Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

51% agree...a good, deep, hard probing is in order.
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:00 pm    Post subject: 51% agree...a good, deep, hard probing is in order. Reply with quote

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20070906103632686


Thursday, September 6 2007

Zogby Poll: 51% of Americans Want Congress to Probe Bush/Cheney Regarding 9/11 Attacks; Over 30% Seek Immediate Impeachment

Released: September 06, 2007
Zogby Poll: 51% of Americans Want Congress to Probe Bush/Cheney Regarding 9/11 Attacks; Over 30% Seek Immediate Impeachment

67% also fault 9/11 Commission for not investigating anomalous collapse of World Trade Center 7

Kansas City, MO (Zogby International) September 6,


Last edited by some waygug-in on Mon Sep 10, 2007 2:52 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:43 am    Post subject: Re: 51% agree...a good probing is in order. Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20070906103632686


Thursday, September 6 2007

Zogby Poll: 51% of Americans Want Congress to Probe Bush/Cheney Regarding 9/11 Attacks; Over 30% Seek Immediate Impeachment

Released: September 06, 2007
Zogby Poll: 51% of Americans Want Congress to Probe Bush/Cheney Regarding 9/11 Attacks; Over 30% Seek Immediate Impeachment

67% also fault 9/11 Commission for not investigating anomalous collapse of World Trade Center 7

Kansas City, MO (Zogby International) September 6,




This just in. Over 30% of Americans are ignorant...or would be if anyone believed this poll to be really representative.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

9/11 was clearly a major tramau catalyst event, PNAC in fact got their Christmas wish delivered even a little ahead of schedule.

For all his crimes, lies & misdeeds Mr. Bush would likely be getting off quite lucky with mere impeachment.

So what is the basic sentence for blatant war crimes & mass murder these days?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=2007090994925351

Sunday, September 9 2007

bin Laden organized 9/11 attacks?

Osama bin Laden organized the 9/11 attacks right?
Not according to the FBI, or the White House, or the Justice Department.

What is implied on TV is very different from the actual actions the US government has taken in "pursuit" of the 9/11 conspirators.

Six years later, the US has filed no charges, presented no evidence and in fact is not even seeking Bin Laden in connection with the crime!

Courageous investigative reporting by KSLA TV in Shreveport, LA (search youtube.com for even more of this from KSLA!):

(click on the link to watch the video)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Will destroy 9-11 conspiracy theories.

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/


http://www.911myths.com/

http://www.debunking911.com/

http://911debunker.livejournal.com/

It is time to call in question to motives of the 9-11 conspiracy theorists.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 7:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, I guess you'll have to call into question the motives of these guys too then.


http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20070908232528506

September 8, 2007
by Alan Miller, PatriotsQuestion911.com

Dear Readers,

Over the last eight weeks a world renowned scientist and three nationally recognized engineers have called for a new investigation of 9/11, yet none of these have been reported in the mainstream media.

Most recently, on Sept. 4, Joel S. Hirschhorn, Ph.D., who served for 12 years as a Senior Staff Member of the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and later as Director of Environment, Energy and Natural Resources for the National Governors Association, called for a new investigation of 9/11, saying "First, let the technical truth emerge. Then, if necessary, cope with the inevitable political, conspiracy and other questions." Former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment Senior Staff Member Calls for New Investigation of 9/11

On Aug. 27, Lynn Margulis, Ph.D., member of the National Academy of Sciences and world renowned scientist, characterized the official account of 9/11 as "a fraud" and called for a new investigation, "I suggest that those of us aware and concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and impartial investigation be undertaken." National Academy of Sciences Member Calls for New 9/11 Investigation

An Aug. 21 article reported that James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division, called for an independent review of the World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. "I wish that there would be a peer review of this," he said, referring to the NIST investigation. "I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they've done; both structurally and from a fire point of view. ... I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable." Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation

On July 16, J. Marx Ayres, former member of the National Institute of Sciences Building Safety Council and former member of the California Seismic Safety Commission called for a new investigation of 9/11, "Steven Jones' call for a serious investigation of the hypothesis that the WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fire, but through the use of pre-positioned 'cutter-charges' must be the rallying cry for all building design experts to speak out." Former California Seismic Safety Commissioner Endorses 9/11 Truth Movement

Additionally, this week, Commander Ralph Kolstad, U.S. Navy �Top Gun� pilot, questioned the official account of 9/11 and called for a new investigation. "When one starts using his own mind, and not what one was told, there is very little to believe in the official story." U.S. Navy 'Top Gun' Pilot Questions 9/11

The mainstream media has not covered any of these stories. Please help disseminate this critically important information by forwarding this story link: http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20070908232528506.


And these too:

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 2:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How many engineers agree with the governments version of events.

Anyway why don't you bring up a conspiracy theory one at a time?

Go ahead try.

Here is a 9-11 conspiracy theory the 9-11 conspiracy theorists say what they do not cause they care about the truth but cause they wish to cause social disorder.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know Joo. You're the info guy...you tell us.


The fact remains that the number of people (engineers and others) who question the "official version" of what happened on 911 is growing.

And guess what? It will continue to do so until they have a real investigation.

By the way, can you even understand that last "sentence" you wrote?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
butlerian



Joined: 04 Sep 2006
Location: Korea

PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
How many engineers agree with the governments version of events.

Anyway why don't you bring up a conspiracy theory one at a time?

Go ahead try.

Here is a 9-11 conspiracy theory the 9-11 conspiracy theorists say what they do not cause they care about the truth but cause they wish to cause social disorder.


Joo, you need to start broadening your horizons. Using only official information will not get you any closer to reality. Alternative media etc will provide you with a better picture.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20070908232528506

Over the last eight weeks a world renowned scientist and three nationally recognized engineers have called for a new investigation of 9/11, yet none of these have been reported in the mainstream media.

An Aug. 21 article reported that James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division, called for an independent review of the World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. "I wish that there would be a peer review of this," he said, referring to the NIST investigation. "I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they've done; both structurally and from a fire point of view. ... I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable." Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation


Looks like 911truth is actually distorting the truth.

He's not calling into question the "conspiracy" aspect of 9/11. Rather, he's interested in the adequacy of the fire proof insulation.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7236.html
Quote:
But some experts remain unconvinced by the study's conclusions. James Quintiere, of the University of Maryland, US, says he does not understand how fireproof insulation could have been dislodged from the buildings' floors and columns.

"Everything I see points to the fact that there may not have been enough insulation," he told New Scientist, adding that the fuel loads used in the report's calculations may have been too low.


http://www.ae911truth.org/info/12
Quote:
Although Dr. Quintiere was strongly critical of NIST's conclusions and its investigatory process, he made it clear he was not a supporter of theories that the Twin Towers were brought down by pre-planted explosives.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, it looks like you're into a little distortion of your own. I said more and more people are questioning the official version of events, I didn't say anything about them supporting various conspiracy theories.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:
Yes, it looks like you're into a little distortion of your own. I said more and more people are questioning the official version of events, I didn't say anything about them supporting various conspiracy theories.


How about "official" conspiracy theories?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:
Yes, it looks like you're into a little distortion of your own. I said more and more people are questioning the official version of events, I didn't say anything about them supporting various conspiracy theories.


If you're responding to me, I never said you said anything about anything. If you're going to accuse someone else of distorting, and at least get your facts straight.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good advice...you would do well to follow it.

Now go back and show me anywhere where these things I posted claim what you say they claim.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another bogus thread by yet another flaming moonbat conspiracy nutbag.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International