|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 7:23 am Post subject: PETA : You can't be an environmentalist if you eat meat. |
|
|
One more example of extremists with extreme views wanting to make other people behave the same way they do - because THEY know what is best for everyone, you see, and if you don't see, that's just too bad because if they have their way, they will take away your choice to be different.
Got a lotta friends who are vegetarians, and every one of them are cool because not a one of them have criticized me for making other decisions about what to order from the kitchen. When we have dinner together, we just make adjustments, that's all.
The extremists, though, they want to make EVERYONE be JUST like them. I guess that boils my turnip a bit, because those of us on the left side of the aisle are are SUPPOSED to embrace diversity. People who are different are interesting, way I figure. Not according to the ones on the far side, apparently. The "true believers" insist that the world must conform to what they want, in every particular way.
PETA's dogma is all bark and no bite
Animal-rights group makes the stupid claim that enviros must be vegetarians
Quote: |
Matt Prescott, a spokesperson for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, asserted last month that "you just cannot be a meat-eating environmentalist." PETA's pronouncement is part of a cooperative campaign among a number of animal-rights groups. Their message is that meat production exacerbates global warming.
PETA will lead the charge by dispatching an operative in a chicken suit to tour the country in a Hummer. The group will also deploy billboards nationwide with a mocking cartoon depicting climate-change hero Al Gore eating a drumstick, next to the words "Too Chicken to Go Vegetarian? Meat Is the No. 1 Cause of Global Warming." PETA's recent bleating has attracted substantial attention, including a recent story in The New York Times. |
I thought PETA was supposed to be all about preventing cruelty to animals - apparently, these days, that also means telling people what they can and can't put in their mouths at lunchtime. My turnip is almost completely boiled right now ...
Main reason for my ire is that climate change really IS a serious problem that people need to talk about - but PETA is just using that issue as a wedge to impose another agenda, and that is what sucks. People can choose to avoid meat as a personal choice if they want, and for whatver reason they like. This is a very obvious attempt, though, to tie personal philosophies to a larger social problem, and I don't like it.
I like to eat chicken from time to time. Grilled or battered and fried, I think the world can surpvive my appetite. I'll do what I can to see that it does, but DON'T tell me what I can't eat.
Last edited by The Bobster on Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:10 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anyone who is really serious about the environment would seriously consider giving up meat. It is one of the greatest contributions you can personally make in that regard. Do some research, Bobster, and you will find that modern farming puts an enormous environmental strain on the planet.
It does seem pretty hypocritical for an environmentalist to continue eating meat. Some of my acquaintances who graduated from environmental science became vegans when they realised what impact meat eating had on the planet.
It's one thing to politely not shove your views down another diners' throat. I have never scolded anyone for not being a vegetarian. It's another thing for an activist to publically give their perspective. That seems quite legitimate to me. Why would you complain about it? They haven't brought in any law to force you into veganism. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alyallen

Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Bobster,
They are extremists and on the far side for a reason. Personally, I'd rather deal with someone who was a environmentalist who eats meat as oppose to a vegetarian or vegan who isn't an environmentalist. I don't think this who deal should be an all or nothing proposition. When people put people in that sort of postition everyone loses....
As far as being an vegan or vegetarian and being an environmentalist, I went to an environmental liberal arts college and from what I saw, the world would be a better place if everyone did their part as oppose to bickering over who isn't giving enough. If someone's an environmentalist, let's be happy that they are doing that and not penalize that person for choosing to eat meat.
There are a number of different factors that impact the environment and everyone's environmental impact is different, so why dumb it down to "do this or your contributions aren't worth shit?"
In any event, PETA doesn't run my life and their opinions of my choices aren't worth shit, so I'll just go about my business doing what I can with zero guilt from anyone....
And yes, there is really such a thing as an environmental liberal arts college...check it out www.greenmtn.edu |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big_Bird wrote: |
It does seem pretty hypocritical for an environmentalist to continue eating meat. |
You are an extremist who has publicly expressed sympathy for terrorist organizations. If you could, I'm guessing you would take away my right and ability to eat anything I damn please. Because of these things, I've decided I don't like you.
Also you are rather rude, and you seem to be proud of it. Rather juvenile, really.
Allyallen
Quote: |
Personally, I'd rather deal with someone who was a environmentalist who eats meat as oppose to a vegetarian or vegan who isn't an environmentalist. |
Said it in another thread, so I'm being redundant, but this is a woman who has her head on straight. Sounds like you and I can make some deals ... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Bobster wrote: |
Big_Bird wrote: |
It does seem pretty hypocritical for an environmentalist to continue eating meat. |
You are an extremist who has publicly expressed sympathy for terrorist organizations. If you could, I'm guessing you would take away my right and ability to eat anything I damn please. Because of these things, I've decided I don't like you. |
If you claimed that I publically expressed sympathy for alleged supporters of terrorist organisations you might be partly accurate. But we all know that accuracy and fact are not one of your hobbies.
BobbityBoo wrote: |
Also you are rather rude, and you seem to be proud of it. Rather juvenile, really.
|
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dutchy pink
Joined: 06 Feb 2007 Location: Incheon
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Basically any groups who choose to support chickens or animals over people are a bunch of hypocrites imho. Is PETA suggesting the whole world become vegetarians? Developing countries too? Poeple who struggle for nutrition should avoid animal products to profess their ecocentric solidarity with fowl?
Now, I'm not a vegetarian, nor an environmentalist, although I had been for years. There are a lot of humans on the planet who are not treated as people, i'll hold off on calling chickens people until those humans are people first.
If you are from the Vermont chapter of PETA and all you see are SUV driving environmentalists, than sure, I agree. If you are a suburbanite environmentalist, you should be a vegetarian. There is a Whole Foods nearby. What else are you doing? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big_Bird wrote: |
If you claimed that I publically expressed sympathy for alleged supporters of terrorist organisations you might be partly accurate. But we all know that accuracy and fact are not one of your hobbies. |
ALF and ELF have been designated as terrorist organizations because of their propensity for violence in the pursiit of political gaols.
You think they are fine. I have not said anything that is not true.
Calling me a liar doesn't work, when you forgot to show where I lied.
From the same article:
Quote: |
Unfortunately, many people mistakenly believe that being an environmentalist means being a shrill, opinionated extremist who tells others how to live their lives. Many associate environmentalism with exaggerated factual claims and an insufferable holier-than-thou attitude. |
The paragraph might decribe some people around here.
Last edited by The Bobster on Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:26 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
dutchy pink wrote: |
Is PETA suggesting the whole world become vegetarians? |
Yes, they are. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dogshed

