|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Alyallen

Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!
|
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 10:27 pm Post subject: Chinese parents fight forced abortions |
|
|
This is just brutal...
Chinese parents fight forced abortions By ALEXA OLESEN, Associated Press Writer
Wed Aug 29, 12:35 PM ET
QIAN'AN, China - Yang Zhongchen, a small-town businessman, wined and dined three government officials for permission to become a father.
But the Peking duck and liquor weren't enough. One night, a couple of weeks before her date for giving birth, Yang's wife was dragged from her bed in a north China town and taken to a clinic, where, she says, her baby was killed by injection while still inside her.
"Several people held me down, they ripped my clothes aside and the doctor pushed a large syringe into my stomach," says Jin Yani, a shy, petite woman with a long ponytail. "It was very painful. ... It was all very rough."
Some 30 years after China decreed a general limit of one child per family, resentment still brews over the state's regular and sometimes brutal intrusion into intimate family matters. Not only are many second pregnancies aborted, but even to have one's first child requires a license.
Seven years after the dead baby was pulled from her body with forceps, Jin remains traumatized and, the couple and a doctor say, unable to bear children. Yang and Jin have made the rounds of government offices pleading for restitution � to no avail.
This year, they took the unusual step of suing the family planning agency in court. The judges ruled against them, saying Yang and Jin conceived out of wedlock. Local family planning officials said Jin consented to the abortion. The couple's appeal to a higher court is pending.
The one-child policy applies to most families in this nation of 1.3 billion people, and communist officials, often under pressure to meet birth quotas set by the government, can be coldly intolerant of violators.
But in the new China, economically powerful and more open to outside influences, ordinary citizens such as Yang and Jin increasingly are speaking out. Aiding them are social campaigners and lawyers who have documented cases of forced abortions in the seventh, eighth or ninth month.
Chen Guangcheng, a self-taught lawyer, prepared a law suit cataloguing 20 cases of forced abortions and sterilizations in rural parts of Shandong province in 2005, allegedly carried out because local officials had failed to reach population control targets.
Chen, who is blind, is serving a prison sentence of three years and four months which his supporters say was meted out in retaliation for his activism.
Many countries ban abortion after 12 or sometimes 24 weeks of pregnancy unless the mother's life is at risk. While China outlaws forced abortions, its laws do not expressly prohibit or even define late-term termination.
Jin, an 18-year-old high school dropout from a broken home, met 30-year-old Yang, a building materials supplier, in September 1998. They moved in together. A year and a half later, in January or February 2000, they discovered Jin was pregnant but couldn't get married right away because she had not reached 20, the marriage age.
After her birthday in April, Jin bought porcelain cups for the wedding and posed for studio photos. On May 5, they were married. Now all that was missing was the piece of paper allowing them to have a child. So about a month before Jin's due date, her husband Yang set out to curry favor with Di Wenjun, head of the neighborhood family planning office in Anshan, the couple's home town about 190 miles east of Beijing.
He faced a fine of $660 to $1,330 for not having gotten a family planning permit in advance, so he treated Di to the Peking duck lunch on Aug. 15, 2000, hoping to escape with a lower fine since this was his first child.
The next day he paid for another meal with Di and the village's Communist Party secretary and accountant.
He said the mood was cordial and that the officials toasted him for finding a young wife and starting a family.
"They told me 'We'll talk to our superiors. We'll do our best. Wait for our news.' So I was put at ease," Yang said.
But three weeks later, on Sept. 7, when Yang was away opening a new building supplies store, Jin was taken from her mother-in-law's home and forced into having the abortion.
Why had the officials failed to make good on their assurances? One of Yang's two lawyers, Wang Chen, says he believes it was because no bribe was paid.
"Dinner is not enough," Wang said. "Nothing gets done without a bribe. This is the situation in China. Yang was too naive."
Di, who has since been promoted to head of family planning for all of Anshan township, could not be reached. Officials who answered his office phone refused to take a message and gave a cell phone number for him that was out of service.
Zhai Zhenwu, a sociology professor at the People's University Institute of Demographic Studies in Beijing, said that while forced, late-term abortions do still occur sporadically, they have fallen sharply.
In the late '80s and early '90s, he said, some family planning officials "were really radical and would do very inappropriate things like take your house, levy huge fines, force you into procedures."
