|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think Eamo is on the right track.
Honestly, there are many aspects of English that Koreans know well: speaking and writing are not high on the list. It has absolutely nothing to do with Native Speakers and changing the qualifications of Native Speakers will do nothing to improve Korean's ability to speak and write. In general, though not completely, those Koreans who do study with Native Speakers, can speak and write English better than those who don't study with Native Speakers.
The problem is that the Korean College Enterance Exam and to a certain extent the TOEIC Test only requires an understanding of English grammar. The TOEIC test does not require any ability to produce language. Koreans are almost exclusively taught reading and listening comprehension and grammar. Only when they are with a Native Speaker do they have to produce anything.
That is the problem.
Cuban Lord, I believe your heart is in the right place but I don't believe you really understand the problem - except your placement of blame on Korea and Koreans. It is not the qualifications of Native Speakers; it is the expectations and place of importance of English by Koreans. Some of this is changing. The placement of Native Speakers in Public Schools is part of this. It obviously has a ways to go though.
I don't believe putting things in the hands of parents would help. Koreans need to make up their minds about English education. They are far too ambivalent about it. They seem to want to be fluent (something that almost no high schools and university in America require anyone to be) but they don't have the curriculum or drive to be fluent.
Please stop bashing Native Speakers who are caught in this Korean ambivalence. We are not the problem and we are only part of the solution. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lets look at how things play in North America:
Parents pay taxes and the government provides the schools. It's found the schools aren't turning out students ready for higher education or the work world.
Solution? Get a new government. Raise hell. Toss the bums out and find someone who can fix the damn school system to teach kids what they need to know.
Korea:
Parents pay taxes and the government provides the schools. It's found the schools aren't turning out students ready for higher education or the work world.
Solution? Keep sending them to the crap schools and then pay more money for private education. Keep voting in the same politicians. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I also reckon the Korean public school system suffers from low-expectation malaise. It could be a hangover from the bad old days when Koreans felt they were doing well if most kids left school able to read, write and do math.
There was very little government funding for schools in those days (pre '80s) so the education system struggled with over 40 in each class and I'm guessing that teacher training was minimal.
The low-level of government funding is still a problem. Just today I asked could I order a bunch of A3 sized cards to give my high-school kids a poster project. My boss looked mystified. Order? He said there was no system in the school for ordering anything not on the curriculum. The Koreans teachers never order anything according to my boss. This is the situation in a top-rated Seoul Foreign Language High School with a name recognized by most, if not all Koreans. I dread to think how skint little country schools are. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dogshed

Joined: 28 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Unposter wrote: |
It is not the qualifications of Native Speakers; it is the expectations and place of importance of English by Koreans. Some of this is changing. The placement of Native Speakers in Public Schools is part of this. It obviously has a ways to go though.
I don't believe putting things in the hands of parents would help. Koreans need to make up their minds about English education. They are far too ambivalent about it. They seem to want to be fluent (something that almost no high schools and university in America require anyone to be) but they don't have the curriculum or drive to be fluent.
Please stop bashing Native Speakers who are caught in this Korean ambivalence. We are not the problem and we are only part of the solution. |
Right. The fact that foreign native speakers come with a variety of skill sets does not have to be a liability. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
T-dot

Joined: 16 May 2004 Location: bundang
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 5:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Unposter wrote: |
Please stop bashing Native Speakers who are caught in this Korean ambivalence. We are not the problem and we are only part of the solution. |
I think you're naive to think that Native Teachers are not a part of the problem. We may not be primary the reason for the lack of english proficiency by Koreans, but we are most definitely not bystanders in all this. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bosintang

Joined: 01 Dec 2003 Location: In the pot with the rest of the mutts
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've posted lots about this before, so I'll keep it short.
The Korean English education system is just a ...mess. Complete, utter mess. There's absolutely nothing about it that is a role model.
Everything that they do in Korea, they should do opposite, and they might make some progress.
As for foreigners roles in Korea, I honestly think they should just stop hiring foreigners to teach English in Korea except for specialised roles. For a few years, anyways. As a whole, we're just causing more problems and we cost too much. With things like visas, housing arrangements, recruitment fees, and when it comes down to it, just plain disorganisation and mismanagement on the schools part, supporting foreigners becomes an end in itself rather than a means to an end.
