Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The 9-11 video you must see
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 13, 14, 15  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE5D61031F935A25752C1A966958260

EVOLUTION IN EUROPE; Italy Discloses Its Web Of Cold War Guerrillas
Print Single-Page Save Share
Del.icio.usDiggFacebookNewsvinePermalinkBy CLYDE HABERMAN, SPECIAL TO THE NEW YORK TIMES
Published: November 16, 1990
In Europe's new order, they are the spies who never quite came in from the cold, foot soldiers in an underground guerrilla network with one stated mission: To fight an enemy that most Europeans believe no longer exists.

Theirs is a tale of secret arms caches and exotic code names, of military stratagems and political intrigues.

At best, their tale is no more than a curious footnote to the cold war. The question is if, at worst, it could be the key to unsolved terrorism dating back two decades. Nowhere do the darker suspicions burn more intensely than in this capital whose appetite for conspiracy theories is insatiable and whose Parliament today began an investigation into where reality may lie.

The focus of the inquiry is a clandestine operation code-named Gladio, created decades ago to arm and train resistance fighters in case the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact allies invaded. All this week, there have been disclosures of similar organizations in virtually all Western European countries, including those that do not belong to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. An Italian Creation

As disclosed in recent days by the Italian Prime Minister, Giulio Andreotti, Gladio, named after after the short, wide, double-edged sword used by gladiators in ancient Rome, came into being during the most gelid days of the cold war.

It was originally an Italian creation, said Mr. Andreotti, who is scheduled to testify on Friday before a parliamentary commission studying bombings and massacres that claimed scores of lives in a terrorism wave that inundated Italy from 1969 to the early 1980's.

The Prime Minister said last week that Gladio later evolved into a branch of an extensive network, operated within NATO and abetted by a 1956 agreement between the United States and Italian secret services. Over the years, he says, 622 Italians belonged to the operation -- civilians who were trained by intelligence operatives and who had fought in World War II or served in the peacetime forces. Preparing the Guerrillas

Germany, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Greece and Luxembourg have all acknowledged that they maintained Gladio-style networks to prepare guerrilla fighters to leap into action in the event of a Warsaw Pact invasion. Many worked under the code name Stay Behind. Greece called its operation Red Sheepskin.


Shocked

Jumping ahead to page 2 of the article we read:


Nourishing conspiracy theories are assertions from key European leaders that they knew nothing about the operation until recently. Joseph Luns, who was NATO secretary general from 1971 to 1984, said he had never heard of it. Belgium's Defense Minister, Guy Coeme, told a radio station today that "things were hidden from me"

Admiral Martini told the lawmakers that some Italian Prime Ministers were also kept in the dark. Indeed, as the Gladio story began to unfold, Italy's only two postwar Prime Ministers not to come from the conservative Christian Democratic Party -- Bettino Craxi, a Socialist, and Giovanni Spadolini, a Republican -- insisted that the disclosures came as news to them. Agreement With U.S. Agencies

There were other disturbing developments for Italian politicians and journalists, who as a group demonstrate a cultivated taste for intrigue and a slender faith in coincidence.

There was Mr. Andreotti's mention of the 1956 agreement with United States agencies, whose aim for decades was to make sure that the Italian Communist Party, the largest in the West, never got a foothold in the Government. And there were long-reported links between Italian secret services and neo-Fascists.

And there is the fact that the major unsolved acts of terrorism that rocked Italy in the 1970's are all presumed to be the work of people on the far right. Left-wing terrorists like the moribund Red Brigades somehow were caught and imprisoned.

Swept up in the dispute is President Francesco Cossiga, who declared recently that it had been his "privilege" to help organize Gladio when he was in the Defense Ministry in the 1960's. Some Independent Left members of Parliament have since demanded his impeachment, but Mr. Cossiga remains unflappable.