Things have improved since a propaganda campaign in 1993 to make enforcement more humane and the enactment of the family planning law in 2001, he said. Controls have been relaxed, allowing couples in many rural areas to have two children under certain conditions.
Still, Radio Free Asia reported this year that dozens of women in Baise, a small city in the southern province of Guangxi, were forced to have abortions because local officials failed to meet their population targets.
In the province's Bobai county, thousands of farmers rioted in May after family planners levied huge fines against people with too many children. Those who didn't pay were told their homes would be demolished and their belongings seized.
Yang and Jin are suing the Family Planning Bureau in their county of Changli for $38,000 in medical expenses and $130,000 for psychological distress.
But it's not about the money, said Yang, a fast-talking chain-smoker. No longer able to afford to run his business, he now works as a day laborer in Qian'an, an iron mining town east of Beijing.
"What I want is my child and I want the court to acknowledge our suffering," he said.
A family planning official in Changli justified Jin's abortion on the grounds she lacked a birth permit. The woman, who would only give her surname, Fu, said no one in the clinic was punished for performing the procedure.
The National Population and Family Planning Commission, the agency overseeing the one-child policy, says it is looking into Jin and Yang's case. Meanwhile, the evidence appears contradictory.
Jin's medical records include a doctor's certificate from 2001, the year after the abortion, confirming she could not have children. Doctors in Changli county say they examined her in 2001 and 2002 and found nothing wrong with her.
The court ruling says Jin agreed to have the operation. Jin says the signature on the consent form is not hers but that of Di, the official her husband courted.
Sun Maohang, another of the Yangs' lawyers, doubts the court will rule for the couple lest it encourage further lawsuits. But he hopes the case will stir debate and lead to clearer guidelines on abortion.
As she waits for the next round in court, Jin says she is too weak to work and has been celibate for years because sex is too painful.
Her husband prods her to tell her story, but during an interview she sits silent for a long time and finally says she doesn't want to talk about the past because it's too sad.
Then she quietly insists the lawsuit is something she has to do for Yang Ying, the baby girl she carried but never got to see or hold.
http://tinyurl.com/2w8ubr |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is frightening and heartbreaking.
Just as I think every woman has a right to choose when to bring a child into the world, so I will also label as an atrocity any act by a govt to force her to kill her own child.
I'm firmly pro-choice, but I have no problem agreeing that abortion is murder. Sometimes murder is necessary, and sometimes it's better than the alternatives. Might as well look at it as it is, and use the words that apply.
It's a difficult choice for a woman to make, but it's her choice, not mine and definitely not any govt's.
The scene described in this article is nothing else than a nightmare. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tjames426
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 5:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jin, an 18-year-old high school dropout from a broken home, met 30-year-old Yang, a building materials supplier, in September 1998. They moved in together. A year and a half later, in January or February 2000, they discovered Jin was pregnant but couldn't get married right away because she had not reached 20, the marriage age.
___
It does not surprise me.
They live in a Confucian society and broke some of the major societal rules. The illicit relationship does not surprise me but...
1. The man was stupid enough to get emotionally involved and allowed an underaged girl to move in with him.
2. She refused to get an abortion when found to be pregnant while underage.
3. They actually wanted to get married without the express "blessing" of their parents.
Remember this is China. Only tragedy comes from such foolishness. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tjames426 wrote: |
It does not surprise me. |
Just curious, where do you draw the line as far as governmentally-conspired and forcefully implemented atrocities upon a human being's body is concerned? I'm asking because, offhand, I can't THINK of anything more monstrous and callously cruel than someone sitting in an office shuffling papers who decides, "Okay, tonight we're going to visit a woman's house, take her forceably to a hospital, and rip a human life out of her body against her consent. And we won't bother to say please and thank you."
It's a serious question. If you do not feel the most extreme sort of outrage and disgust over this ... what possibly would?
God love the internet, for the anonymity it allows people like you to say things on a computer you would never have the cojones to say out loud in front of real people ...
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bramble