My main point is, it's not about us, or at least it shouldn't be. We're not hired or treated as professionals let alone in control of anything. We didn't hire ourselves or force anyone at gunpoint to send us free airplane tickets and housing. How can it be our problem? We're just one bloody freak show in their 3-ring circus. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VirginIslander
Joined: 24 May 2006 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
First, I would like to see more English programs for English learners. And they cant suck like they do now! Have you watched Arriang?
Second, books. Most ESL books I've seen in Korean do not target Korean children and their specific language needs. Publishers produce books that can be sold in the international market, not the Korean marker. For example, I have sixth grade elite students who can write excellent essays on the unification of Korea but can pronounce the "w" in wolf when reading The Call of The Wild.
Third, time off. Kids and Teachers should get a break while in class. Watch a movie in class, have a party, do a play, go the park at least once a month.
Also, Kids and Teachers should have time off from the academy. How creative, motivated and concerned about students can a Korean Teacher be when she has been teaching year-round for three years? I only took off a week between contracts and Im not as creative or as interested in the material as I was the year before.
I would argue that that is the one of the biggest problems with privatge English education in Korea. That's not Korea's fault; it's Korea's men who define their masculinity by the numbers of hours on their time card. Hey, if I can work 12 hours a day, so should my teahers.
I hear often hear complaints about learning too many words and too much meaningless homeowork. But, after working 30 consecutive months, what would you rely on? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VirginIslander
Joined: 24 May 2006 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
My main point is, it's not about us, or at least it shouldn't be. We're not hired or treated as professionals let alone in control of anything. We didn't hire ourselves or force anyone at gunpoint to send us free airplane tickets and housing. How can it be our problem? We're just one bloody freak show in their 3-ring circus. |
On the other hand, schools are making changes. My school is run by a Korean-American. He dropped my course load to four classes a day, raised me several hundred thousand won and made me the head teacher.
As of now, Im trying to develop a traing video, write a curriculum, make a database for all tests and supplemental materials, develop a writing program, make a website for our school that will attract excellent teachers (pictures of our classrooms with projectors and internet, our loft apartments) so we dont have to use recruiters, ect....
Im still working on the time off for teachers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mack4289

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
VirginIslander wrote: |
Quote: |
My main point is, it's not about us, or at least it shouldn't be. We're not hired or treated as professionals let alone in control of anything. We didn't hire ourselves or force anyone at gunpoint to send us free airplane tickets and housing. How can it be our problem? We're just one bloody freak show in their 3-ring circus. |
On the other hand, schools are making changes. My school is run by a Korean-American. He dropped my course load to four classes a day, raised me several hundred thousand won and made me the head teacher.
As of now, Im trying to develop a traing video, write a curriculum, make a database for all tests and supplemental materials, develop a writing program, make a website for our school that will attract excellent teachers (pictures of our classrooms with projectors and internet, our loft apartments) so we dont have to use recruiters, ect....
Im still working on the time off for teachers. |
I'm guessing if there is significant education reform here, it's going to be the gyopos and Koreans who have studied elsewhere who are going to make it happen. Koreans make up the biggest group of foreign university students studying in American universities (http://seoul.usembassy.gov/113_110906.html). Many of them have probably formed these kinds of opinions studying abroad:
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2876560
"�I hated my high school education, which was focused on memorizing everything only because it would appear in exams,� said Baek Jin-su, a 20-year-old freshmen at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT. �I figured the university education in Korea would not be any better.�
Park Ji-ho, a sophomore at Yale University, said he�s getting opportunities that he could only dream about in Korea. �Every Wednesday, we participate in debates with influential people including Barack Obama, a leading Democratic presidential candidate, and former U.S. President George Bush,� Park said.
Another student, Lee Jun-seok, said he saw more talented students while he was studying in Korea, but universities at home don�t teach a wide range of subjects and don�t teach the students to become leaders. �Seoul National University students are far more talented in computer programming than my classmates,� said Lee, a computer science senior at Harvard University. �But at Harvard, we learn how to be a leader by taking various classes ranging from economics to politics, so we can better use the abilities of engineers. That is different from what computer engineering students in Korea are learning.�
The problem is a lot of them might not come back:
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2876560
"In interviews with the JoongAng Ilbo, only four out of 35 star Korean students studying at seven prestigious U.S. universities said they will return as soon as their studies end. Thirteen said they will eventually go back, but not right away, 16 said they did not know if they would return and two said they would not come back."
