Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

How to use a Korean co-teacher properly in High School
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

boyne11 wrote:
Quote:
It is your job to "make them participate more."


Of course it not your job. You are only a "teacher's assistant."

You're job is to deliver the English instruction but not to motivate/decipline them. They're grown/hard-headed teenagers so no matter what you do to try to motivate and make it interesting, they wouldn't care.

What do you have when you have a mixed dirt bags in classrooms? You gotta bags of dirt.

Just focus on delivering your English instruction.


What a defeatest attitude. I'm sure glad I don't have kids in your classroom.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 10:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mikekim wrote:
The English teachers at my school have an average reputation, but their speaking skill is below average. They are all women too, so I doubt they could handle any rotten boys if they had to.

So do you guys use your co-teachers as a classroom management/translation "device" or do you actually co-teach with them is what I want to know. It seems to be the former, rather than the latter.


It really depends on the CT. I teach about half my classes solo and half with a CT. One of them's quite passive but very good when called upon. With another, with whom I teach my grade 1 & 2 MS classes, we sometimes teach as a team and sometimes she's more non-existant, depending on what we're doing. For my grade 1 vocational HS classes (the lowest level classes I've ever had with the worst attitude I've ever seen) I have their regular Korean English teacher on hand as my CT, but since he's pretty much given up on them himself it's not much of a help getting him to help teach.

Trust me, though, once you have Korean teachers in the classroom it will be 80% them and 20% you that determines how the lesson goes, especailly if the class is lower-level.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jizzo T. Clown



Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Location: at my wit's end

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yu_Bum_suk wrote:

Trust me, though, once you have Korean teachers in the classroom it will be 80% them and 20% you that determines how the lesson goes, especailly if the class is lower-level.


Spot-on, which is why it is essential that you buddy up with your coteachers any way you can!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
boyne11



Joined: 08 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yu_Bum_suk wrote:
boyne11 wrote:
Quote:
It is your job to "make them participate more."


Of course it not your job. You are only a "teacher's assistant."

You're job is to deliver the English instruction but not to motivate/decipline them. They're grown/hard-headed teenagers so no matter what you do to try to motivate and make it interesting, they wouldn't care.

What do you have when you have a mixed dirt bags in classrooms? You gotta bags of dirt.

Just focus on delivering your English instruction.


What a defeatest attitude. I'm sure glad I don't have kids in your classroom.


It's not your classroom, it's your co-teacher's classroom. You're a "teacher's assistant." Don't you forget that, buddy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

boyne11 wrote:
Yu_Bum_suk wrote:
boyne11 wrote:
Quote:
It is your job to "make them participate more."


Of course it not your job. You are only a "teacher's assistant."

You're job is to deliver the English instruction but not to motivate/decipline them. They're grown/hard-headed teenagers so no matter what you do to try to motivate and make it interesting, they wouldn't care.

What do you have when you have a mixed dirt bags in classrooms? You gotta bags of dirt.

Just focus on delivering your English instruction.


What a defeatest attitude. I'm sure glad I don't have kids in your classroom.


It's not your classroom, it's your co-teacher's classroom. You're a "teacher's assistant." Don't you forget that, buddy.


Um, for my academic HS classes and grade 2 vocational classes, would you mind telling me what 'co-teacher' that would be? I don't seem to see any around when I'm teaching.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
boyne11



Joined: 08 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yu_Bum_suk wrote:
boyne11 wrote:
Yu_Bum_suk wrote:
boyne11 wrote:
Quote:
It is your job to "make them participate more."


Of course it not your job. You are only a "teacher's assistant."

You're job is to deliver the English instruction but not to motivate/decipline them. They're grown/hard-headed teenagers so no matter what you do to try to motivate and make it interesting, they wouldn't care.

What do you have when you have a mixed dirt bags in classrooms? You gotta bags of dirt.

Just focus on delivering your English instruction.


What a defeatest attitude. I'm sure glad I don't have kids in your classroom.


