Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Quebec women's group targets hijab, yarmulke
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Pligganease



Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Location: The deep south...

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yawarakaijin wrote:
Let me ask you this. Would you be willing to accept an Iranian, Saudi, Somali explanation as to why western women dress the way they do and what it say about OUR society? I highly doubt it. You would deride all their conclusions as being ridiculous. "Oh those silly muslims, they just don't understand our culture."

And yet I am supposed to take ,as an absolute truth,some white dude from middle america's view that those nasty, freedom hating muslims force all their women to cover their bodies as an act of subjugation? Gimme a break. Enlighten me please. Just how many middle eastern women have you met, taught, visited their homes, met their husbands? Enlighten me how they all lied to you and were cowering in fear of their husband's frightening muslim wrath.
Rolling Eyes


The day I allow George Bush to educate me about the intricacies of muslim culture is the day I accept Ahmadinejad's theories on the west.


I've already said you were more enlightened than me. You've eaten with and taught about a dozen or so Muslim women, and therefore you're an expert on Islamic culture. I'm gonna go back now and read my "George Bush's Guide to the Muslim Lifestyle" again.

*edit due to earlier time constraints*

I was thinking, with my limited George Bush allowed brain power, that I should thank you for trying to educate me on the misunderstandings of other cultures. See, all this time I've been calling a "spade" a "spade," I've really been missing the big picture. Maybe I am just misunderstanding other cultures.

Maybe I was wrong for thinking someone like Warren Jeffs deserved jail time. After all, I might have just been misunderstanding his culture. It's fine in his culture for girls to be forced into marriages. That's also common in many other cultures, such as Islamic culture. Maybe I'm just ignorant.

In Warren Jeffs' culture, it's also OK for men to take more than one wife. I used to think that it was wrong to force women to do that. I guess I just misunderstood. I've known a lot of Mormons, and I've seen a lot of interviews on television with members of polygamist families that seemed pretty happy. I should just take their word for it. Here I was, thinking that they actually had to go back and live in those situations, and might possibly regret having ever condemned or said something negative about that aspect of their culture. I just misunderstood.

Maybe I was wrong about all of the so called "injustices" of the world against women. Maybe I just didn't get those cultures. Maybe I just don't get it. Maybe I should go back and rethink my positions on things such as female genital mutilation, child prostitution, gender-based abortion, and women's suffrage. Maybe I'm just not understanding those cultures.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
canuckistan
Mod Team
Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Location: Training future GS competitors.....

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In public institutions, headscarves ok. Full face veil, not ok.

If you don't want to be "seen in public", then don't work in a public institution.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yawarakaijin



Joined: 08 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, now that you have finally admitted that I am more enlightened than you I can rest easy. Wink

It wasn't my intent to come off as trying to be morally superior. I have no doubt that there are areas where people who dress like this are abused and oppressed but I don't believe that is ALL there is to it.

Do you really think muslim parents wake up in the morning and think "hmmm, I wonder what the best way to oppress my daughter is today? I wonder how I can make my precious daughter's like as miserable as possible." Rolling Eyes

I am going to throw something out to you. What if, just if, and I know it is hard to comprehend. What if certain people believed that modesty is an important virtue. What if some crazy, messed up group of people decided that how a woman looks should play absolutely no role is how she is viewed by society. What if this group of people has seen how women are portrayed in other societies and decided it was immoral. Let's say, just as immoral as forcing a woman to wear a veil. Wink What if their method to combat what they viewed as immoral was to require women to cover up? Can't you even admit that other cultures have the capacity to view or society and condem it as immoral the same way we do theirs?


My main point of contention is how we in the west automatically condem something exclusively through our own eyes. I have no problem with a culture setting and defining its own norms and practices but why is it that only OUR set of norms and practices are given validity? Do you not think it even slightly vain to proclaim our cultures values as being "universal"? It doesn't seem like a healthy position to open up debate from.

I'm not apologist, nor moral relatavist, but I think absolutely absurd to attack an issue with the premise that only our viewpoint is the correct one. Hell, we rarely even argue whether or not our stance is correct. It's all a moot point really because we don't even acknowledge that other viewpoints even exist.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pligganease



Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Location: The deep south...

