View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
deadman
Joined: 27 May 2006 Location: Suwon
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:03 pm Post subject: Re: CNN: 911 mystery aircraft was "Doomsday Plane" |
|
|
why would it be important? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:08 pm Post subject: Re: CNN: 911 mystery aircraft was "Doomsday Plane" |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
why would it be 'important'? |
Duh ... why is it NOT?
Reptilian brain ... clearly ... cannot ... reason too well.
Last edited by igotthisguitar on Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:13 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:10 pm Post subject: Re: CNN: 911 mystery aircraft was "Doomsday Plane" |
|
|
igotthisguitar wrote: |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
why would it be 'important'? |
Duh ... why is it NOT?
Reptilian brain clearly can't reason too well. |
Hey Nazi.
tell us why it is important . |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sincinnatislink

Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Location: Top secret.
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Shut up Shut up Shut up Shut up Shut up Shut up Shut up Shut up Shut up Shut up Shut up |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
deadman
Joined: 27 May 2006 Location: Suwon
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
http://www.911myths.com/html/stand_down.html |
What has this got to do with the alleged stand down? Are you sure you're on the right thread. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what are you accusing |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
deadman
Joined: 27 May 2006 Location: Suwon
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:15 pm Post subject: Re: CNN: 911 mystery aircraft was "Doomsday Plane" |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
why would it be important? |
It;s interesting because its existence was initially denied, and then admitted.
There was speculation, now there is proof.
Nothing conclusive, but it does raise more questions - what was it doing (in the restricted airspace)? What did it see/hear? Is it evidence of foreknowledge of some kind?
This revelation isn't spectacularly amazing; just a small piece of the puzzle. Do you have any more info on the subject? how about contributing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How often to intel planes fly over washington? I don't know how often but that by itself isn't anything.
Why not have a plane over NY at the same time? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
deadman
Joined: 27 May 2006 Location: Suwon
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
How often to intel planes fly over washington? I don't know how often but that by itself isn't anything. |
It's the Pentagon's denial of its existence that is more interesting.
Quote: |
Why not have a plane over NY at the same time? |
Why are you asking me? Do you think I did it?
Here is something for you:
http://www.rense.com/general76/missing.htm
Something from Rense.com was right, apparently.
I feel shocked and betrayed. You told me that everthing that came from there was a lie. How can I ever trust you again? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It says the first in a series in the end it will be a distortion. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
deadman
Joined: 27 May 2006 Location: Suwon
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
It says the first in a series in the end it will be a distortion. |
Quote: |
Part II
Every savvy investigator knows the Reptilians did it. |
See? It's not a distortion. It's true!
Further, some questions posed by todays article:
http://www.rense.com/general78/gaff.htm
Quote: |
CNN leaves out crucial facts:
1. Why did the USAF officially deny the presence of this plane? Last year, the USAF lied to a member of Congress, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), who looked into this matter through official channels. Our elected representatives supposedly have access to classified information. But not in this case, apparently. Why not?
2. Why was the event expunged from history for 6 years? Videos of this event were shown in the UK, in Spain, and probably in many other nations during the world coverage of 911 -- yet the video evidence of the E-4B was kept out of the news here in America. Until now. Why?
3. Lee Hamilton, co chair of the 911 Commission, now says he knew about the fly over -- but left it out of his official investigation because he deemed it was not important enough. Hamilton has called the "conspiracy theories" ludicrous. But what is really ludicrous is his statement that the presence of the E-4B was not important enough! His statement on CNN is absurd -- and thoroughly discredits the official 911 investigation and its final report, which makes no mention of the E-4B, not even in a footnote.
4. The CNN story fails to mention the E-4B's involvement in NORAD's Global Guardian exercise. It also fails to mention that in 2001 Global Guardian was rescheduled from October to September. |
Good questions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
deadman wrote: |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
It says the first in a series in the end it will be a distortion. |
Quote: |
Part II
Every savvy investigator knows the Reptilians did it. |
See? It's not a distortion. It's true!
Further, some questions posed by todays article:
http://www.rense.com/general78/gaff.htm
Quote: |
CNN leaves out crucial facts:
1. Why did the USAF officially deny the presence of this plane? Last year, the USAF lied to a member of Congress, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), who looked into this matter through official channels. Our elected representatives supposedly have access to classified information. But not in this case, apparently. Why not?
2. Why was the event expunged from history for 6 years? Videos of this event were shown in the UK, in Spain, and probably in many other nations during the world coverage of 911 -- yet the video evidence of the E-4B was kept out of the news here in America. Until now. Why?
3. Lee Hamilton, co chair of the 911 Commission, now says he knew about the fly over -- but left it out of his official investigation because he deemed it was not important enough. Hamilton has called the "conspiracy theories" ludicrous. But what is really ludicrous is his statement that the presence of the E-4B was not important enough! His statement on CNN is absurd -- and thoroughly discredits the official 911 investigation and its final report, which makes no mention of the E-4B, not even in a footnote.
4. The CNN story fails to mention the E-4B's involvement in NORAD's Global Guardian exercise. It also fails to mention that in 2001 Global Guardian was rescheduled from October to September. |
Good questions. |
watch the video from raw story.
IT is not the business of the US miltary to give infomation on its secret planes.
In the end it will part of a distortion. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SPINOZA
Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Location: $eoul
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a description of the plane in the article in the OP:
Quote: |
"The E-4B is a state of the art flying command post," CNN explained, "built and equipped for one reason -- to keep the government running no matter what, even in the event of a nuclear war |
Just my humble opinion, but, is it really unreasonable for a plane of the above description to be over Washington DC?
See also Screw Loose Change's discussion of Restricted Air Space at approximately the 57 minute mark, which clears up the popular misconception that planes entering restricted air space were immediately intercepted. The latter came into effect on September 28th 2001. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|