It's not your classroom, it's your co-teacher's classroom. You're a "teacher's assistant." Don't you forget that, buddy.


Um, for my academic HS classes and grade 2 vocational classes, would you mind telling me what 'co-teacher' that would be? I don't seem to see any around when I'm teaching.


ummmm, I guess you lucked out some how, but just remember that you're still officially labelled as a "Teacher's Asisstant."

things in korea is not always rosy as your situation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

boyne11 wrote:
ummmm, I guess you lucked out some how, but just remember that you're still officially labelled as a "Teacher's Asisstant."


That's not what my contract says, and more importantly, not what my principal thinks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
boyne11



Joined: 08 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yu_Bum_suk wrote:
boyne11 wrote:
ummmm, I guess you lucked out some how, but just remember that you're still officially labelled as a "Teacher's Asisstant."


That's not what my contract says, and more importantly, not what my principal thinks.


what does it say? "Asistant Teacher?" Congrats! as I said, your situation is different from many who post here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jizzo T. Clown



Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Location: at my wit's end

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

boyne11--Do you even work in a public school?

It is MY classroom. The coteachers have their classroom.

In my classes I'm the one who does the planning. My coteachers expect me to have my own lesson plans, and they never ask what I'm teaching until they get to class. So I always do at least 50% of the teaching, and usually 80% or more. So I don't see what this "assistant teacher" thing entails. Yes, we are supposed to be here as assistant teachers, but in reality we are expected to both plan for and teach our own classes. If we were 100% assistants (like in the JET program in Japan), when we got to class the lessons would be preplanned and the coteacher would handle the bulk of the instruction, as well as tell us when to open our mouth. I seriously doubt that's the case anywhere in Korea. If it is, tell me so I can apply for your job next year.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tjames426



Joined: 06 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I teach classes of 8 pre-kindergarden and kindergarden students just fine by myself. Why would I want a Korean teacher to come in and mess things up? The students are forced to learn more.

Occasionally, a Korean teacher enters to classroom. Guess what? I am no longer in charge, nor is English used. The students only talk to, respect, and respond to the Korean teacher in Korean.

Korean teachers assisting Foriegn teachers in Public HS...are part of the problem in Korean education.

___
If you don't know how to positively interact with or teach English to a classroom of children or High School students who do not speak English, you should not be here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jizzo T. Clown



Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Location: at my wit's end

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tjames426 wrote:

Korean teachers assisting Foriegn [sic] teachers in Public HS...are part of the problem in Korean education.


When a Korean teacher is in the room, I AM in charge and the students DO speak English. Perhaps YOU shouldn't be here.

Here's a newsflash: The majority of foreign "teachers" in public schools have little to no experience in the classroom. ALL of the Korean teachers in public schools do. Add to that the fact they know the students' needs better than we ever could, particularly with low level students. I agree that if the students' level is high enough then there's little to no need of a coteacher. In my case, however, the students are extremely low, and have no reason to study English outside the fact that it's required. Of course it is up to us to earn the respect of the students. But at the same time, it's not our place to look upon Korean educators as our "tools" because many of them have been doing this a helluva lot longer than we have, and they know how to work well within the system.

If anything, having inexperienced native teachers in public schools is part of the problem. Would you want a Korean who majored in Anthropology teaching your child how to speak Korean--and while we're at it, the Korean won't be given a curriculum, your child won't be given a grade for the class, and the teacher speaks no English whatsoever--but he likes American women and he loves money. And he's also a borderline alcoholic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

boyne11 wrote:
Yu_Bum_suk wrote:
boyne11 wrote:
ummmm, I guess you lucked out some how, but just remember that you're still officially labelled as a "Teacher's Asisstant."


That's not what my contract says, and more importantly, not what my principal thinks.


what does it say? "Asistant Teacher?" Congrats! as I said, your situation is different from many who post here.


Well, according to the contract sitting in my desk drawer, I'm a 외국인 교원.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tjames426



Joined: 06 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seems my previous post ticked someone off...