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yawarakaijin wrote:
What if some crazy, messed up group of people decided that how a woman looks should play absolutely no role is how she is viewed by society.


If you are asserting that his is the reason Muslim women wear the bee-keeper suit, and that this is the reason that Muslim men have historically forced them to do so, we're done here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yawarakaijin



Joined: 08 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is the way numerous muslims have explained it to me. If you explain to me why I should wholeheartedly accept the western, and lone interpretation of why it is done, then we can end it. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pligganease



Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Location: The deep south...

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's the biggest joke in poor taste I've ever heard. However, let's take it at face value.

Quote:
What if some crazy, messed up group of people decided that how a woman looks should play absolutely no role is how she is viewed by society.


So, it's OK for a man's appearance to be a part of his character, but not a woman... OK, sounds fair...

Men, who are and always have been the rulers of that society, deemed that to be the rule, that the way a woman looks should play no role whatsoever in her place in society. Therefore, a man made them dress this way. Yep, still sounds good...

Women are not allowed to use their wiles against men, but men are allowed to use theirs against women. Still sounding pretty good...

I don't see why I could have ever thought that the whole bee-keeper suit was a fine example of men oppressing women. I must have been either gullible, naive, or stupid. Rolling Eyes

Basically what it comes down to is this: At some point you have to say that some things are better. Women having the right to choose what they wear is better than women not being able to choose what they wear. Most women that wear bee-keeper suits started out wearing bee-keeper suits because some man told them they would go to hell if they didn't. Maybe, they were beaten or possibly killed for not wearing it. Yet, these same men didn't think it was important for themselves to cover up and be "modest." Nope, just the women. Interesting, isn't it.

You want to argue that every culture is the same, and that none are better than others? I say that's bullshit. I suppose you think female genital mutilation is fine, too? After all, who are you to judge a different culture than your own? What about the genocide in Sudan? Not, your culture, so who are you to judge, right? Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alyallen wrote:
JMO wrote:
I say ban all religious clothing, symbols from government school/offices. Apply it to all religions, seems fair.


Why is this an issue in the first place? I'm not trying to be flippant but if the west is about personal freedom, why does this issue wind up in the cross hairs of politicians and governments?


Because religion and state institutions shouldn't mix. No crucifixes on the walls, no religious clothing on employees, students. That stuff should be for the home.

I'm pretty sure I couldn't wear clothing advocating my own personal political agenda in a state institution so the same should be said for religious items.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the other hand wrote:
Quote:
I say ban all religious clothing, symbols from government school/offices. Apply it to all religions, seems fair.


I dunno. If you take that to its logical conclusion, you could end up with a lot of common, everyday type images being banned.





Not to mention zodiac jewelery, celtic paraphanalia, rasta t-shirts, and so on and so forth.

I guess the French do manage to enforce a general ban on all religious imagery over a certain size. I'd be curious to know, though, how they deal with sacred imagery being used for largely decorative purposes.


Well the crucifix for sure, and as for the rest, yea they would have to go as well. I'm not sure if the celtic items would be religious but if so they would also be banned.

Of course you could compromise with a french style solution.


In my school there was religious imagery(was a convent school) and i did and still wear a miraculous medal. Although now out of habit more than anything. So I guess I'm a bit of a hyprrocrite on this one but I would have had no problem forsaking my medal if everyone had to do the same.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yawarakaijin



Joined: 08 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have no problems with judging a society on it's merits. What I do have a problem with is sweeping, ethnocentric explanations as to why things are the way they are. I have a problem with one side launching an argument from the position that their view alone is universally correct.

There is no doubt that backwards thinking played a large role in the promotion and usage of the burqa or other religious symbols. It is a very different thing to say that that originally backwards thinking is the sole reason why these symbols are still worn today. Your oversimplifying of the situation hints of ethnocentrism does it not? It's a black and white issue from my point of view, thus it's simply a black and white matter.