But with all the money to be made in hagwans and with the sense of pride many Koreans seem to have in their country, there's plenty of reason to believe a lot of them will come back. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Don Gately

Joined: 20 Mar 2006 Location: In a basement taking a severe beating
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 8:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
cubanlord wrote: |
A lot of you have some solid points and I would like to use them in my next article. I have presented the problem. Now, I will present the solutions. Please tell me what you feel is the most important thing Korea can do to rectify the current situation. Also, please give me relevant information to support your opinion. All credit, if wished, will be given accordingly (and no, not handles. I'll PM you and you can let me know your real name).
Me. |
The Korean education system is totally, inherently flawed. It is designed to produce a super race, wherein every student is a tiny Einstein.
The fact of the matter is the Korean population (like every other population) is a bell curve, with very few students who will benefit from a 12 hour school day.
Only through a total overhaul of its educational system and philosophy can Korea free itself from its current predicament of bankrupting its middle-class families to provide futures their children will never achieve.
Step out of the Hagwon-University in Seoul-Job with Chaebol mindset. Expand the definition of what passes for success in Korea. Place a greater emphasis on art, music, and sports, and no, I'm not talking about the World Cup or playing a violin because it gets you into a better college.
Korea needs to value more than just the absolute overachievers, or else fathers will continue to live overseas to finance their children's ridiculous education, families will continue to live in debt for the selfsame reason, and kids will continue to hang themselves when they don't get into their first choice of University.
The philosophy and end goals of the Korean education system need to change. Both the end, and the means.
Here's the bad news: the first step to doing this is the complete and utter disbanding of the Hogwan industry. How do you achieve that? Simple, you raise the standards for teachers. And not just to a TOEFEL or TESL certification you can get by spending two weeks in Guadalajara. If you want to teach in a Hogwan from now on you need post-graduate work. A master's of education, at least. After that, if what you really want to do is work in a Hogwan for $2,000/mo., more power to you. That way, you're affecting the supply side, not the demand. The public schools are still allowed to hire BAs and BSs, however, so it becomes ridiculously more cost effective to just let your kid get his Waeg exposure at his local grammar school.
Likewise, raise qualifications for teachers in all kinds of Hogwans. You want to teach math after hours? Fine, you better be at least as qualified as the High School math teachers. Otherwise, why would anybody listen to you? Just to be put through their rote paces and waste their time when they could be getting healthy rest for their young bodies? I think we've seen how that works.
Much as I hate to say this, Koreans have to get more comfortable with the idea that their kids are mediocre. 50% of us are. It's not a hanging crime. I know that's not a very romantic sentiment, but it could be worse. You could be in the 25% on the left side of the bell curve.
Sorry for the screed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cubanlord

Joined: 08 Jul 2005 Location: In Japan!
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Everyone that has participated in this thread thus far has given excellent view points on the English education system in Korea. Hopefully, those that have not been participating, rather just sitting back and reading this thread, will speak up without the sarcasm and actually put forth ideas which could help solve this problem. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VirginIslander
Joined: 24 May 2006 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Here's the bad news: the first step to doing this is the complete and utter disbanding of the Hogwan industry. How do you achieve that? Simple, you raise the standards for teachers. And not just to a TOEFEL or TESL certification you can get by spending two weeks in Guadalajara. If you want to teach in a Hogwan from now on you need post-graduate work. A master's of education, at least. After that, if what you really want to do is work in a Hogwan for $2,000/mo., more power to you. That way, you're affecting the supply side, not the demand. The public schools are still allowed to hire BAs and BSs, however, so it becomes ridiculously more cost effective to just let your kid get his Waeg exposure at his local grammar school |
.
Do you really need a masters to teach second graders English? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VirginIslander
Joined: 24 May 2006 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mack wrote:
Quote: |
I'm guessing if there is significant education reform here, it's going to be the gyopos and Koreans who have studied elsewhere who are going to make it happen. Koreans make up the biggest group of foreign university students studying in American universities (http://seoul.usembassy.gov/113_110906.html). Many of them have probably formed these kinds of opinions studying abroad:
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2876560
"�I hated my high school education, which was focused on memorizing everything only because it would appear in exams,� said Baek Jin-su, a 20-year-old freshmen at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT. �I figured the university education in Korea would not be any better.�
Park Ji-ho, a sophomore at Yale University, said he�s getting opportunities that he could only dream about in Korea. �Every Wednesday, we participate in debates with influential people including Barack Obama, a leading Democratic presidential candidate, and former U.S. President George Bush,� Park said.
