Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Ron Paul suddenly being taken seriously
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13 ... 22, 23, 24  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So Joo Rip, since you've become so pro-alternative energy and Ron Paul won't do it for you. Any candidates you want to advocate that would be great for that?

I say this knowing well you are a strong Guiliani and McCain supporter who has no intention whatsoever of any alternative energy options. They are so entrenched in the 'war to get more oil' program Bush embarked us on.

But if you have a candidate you'd recommend that IS pro-alternative energy, would you mind sharing that candidate's name with the rest of us?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tiger Beer wrote:
So Joo Rip, since you've become so pro-alternative energy and Ron Paul won't do it for you. Any candidates you want to advocate that would be great for that?

I say this knowing well you are a strong Guiliani and McCain supporter who has no intention whatsoever of any alternative energy options. They are so entrenched in the 'war to get more oil' program Bush embarked us on.

But if you have a candidate you'd recommend that IS pro-alternative energy, would you mind sharing that candidate's name with the rest of us?


OF all the candidates Ron Paul is the worst on this - the very worst.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Tiger Beer wrote:
So Joo Rip, since you've become so pro-alternative energy and Ron Paul won't do it for you. Any candidates you want to advocate that would be great for that?

I say this knowing well you are a strong Guiliani and McCain supporter who has no intention whatsoever of any alternative energy options. They are so entrenched in the 'war to get more oil' program Bush embarked us on.

But if you have a candidate you'd recommend that IS pro-alternative energy, would you mind sharing that candidate's name with the rest of us?


OF all the candidates Ron Paul is the worst on this - the very worst.

In other words, you don't know and have no real interest to know.

Maybe you should educate yourself on the candidates if this is a serious issue of yours (which it isn't). Your real issue to be at war, and Ron Paul isn't interested in that.

Regarding best or worst. Not being at war would seriously bring down the consumption of oil right there. We spend a lot of $$ on OIL to be at WAR. But again, you aren't REALLY interested in bringing down the consumption of oil.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tiger Beer"][
Quote:
In other words, you don't know and have no real interest to know.

No it is public record Ron Paul would even get rid of the gas taxes . He position is worse than Bush's far worse.

See the post on Ron Paul and alternative energy. He got the worst rating

Quote:
Maybe you should educate yourself on the candidates if this is a serious issue of yours (which it isn't). Your real issue to be at war, and Ron Paul isn't interested in that.


It is a serious issue for me. Cutting US oil use would cut off money to the enemies of the US.

At if you look at website on all my posts you will see IAGS.org.


Joined: 25 May 2003
Location: http://www.iags.org/index.html



It has been there for a long time.

I really resent that you say it isn't an issue of mine.

I don't ask for much but I think you ought to take back the charge cause it is not true and every one of my posts show it.

Quote:
Regarding best or worst. Not being at war would seriously bring down the consumption of oil right there. We spend a lot of $$ on OIL to be at WAR. But again, you aren't REALLY interested in bringing down the consumption of oil.



Well if the Bathists the Khomeni followers and the Al Qaedists quit their war then it will be time to end the war. Let them quit the war.


Tigerbeer if you are an honest guy then you ought to take back the charge.

For the record alternative energy IS part of the war.


Last edited by Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee on Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:59 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
atomic42



Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Location: Gimhae

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Atomic 42 when you die, I'd like to go to your funeral but I'll probably have to go to work that day. I believe in business before pleasure


Cute. Did you steal that one from Mr. T or Different Strokes? Rolling Eyes

Grow the eff up and wake up to reality, dude.
Or maybe your point here is to be the village idiot for the sake of entertainment. If so, thanks, but we're all laughing at you, not with you.
Carry on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

atomic42 wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Atomic 42 when you die, I'd like to go to your funeral but I'll probably have to go to work that day. I believe in business before pleasure


Cute. Did you steal that one from Mr. T or Different Strokes? Rolling Eyes

Grow the eff up and wake up to reality, dude.
Or maybe your point here is to be the village idiot for the sake of entertainment. If so, thanks, but we're all laughing at you, not with you.
Carry on.


