Korean Job Discussion Forums

[mindmetoo]

[some waygug-in]

For the sake of brevity, I didn't post the entire article, but since you insist:

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0708/S00326.htm

*Statement of Kristen Breitweiser, Co-Chairperson, September 11 Advocates Concerning the Joint 9/11 Inquiry Senate Select Committee on Intelligence House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence September 18, 2002 * [snip] Perhaps even more disturbing is the information regarding Khalid al-Midhar and Nawaf Alhazmi, two of the hijackers. in late August, the CIA asked the INS to put these two men on a watchlist because of their ties to the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole. On August 23, 2001, the INS informed the CIA that both men had already slipped into the country. Immediately thereafter, the CIA asked the FBI to find al-Midhar and Alhazmi. Not a seemingly hard task in light of the fact that one of them was listed in the San Diego phone book, the other took out a bank account in his own name, and finally, an FBI informant happened to be their roommate. [snip]*

Later after three more years of connecting dots, Kristen Breitweiser wrote in Huffington Post, August 20, 2005 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kristen-breitweiser/enabling-danger- part -one_b_5951.html *

[snip] Additionally, when one carefully reads the 9/11 chronology and information provided in the public record, it becomes increasingly clear that the CIA�s repeated failure to share information with the FBI about two of the 9/11 hijackers-al Mihdhar and al Hazmi-- was purposeful. There exists at least seven instances between January 2000 and September 11th, 2001, that the CIA withheld vital information from the FBI about these two hijackers who were inside this country training for the attacks. Once, twice, maybe even three times could be considered merely careless oversights. But at least seven documented times? To me, that suggests something else. (To read about these instances, I suggest you read 9/11 materials relating to the "watchlisting issue" involving al Mihdhar and al Hazmi which is a story so detailed, that it deserves its own lengthy blog.) [snip]

*From an interview with Newsweek Investigative Reporter Michael Isikoff for the documentary, 9/11: Press for Truth http://www.911pressfortruth.com :*

MICHAEL ISIKOFF: The CIA learned about this meeting. It arranged for it to be under surveillance by the Malaysian special branch... The CIA subsequently learned within days that... Almihdhar and Alhazmi were headed for the United States. ...An FBI detailee who knew about this at the Counter Terrorism Center of the CIA drafted a cable to alert the FBI, and that cable was quashed by superiors at the CIA.

[cbclark4]

Your inept assertions combined with your irrational assumptions along
with your incoherent conjecture add up to a completely unfounded porism.

It can only be classified as a study in guessology.

[mindmetoo]

[blaseblasphemener]

[cbclark4]

[mindmetoo]

[some waygug-in]

[mindmetoo]

[some waygug-in]

It is evidence that a full and complete investigation has NOT been done and it would seem that the 911 commission did not do their job.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kristen-breitweiser/enabling-danger-part-one_b_5951.html

The 9/11 Commission

At a bare minimum, the 9/11 Commission is not being honest with the American people. First, the Commission feigned total ignorance about Able Danger. Then, they admitted that they remembered hearing something about it. Next, they acknowledged that they were briefed about the program but found a discrepancy in the dates provided by the Able Danger informant, and therefore decided that the information was irrelevant to their investigation. Convenient excuses. But, wrong. Because, I happen to be one of the 9/11 widows that received personal commitments from each of the 9/11 Commissioners that they would track down every lead, and turn over every rock so as to provide the most thorough and definitive account of the 9/11 attacks to the American people. Last week�s revelations about Able Danger prove that the Commission has not been above-board with their investigation. Nor has their investigation been anywhere near exhaustive.

Now, legally speaking, the 9/11 Commissioners were mandated to provide a full accounting of the 9/11 attacks to the American people. If the Able Danger operation and its accompanying information turn out to be true, then necessarily each Commissioner has broken the law in that they failed to fulfill their legislative mandate in providing a full and just accounting of the 9/11 attacks to the American people. However, if we also come to learn that Atta�s or any of the other hijackers names were mentioned in the Able Danger chart, I think this nation will have bigger problems to deal with than accusing the 9/11 Commission of not following their mandate in providing a full accounting to the American people. As with most things in life, only time will tell.

[blaseblasphemener]

Well, if they did break the law, they need not worry. Bush will pardon them.

[Gopher]

Two years after the Nixon Administration's "Track II" covert operation/conspiracy failed to block Chilean President Salvador Allende's inauguration, the American Senate investigated the matter and produced witnesses, including DCI Richard M. Helms, who explained exactly what the President had said and how exactly the relevant government agencies had implemented his instructions.

We have Helms's hand-written notes of his Oval-Office meeting. We have Helms and his senior staff's memoranda on how they met after this meeting and discussed exactly how they might best execute the President's orders. We knew pretty much everything by 1975.

I can say the same thing for any American-sponsored covert operation I have ever studied. (Cannot say the same for any other government, unfortunately.)

In any case, the 9/11 people have nothing approximating this. We only know, again and again, that they mistrust "the official story." Yet far more people from the government have openly and not-so-openly clashed with W. Bush than ever did with Nixon: start with Lieutenant General Ricardo Sanchez and work your way backward through dozens of people. Include George Tenet and Colin Powell. Include people like President Jimmy Carter and others, not to mention the now-Democratic-Congress, who actively look to expose and discredit the W. Bush Administration.

Are you telling me that all of these people have been duped and/or are in on it? If so, how do you know?

In fact, at the end of the day, you have no evidence at all to support anything you wildly allege. You have nothing. Not even imagination.

[some waygug-in]

I am alleging nothing of the kind, only that further investigation is warranted.

[mindmetoo]

[blaseblasphemener]