Korean Job Discussion Forums

[dutchy pink]

Tony,
Can I ask, What are you talking about?
You, most likely, have never had more than a 2 minute exchange with a gay person.
Your little statement that there is no proof any gays have not had a long term relationship because they can't get married, is, simply put, moronic.
Do you have any idea what this debate is even about?

[Tony_Balony]

Yes, I have good gay friends that is until I went to one of their awful parties. I had a government job where I worked with plenty of homosexual people. Its best to know them superficially, as they start to annoy soon after.

I can remove the Bible and the sex references and I'm still left with plenty of material to be annoyed.

Gays have never been able to be married, this excludes proof that gays have been in long term married relationships. Shaking up and being married are two very different things. You won't be able to make this claim for at least 20 years. In the meantime, things don't look good for the ones that are getting married. The statistics aren't good so far.

[dutchy pink]

What statistics?
Are you perusing Gay Home and Gardens in your free time?
Is this "fact" in reference to the extraordinary success rate of heterosexual marraiges?

Yes, we will have to wait 20 years before we can know anything about gay relationships, since 1997 was the first documented case of two people of the same sex ever being in love.
Are you serious?

I ask again, What are you talking about?
You make less than no sense.

[JMO]

Tony does stray into the realm of the minus sense on a regular basis.

[Tony_Balony]

[Tony_Balony]

[dutchy pink]

Tony, really, you are too much.
Are your parents together?
2 couples get divorced and that is your proof. From yahoo news.
debating you on this subject takes away from any would-be seriousness that this subject might provoke.
Kindly remove yourself from this debate/topic/forum.

[Tony_Balony]

I'm trying to resarch this matter and I want to use info from homo websites since you'll disregard information from conservative sources "just because" so I go to Gay sites and I have to look at butt plug advertisements. Thats so Gay.

You know what? The best evidence I have Mr. Garrison on South Park.

First he's twisted, then he's a pervert, then he comes out and we have to watch a ep of him coming out, then an ep of him having a sex change operation and then another ep of him coming out as a lesbian. Stan said it best. He just sighed and said "Again?".

Im not going through this again. I don't want to be drawn into your self absorbtion. I went through this before and its as lame as it was last time.
you can look in the mirror some more if you want but its not for me.

I'm out - have a good debate.

[dutchy pink]

Thanks

[shantaram]

I cannot believe the ignorance I have read on this thread.

Maybe the poll should have a fourth and a fifth option,

4) No, but I'm better than they are,

5) No, but I like to make ignorant statements about them.

[Demophobe]

[shantaram]

Demophobe, I have thought about this for a couple of days (and read about homophobia on Wikipedia- is that cheating?) and I think you are right to say it's wrong to label all people who don't like or won't tolerate homosexuality as homophobic. There is a spectrum of opinions on the topic. If you accept that there is a phobia of homosexuality (which I and many others call homophobia), you can see that people display that attitude on this board frequently. For example, the person who threatened to break his friend's hand for placing it on his knee. You're right I think in saying that there are straight people who put up a facade of tolerating gays but underneath it have different opinions. They make very uncomfortable friendships with gays in my experience. I think that when it comes to friendships, it's better for people to say what they think and get it off their chest, otherwise what's the point in being friends? I also think that gay culture could do with some pointers. In order to become more assimilated into society, it needs to listen to criticism from others, and not write everything negative off as homophobia. There is too much negative criticism unfortunately, and it can be stultifying. I have rather a negative opinion of some posters on this board as a result of reading their remarks. Some remarks are homophobic, some ignorant, some plain offensive. I think you are making an intelligent point Demophobe. I don't agree with your opinion, you don't agree with homosexuality, no hard feelings (did I just say that?)

[Demophobe]

shantaram: No hard feelings. Of course, this is the net...as real as a dream. You have every right to take issue with me still; I was anything but articulate in this matter until now. I was making vague generalities and being provocative for no.good.reason. at all.



Your post was as refreshing a break as mine; both of us were engaging in poop-throwing and while it is entertaining, it perpetuates the idea that no productive discussion can emanate from Dave's. So, for me, this is closed. There were some great posts by many folks, so that was nice.

We agree to disagree. A gentleman and a scholar.

[Grimalkin]

[Yesterday]

Back years ago in Psychology - we learnt that people who suffered from "homophobia" were MOST LIKELY - "gay" themselves - but living in denial ...........