No joke here I am aware of the reality you aren't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 4:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tiger Beer wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Tiger Beer wrote:
So Joo Rip, since you've become so pro-alternative energy and Ron Paul won't do it for you. Any candidates you want to advocate that would be great for that?

I say this knowing well you are a strong Guiliani and McCain supporter who has no intention whatsoever of any alternative energy options. They are so entrenched in the 'war to get more oil' program Bush embarked us on.

But if you have a candidate you'd recommend that IS pro-alternative energy, would you mind sharing that candidate's name with the rest of us?


OF all the candidates Ron Paul is the worst on this - the very worst.

In other words, you don't know and have no real interest to know.

Maybe you should educate yourself on the candidates if this is a serious issue of yours (which it isn't). Your real issue to be at war, and Ron Paul isn't interested in that.

Regarding best or worst. Not being at war would seriously bring down the consumption of oil right there. We spend a lot of $$ on OIL to be at WAR. But again, you aren't REALLY interested in bringing down the consumption of oil.




Quote:
Over the next ten days, I will be ranking ten of the Republican Presidential candidates on their alternative energy positions -- to figure out which candidate is the best to �cure our addiction to oil.�
#10

Congressman Ron Paul (R - TX)


Ron Paul has the least favorable position on alternative energy. He believes the American economy will continue to depend on oil in the foreseeable future. He is putting alternative energy on the back burner, and instead focusing on increasing the number of domestic refineries. Just recently, he voted Yes for the Refinery Permit Process Schedule Act.


Paul has opposed every bill supporting alternative energy investment:


� Voted NO for the Clean Energy Act of 2007 - To reduce our Nation's dependency on foreign oil by investing in clean, renewable, and alternative energy resources, promoting new emerging energy technologies, developing greater efficiency, and creating a Strategic Energy Efficiency and Renewable Reserve to invest in alternative energy (01/18/2007)



� Voted NO for the Energy Policy Act of 2005 � To develop an energy policy that addresses tax incentives, conservation strategies, regulatory standards, research and development programs, energy efficiency, and alternative sources of energy (07/28/2005)

� Voted NO for the Energy Omnibus bill - To enhance energy conservation and research and development, to provide for security and diversity in the energy supply for the American people (06/15/2004)

� Voted NO for the Securing America's Future Energy [SAFE] Act of 2001 - To enhance energy conservation, research and development and to provide for security and diversity in the energy supply for the American people (08/02/2001)

The problem is that Ron Paul has a tendency to vote against proposals for government spending, initiatives, and/or taxes. Could any progress be made in the alternative energy field without any of the three?

It would be extremely difficult for such a candidate to lead us towards energy independence if he is unwilling to invest in a cleaner future.

Anyone disagree?


http://seekingalpha.com/article/34879-ranking-the-candidates-alt-energy-support-congressman-ron-paul
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
No joke here I am aware of the reality you aren't.


paper hanger
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
blaseblasphemener



Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mo-men-tum:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=FG2PUZoukfA
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

igotthisguitar wrote:
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
No joke here I am aware of the reality you aren't.


paper hanger


Iamthewitness Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
atomic42



Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Location: Gimhae

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
Iamthewitness Rolling Eyes


Youareasillytoolwhomakesusallgigglelikecindybrady.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

atomic42 wrote:
Youareasillytoolwhomakesusallgigglelikecindybrady.


Your birth certificate is a letter of apology from a condom factory.

and look at you siding with the Nazi. figures.

Radical creep
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok fine.

So who's Cindy Brady?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

He is a sicko like you. You two can be friends
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So Joo is a transvestite? This is what you're stating, eh Atomick?

Deep rooted gender identity problems? A little JD Edgar Hoover thing?
Hmmmmmm ... yah, well i hear it's quite poopular ... in some circles Laughing

Get it? POOP-U-liar Wink

Oh, those rough boys in their leather & chains Shocked

i guess this would better explain his bitter rhetorick & angry rants.

Poor guy/girl whatever Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13 ... 22, 23, 24  Next
Page 12 of 24

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International