Korean Job Discussion Forums

fromtheuk · Joined: 31 Mar 2007

I'll try and answer your questions:

I would like to ask you some questions? I have now read all 11 pages I'm British also, by the way

You know the vast majority of the people of the UK were against the invasion of Iraq, are they also pagans and kuffars and are deserving of the atrocities of 7/7 for example?

Well most of Britain are not Muslim, but are barely Christian in name. So they are kuffar, which is the plural term for non-Muslim. I don't believe 7/7 was a permissible act, so I don't wish to see that repeated. By the way, I think after the initial invasion polls indicated most of Britain supported it, it's only when things went pear-shaped, support for the invasion declined.

Once the British armed forces leave Iraq, should any future bombings under the Al Qaeda umbrella cease in the UK?

If Britain, pulls out of all Muslim countries and ceases to support Israel, it wouldn't be seen as an enemy of Islam. If they withdraw troops, they will always support Israel anyway.

If you read what al-Qaida say, their main reason for attacking Britain is because of their role in the coalition in Iraq and Afghanistan. I'm a British citizen so I wouldn't like to see bombings in Britain.

But I think if British troops are pulled out of those countries, the threat will diminish, because al-Qaida say they only want to attack Britain because of it's support of the U.S. invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. Al-Qaida themselves made a mockery of Bush' claim al-Qaida attacked the U.S. because they hate their freedom.

Al-Qaida once asked if they had launched 9/11 because they hated the wests freedom, why had they not threatened to attack Sweden? Because they have no hostile foreign policy to Muslims. It's very simple.

Al-Qaida attacked them because of their support of Israel, which has caused much more misery and pain to Muslims in Palestine than 9/11 did.

When the British and the Americans leave Iraq, what is the way forward for that country?

The way forward is defined by the coalition as Iraq becoming a democracy. In other words a pro-U.S. administration. I think the way forward would be for Iraq to become an Islamic state, governed only by Sharia law.

Was 9/11 justified? Did America ask for it?

Islamic scholars have given different opinions on 9/11. The majority condemned it, while others said it was permitted due to the U.S. support of Israel, in its crimes against Muslims in Palestine. I think 9/11 cannot be justified.

For the U.S. to support Israel's oppression of Muslims and not expect any form of response shows how arrogant and stupid they had become.

Do you believe that kuffars have the right to live in Saudi Arabia (or any Islamic land) with you? If so is there any laws or ways they should adhere to and if kuffars have no right to live in Saudi Arabia, why not?

This is a complex issue which in all honesty I'm not qualified to answer. If you visit an Islamic website called www.islamqa.com you can ask a qualified Islamic scholar on this issue, and he will give you a comprehensive reply. I'm not a scholar and therefore I'm unable to answer that fully.

Are you a Liverpool supporter by any chance?

This question I find utterly offensive. I'm from Nottingham, I'm not into football but I think Nottingham Forest's logo is still the best. Laughing

Big_Bird · Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:12 pm Post subject:

bejarano-korea · Joined: 13 Dec 2006

Big_Bird · Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:56 pm Post subject:

On the other hand · Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue

Big_Bird · Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 12:27 am Post subject:

Satori · Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all

You know it's odd, this filth sometimes talks like he's trying to reason with people, you know, get out of Israel and we'll stop bombing your cities, that is reason, that presumes that the listener is supposed to consider the statement in a reasonable way and respond with reason. He complains about poor treatment of Muslims in Brittain, and appeals to our reason there too. Then, on the other hand, he states that nothing short of total Islamic domination of the world will actually be satisfactory to him. And unfortunately this peice of human excrement who posted the OP is NOT that much of a radical, there are millions like him. And they all gave up the right to any kind of reasonable consideration or treatment and long long time ago. Islam has declared war on the west, supported fully in thier holy book, and the time for reasoning is well past.

On the other hand · Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue

Big_Bird · Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 1:01 am Post subject:

bigverne · Joined: 12 May 2004

fromtheuk · Joined: 31 Mar 2007

As regards Sad-Bore-ee - Resorting to verbal abuse is not a sign of good manners. English clearly isn't your first language, because your last post demonstrates you had difficulty understanding what I had written.

Hmm.....I don't remember planning world domination over the last few days nor have I declared war on anyone. You ought to stand in the corner of the classroom with your hands on your head, you're a foul mouthed, badly behaved child, now go wash your mouth out before you post your next useless post.

Your deafening silence as regards why the west is 'under threat' speaks volumes. You ought to face up to the crimes of your government and address them. Burying your head in the sand will not make the problem go away.

bejarano-korea - 2 points. 1) Israel - It has nukes and support of the west. It has existed for just a few decades, not long in historical terms. It is surrounded by Muslim countries, all of which hate them.

I think the neocons on this forum would never admit it publically, but there is no way Israel can sustain itself over the long term. It relies mostly on the U.S.

So from an Islamic perspective Israel can never be recognized nor can it be accepted as a state. It doesn't mean there has to be a holocaust, but all of Israel is Muslim Palestinian land, and Muslims will never rest until they regain all of that land, every single bit of it.

So effectively Israel will not exist, any Jews who have actual historical links to that land as opposed to being Jews which settled there after the state of Israel was created, will pay the non-Muslim tax, and live as citizens under the protection of an Islamic state.

When Israel does cease to exist, if it was an all out war, then, sadly for the Israeli's, most of them will perish.

2) If the west decided to nuke the middle east, that would be interesting. I personally don't think that would happen. Even though the Pakistan government is currently with the coalition against 'terrorism', if we had a crazier world situation where the west was literally wiping countries off the map, don't forget Pakistan has nukes, so I don't think it's realistic the west would wipe out whole countries.

That would be madness, the result would be just more terrorism anyway, but if we imagine your scenario, terrorism would be state sponsored more than ever before.

Satori · Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all

On the other hand · Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue

Big Bird wrote:

Satori · Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all

Maybe the liberals have an anti war policy but are unsatisfactory to the mainstream votrers on other issues.

Big_Bird · Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:57 pm Post subject:

I think also, a lot of the anti-war people assume the damage has already been done, and that leaving Iraq will have to be done properly, to minimise any more damage. Voting against Labour would just punish them for something already done which can not be undone.

You also have to understand the mindset of the British voter. We've had a two party system for so long, no 'anti-war voter' would be confident that other 'anti-war voters' would dare to risk their vote for Liberal, and risk letting in the dreadful Tories.