a tall order. AIDS researchers don't have a solid explanation for why black women in America have such a shockingly high prevalence of HIV infection and AIDS, which makes it difficult to spell out precisely how the government should respond to the problem�other than to reach out to these women more aggressively and to conduct more studies.

The data that investigators do have makes it clear that heterosexual sex is the primary mode of transmission, accounting for 74 percent of the HIV/AIDS cases reported in 2002 in black American women. Yet attempts to tease out the dynamics that drive this heterosexual spread have led to more theories than hard facts, with researchers using such different methods to gather their data that it's hard to compare their results. One particularly splashy speculation also has attracted more of the spotlight than it deserves: black men "on the down low," who identify themselves as heterosexual but secretly have sex with men.

Without question, there is a higher percentage of HIV and AIDS in the black female population in the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last year looked at data from 1999 to 2002 reported by 29 states that track HIV infections. The data are somewhat skewed because several states that have serious AIDS problems�including California, New York, and Illinois�did not at that time tally HIV infections. Still, the study found that black women accounted for nearly 72 percent of the female cases, while whites made up 18 percent and Hispanics 8.5 percent. Given that only 13 percent of Americans are black, you don't need a statistician to see the scale of the problem. (Encouragingly, the number of new HIV cases reported in women, regardless of race, did not increase during the four years that the study analyzed.)

When looking at people whose HIV infection progresses to the point of causing AIDS, the disproportionate toll on black women becomes clearer still. Black women in 2002 accounted for 67 percent of the country's AIDS cases among women. For the sake of comparison, consider that blacks had a rate of 48 cases per 100,000 blacks, while whites had a rate of 2 per 100,000 whites. There's an interesting geographic distribution of cases, too, that may offer important clues about forces propelling this particular epidemic: The vast majority of black women with AIDS live in the South and the Northeast. The CDC's HIV/AIDS statistics do not offer a breakdown of income and healthcare insurance, but that's an obvious place to look for explanations.

Ifill's question referred specifically to AIDS deaths in 25-to-44 year olds. The figure she cited actually took many AIDS researchers by surprise but seems to have come from the National Vital Statistics report issued last year that shows black women in 2001 had a rate of death from AIDS 14 times (not 13 times) higher than that of whites.

Why does such a problem exist? No compelling evidence suggests that blacks have any special genetic susceptibility to HIV. The CDC offers a laundry list of reasons of why African American men and women have relatively high rates of HIV infection and AIDS. The two most convincing explanations on the list: poverty and sexually transmitted diseases. The 2000 U.S. Census found that one in four blacks lived in poverty, and studies clearly have shown a strong link between poverty and the risk of HIV infection. Poor people also receive lower-quality healthcare, which means they will often progress from HIV infection to AIDS more quickly. And the link to sexually transmitted diseases, which create open sores that facilitate the spread of HIV, is equally clear-cut: Blacks are 24 times more likely to contract gonorrhea and eight times more likely to get syphilis.

The CDC list also includes community denial about injection drug use and homosexuality, but there is scant evidence to support the notion that those risk factors are somehow higher in blacks. In fact, injection drug use, a particularly effective way to spread HIV, is actually lower in black women than in white women: It accounted for 24 percent of HIV/AIDS cases among black females in 2002 and 34 percent among white females. It could be that black women are having sex with more men who are injecting drugs, but no compelling data back that conclusion, either.

Then there's the much ballyhooed "down low" phenomenon. Some men on the DL are becoming infected by anal intercourse with men and then spreading the infection to their female partners, a transmission route that became widely discussed earlier this year with the publication of J.L. King's On the Down Low: A Journey Into the Lives of "Straight" Black Men Who Sleep With Men. But the great unknown is how frequently this occurs, and whether it's truly different in blacks versus whites or Hispanics.

Because of a flurry of media coverage about the DL link, including an Oprah show featuring King and a New York Times Magazine story, many who study AIDS in the black community cringe at its mention. "I'm sick of hearing about it," says Victoria Cargill, an epidemiologist at the Office of AIDS Research at the National Institutes of Health. Cargill, who also works at a clinic in poor, black Southeast D.C., says the high prevalence of HIV/AIDS in women can clearly be attributed to a host of factors that have nothing to do with the DL. "I'm not saying it doesn't exist, but if we start adding up how many people this affects, this is the eye of the needle," says Cargill. "Let's start talking about the needle." CDC epidemiologist Greg Millett says that when it comes to the DL phenomenon, there simply are more questions than answers. "The truth is there are very few studies that deal with bisexual black men and even fewer that deal with the down low," says Millett, who has put together a provocative PowerPoint presentation on the topic.

A fascinating CDC study published last year specifically looked at men who have sex with men and do not disclose their sexual orientation versus those who do disclose. The study recruited participants from only six gay bars (which already tilts the results away from DL men who may not go to gay bars), but the findings were startling. More black men were nondisclosers (18 percent)�that is, on the DL�than white men (8 percent), and all nondisclosures reported having more sex with women than with men. But nondisclosers of all races were also less likely to be infected with HIV than disclosers, and black nondisclosers in particular reported significantly less unprotected anal intercourse with men than did black disclosers. Several other recent studies have found higher proportions of bisexual black men than white men, but it's unclear whether how much of an HIV "bridge" they are to black women.