Another student, Lee Jun-seok, said he saw more talented students while he was studying in Korea, but universities at home don�t teach a wide range of subjects and don�t teach the students to become leaders. �Seoul National University students are far more talented in computer programming than my classmates,� said Lee, a computer science senior at Harvard University. �But at Harvard, we learn how to be a leader by taking various classes ranging from economics to politics, so we can better use the abilities of engineers. That is different from what computer engineering students in Korea are learning.�
The problem is a lot of them might not come back:
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2876560
"In interviews with the JoongAng Ilbo, only four out of 35 star Korean students studying at seven prestigious U.S. universities said they will return as soon as their studies end. Thirteen said they will eventually go back, but not right away, 16 said they did not know if they would return and two said they would not come back."
But with all the money to be made in hagwans and with the sense of pride many Koreans seem to have in their country, there's plenty of reason to believe a lot of them will come back. |
You're right. But, what do men with power and money want: more power and money. Do you think that they going to step aside while a new generation takes over?
This year I work with many Koreans who can speak English fluently, more fluently than the CEO's. Almost all of them studied abroad, between two and three years each. All of them dont like the way students are being taught. They have said things like "I liked better they way we did it in Canada." They are great girls and guys and they would really like to change the system.
With several classes, prep time, grading time, phone calls, meaningless meetings, dinner, when do they have time to make these changes themsevles? And, at 1.4 million a month , while the big bosses are bringing in 10 million a month, why should they make changes. Moreover, they only thing that is constant is change, except for in Korea. The new teachers, especially the women, are not supposed to question their elders. Can you imagine a 25 year old woman telling a 45 year old Korean man that he is doing it wrong?
Now, if you guys really wanted to see some changes, how about taking our savings and starting our own school based on our principals? If you want change, you'll need money.
Koreans are competitive. If they see that we are doing it better, they'll copy us and they'll be a domino effect. How many times have you seen this with chicken restaraunts?
First rule: Our Korean teachers will be paid over 2 million and we'll give them time off every year. Now we will have the most quailfied teachers Korean in the howgron system.
But, most of us dont want to invest the time or money to making changes. It was the same in the Caribbean and on the Ute reservation in Utah.
Temporary teachers complain, and complain, and complain, and complain, and complain.......and then they go home.
I'll never forgot an Ute man saying to my sister "You college kids come down here for a year to make yourselves feel better, tell us what to do and then leave." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mack4289

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VirginIslander wrote: |
Mack wrote:
Quote: |
I'm guessing if there is significant education reform here, it's going to be the gyopos and Koreans who have studied elsewhere who are going to make it happen. Koreans make up the biggest group of foreign university students studying in American universities (http://seoul.usembassy.gov/113_110906.html). Many of them have probably formed these kinds of opinions studying abroad:
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2876560
"�I hated my high school education, which was focused on memorizing everything only because it would appear in exams,� said Baek Jin-su, a 20-year-old freshmen at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT. �I figured the university education in Korea would not be any better.�
Park Ji-ho, a sophomore at Yale University, said he�s getting opportunities that he could only dream about in Korea. �Every Wednesday, we participate in debates with influential people including Barack Obama, a leading Democratic presidential candidate, and former U.S. President George Bush,� Park said.
Another student, Lee Jun-seok, said he saw more talented students while he was studying in Korea, but universities at home don�t teach a wide range of subjects and don�t teach the students to become leaders. �Seoul National University students are far more talented in computer programming than my classmates,� said Lee, a computer science senior at Harvard University. �But at Harvard, we learn how to be a leader by taking various classes ranging from economics to politics, so we can better use the abilities of engineers. That is different from what computer engineering students in Korea are learning.�
The problem is a lot of them might not come back:
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2876560
"In interviews with the JoongAng Ilbo, only four out of 35 star Korean students studying at seven prestigious U.S. universities said they will return as soon as their studies end. Thirteen said they will eventually go back, but not right away, 16 said they did not know if they would return and two said they would not come back."