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Location: National treasures need homes
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Was something deleted? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alyallen

Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bramble wrote: |
Was something deleted? |
It does not appear so to me but I can wrong... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
flakfizer

Joined: 12 Nov 2004 Location: scaling the Cliffs of Insanity with a frayed rope.
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Bobster wrote: |
I'm firmly pro-choice, but I have no problem agreeing that abortion is murder. Sometimes murder is necessary, and sometimes it's better than the alternatives. Might as well look at it as it is, and use the words that apply.
It's a difficult choice for a woman to make, but it's her choice, not mine and definitely not any govt's.
. |
I don't understand this. What does "pro-choice" mean? I thought it meant that women have the right to choose whether to have their fetuses aborted or not. This "right" is predicated on the idea that the fetus is not a human being. Otherwise, it would not be a woman's choice to abort. It might still be allowed if the woman's life were in jeopardy or something, but if the fetus were seen as a human being, the government would have a responsibility to protect that life just like any other human life. The only way a pro-choice stance is possible is if the fetus is not seen as a human being, and therefore the killing of it would not be murder.
Your first two lines can be joined to read, "I firmly believe that women have the right to choose to commit murder." Scary.
Let me be clear. I am not arguing for or against abortion here. I believe abortion is wrong, but that is not my issue with your post. If someone wants to be pro-choice, I just don't see how they can agree that abortion is murder. The following is from WIKI:
Quote: |
Pro-life and pro-choice individuals often use political framing to convey their perspective on the issues, and in some cases, to discredit opposing views. Pro-life advocates tend to use terms such as "mother", "unborn child", "unborn baby", "pre-born infant" or infanticide.[14] Pro-choice advocates tend to use terms such as "zygote", "embryo" or "fetus". |
The pro-choice position needs to hold the view that the fetus is not a human being and is therefore not protected by the same rights that we enjoy. If you are pro-choice, fine, but I don't see how you can be pro-choice and agree that abortion is murder. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The fact that China was awarded the Olympics is disgusting. A country that openly props up and defends murderous regimes in North Korea, Myanmar, Sudan. A country that itself is guilty of mass murders of millions of its own, living and not yet born. A country that ships lethal drugs, toys, toothpaste and pet food to our countries. How such a vile piece of shit ever got the olympics is beyond me. There isnt a single good thing one could say about modern day China. A vile country. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
flakfizer wrote: |
If you are pro-choice, fine, but I don't see how you can be pro-choice and agree that abortion is murder. |
I explained it already. I'll try again. Murder is not always wrong.
There. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alyallen

Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
flakfizer wrote: |
The Bobster wrote: |
I'm firmly pro-choice, but I have no problem agreeing that abortion is murder. Sometimes murder is necessary, and sometimes it's better than the alternatives. Might as well look at it as it is, and use the words that apply.
It's a difficult choice for a woman to make, but it's her choice, not mine and definitely not any govt's.
. |
I don't understand this. What does "pro-choice" mean? I thought it meant that women have the right to choose whether to have their fetuses aborted or not. This "right" is predicated on the idea that the fetus is not a human being. Otherwise, it would not be a woman's choice to abort. It might still be allowed if the woman's life were in jeopardy or something, but if the fetus were seen as a human being, the government would have a responsibility to protect that life just like any other human life. The only way a pro-choice stance is possible is if the fetus is not seen as a human being, and therefore the killing of it would not be murder.
Your first two lines can be joined to read, "I firmly believe that women have the right to choose to commit murder." Scary.
Let me be clear. I am not arguing for or against abortion here. I believe abortion is wrong, but that is not my issue with your post. If someone wants to be pro-choice, I just don't see how they can agree that abortion is murder. The following is from WIKI:
Quote: |
Pro-life and pro-choice individuals often use political framing to convey their perspective on the issues, and in some cases, to discredit opposing views. Pro-life advocates tend to use terms such as "mother", "unborn child", "unborn baby", "pre-born infant" or infanticide.[14] Pro-choice advocates tend to use terms such as "zygote", "embryo" or "fetus". |
The pro-choice position needs to hold the view that the fetus is not a human being and is therefore not protected by the same rights that we enjoy. If you are pro-choice, fine, but I don't see how you can be pro-choice and agree that abortion is murder. |
There is a big difference between an abortion at 12 weeks and an abortion at nearly full term. This woman wanted this baby and she was married and the couple had no children so I don't see why they choose to abort against the mother's will rather than fine the couple and let the pregnancy go to full term....
from the article
Quote: |
a couple of weeks before her date for giving birth, Yang's wife was dragged from her bed in a north China town and taken to a clinic, where, she says, her baby was killed by injection while still inside her. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chris_J2

Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Location: From Brisbane, Au.
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 6:36 pm Post subject: Mandatory Abortion |
|
|
Quote: |
A country that openly props up and defends murderous regimes in North Korea, Myanmar, Sudan. |
That is a 2 edged sword. There is very little trade & investment by Western countries in Africa. Promises by Western countries of aid for Africa have been consistently reneged on, & almost the entire continent neglected by the West. Rwanda in 1992 comes to mind as a prime example. Where were the human rights protestors & investors then?
"China has become the largest new investor, trader, buyer, and aid donor in a raft of African countries and a major new economic force in sub-Saharan Africa . Chinese trade with Africa is growing at 50 percent a year. Already, that trade has jumped in value from $10 billion in 2000 to $25 billion last year. China is building roads, railways, harbors, petrochemical installations, and military barracks; it is pumping oil, farming, taking trees, supplying laborers, and offering physicians. A number of African nations now depend critically on Chinese cash and initiative." Source: Boston.com news
So yes, despite the support of corrupt African (and other) regimes, China remains the sole benefactor in many African countries whose general populations would be infinitely worse off without Chinese investment & aid.
Quote: |
A country that ships lethal drugs, toys, toothpaste and pet food to our countries. |
Afghanistan is currently the world's largest producer of opium poppies. The Taliban are far more guilty of drug-running, imho. No prizes for guessing how they pay for their ammunition & recruiting.
Interesting thread here:
http://thorntree.lonelyplanet.com/messagepost.cfm?postaction=reply&catid=10&threadid=1443873&messid=12724615&STARTPAGE=1&parentid=0&from=1&showall=true
OP: I sympathise with the women subjected to forced abortions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 6:43 pm Post subject: Re: Mandatory Abortion |
|
|
chris_J2 wrote: |
Quote: |
A country that openly props up and defends murderous regimes in North Korea, Myanmar, Sudan. |
That is a 2 edged sword. There is very little trade & investment by Western countries in Africa. Promises by Western countries of aid for Africa have been consistently reneged on, & almost the entire continent neglected by the West. Rwanda in 1992 comes to mind as a prime example. Where were the human rights protestors & investors then?
"China has become the largest new investor, trader, buyer, and aid donor in a raft of African countries and a major new economic force in sub-Saharan Africa . Chinese trade with Africa is growing at 50 percent a year. Already, that trade has jumped in value from $10 billion in 2000 to $25 billion last year. China is building roads, railways, harbors, petrochemical installations, and military barracks; it is pumping oil, farming, taking trees, supplying laborers, and offering physicians. A number of African nations now depend critically on Chinese cash and initiative." Source: Boston.com news
So yes, despite the support of corrupt African (and other) regimes, China remains the sole benefactor in many African countries whose general populations would be infinitely worse off without Chinese investment & aid.
Quote: |
A country that ships lethal drugs, toys, toothpaste and pet food to our countries. |
Afghanistan is currently the world's largest producer of opium poppies. The Taliban are far more guilty of drug-running, imho. No prizes for guessing how they pay for their ammunition & recruiting.
Interesting thread here:
http://thorntree.lonelyplanet.com/messagepost.cfm?postaction=reply&catid=10&threadid=1443873&messid=12724615&STARTPAGE=1&parentid=0&from=1&showall=true
OP: I sympathise with the women subjected to forced abortions. |
By drugs I mean medicines. 90 people died in Panam from posioned cough syrup Made in China. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chris_J2

Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Location: From Brisbane, Au.
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 6:57 pm Post subject: China |
|
|
Quote: |
By drugs I mean medicines. 90 people died in Panama from posioned cough syrup Made in China. |
Fair enough. I wasn't aware of that. Thanks for clarifying. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mosley
Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Bobster: "Murder is not always wrong."
There you have it, folks. Leftist moral relativism in a nutshell. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alyallen

Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mosley wrote: |
The Bobster: "Murder is not always wrong."
There you have it, folks. Leftist moral relativism in a nutshell. |
Blah blah blah
You really want to infer that there are absolutes in this world? You really want to go there? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|