Phill Wilson, executive director of the Black AIDS Institute in Los Angeles, suggests, rather, that the single biggest driver of the heterosexual spread to black women is the incarceration of black men. "The prison industry in America is an almost exact replication of the mining industry in South Africa, where you take large groups of men and move them from their families for an extended period of time," says Wilson. As studies conducted in South Africa have shown, men who leave their homes for the mines often have new sexual partners�as do the women they leave behind. The increased sexual mixing spreads HIV in both the migrant men and their regular partners. When they return home, the men may infect their regular partners�or vice versa. This pattern of sexual networking is called concurrent partnering, which means that relationships overlap, and there's nothing that HIV likes more.

Wilson and others argue that with so many men cycling in and out of the African American community, women end up at a greater risk because of similar disruptions of sexual networks and the resultant concurrency patterns: They mix with new partners when their men leave and often reunite with them when they are released. Incarceration also exposes many men to anal sex, whether by coercion or choice, and injection-drug use, the two most efficient ways to spread HIV. And if the locked-up man was the main wage earner, poverty can be a factor, too.


One superb study of concurrency in African Americans in rural North Carolina found that 53 percent of the men and 31 percent of the women reported concurrent partners during the preceding five years. Interestingly, 80 percent of the men in the study who said they had been incarcerated for more than 24 hours reported having had concurrent partners within five years; that percentage plummeted to 43 percent if a man had not been locked up for a day or longer.

Equally important, black women have a small pool of black men to choose from at any given time. "African American women are the only group in the United States where there are fewer men than women," says Gail Wyatt, an associate director of the AIDS Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles. "The availability of a partner who shares the same values is much less likely. The women are more likely to be educated than their partners. They're more likely to be employed." As a result of the shortage of black men, black women are vulnerable to becoming involved with men who are engaging in risky behaviors that they don't know about, whether it be having unprotected sex with other partners, female or male; visiting sex workers; or injecting drugs.
The muddy truth is that the high rate of HIV infection and AIDS among African American women is due to a combination of all these factors. "It's a perfect storm of issues," says NIH's Cargill.

And there's one more factor to consider, says Wilson: Politicians ignore this population. "It's both a cause and a symptom of the problem that our government really is not interested in the health and well-being of black people and in particular black women," says Wilson. "How is it that D ick Cheney can tell you how many machine guns are in Baghdad, but doesn't have a clue about issues that are killing black women a stone's throw from his office?"

Gwen Ifill, for her part, received so many queries about this particular question that she wrote out a response, refreshingly candid, that her publicist gave out to people who inquired. "I have to say I was surprised that neither the Vice President nor the Senator had an answer on this," wrote Ifill. "As a black woman, I also found it depressing. The good news is that, in the feedback I have gotten since the debate, folks got that. These debates have been very useful for smart and involved likely voters. They have gotten to see what these folks do, and don't, care about."

No one seems to be 100% sure of what is fueling this epidemic in the U.S. but this article brings up some good points, I find it somewhat insulting that Steve's premise revolves around the idea of well...they are having sex with more people in comparison to the rest of the populous. It's a much larger and complicated issue than that, I believe.

So...I suppose that Hillary Clinton may have a point about a lack of awareness if a VP and a VP candidate are unaware of this situation during a CAMPAIGN YEAR. So I won't say she's pandering to the Black vote but that she is more aware of it than a lot of politicans may be.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
cerulean808



Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevemcgarrett

Quote:
You can start with John McWhorter's Losing the Race.


You're kidding yourself if you think you can tell anybody on this board what to do you arrogant fool Laughing . Besides why would anyone read something because it gets the stamp of approval from an American Crazy?

Roo

Quote:
When you don't like the facts then it is a " conspiracy"


More of your nonsense. What conspiracy? You're just throwing anything hoping it will stick. It's your ilk who have difficulty with the facts.

In fact you don't seem to bother with them much all, too difficult, much easier just to lie , like the Saddam's weapons of mass destruction number.

Here's another one of those difficult facts you and mcgarrett would prefer not to be mentioned. Some states like Florida have to get permission from a federal authority before making any changes to their voting system. Because they have a long ugly history of white conservatives trying to screw black voters in their state.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 12:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cerulean808"
Quote:
More of your nonsense. What conspiracy? You're just throwing anything hoping it will stick. It's your ilk who have difficulty with the facts.




You call the the selection of Collin Powell and Condi Rice "window dressing" to "fool" African American voters



Looks like you are claiming a conspiracy to me.As I said when you don't like the facts you claim a conspiracy .


Quote:
In fact you don't seem to bother with them much all, too difficult, much easier just to lie , like the Saddam's weapons of mass destruction number.



As I have said many times Saddam never gave up his war nor was he in compliance. You and Pilger are both liars.


Quote:
Here's another one of those difficult facts you and mcgarrett would prefer not to be mentioned. Some states like Florida have to get permission from a federal authority before making any changes to their voting system. Because they have a long ugly history of white conservatives trying to screw black voters in their state.


Why would I prefer that it not be mentioned? Duh?

The US isn't perfect but it tries harder than the vast majority of nations to fix its short comings.

But there is an irony here:On this thread you are looking evidence of racism by the US while on other thread you apologize for Iran's racist regime. More proof that you are a moonbat. Hee, Hee.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International