Fact is, he said, "I admire the fact that we have kept the secret for 45 years."
Confused


Yeah, conspiracies never happen.. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

blaseblasphemener wrote:

Not flag in that meaning, flag as in "stripe/affiliation/group".


Okay but so what? How do you know this is routine? How do you go from small operations of this nature to a large one that results in the death of 3,000 Americans?

Quote:
I don't think an agency like the CIA follows all the rules, now do you?,


No government agency always follows the rules. The same can be said of corporations, schools, and individual people. While I accept you have had a parking ticket, I don't accept you've killed 20 people unless I have very good evidence. You have two hands. You're theoretically capable of mass murder. But where's the proof? We're rather protected by courts that demand good proof instead of simply going "ah, I knew a guy who had hands and killed with them. You got two hands too! Guilty!"

Quote:
and remember, the directives could be through a third-party anyway, so the CIA could be using a patsy in the Middle East, or a paid agent/mole in the ME, who in turn is giving directives to the highjackers in the U.S.


And maybe space aliens made Mt Rushmore. Evidence is needed for claims.

Quote:
Oh, and to segway back to the "too many coincidences" argument, don't you think it's convenient that WTC7 was the one building that was felled by debris from WTC1&2, seeing as it contained thousands of SEC documents that were destroyed? Just another coincedence...


If building 3 fell instead of 7, I'm sure conspiracy theorist would find some reason the conspiracy needed to take out that building. WTC 7 stood for hours. Long enough to clear out any secret documents, no? They already killed 3,000 people. Why not risk 1 more guy to get the papers? I don't find it hard to believe that buildings surrounding the towers were damaged by the massive release of all that potential energy. I don't find it hard to believe one, some, or all the buildings suffered structural damage as a result. Do you have any engineering reports that indicate the government engineering reports on the cause of WTC7's collapse are false and not a result of receiving over pressure from the fall of the towers?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blaseblasphemener



Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

But:

It's impossible to keep a secret for 44 years, someone will talk!

Governments would never commit murder against their own people!

I could see something like the Gulf of Tonkin happening, but something on the scale of 9/11?

The kind of people who want power won't use it irresponsibly, they have scruples, just like us!

People in power should never have their patriotism and loyalty questioned, by god!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:

Yeah, conspiracies never happen.. Rolling Eyes


That's a straw man argument. Who claims this? I don't. I don't think anyone in opposition to the 9/11 troobies claims such.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blaseblasphemener



Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Okay but so what? How do you know this is routine? How do you go from small operations of this nature to a large one that results in the death of 3,000 Americans?


It wasn't that large. 19 guys. 4 airplanes. bingo-bango-boingo.

What WAS large was getting the U.S. air defence to stand-down that morning.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How many times have we read on this forum that :

"It would be impossible to keep such a conspiracy a secret?"


I haven't kept track myself, but I have run across statements similar to this many times, all by people claiming that this proves that there couldn't possibly be a conspiracy surrounding the events of 911.



As for other "coincidences":

http://killtown.911review.org/oddities.html

� 1998 - U.S. intelligence had information that a group of unidentified Arabs planned to fly an explosives-laden airplane into the WTC and attack Washington D.C., officials say the planning for 9/11 began.

Prior hints of September 11-type attack

"As early as 1998, intelligence sources told TIME magazine they had evidence that bin Laden might be planning a strike on New York or Washington in retaliation for a U.S. missile strike against al Qaeda camps in Afghanistan and a factory suspected of making chemical weapons components in Sudan.

Then, in September 1999, came the interagency government report --- titled the "Sociology and Psychology of Terrorism: Who Becomes a Terrorist and Why" -- that referenced bin Laden's terrorist network, al Qaeda, and its potential involvement in such a plot." - CNN (05/18/02)



Officials: Sept. 11 attacks were planned since 1998

"Al-Qaeda spent three years planning the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, methodically selecting targets and recruiting skilled participants and "muscle" to hijack the jets, U.S. intelligence and law enforcement officials told lawmakers Tuesday. In a closed session held in a secure room of the U.S. Capitol, a House-Senate investigative panel for the first time heard the chiefs of the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency detail the elaborate terrorist plot and "several of the areas in which we missed" clues pointing to it, according to Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Bob Graham, D-Fla. "There were lapses, in my judgment, by all three agencies," Graham said.