But with all the money to be made in hagwans and with the sense of pride many Koreans seem to have in their country, there's plenty of reason to believe a lot of them will come back. |
You're right. But, what do men with power and money want: more power and money. Do you think that they going to step aside while a new generation takes over?
This year I work with many Koreans who can speak English fluently, more fluently than the CEO's. Almost all of them studied abroad, between two and three years each. All of them dont like the way students are being taught. They have said things like "I liked better they way we did it in Canada." They are great girls and guys and they would really like to change the system.
With several classes, prep time, grading time, phone calls, meaningless meetings, dinner, when do they have time to make these changes themsevles? And, at 1.4 million a month , while the big bosses are bringing in 10 million a month, why should they make changes. Moreover, they only thing that is constant is change, except for in Korea. The new teachers, especially the women, are not supposed to question their elders. Can you imagine a 25 year old woman telling a 45 year old Korean man that he is doing it wrong?
Now, if you guys really wanted to see some changes, how about taking our savings and starting our own school based on our principals? If you want change, you'll need money.
Koreans are competitive. If they see that we are doing it better, they'll copy us and they'll be a domino effect. How many times have you seen this with chicken restaraunts?
First rule: Our Korean teachers will be paid over 2 million and we'll give them time off every year. Now we will have the most quailfied teachers Korean in the howgron system.
But, most of us dont want to invest the time or money to making changes. It was the same in the Caribbean and on the Ute reservation in Utah.
Temporary teachers complain, and complain, and complain, and complain, and complain.......and then they go home.
I'll never forgot an Ute man saying to my sister "You college kids come down here for a year to make yourselves feel better, tell us what to do and then leave." |
Fair enough, but maybe some of these ideas stick with people here and cause some small change. I'd say it's better to make constructive criticisms or even just valid complaints rather than keeping quiet when we see something we think could be done better.
But ultimately, in Korea, or a Ute reservation or the Caribbean, the main impetus for change has to come from the people living in that place. Sometimes outside help makes that change happen faster, sometimes it slows it down, but if the people living there don't want that change badly enough it won't happen.
This is why convincing the parents of the need for change is so important. As long as parents will pay for their kids to be in classes 12 hours a day, kids will be in classes 12 hours a day. The parents will have to become convinced that studying efficiently is better for kids than
studying all the time before any serious changes get made. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cubanlord

Joined: 08 Jul 2005 Location: In Japan!
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mack4289 wrote: |
The parents will have to become convinced that studying efficiently is better for kids than
studying all the time before any serious changes get made. |
Right. However, we have to acknowledge the fact that many parents send their children to hogwons not for the education, but for the 'babysitting' value of it. Take the average hogwon child for example. S/he does not go to just one hogwon, they go to 50 of them a day! Many times, parents just don't want to deal with their kids; what better way to get them out of your hair than to send them off to hogwon after hogwon? This is from where the 'Edutainer' label was created. To parents, as long as their children are happy, what do they care? I am not saying this is the case for ALL students. I am saying this is the case for a lot of students. Why do people think that hogwons want foreigners to, "just make them happy?" It's sickening.
Thankfully, there are those handful of parents that know better. They send their child to maybe 1 or 2 hogwons for an hour each. Then, the kids go home. Hey, if the child is learning, why not? But, that's the problem. Most children do not learn because as someone said it before, there is no teeth in hogwon discipline. Rather, there is reprimand for the poor soul that doesn't make the children laugh.
I rule with an iron fist in my classroom, yet, my students adore me. This is because I treat them with respect and value their opinions. Every few weeks I have them evaluate me and tell me what they liked and did not like about the class. Once I see a pattern develop, I adjust accordingly. THIS is what teachers should be doing. Center your pedagogical method around those who are directly affected, not around what you 'think' is correct. This is something the Ministry of Education and the private sector need to grasp. Support its teachers and schools and what they do; change and adapt to an ever changing time. Only then will things begin to balance.
But hey, Korea, keep doing things the way you are used to doing them. After all, just because you have a *beep*, are a male, and are old means you are all knowledgeable. Of course someone with a Ph.D. and extensive experience or one with an MA in TESOL and extensive experience won't know more than you and your age number. Of course we won't know how to educate those that want it. Of course we can't don't know what we are talking about because we aren't Korean. Keep thinking that way. I am sure your yearning for global recognition will be acheived through this so provenly positive method. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|