Muslims themselves have been debating this issue. Hence you have modern muslim women in North America choosing to cover themselves. You have different percentages of women following this custom in different islamic countries. You have some Iranian women who prefer a miniskirt and high heels and others who prefer to dress more moderatly.

My point was... I wouldn't wholeheartedly accpet a Taliban's critique of modern western civilization anymore than I would accept some farmer from Iowa's take on modern islamic country. While both may have a valid point or two to make, I would hardly accept their interpretation as being definitive.

The original op was about the wearing/banning of religious symbols in Canada. I know enough modern muslim women in Canada who have chosen to wear a veil for reasons much different than you stated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pligganease



Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Location: The deep south...

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yawarakaijin wrote:
I know enough modern muslim women in Canada who have chosen to wear a veil for reasons much different than you stated.


And much different than they stated, too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
yawarakaijin



Joined: 08 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pligganease wrote:
yawarakaijin wrote:
I know enough modern muslim women in Canada who have chosen to wear a veil for reasons much different than you stated.


And much different than they stated, too.


Well of course! I mean, who ever heard of a muslim woman being capable of free, indenpendant thought. Rolling Eyes You have shown your true colours there Plig.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pligganease



Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Location: The deep south...

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yawarakaijin wrote:
Pligganease wrote:
yawarakaijin wrote:
I know enough modern muslim women in Canada who have chosen to wear a veil for reasons much different than you stated.


And much different than they stated, too.


Well of course! I mean, who ever heard of a muslim woman being capable of free, indenpendant thought. Rolling Eyes You have shown your true colours there Plig.



As have you, when you inferred that the opinion I have had come straight from George Bush.

"Whoever heard of an American capable of having free, independent thought," you said.

____________________________________________-

Besides that, you missed the point of my statement. I've already mentioned and stand by the fact that the majority of women that are in oppressive situations will not comment honestly on those situations due to the fact that they are fearful of the oppressors discovering their discontent.

They also aren't likely to admit the fault of their culture to an outsider just so that outsider can criticize their culture. Therefore, they'll spout a poor but moderately understandable reason for their own willingness to suffer through something oppressive and hope that the listener is gullible enough to swallow it without question.

I equate wearing the bee-keeper suits to living in Jonestown; everyone's happy and smiling on the outside, but inside they are screaming, "Get me the *beep* out of this place." They are just afraid of the repercussions if they were to act against their societal norms.

You appear to be one of the guys who would have looked at Jonestown and said, "Now, that looks like a happy community."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alyallen



Joined: 29 Mar 2004
Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JMO wrote:
Alyallen wrote:
JMO wrote:
I say ban all religious clothing, symbols from government school/offices. Apply it to all religions, seems fair.


Why is this an issue in the first place? I'm not trying to be flippant but if the west is about personal freedom, why does this issue wind up in the cross hairs of politicians and governments?


Because religion and state institutions shouldn't mix. No crucifixes on the walls, no religious clothing on employees, students. That stuff should be for the home.

I'm pretty sure I couldn't wear clothing advocating my own personal political agenda in a state institution so the same should be said for religious items.


I am not a religious person in the slightest so maybe that's why I don't feel the need to restrict someone's clothing based on their religion. Weird, huh?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
yawarakaijin



Joined: 08 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well lets just leave it at I'm missing your point and your missing mine shall we? The Bush comment was tongue in cheek, it wasn't made to infer that you were some Bushie or anything of the sort.

I have admitted that some women may wear a veil due to pressures from the outside. I take issue with you painting an entire culture as being so monolithic.

Is it absolutely beyond reason for you to believe than an educated, muslim woman might actually wish to wear a veil as a symbol of religious devotion?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pligganease



Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Location: The deep south...

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yawarakaijin wrote:
Well lets just leave it at I'm missing your point and your missing mine shall we?


Fair enough.

yawarakaijin wrote:
Is it absolutely beyond reason for you to believe than an educated, muslim woman might actually wish to wear a veil as a symbol of religious devotion?


Not at all. However, it's ridiculous to assume that because an educated Muslim woman might wear a bee-keeper suit as a symbol of religious devotion that all people who wear the bee-keeper suits are doing it willingly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International