View previous topic :: View next topic |
World Top 500 Universities: where's yours? |
Top 100 |
|
46% |
[ 36 ] |
102-202 |
|
14% |
[ 11 ] |
203-304 |
|
10% |
[ 8 ] |
305-402 |
|
6% |
[ 5 ] |
403-510 |
|
3% |
[ 3 ] |
Not in the Top 500 |
|
18% |
[ 14 ] |
|
Total Votes : 77 |
|
Author |
Message |
SPINOZA
Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Location: $eoul
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:27 pm Post subject: World Top 500 Universities, 2007: Where's yours? |
|
|
Top 500
Top 500 in previous years
The university that published the chart is Shanghai Jiao Tong University, who themselves are ranked 234.
**the poll options look that way because some universities have the same rank. In that case, if two universities are, say, both #30, the next rank is 32. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
laogaiguk

Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Location: somewhere in Korea
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Who cares? The really good schools have all started pulling out of these stupid rankings recently (at least in Canada and America), and I know more will follow. They are practically useless if you really check them out. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Newbie

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
23 baby!
(how the hell did I ever get in?) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
just another day

Joined: 12 Jul 2007 Location: Living with the Alaskan Inuits!!
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
#4 baby!
good thing i started smoking weed AFTER I got in.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alphakennyone

Joined: 01 Aug 2005 Location: city heights
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
#14. how come i don't get paid more? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's a very weird list.
Unless something terrible has happend to Durham and LSE in the UK recently......they are ranked 16th-23rd!!
My Uni, Queens, Belfast, is in the 200th-300th band worldwide. It was top 5 in the UK a few years before I went there. Not that I care about ranking because I know my degree was bloody hard work and nobody in my faculty (English) got even a pass easily. Never mind the highest grade. Only two 'firsts' were given the year I went there. From around 250 English majors.
Anyway, I'm sure there is a better list out there. I always thought the two big factors were tutor/student ratio and funds spent on research. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
skinhead

Joined: 11 Jun 2004
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
U Chicago pips Oxford? Very strange indeed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mine is well within the top 50, but I won't specify (don't want to give away my location!). That's no surprise because it has a very high ranking on other lists.
I still think it is a load of crap. I took two subjects at a 'lesser' uni across town (because those subjects weren't offered at mine) and it was much much better - got much more out of it. But my mum and dad could brag to their friends and colleagues that I had gone to a good one. Actually, I reckon one of the very best unis in the world is the British Open University. I would do all my study with that institution if I could. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pastis

Joined: 20 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
#16 - not bad...
I don't think that list is very good though, it's too typically Anglo-American biased (ex. I doubt many French would agree with the Sorbonne being ranked as low as 39th and 52nd, while Cambridge and Oxford are both in the top 10).
It also seems to have left out or substantially under-ranked many top tier private unis (ex. Keio University in Tokyo - usually considered the best in Japan after Tokyo U. and Kyoto U. - is very prestigious with lots of Prime Ministers etc. as alumni). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
faster

Joined: 03 Sep 2006
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Crap list, but pretty amazing to see 8 of the top 10 and 17 of the top 20 are in the U.S.
The only three non-U.S. universities in the top 20 are Cambridge, Oxford, and Tokyo University. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
faster wrote: |
Crap list, but pretty amazing to see 8 of the top 10 and 17 of the top 20 are in the U.S.
The only three non-U.S. universities in the top 20 are Cambridge, Oxford, and Tokyo University. |
So the obivous question is.....do you really think the US has such a monopoly on good universities? It's possible, but do you all really think so? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
faster

Joined: 03 Sep 2006
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
eamo wrote: |
faster wrote: |
Crap list, but pretty amazing to see 8 of the top 10 and 17 of the top 20 are in the U.S.
The only three non-U.S. universities in the top 20 are Cambridge, Oxford, and Tokyo University. |
So the obivous question is.....do you really think the US has such a monopoly on good universities? It's possible, but do you all really think so? |
Me? I have no idea since I've only attended one, which is in the US.
I don't think lists like this are very useful, however, and I already called this one "crap." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
faster wrote: |
eamo wrote: |
faster wrote: |
Crap list, but pretty amazing to see 8 of the top 10 and 17 of the top 20 are in the U.S.
The only three non-U.S. universities in the top 20 are Cambridge, Oxford, and Tokyo University. |
So the obivous question is.....do you really think the US has such a monopoly on good universities? It's possible, but do you all really think so? |
Me? I have no idea since I've only attended one, which is in the US.
I don't think lists like this are very useful, however, and I already called this one "crap." |
Not just you. I just threw the question out.
Could, what was it? 8 of the top 10 Uni's be in the US? I agree it's possible. I'm not being bewildered here because I think Americans are stupid. Far from it. I thin it's possible. But I'm asking why? Do American Uni's have a methodology or approach which earns excellence? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
twg

Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Location: Getting some fresh air...
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, Korea... the great leveler. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
huffdaddy
Joined: 25 Nov 2005
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
skinhead wrote: |
U Chicago pips Oxford? Very strange indeed. |
What's so strange about that?
Chicago has had 79 Nobel Prize winners affiliated with the school. Oxford has had 56. It's not the best measure of a school, but it indicates that Chicago deserves to be near the top.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_laureates_by_university_affiliation |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|