CIA Director George Tenet, FBI Director Robert Mueller and Air Force Lt. Gen. Michael Hayden, the NSA chief, described how al-Qaeda began planning the Sept. 11 attacks in 1998, recruited the participants and maintained secrecy." - USA Today (06/18/02)



"In 1998, U.S. intelligence had information that a group of unidentified Arabs planned to fly an explosives-laden airplane into the World Trade Center, according to a joint inquiry of the House and Senate intelligence committees." - CNN (09/19/02)

"Even though Bush has refused to make parts of the 9-11 report public, one thing is startlingly clear: The U.S. government had received repeated warnings of impending attacks�and attacks using planes directed at New York and Washington�for several years. The government never told us about what it knew was coming.
See for yourself. The report lists 36 different summaries of warnings dating back to 1997. Among them:
"In September 1998, the [Intelligence Community] obtained information that Bin Laden's next operation might involve flying an explosive-laden aircraft into a U.S. airport and detonating it."
"In the fall of 1998, the [Intelligence Community] obtained information concerning a Bin Laden plot involving aircraft in the New York and Washington, D.C. areas."
"In March 2000, the [Intelligence Community] obtained information regarding the types of targets that operatives of Bin Laden's network might strike. The Statue of Liberty was specifically mentioned, as were skyscrapers, ports, airports, and nuclear power plans."
Maybe the Bush team dismissed warning signals as the discoveries of an overly hyped up Clinton team. But John Dean, a White House counsel under Nixon who has become a guide to deciphering reports on 9/11, says this is unlikely. Condi Rice, Bush�s national security adviser, "stated in a May 16, 2002, press briefing that, on August 6, 2001, the President Daily Brief (PDB) included information about Bin Laden's methods of operation from a historical perspective dating back to 1997."
Rice also said at this briefing that the PDB pointed out that Bin Laden might hijack an airline and take hostages to gain release of one of their operatives. She said the warning was "generalized"�no date, place, or method.
As Dean notes, how could Rice, having known all this, say that the administration had no idea "these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon"?
"In sum, the 9-11 Report of the Congressional Inquiry indicates that the intelligence community was very aware that Bin Laden might fly an airplane into an American skyscraper," says Dean. "Given the fact that there had already been an attempt to bring down the twin towers of the World Trade Center with a bomb, how could Rice say what she did?"
We don't know because Bush has invoked executive privilege to withhold from Congress this key briefing on August 6, 2001. - Village Voice (07/31/03)

(See also: 1996 - U.S. officials considered possibility a plane could be flown into the main stadium at Olympics in Atlanta; 1999 - NORAD starts conducting exercises in which airplanes are hijacked and crashed into targets which include the World Trade Center and the Pentagon; April 2001 - NORAD planned an exercise about a hijacked plane crash into the Pentagon, but was rejected; May 16, 2002 - Condoleezza Rice said she didn't think anybody could have predicted that terrorists would hijack planes and use them as missiles)



But then Condoleeza Rice gets up and says that no one could have forseen terrorists using planes as weapons. Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

blaseblasphemener wrote:
Quote:
Okay but so what? How do you know this is routine? How do you go from small operations of this nature to a large one that results in the death of 3,000 Americans?


It wasn't that large. 19 guys. 4 airplanes. bingo-bango-boingo.

What WAS large was getting the U.S. air defence to stand-down that morning.


So it wasn't large but it was large? By large I'm speaking about deaths.

And you've not established that the US air defense "stood down" that morning.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:
How many times have we read on this forum that :

"It would be impossible to keep such a conspiracy a secret?"


