View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thats not skimpy. They humiliated her. She should sue. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kermo

Joined: 01 Sep 2004 Location: Eating eggs, with a comb, out of a shoe.
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It does look like she's wearing the mini-skirt very low. Look at her hip-bone jutting though the shirt, and then look at the top of the skirt. I would assume that when worn at her hips like a normal skirt, it might look surprisingly short.
However, there's absolutely no grounds for an airline to put a passenger off a flight based on allegedly skimpy clothing. It's ridiculous. Even if they have a policy, that needs to be *advertised* so passengers can be prepared.
Airlines playing morality police in a secular democracy is wrong but suing over hurt feelings? If I don't say it, someone else will -- it's a singularly American response to a singularly American problem.
p.s. Does anyone else feel that the poor girl doesn't really look 23? Does Hooters have a maximum age limit?
Last edited by kermo on Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:53 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SuperFly

Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Location: In the doghouse
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kick her out? Hell no!
If you read the article, there's a hint from the airline about how it transpired...
"Southwest Airlines was responding to a concern about Ms. Ebbert's revealing attire on the flight that day."
So it sounds like someone complained about the attire. I could be wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spliff

Joined: 19 Jan 2004 Location: Khon Kaen, Thailand
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What Kerm's said...  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Her face kinda looks like Mayor Quimby's.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Masta_Don

Joined: 17 Aug 2006 Location: Hyehwa-dong, Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Next time I fly Southwest (heaven forbid) I'm gonna complain that the person next to me is offending my delicate sensibilities becuz they're too fat. It's like riding in a cattle car a mile up in the sky. I could use the extra room. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mateomiguel
Joined: 16 May 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In the video interview when she sits down again from that standing pose in the photo you can see her panties for just a moment. So there might have been a panty flash on that fateful day.
Yes, ground the aircraft and kick off the terrorists, some hottie flashed her panties. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mountainous

Joined: 04 Sep 2007 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Does Hooters have a maximum age limit?
If you look relatively young and happy (still have most of your hair, nice smile, teeth are intact, etc..), it shouldn't be a problem.
Ladies over 40 will generally have difficulty finding jobs in major cities.
They may have to accept a job on the outskirts. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Was she flying in an airplane or a Victorian England? If it was the latter then I could see why. If it was the former sorry for the confusion. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kenny Kimchee

Joined: 12 May 2003
|
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yet another example of how my nation is going down the toilet: a bunch of Puritanical busybodies obsessed with telling others how to live their lives.
As I read the story, I thought the only thing that would make it even better was if the girl sued for emotional distress. Looks like my wish was half-fulfilled:
Quote: |
The Ebberts have engaged an attorney, Martin Reed, to help them decide what to do next.
Asked if he will file suit, Reed told Lauer, �We�ve not made that decision, yet. We�re considering all the facts and all the circumstances.�
�Initially, I just wanted an apology,� Kyla told Lauer. �At this point, just some acknowledgement that they were wrong. That would be better.� |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
And she said it was a MAN who complained!!!! Oh yeah. I forgot. Male flight attendants.................  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
unknown9398

Joined: 03 Nov 2006 Location: Yeongcheon, S. Korea
|
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
jinju wrote: |
Thats not skimpy. They humiliated her. She should sue. |
Sue for what? Being embarassed? Welcome to "life." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FUBAR
Joined: 21 Oct 2003 Location: The Y.C.
|
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I really bet that her white t-shirt was pulled down as far as it is in that photo. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tzechuk

Joined: 20 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
kermo wrote: |
It does look like she's wearing the mini-skirt very low. Look at her hip-bone jutting though the shirt, and then look at the top of the skirt. I would assume that when worn at her hips like a normal skirt, it might look surprisingly short. |
Except that I think the skirt isn't meant to be worn like a normal skirt - otherwise she wouldn't be able to wear it like it is.
I'd hazard a guess that it's more like a hipster skirt.
Last edited by tzechuk on Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:22 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|