Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

"Operation Banner" (Northern Ireland) comes to an
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
philipjames



Joined: 03 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1. Saying 'Londonderry' instead of Derry does not constitute oppression. If you think it does you've just shown the weakness of the Irish Catholics' claim to be 'oppressed.' The cop was raised all his life to say 'Londonderry'. There's nothing wrong with saying it. It is his choice. It is not oppression. And it doesn't justify a bullet in the head.

2. There were only 10% Catholics in the police because of Catholics' ideological objection to wearing the uniform of the Crown. Also intimidation from / disapproval by family members. One-third of positions were set aside for Catholics. They chose not to join. That was their right. But one can't then complain about Catholic under-representation in the police. They had the option of joining. They chose not to.

3. The character above who went on about Edward Carson revealed that he hasn't read a book on NI in his life.

4. Discrimination and narrow-mindedness worked both ways in Northern Ireland, although Ulster Catholics would never admit it. From today's Irish Independent: http://www.independent.ie/national-news/protestant-gaa-star-hounded-out-by-vile-taunts-1049377.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
philipjames



Joined: 03 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And let's not forget that discrimination against Protestants was widespread in the South. In the 1911 census Protestants comprised 11% of the population of the 26 counties that would become the Free State / Eire / Republic. Today the Protestant population sits at 3%. That speaks volumes about how 'welcome' Protestants were made to feel in the Republic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

philipjames wrote:
1. Saying 'Londonderry' instead of Derry does not constitute oppression. If you think it does you've just shown the weakness of the Irish Catholics' claim to be 'oppressed.' The cop was raised all his life to say 'Londonderry'. There's nothing wrong with saying it. It is his choice. It is not oppression. And it doesn't justify a bullet in the head.


Can you read? I said this

Quote:
It can be something small like being made to say " I'm going to Londonderry" rather than "I'm going to Derry" by some idiot cop at a checkpoint


We are in a checkpoint going over the border, myself and my 18 year old brother. He asks as they always do " where are you going?", my bro says "Derry". The cop says there is no such place as Derry and makes him repeat until he says Londonderry. That is discrimination. It definitly doesn't justify a bullet in the head but it is one of the reasons why I don't like the RUC.


Last edited by JMO on Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:47 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

philipjames wrote:
And let's not forget that discrimination against Protestants was widespread in the South. In the 1911 census Protestants comprised 11% of the population of the 26 counties that would become the Free State / Eire / Republic. Today the Protestant population sits at 3%. That speaks volumes about how 'welcome' Protestants were made to feel in the Republic.


I agree, thats terrible. God forbid that I would try to defend such an untenable position.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
4. Discrimination and narrow-mindedness worked both ways in Northern Ireland, although Ulster Catholics would never admit it. From today's Irish Independent: http://www.independent.ie/national-news/protestant-gaa-star-hounded-out-by-vile-taunts-1049377.html


Well duh. I never claimed that there was no discrimination going the other way. I was just giving some reasons why I don't like the RUC and also why the IRA came into existence. Of course discrimination works both ways and it is despicable from whichever direction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bingo



Joined: 22 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 6:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No offence, but your story about crossing the border at Derry sounds very fishy. The cop made your uncle repeat the sentence until you said "Londonderry?" Sounds a bit bizarre. I doubt it happened. I'm not saying it didn't happen, but I very much doubt it went down as you're saying.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 7:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bingo wrote:
No offence, but your story about crossing the border at Derry sounds very fishy. The cop made your uncle repeat the sentence until you said "Londonderry?" Sounds a bit bizarre. I doubt it happened. I'm not saying it didn't happen, but I very much doubt it went down as you're saying.


It was my brother and yes it did happen. I didn't say anything, he was talking to the driver, my brother. I very much doubt he would have done it to my dad or uncles. It was a case of a cop taking the piss out of a very young man(my brother was 18.) and his even younger brother in a crappy car. He was probably just trying to teka the wind out my bros sails, as it was obvious he had only recently got his full license. Whats bizarre about it? You really think a cop couldn't do that then you are charmingly naive. Oh and no offence taken.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bingo



Joined: 22 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 8:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What was the cop's tone and demeanor. Was he having a laugh with you, or intentionally being a *beep*? There's a difference.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Grimalkin



Joined: 22 May 2005

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 8:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

philipjames wrote:
And let's not forget that discrimination against Protestants was widespread in the South. In the 1911 census Protestants comprised 11% of the population of the 26 counties that would become the Free State / Eire / Republic. Today the Protestant population sits at 3%. That speaks volumes about how 'welcome' Protestants were made to feel in the Republic.


Yeah that probably explains all the civil rights marches they had in the South!


And by 'welcome' do you mean that the Free State government were not prepared to discriminate in favour of the protestants against the catholics in the same way that our government were prepared to discriminate against the catholic community in favour of the protestant community in the North?


Besides the figures you show are meaningless.


First you need to cite your source.


Next you need to show what percentage decline was caused by a largely protestant administration and army personnel returning to the mainland after the formation of the free state.


Then you need to show comparative figures for the catholics in the free state for the same period (are there as many people who call themselves catholic nowadays as did in 1911). What effect did increase in population have (catholics traditionally have more children than protestants).


It would also help if you were to show figures for catholic and protestant populations in the UK over the same period.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Grimalkin



Joined: 22 May 2005

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 8:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bingo wrote:
What was the cop's tone and demeanor. Was he having a laugh with you, or intentionally being a *beep*? There's a difference.