I haven't kept track myself, but I have run across statements similar to this many times, all by people claiming that this proves that there couldn't possibly be a conspiracy surrounding the events of 911.


I would not say "impossible" but unlikely. It would seem the conspiracy requires untold numbers of people and untold numbers of people to remain silent. You're no working your way up the slippery slope. And this not proof there was no conspiracy. This is just saying "well, give me good evidence to demonstrate your claim the government was behind 9/11 in some fashion".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blaseblasphemener



Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

great link, thanks for that.

at this point, I'd say the U.S. government should have to prove they are NOT involved when something fishy happens, like 9/11.

It reminds me of the scene in the Godfather after Don Coreleone meets with the heads of the five families, and he says, " I'm a superstitious man, and if some unlucky accident should befall Michael - if he is to be shot in the head by a police officer, or be found hung dead in a jail cell... or if he should be struck by a bolt of lightning - then I'm going to blame some of the people in this room; and then I do not forgive. But with said, I pledge - on the souls of my grandchildren - that I will not be the one to break the peace that we have made today. "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blaseblasphemener



Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="mindmetoo"]
blaseblasphemener wrote:
Quote:
Okay but so what? How do you know this is routine? How do you go from small operations of this nature to a large one that results in the death of 3,000 Americans?


It wasn't that large. 19 guys. 4 airplanes. bingo-bango-boingo.

What WAS large was getting the U.S. air defence to stand-down that morning.


So it wasn't large but it was large? By large I'm speaking about deaths.

And you've not established that the US air defense "stood down" that morning.[/quote]

I say I have. Cheney gave an order from the White House which was verified by the Transportation secretary. That order was either a) shoot down the oncoming missile/plane b) don't shoot it down. Now, show me where the Pentagon or anyone else fired even one defensive shot at that missile/plane. It didn't happen. It flew from 50 miles out and struck the Pentagon. This tells me that b) was the order. How do you inteprete Cheney's order and the subsequent events?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

blaseblasphemener wrote:
at this point, I'd say the U.S. government should have to prove they are NOT involved when something fishy happens, like 9/11.


How do they prove a negative? Prove I don't have an invisible dragon in my bathroom.

The government makes a claim. "This is the official story. Here is the evidence." Is the evidence consistent? Is there something that can't be explained by the official story or the fact that all governments lie to protect themselves from claims they were asleep at the switch and all governments use tragedy to advance agendas?

It's akin to those who say the government needs to prove they don't have space alien bodies. Any proof can simply be written off as lies or misdirection. You might not find the evidence compelling. But oh well. If you have a hypothesis that accounts for the current evidence and evidence that can't be explained as above, then you need to offer it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

blaseblasphemener wrote:

And you've not established that the US air defense "stood down" that morning.[/quote]

I say I have. Cheney gave an order from the White House which was verified by the Transportation secretary. That order was either a) shoot down the oncoming missile/plane b) don't shoot it down. Now, show me where the Pentagon or anyone else fired even one defensive shot at that missile/plane. It didn't happen. It flew from 50 miles out and struck the Pentagon. This tells me that b) was the order. How do you inteprete Cheney's order and the subsequent events?


You're not making sense. What order did Cheney give? Shoot down the plane or not shoot down the plane? A plane moving 500 mph that's 50 miles out doesn't sound like there's much time to be shot down, no? The transportation secretary confirms there was an order but there is no published account of what that order was? So you're just guessing?

Was there any fighter within range of the airliner capable of shooting it down? What military assets were in place that had the opportunity, the authorization, and were purposely not used?

Let's put it this way, for decades America has protected flying fuel bombs (Boeing planes) with people making $5.15 an hour and as a matter of policy allowed you to bring knives on unguarded planes. If a terrorist can see the loop hole in that, he might also conclude internal American security is likewise as slack and take their shot. And guess what, they wagered right.