Joined: 28 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Modern meat production is inefficient when compared to other methods of making protein. However, I wonder about less intensive meat production. Pigs are often used to recycle scrap, and cattle will eat plants that humans can't consume and require very little water and fuel input.
NPR just had a good story on gasses being released by melting permafrost. I'm thinking it may be too late to roll back climate change. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Young FRANKenstein

Joined: 02 Oct 2006 Location: Castle Frankenstein (that's FRONKensteen)
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:30 pm Post subject: Re: PETA : You can't be an environmentallist if you eat meat |
|
|
The Bobster wrote: |
I thought PETA was supposed to be all about preventing cruelty to animals. |
Yeah, but when they collect strays from shelters and euthanize them and dump them in the garbage like trash... yeah, I guess that's not being TOO cruel to animals. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PETA says you're also not an animal lover if have a pet. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I miss RED DOG!!! Where is she? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bramble

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Location: National treasures need homes
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
I miss RED DOG!!! Where is she? |
Ask the mods.
A whole lot of people at this site must be really bored today ... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
IlIlNine
Joined: 15 Jun 2005 Location: Gunpo, Gyonggi, SoKo
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You know - it's like Bobster and Big Bird are on opposite ends of the ring, but the reality lies in the middle.
Here's the generally accepted statistic - since there seems to be a lack of actual facts in this thread...
Quote: |
According to the Worldwatch Institute, about 15 to 20 percent of global methane emissions come from livestock. |
Methane being more toxic / bigger contributor to the greenhouse effect than CO2
That, combined with the amount of land that cows chew up that could be forest, the amount of food that cow eat that could be for humans (lots!), the whole distrbuton network for the meat (gotta ship it to and from (when it gets rejected) Korea somehow!).. leads me to believe that if you care about the environment, perhaps cutting down a bit on the meat isn't a bad idea. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alyallen

Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IlIlNine wrote: |
You know - it's like Bobster and Big Bird are on opposite ends of the ring, but the reality lies in the middle.
Here's the generally accepted statistic - since there seems to be a lack of actual facts in this thread...
Quote: |
According to the Worldwatch Institute, about 15 to 20 percent of global methane emissions come from livestock. |
Methane being more toxic / bigger contributor to the greenhouse effect than CO2
That, combined with the amount of land that cows chew up that could be forest, the amount of food that cow eat that could be for humans (lots!), the whole distrbuton network for the meat (gotta ship it to and from (when it gets rejected) Korea somehow!).. leads me to believe that if you care about the environment, perhaps cutting down a bit on the meat isn't a bad idea. |
I don't really have time to find stats and all that but here goes. Most food that animals eat are not fit for human consumption. Even if all the land used for animal food was surplanted by plants for animals, guess what? Most people still couldn't afford to it in any case. So we might have less global warming (in theory) but the reality on the ground is that a whole lot of people will still be suffering from hunger and starvation. In any event, we are living in the world of processed food. You are going to tell me that that process doesn't contribute to the problems we have in the world today? What needs to happen is that people eat less processed food, that are full of actual nutrients that will make people eat LESS...whether meat or corn..that would be a positive.
Environmentalists and Animal lovers are going to have to be REALISTIC. Why do you think so many people are reluctant to be labeled either? It's because of useless counterproductive rhetoric like the bobster cited at the beginning of the thread.
Oh and yes, seeing hippy vegans driving BMWs to the next town over to buy $8 organic apples sort of makes people scratch their head and wonder...what's the point?? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|