Once again, a qualified ESL instructor does not need a native language speaker to translate or be a disciple tool for them. The whole program to have a Korean in a public classroom with the qualified foreign teacher is self-defeating in many ways.

First, the students have a crutch to lean upon. Instead of trying to listen, learn and understand English, all they have to do is ask the Korean adult to translate. Without the "translator", the kids are forced to learn. But of course, real foreign language learning happens in Korean private schools where so called joint teaching does not exist in the classroom.

Second, they have less respect for the Foreigner. Gee. all foreigners must be imbeciles. They cannot even teach a class of kids by themselves. They need Kim Teacher to hold his or her hand through the process. This leads to a confirmation of Xenophobia and the superiority of Korean culture, but that is a different subject.

Third, other countries do not have this program. Ask teachers in China and elsewhere. A foreign teacher gets thrown into a classroom of 30 kids all by themselves.

Guess what? The kids perform well, learn, and find out that foreigners are not stupid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ddeubel



Joined: 20 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Seems my previous post ticked someone off...

Once again, a qualified ESL instructor does not need a native language speaker to translate or be a disciple tool for them. The whole program to have a Korean in a public classroom with the qualified foreign teacher is self-defeating in many ways.

First, the students have a crutch to lean upon. Instead of trying to listen, learn and understand English, all they have to do is ask the Korean adult to translate. Without the "translator", the kids are forced to learn. But of course, real foreign language learning happens in Korean private schools where so called joint teaching does not exist in the classroom.

Second, they have less respect for the Foreigner. Gee. all foreigners must be imbeciles. They cannot even teach a class of kids by themselves. They need Kim Teacher to hold his or her hand through the process. This leads to a confirmation of Xenophobia and the superiority of Korean culture, but that is a different subject.

Third, other countries do not have this program. Ask teachers in China and elsewhere. A foreign teacher gets thrown into a classroom of 30 kids all by themselves.

Guess what? The kids perform well, learn, and find out that foreigners are not stupid.


I was not at all ticked-off. Just dumbfounded and now it is confirmed, by your own ignorance of what the benefits of coteaching are and why co-teaching is a model being implemented by public schools in Korea for language instruction.

I'm not going to drone on and point you to why you are wrong. As part of my job, I've written, studied, given workshops and made recommendation on coteaching. Take a look at both my Teaching Research folder http://www.esnips.com/web/TeachingResearch and my Professional Development folder available on www.ddd.batcave.net (scroll down and click on the left.)

I suggest you temper your language until you really know how effective coteaching can be. (and is researched and proven though yes, if you don't have a good professional relationship with your co-teacher it can be hell but this should be a rarity if the right steps are taken). Besides lowering student - teacher ratio, making for more effective planning, showing a communicative model for students, increasing teacher reflectiveness and teaching "desire", lowering the isolating factor of foreigners in other cultures (culture shock, practicalities helped with), increasing Korean teachers English fluency, exposing Korean teachers to alternative models of teaching.....okay, I've run out of breath. There are many more. Check out my ppt on this at link

http://www.slideshare.net/ddeubel/co-teaching-workshop/

I hope you refrain from simplifying teaching and your points about coteaching being self defeating are self-defeated themselves. Please read them again and see how really weak and "biased" they are....

DD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
boyne11



Joined: 08 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DD, why don't you recommend the thick skulled Korean administrators to separate the classrooms by students' english level, not by their grade level?

If you're so great at planning, recommending, and delivering english instruction and someone in a position to recommend plans of instruction, that's the first thing you should do instead of trying to rig a severally broken system.

For me, coteaching sucks as Tjames has said already. You have half of the class clueless, 1/4 somewhat clueless, 1/4 learning (and they regulary attend hagwon).

You've noticed that kids who attend english hagwons are performing much better, right? So you must admit that hagwon setting and environment where they separate the students by their english level with FTs alone is much effective than co-teaching in public school right?

If y'all enjoy co-teaching, be my guest, continue to allow your korean counter part to teach the kids konglish. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International