What are you stupid?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bingo



Joined: 22 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nope. But I'm definitely starting to think that you are. The Protestant decline was due to the withdrawal of British troops after 1921? That's the stupidest thing I've ever read. They were not troops, they were southern Irishmen who fled the south. The exodus of Protestants out of the 26 was the largest movement of population in 20th century Ireland. The supposedly "Free" state became a Roman Catholic theocracy that went out of its way to make Protestants uncomfortable and unwelcome. If you need me to cite sources for anti-Protestant descrimination in the South that fact alone shows how unread you are on the issues. But to help with your education I will cite two sources off the top of my head.

Donald Akenson, Small Differences (chapter one)
Susan McKay, Northern Protestants

Again, asking me to cite this stuff is liking asking the weatherman to cite evidence that the sky is blue. Get a library card for Christ's sake.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bingo



Joined: 22 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Between 1906 and 1921 the Protestant populationd dropped by roughly 200,000 people. These were Irishmen. They were farmers, clerks, bankers, businessmen and unemployed. The south was their home. They were born there as were their parents and grandparents. But such was the threatening atmosphere that they packed up and left.

If you are really interested in this, you can do a web search. The facts are there. I shouldn't have to do your homework for you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
philipjames



Joined: 03 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There was definitely discrimination in the South. There was also discrimination in the North. But while the Nat. population in the North grew to the extent that they felt empowered to confront the State in 1969, the Protestant population in the South was dwindling away. The Irish State made no effort to reverse or stem this tide. Why would they? Ireland was to be Catholic and gaelic; a tidy little mono-ethnic sectarian state. No wonder Ulster Protestants were less than enthusiastic about joining the South. And when religious Roman Catholics started bombing Protestant towns and neighborhoods after 1970 the Republic, rather than arresting them, gave them a free haven to carry out their operations. A charming little mini-Afghanistan in Western Europe. The 1916 declaration talked about 'honouring all the childen of the nation equally." Subsequent events showed that actions spoke louder than words.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bingo wrote:
What was the cop's tone and demeanor. Was he having a laugh with you, or intentionally being a *beep*? There's a difference.


It seemed was intentionally being a asshole. But he could have been just messing with us. There is a thin divide and its hard to tell. I know he made my brother feel small. Little things like that build up.

Quote:
There was definitely discrimination in the South. There was also discrimination in the North


I agree.

Quote:
Ireland was to be Catholic and gaelic; a tidy little mono-ethnic sectarian state


This was DeValera's dream and on this I would disagree with him also.



Quote:
And when religious Roman Catholics started bombing Protestant towns and neighborhoods after 1970 the Republic, rather than arresting them, gave them a free haven to carry out their operations


Most of the members of my family who are hardcore nationalist(mostly uncles on my ma side) have little love for the church. Indeed many nationalists believed the church turned traitor to the british government long ago. Back in the day they used to excommunicate IRA members as far as I know. Read Seamus Deane's 'Reading in the Dark' to get an idea of church vs country in Derry in the middle of the century. Really..its a great novel and not really political.

So I would say nationalists from the catholic comunity rather than religious roman catholics. Its no skin off my nose though as I'm neither a practicing catholic nor a nationalist.

The Republic did give the IRA a free haven in many ways, but really what do you expect? They are going to throw guys in jail fo doing exactly what the leaders/ex leaders of their own parties had done 50 years earlier? Not going to happen. Once again I think they should have but you have to understand why they didn't.

Quote:
A charming little mini-Afghanistan in Western Europe


I don't know what you expect. People support their own. Its sad but true and hopefully something we are getting away from in Ireland.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Grimalkin



Joined: 22 May 2005

PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bingo wrote:
Nope. But I'm definitely starting to think that you are. The Protestant decline was due to the withdrawal of British troops after 1921? That's the stupidest thing I've ever read. They were not troops, they were southern Irishmen who fled the south. The exodus of Protestants out of the 26 was the largest movement of population in 20th century Ireland. The supposedly "Free" state became a Roman Catholic theocracy that went out of its way to make Protestants uncomfortable and unwelcome. If you need me to cite sources for anti-Protestant descrimination in the South that fact alone shows how unread you are on the issues. But to help with your education I will cite two sources off the top of my head.

Donald Akenson, Small Differences (chapter one)
Susan McKay, Northern Protestants

Again, asking me to cite this stuff is liking asking the weatherman to cite evidence that the sky is blue. Get a library card for Christ's sake.


Yeah that'd be a lot of help in S.Korea. I'm sure the library shelves are just creaking under the weight of tomes dealing with the demographic studies of Ireland in the period 1911 to the present day.


I did however check the sources you cited and (surprise surprise ) the authors are both N. Irish protestants. Thanks for leading me to such unbiased sources.

One review of Donald Akenson's 'Small Differences' starts "In this provocative but grievously flawed book"...


...(I guess I won't be rushing out to buy that one).


I did find a positive review of Susan McKay's 'Northern Protestants' but the reviewer did provide the following biographical details about himself...


"I was brought up a Protestant in Belfast, born during WWII. My great uncle Sam had been a 'Labour-Unionist' politician in the 1920s and became the first Speaker in Stormont. I attended N.Ireland's 'premier private school' Campbell College. I didn't knowingly meet a Catholic until at the age of 18 I went to University. I know these people of whom Susan McKay writes. Her grandfather was an Orangeman, mine was a Mason..."


so possibly not the most unbiased of reviewers.


You wouldn't happen to be able to cite any other sources that could be trusted to be a little more...well...balanced.


And by the way, with regard to the umbrage you've taken at having to do my homework I think it's generally accepted when somebody bases their arguments on certain facts it's up to them to provide the sources of those facts, it's not up to their audience to go chasing down the sources, so it looks as though it's philipjames you should be taking out your frustration on not me!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International