Now couple that with a Bush government that keeps demonstrating unparalleled levels of incompetence. Katrina, for example. I dunno. You're going to have some smoking gun evidence to convince me some plot was hatched within the corridors of American government.

You keep saying "missile". Do you believe there is evidence a missile struck, say, the Pentagon. The debris/damage is not consistent with what an 757 would do?

And was it a large conspiracy or not a large conspiracy? Put your nickel down.

If you're saying a missile was fired at the Pentagon, someone had to fire the missile. Someone had to load the missile on the plane. Someone had to take care of a plane returning with a fired missile. Someone had to replenish the missile in stores. Missiles just aren't loaded and fired without a rather large chain of people. That adds people. WTC7 was blown up by controlled demolition? So that requires more people. The 8 shadowy men that got the 18 terrorists were not the ones to make and plant the bombs. Were controlled explosives used to bring down the twin towers? Again, more people are involved there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cbclark4



Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Location: Masan

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BP has no answers he has only questions to questions.

He chooses to BELIEVE that the US conspired to commit the 9/11 attacks.

Yet he chooses not BELIEVE there was any connection between global terrorism and the Saddam's regime.

He may also BELIEVE there is no nuclear connection between NK and Syria.

BELIEVE away.

There are no questions that can't be questioned.

A question is not a point.

Give me evidence. Give me truth. Give me facts. Give me proof.

I'm sick of tired innuendos.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
blaseblasphemener



Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cbclark4 wrote:
BP has no answers he has only questions to questions.

He chooses to BELIEVE that the US conspired to commit the 9/11 attacks.

Yet he chooses not BELIEVE there was any connection between global terrorism and the Saddam's regime.

He may also BELIEVE there is no nuclear connection between NK and Syria.

BELIEVE away.

There are no questions that can't be questioned.

A question is not a point.

Give me evidence. Give me truth. Give me facts. Give me proof.

I'm sick of tired innuendos.


cbc, you realize that is the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, a symbol of socialism in Canada. I always think of it when you post. Just ironic, since you don't seem very left-wing.

As I said and read the Godfather quote again, the U.S. has shown ample times that if something fishy happens and it benefits them, it is shown later they were involved. There were enough signs before 9/11 and enough questions after 9/11 to say at the very least that a coverup has taken place. The 9/11 commission was a joke. It's findings were a joke. It's scope of investigation was a joke. It's creation was a joke. The whole point of it was to not uncover the truth. If you believe otherwise, you are not looking closely at what they found, and what they ignored. This is well documented, you can google it. Or, do you believe they did a good job? What about the media? Why has this story been almost completely ignored by the media, when people around the world clearly find in large numbers that they don't believe the official story. Why did it take Popular Mechanics of all things, to publish a story years after? Is PM a bastian of investigative news gathering? Have you read the NYTimes piece that came out last year about the meeting of conspiracy theorists? It was dripping with sarcasm. If you think the mainstream media is objective, and has the moxie to challenge conventional wisdom, you are sadly mistaken. Remember, if not for chance, Watergate never would have been exposed, and that was small scale compared to this.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Perhaps CBC would like to attend this event?

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20071011110555678





Symposium

9/11: Family Members, First Responders & Experts Speak Out

Join us for this powerful one-day symposium
Saturday November 3, 2007
Saint Joseph College West Hartford , Connecticut

Sponsored by Citizens for a New 9/11 Investigation

Co-Sponsored by: Architect & Engineers for 9/11 Truth - Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice -
The FealGood Foundation - Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth - 911truth.org

Join us for an authoritative one-day symposium exploring the questions that still surround the events of September 11th, 2001. Our intention is to bring the undisclosed stories, testimony and evidence concerning 9/11 into mainstream public discourse. It is our belief that an educated public will demand new independent investigations that will ultimately lead to our larger goals of justice and redress for the countless victims of 9/11 and its aftermath.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 13, 14, 15  Next
Page 6 of 15

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International